On Tue, Nov 04, 1997 at 09:03:14PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > what about this : > the new to-be 2.1 distribution should be empty (not all these symlinkls > to the old hamm tree), and only real new packages with fhs should go > there.
I just joined this list; can somebody point me at (a) a copy of the new FHS (which is a replacement for the FSSTND?), and (b) a rationale for its changes. For example, from what I've picked up so far, usr/doc is changing to usr/share/doc. That doesn't sound a particularly worthwhile change to me at present, so I would like to read a rationale for the changes. thanks, Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt, StudIEAust [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student, computer science & computer systems engineering. 3rd year, RMIT. http://hamish.home.ml.org/ (PGP key here) CPOM: [***** ] 58% The opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. --Bohr
