On Thu, May 27, 1999 at 11:46:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > You have decided that xfree86-common has to be of standard priority.
> > > I think this is not ok because it is not needed at all.
> >
> > I have made no such decision. The decision was made for me.
> >
> > When package A has a
On Thu, May 27, 1999 at 01:56:19PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Manoj, you might want to clean this up a little (a lot of it reads as
> a proposal rather than a procedure) and make it accessible from the
> developer's corner. All in your copious free time, of course.
Or put it in the policy manu
On 27-May-99, 11:02 (CDT), Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How exactly do you make a formal policy proposal? I had a look at the
> policy and couldn't find a chapter describing it. Is that in a
> different file?
>
http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/policy/ch3.html
Manoj, you might wa
How exactly do you make a formal policy proposal? I had a look at the
policy and couldn't find a chapter describing it. Is that in a
different file?
May the Source be with you.
Goswin
On Wed, 26 May, 1999, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> > On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 10:35:57AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > > I changed the description so it does not say it is a mirror anymore:
>
> Creation of a sub-directory aside from main, contrib, non-free named
> data.
>
> I will really like to see
Quoting Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:53:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Seconded, this seems a good solution.
>
> Normally I would second this, however I'm going to hold out because
> wichert has a more complete solution he's planning to toss out sonn
Quoting Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> > So I want to make a Suggestion:
>
> Do you mean a Proposal? Sorry to nit-pick, but I need to know if I'm
> supposed to track this like I do other formal Proposals to change policy.
May be a draft for a proposal? ;) Sorry to be co
Fabien Ninoles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I want to make a Suggestion:
>
> Creation of a sub-directory aside from main, contrib, non-free named
> data.
I can't find anything on the official way make proposals to the
policy. Is it wrong that official proposals should be bugs against
debian
On Wed, 26 May 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:25:19AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > The fact that I am able to execute emacs or ghostscript in console mode
> > without xfree86-common shows that the dependency of xlib6g on
> > xfree86-common is not absolute, and theref
On Wed, 26 May 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> Closing them appeals to my sense of tidyness, but keeping them open makes
> them available for future maintainers to pick up.
>
> I'd like to see discussion on whether or not to keep them open. Opinions?
We could create a new virtual package named "obs
On 27-May-99 Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:53:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Seconded, this seems a good solution.
>
> Normally I would second this, however I'm going to hold out because
> wichert has a more complete solution he's planning to toss out sonn as
> the vo
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:53:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Seconded, this seems a good solution.
Normally I would second this, however I'm going to hold out because
wichert has a more complete solution he's planning to toss out sonn as
the vote for the logos have been tallied.
--
Joseph
Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> So I want to make a Suggestion:
Do you mean a Proposal? Sorry to nit-pick, but I need to know if I'm
supposed to track this like I do other formal Proposals to change policy.
> - Foo-Scripts;
What's a foo-script?
--
see shy jo
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 11:25:19AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > I still fail to see why do I need xfree86-common to execute emacs or
> > > ghostview in console mode (as I always was able to do under Debian 2.0).
> >
> > Because xlib6g depends on xfree86-common.
>
> I mean I fail to see why x
14 matches
Mail list logo
