Hi,
>>"Darren" == Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> Manoj, Before we vote on the Policy Proceedures you proposed
Darren> (and I'm in favor of them, in general) I think we should
Darren> first settle the matter of the Constitution since THAT should
Darren> be the basis for everything else.
I think these are mostly orthogonal. The reasons are twofold
-- we need an update mechanism for the policy, and the constitution
proposal, by it's own rules, has expired, and has generally been
mired in apathy.
-- we need not resort to constitutional procedures to implement the
update mechanism outlined in the guidelines I proposed, so there
is no need wait for the ratification of the constituion.
If people disagree, they can just vote NO ;-).
In any case, lest this becomes yet another debating society
debacle, the discussion period is ended; either we accept this, or we
reject this.
manoj
no votes so far.
--
Can anyone remember when the times were not hard, and money not
scarce?
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
