David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Baseae 20
> > ed 10
>
> ed should definitely have a higher priority than ae.
I disagree most strongly:
a) There actually are people who like ae
b) You could be forced to install ed ev
On Fri, Nov 14 1997 23:02 EST Dale Scheetz writes:
> == begin proposal
[...]
> Base ae 20
> ed 10
ed should definitely have a higher priority than ae.
David
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As you know well by now Juan: debstd compresses changelogs. So
> please state the issue accurately.
Umm, not always it doesn't. If you're going to ask people to be
accurate, please do the same yourself. If the changelog is small it
won't be compre
As you know well by now Juan: debstd compresses changelogs. So please state the
issue accurately.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: On Wed, 19 Nov 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: > A quick scan on Contents.gz showed that 552 packages come with
: > uncompressed changelogs.
:
On Wed, 19 Nov 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A quick scan on Contents.gz showed that 552 packages come with
> uncompressed changelogs.
So what? If they are against current policy, we should
either fix them, or fix the Policy. And I think the current Policy is
fine respecting to
A quick scan on Contents.gz showed that 552 packages come with
uncompressed changelogs. Please respect my hardisk, we did not
buy it together ;-)
--
Ioannis Tambouras
[EMAIL PROTECTED], West Palm Beach, Florida
Signed pgp-key on key server.
Can anyone tell me, please, if all the changelog files should
be compressed? I think that's pretty clear in section 5.8 of the
Debian Policy, but Christoph Lameter always closes the bugs against
his packages for not doing so.
--
Juan Cespedes
Mark W. Eichin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's worth checking what FSSTND/FHS have to say about /usr/games, if
> anything. Remember that /usr/X11R6/bin *itself* is discriminating --
> /usr/bin would do -- but that's another historical artifact...
/usr/games is listed, but there is no section
On Tue, Nov 18, 1997 at 12:22:56PM -0500, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
>
> > I think that a seperate tree for games is a bit discrimating.
>
> Yep! :-) It's traditional, as well, mostly I suspect so that (for
> example) overenthusiastic admins could have a cron job chmod off
> access to /usr/games dur
9 matches
Mail list logo
