[Please CC: any replies to me since I'm not subscribed to this list.]
I'm still listed as current maintainer of the virtual package name list,
as distributed on ftp.debian.org (doc/package-developer/). It would be
nice if someone could reupload this file and change the contact address.
Thanks,
Manoj said:
> Hi,
> >>"Buddha" == Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Buddha> Just to verify a procedural detail here:
>
> Buddha> I assume that since I am not technically an official Debian
> Buddha> Developer, I am disenfranchised in this vote?
>
> Unfortunately, yes. Anyone n
Hi,
>>"Darren" == Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> Manoj, Before we vote on the Policy Proceedures you proposed
Darren> (and I'm in favor of them, in general) I think we should
Darren> first settle the matter of the Constitution since THAT should
Darren> be the basis for every
Hi,
>>"Buddha" == Buddha Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Buddha> Just to verify a procedural detail here:
Buddha> I assume that since I am not technically an official Debian
Buddha> Developer, I am disenfranchised in this vote?
Unfortunately, yes. Anyone not in the debian developers
> Ladies and Gentlemen,
> HOW TO VOTE
Just to verify a procedural detail here:
I assume that since I am not technically an official Debian Developer,
I am disenfranchised in this vote?
I'm not complaining. If so, I find it a perfectly reasonable position
for Debian to hold. I certainly know
Manoj,
Before we vote on the Policy Proceedures you proposed (and I'm in favor of
them, in general) I think we should first settle the matter of the Constitution
since THAT should be the basis for everything else.
Just my $0.005
Darren
-
http://benham.net/index.ht
Ladies and Gentlemen,
The time period for discussion ran out this weekend. There was
just one dissenting voice, that of Ian Jackson, and beyond his first
message, he has not responded to the issue.
Even though no formal objection was raised, I feel we have
failed to achieve con
7 matches
Mail list logo
