Hi,
can you please explain why the license of this software is GPL-3+?
All I found was a hint for GPL-3-only ...
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgp
Hi Dennis,
please also mention at least the files licensed under MIT-0 and/or Unlicense in
your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
p
Hi Vasyl,
you still didn't mention the Kodi Translation Team in your debian/copyright and
didn't address the superfluous number of language package.
There is no need to bloat the Packages-file. Wouldn't it be enough to put the
English files into kodi and the rest into kodi-languages?
Thorste
Hi,
is there a reason why you created dozens of small language packages?
Please also mention debian/dh-addon in your debian/coypright.
As your description mentions the translators, please also acknowledge their
work and add them to your debian/copyright as well (at least the Kodi
Translation T
Hi,
the mentioned bug from the RedHat bugtracker contains no reasoning why
the license of this software is compatible with DFSG.
It just has a statement that some people thought it might be. Meanwhile
those people no longer believe that this is the case and the license is
now considered non-free
Hi Dylan,
please also mention the Apache license for some icons in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
pgpUo_1A_PZYM.pgp
Descript
Hi,
shouldn't one copyright holder be better called hpi1 instead of hpil?
Thorsten
Hi Dylan,
some parts of this software are licensed under the LDPC. This license requires:
"... this copyright notice is retained and prominently displayed, ...".
I don't know what the author of this license means with "prominently displayed"
and whether Debian fulfills this requirement.
Thus I
Hi,
please also mention Stephan M. Bernsee and Bjoern Hoehrmann and their licenses
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
... as requested by Email long time ago.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Matteo,
please also mention at least
Nvidia
Tipue
DreamWorks Animation LLC.
The Khronos Group Inc.
and their licenses in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new f
Hi Christopher,
according to the file headers and README.md, the only copyright holder of this
software is Fluendo, S.A.
I think the authors should not be mentioned in your debian/copyright.
While you are at it, isn't the software even available under LGPL-2+?
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please
@@
+libsndfile (1.0.28-6+deb10u2) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload by the LTS Team.
+ * CVE-2021-4156
+heap out-of-bounds read
+
+ -- Thorsten Alteholz Sat, 25 Jun 2022 22:03:02 +0200
+
libsndfile (1.0.28-6+deb10u1) buster-security; urgency=medium
* CVE-021-3246
Hi Dominik,
please also mention the CC license of some example svgs in your
debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
this license:
vimix-0.7.0+git20220321+ds/rsc/images/icons_LICENCE.txt
is not compatible with DFSG:
"(...) you agree not to sell, redistribute, sublicense, share or otherwise
transfer the Work to other people or entities (...)."
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email
Hi,
according to the file headers, the license of this software is only GPL-2.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
please remove all files under a CC-NC license from the source tarball.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
please also mention Two Orioles, LLC in your dbeian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
DPF-Plugins-1.4\dpf\dgl\src\Resources.cpp and hpp seem to be generated files.
Please explain where the sources can be found and how one could create those
files.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if
Hi,
according to [1] the CC-2.0 licenses are not compatible with DFSG. So please
remove all files under such licenses from the source tar-ball.
Thanks!
Thorsten
[1]
https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses#Creative_Commons_Attribution_Share-Alike_.28CC-BY-SA.29_v3.0
===
Please feel free to
Hi,
please also mention at least
Digital Devices GmbH
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
"So, please ignore+remove it from NEW."
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Dennis,
please mention the zlib license of some files in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Emmanuel,
please also mention at least the Apache license in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
unfortunately the complete license text of the CC license is needed in your
debian/coypright.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Stuart,
I marked your package for ACCEPT, but please also mention Mark Conway Wirt
as copyright holder of pyknon-version1.2/test/test_midi.py.
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Dylan,
the list of grants does not contain the right to modify and distribute the
modifications of files under the Alliance-for-Open-Media-Patent-License-1.0.
I am afraid that this is not compatible woth the DFSG.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't unde
same reason as other version ...
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
same reason as other version ...
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
please also mention the Apache license in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Matteo,
I marked the package for accept, but please also mention Dreamworks in your
debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi,
please also mention at least the CC license, the Expat license and the Apache
license in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Emmanuel,
please also mention the BSD license of
libcamera-0\~git20190625+cb21bb3/Documentation/theme/search.html
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files wh
Hi,
please also mention the CC license of
celluloid-0.17/data/io.github.celluloid_player.Celluloid.*
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi Sebastian,
I marked your package for accept, but our hardworking trainees made a note:
Why do you think that libplacebo-v1.18.0/demos/vulkanlogo.png is CC0?
Surely it's copyright Vulkan?
By the way, CC0 is in common-licenses now, so you don't have to
reproduce it in d/copyright in full.
T
Hi Reinhard,
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Now about 6 weeks have passed since I've been uploading this package, and
I do have a question: Is there anything wrong with this package?
yes, you did an upload to unstable. At this time of the freeze and
without a notice from the main
as requested by email
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
37 matches
Mail list logo