Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?

1997-12-18 Thread Radu Duta
On Thu, Dec 18, 1997 at 02:19:07AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >Radu> Hmm, well my intention for the md5sums is a bit different. I'd >Radu> like to use them to 1)check package integrity, and 2)check for >Radu> modified configuration files. Tripwire is fine, and you'd still >Radu> have to run t

Re: Policy for group ownership of games (Was: Re: Bug#15846: rocks-n-diamonds: errors on startup)

1997-12-18 Thread Joost Kooij
On 17 Dec 1997, Guy Maor wrote: > Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How about adding a group "gamesadmin" to the system and making all level > > definitions etc. owned by this group. > > Sounds like overkill to me. > > I think you should go with the simple solution - the builtin lev

Re: are md5sums mandatory for all packages?

1997-12-18 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Radu" == Radu Duta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Radu> On Tue, Dec 16, 1997 at 11:46:29PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava Radu> wrote: >> The adddition of the md5sums has come up before. Personally, I >> think the utility is limited, given the presence of tripwire, which >> goes much further to ensu

Re: Policy for group ownership of games (Was: Re: Bug#15846: rocks-n-diamonds: errors on startup)

1997-12-18 Thread Guy Maor
Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about adding a group "gamesadmin" to the system and making all level > definitions etc. owned by this group. Sounds like overkill to me. I think you should go with the simple solution - the builtin levels are not writable, but you can specify levels