Hello!
[Fri, 27 Feb 2004] Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Given that I don't know this issue indepth, I thought it was
> necessary to rebuild all jack related applications against this new
> release. If I am wrong, that is no ABI/API changes were introduced and
From 0.75.0 (or something like
> "mm" == Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mm> * Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-28 12:37]: >>
mm> Would it make sense to turn DeMuDi into the CDD created by the
mm> >> Debian Multimedia subproject?
mm> As I said (in a meeting IRL), I don't kno
* Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-28 12:37]:
> Would it make sense to turn DeMuDi into the CDD created by the Debian
> Multimedia subproject?
As I said (in a meeting IRL), I don't know the status of -multimedia
or what they are working on. However, I think that you should try to
merg
Martin, after our meeting I've started to analyze more in depth the
issue of how to allow Debian derived "distributions" happily coexist
with Debian itself, and I found out [0] that the topic is now much
more developed than two years ago, when the AGNULA/DeMuDi project
started.
Acco
> "ju" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ju> [1 ] Post-mortem reports on this,
ju> and slight updates.
>> > 11 Feb 2004 : All jack-related packages enter testing, or >>
>> > gets removed from testing.
>>
>> This is rather optimistic at this rate. We may
5 matches
Mail list logo
