[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: sp > Version: 1.3-1.1-2 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > This is not a legal version number.
I (who suggested this version number for sp) use such a numbering scheme for packages ss2g, comerr2g, ssg-dev, comerrg-dev, which are, as sp_1.3 is included in the upstream jade_1.1, included in upstream e2fsprogs, but with non-matching version numbers. I raised this issue on deb-policy in January, in a thread named "Versionning of non-standalone library packages". It did not appear that anybody got concerned by this except for Christian, but I saw no objections to its use. What do other think ? -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer, alt-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | support Debian GNU/Linux: debian-email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | more powerful, more stable ! http://www.a2points.com/homepage/3475232 | Check <http://www.debian.org/> -- E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
