Hi,
This bug was my mistake. I have also closed it, trhe very same
day, as soon as blood returned to my brain and I could think again.
manoj
>>"Yann" == Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yann> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Package: sp Version: 1.3-1.1-2 Severity: importan
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> How can I provide for this in the GIMP package? If I remove the
> dependancy on xfnt75 and xfnt100, I'll get bug reports that GIMP
> crashes without informative information (it's because it needs the
> fonts and can't get them). If I leave the dependancy
Hi,
> GIMP *needs* access to the 75bpp X fonts *and* the 100bpp X fonts. So
> I made the gimp package depend on xfnt75 and xfnt100. No problems
> there, but some people don't install xfnt75 and xfnt100, and instead
> use xfs to serve the fonts out.
Just to make it clear, my situation is somewhat
I'm not sure of a good way. There are other bug reports because of
the dependencies within X11. Perhaps something like an "xfs-client"
dummy package that provides serveral xfnt values? The problem is the
need to go around the system a bit - after all, you don't really
*know* what fonts xfs will
On Thu, Mar 12, 1998 at 12:06:03PM -0800, Ben Gertzfield wrote:
> How can I provide for this in the GIMP package? If I remove the
> dependancy on xfnt75 and xfnt100, I'll get bug reports that GIMP
> crashes without informative information
You'll get them anyway.
Depending on fonts being installe
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Yann Dirson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Package: sp
> > Version: 1.3-1.1-2
> > Severity: important
> What do other think ?
It certianly will compare correctly, so long as you realize that -
compared to any other single character will loose.
Jason
--
E-mail
The statement was reasonable in the context of Manoj's demand to a new
developer that he be an expert on shell scripts. No one is an expert on
everything and we need to combine our talents. Variety is good. Someone
might not know much about shell scripts but be an expert in C++. Debian can
have all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: sp
> Version: 1.3-1.1-2
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> This is not a legal version number.
I (who suggested this version number for sp) use such a numbering
scheme for packages ss2g, comerr2g, ssg-dev, comerrg-dev, which are,
as sp_1.3 is inclu
Hi,
This is old hat, and I think it should not be raked up again,
but:
>>"Christoph" == Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christoph> The statement was reasonable in the context of Manoj's
Christoph> demand to a new developer that he be an expert on shell
Christoph> scripts.
Is there some good reason? I guess it depends on the interpretation
of "postrm".
It seemed to me like it might make sense to remove them in the postrm
where you know that anything that might have referenced this directory
is gone, and can't be executed again.
Just curious. I don't think it'll
10 matches
Mail list logo
