>>>>> "ju" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ju> [1 <text/plain; US-ASCII (7bit)>] Post-mortem reports on this, ju> and slight updates. >> > 11 Feb 2004 : All jack-related packages enter testing, or >> >> > gets removed from testing. >> >> This is rather optimistic at this rate. We may delay by a few >> weeks. ju> This wasn't delayed by too many weeks, and we have jack in ju> testing. Congratulations. >> > 1 Mar 2004 : New jack release to Debian unstable. ju> This will not happen, as release management team has ju> requested. ju> We may release debian maintenance versions of jack and upload ju> to unstable; but we should be concentrating more on getting a ju> jack-related packages solid and releasable. We won't release ju> binary-incompatible version of jack in unstable until we get ju> to release sarge. In this case I guess all Debian unstable/testing jack dependent packages have already been successfully rebuilt against jack 0.94.0. Am I correct? bye, free