On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 01:06:18PM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > No... The package puts a file that needs to be modified by the site (and
> > possibly by the individual machine) in /usr/share.. Perhaps the program
> > is at fault for doing this. I do know that lintian will generate an
> > err
Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> > If that where so easy
> >
> > Is there any automatik mechanism to register the aplications? A web
> > page where one can input once email and see the status of once
> > apllication or even a plain list of recieved aplliactions?
>
> They use a hum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> /etc is intended to be the only repository for configuration
> information. It is machine specific. However, machine-specific does
> not mean that the configuration information in /etc cannot be shared
> between machines. This can be done via symb
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No... The package puts a file that needs to be modified by the site (and
> possibly by the individual machine) in /usr/share.. Perhaps the program
> is at fault for doing this. I do know that lintian will generate an
> error on the package should I ru
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 02:17:30AM -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > Interesting points. However I would suggest that most of the files in
> > /etc are about local configurations, and are, in general, not
> > shareable. In fact, the FHS defines /etc as being for non-shareable,
>
> You need to be
Hi,
Thank you, Marcus, for remindig me of this. Yes, I think this
is better than choosing one option or the other, for _other_ people.
As far as I, personally, am concerned, our previous conclusion
on this topic remains the final word -- I have seen nothing new come
up in the r
Raul, bug# 22308 has been fixed. If you agree, could you please
close the bug? Since I'm not the submitter and it's a policy bug,
I'm not comfortable closing it myself (feeling wimpy today).
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
>
> Is there sufficient interest to make a register-binary-format shell
> script (like update-inetd, or register-window-manager) and put it into
> the documentation?
>
This seems like a good idea. Bear in mind that if every Tom, Dick, and Harry
register, there is some memory bloat, so a way for
* GB => Goswin Brederlow
GB> If the suggests to non-free or contrib are depreciated by policy
GB> or even forbidden, debian will loose much.
This is just a matter of opinion. ;-)
GB> Non-free is a part of Debian in some way,
Our Social Contract disagrees:
>--
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Interesting points. However I would suggest that most of the files in
>> /etc are about local configurations, and are, in general, not
>> shareable. In fact, the FHS defines /etc as being for non-shareable,
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting points. However I would suggest that most of the files in
> /etc are about local configurations, and are, in general, not
> shareable. In fact, the FHS defines /etc as being for non-shareable,
You need to be careful about using the word "s
> On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 12:33:21AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > Interesting points. However I would suggest that most of the files in
> > /etc are about local configurations, and are, in general, not
> > shareable. In fact, the FHS defines /etc as being for non-shareable,
> > static data. B
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Interesting points. However I would suggest that most of the files in
> /etc are about local configurations, and are, in general, not
> shareable. In fact, the FHS defines /etc as being for non-shareable,
> static data. But what should be done for sha
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 12:33:21AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Interesting points. However I would suggest that most of the files in
> /etc are about local configurations, and are, in general, not
> shareable. In fact, the FHS defines /etc as being for non-shareable,
> static data. But what sh
Interesting points. However I would suggest that most of the files in
/etc are about local configurations, and are, in general, not
shareable. In fact, the FHS defines /etc as being for non-shareable,
static data. But what should be done for shareable configuration
data? Debian uses /etc as the
15 matches
Mail list logo
