Re: Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.0 (fwd)

1997-11-05 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/doc/fsstnd (or so, should be easy to find). should have the old and the new version of the fsstnd 1.0 1.1 1.2 and fhs 2.0 ... andreas -- Find out how to avoid all those pesky crashes, lockups, application errors, and slow applications at http://www.debian.org -- Debian

Re: Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.0 (fwd)

1997-11-05 Thread Mark Baker
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just joined this list; can somebody point me at > (a) a copy of the new FHS (which is a replacement for the FSSTND?), and > (b) a rationale for its changes. > > For example, from what I've picked up so far, us

Re: Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.0 (fwd)

1997-11-05 Thread Scott Ellis
On Wed, 5 Nov 1997, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 1997 at 09:03:14PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > what about this : > > the new to-be 2.1 distribution should be empty (not all these symlinkls > > to the old hamm tree), and only real new packages with fhs should go > > there. >

Re: Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.0 (fwd)

1997-11-05 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Nov 04, 1997 at 09:03:14PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > what about this : > the new to-be 2.1 distribution should be empty (not all these symlinkls > to the old hamm tree), and only real new packages with fhs should go > there. I just joined this list; can somebody point me at (a) a

Re: Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.0 (fwd)

1997-11-05 Thread Fabrizio Polacco
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > what about this : > the new to-be 2.1 distribution should be empty (not all these > symlinkls to the old hamm tree), and only real new packages with > fhs should go there. I don't see the connection between the ftp site and the file system on user's machine. Symlin