What to do if FTBFS bug is not reproducible?

2012-01-24 Thread Vasudev Kamath
g and also have provided my build log. How can I proceed shall I manually close this bug and prepare a normal QA upload or I need to wait for some reply on the bug. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646474 Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com h

Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)

2012-01-25 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ons to undo the patches -- Vasudev Kamath Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:28:03 +0530 If some one can upload the same for me it would be really helpful. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
-options doesn't belong in the source > package. And if you look carefully, dpkg-source in fact didn't > include it in .debian.tar.gz. Okay I read maint-guide section 5.22 again and now I'm clear this is only for changing the behaviour dpkg-source locally. I'll remove this section from changelog. I'll upload finished package ASAP. Thanks for the review :) Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 17:52 Fri 27 Jan , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-01-27, 21:52: > >>> + Reduced the update-alternative priority to 30 as per > >>>request from user to the previous maintainer > >>Hmm. Was there a bug report about that? > >No previou

Bug#657428: RFS: surf -- simple web browser (QA upload)

2012-01-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
page ;). Fixed it and added Bug-Debian too. New version is already uploaded to mentors. Thanks for the reviews Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#662124: RFS: fonts-lato/1.104-1 [ITP] -- sans-serif typeface family font

2012-03-04 Thread Vasudev Kamath
dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-lato/fonts-lato_1.104-1.dsc More information about Lato can be obtained from http://www.latofonts.com Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

How to handle embedded javascript/php libraries in WebApps

2012-03-31 Thread Vasudev Kamath
oilating policy by shipping these libraries along with friendica package. So I require some suggestion on how I can handle this situation. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/friendica.git;a=summary Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: How to handle embedded javascript/php libraries in WebApps

2012-04-01 Thread Vasudev Kamath
fer > a good ABI versioning system, so if you do have to change the ABI, there > isn't a good way of handling the transition.) Agreed on this Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: How to handle embedded javascript/php libraries in WebApps

2012-04-01 Thread Vasudev Kamath
treams to unfork things. As I said in reply to Russ's mail either upstream doesn't exists or the modification done by friendica developers isn't a generic so that we can provide patch to upstream (As in case of tinymce) So I'm really not sure how can I get this unforked. Best

Help need to resolve dbconfig issue

2012-04-26 Thread Vasudev Kamath
aste.debian.net/165379/ With Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E signature.asc Descr

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-07-29 Thread Vasudev Kamath
or. (Closes: #642307,#665884) * Fixed a typo in the wmname manpage * Added some docs [ Vasudev Kamath ] * Imported new version of slock (Closes: #667796) * Imported new version of tabbed * debian/control: + Increased minimum debhelper required to 9 + Bumped Standards-Version

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-07-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 10:48 Mon 30 Jul , Jakub Wilk wrote: > This is only a very rudimentary review. I don't have time to review > this properly for the time being. Anybody else is welcome to do it > for me. :) Thanks.. Wonder how many more silly stuffs show up on actual review ;-) > > * V

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-18 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 20:46 Thu 16 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-07-30, 21:56: > >>It doesn't look like it's suitable for wheezy, so please make it > >>s/unstable/experimental/. > >Done! When it should be moved to unstable? After wheezy release? >

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-22 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 15:49 Mon 20 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-08-18, 22:07: > >>get-orig-source: TMPDIR :=$(shell (mktemp --tmpdir -d suckless-tools.)) > >> > >>It looks like a nice hack, but... it will create a temporary > >>directory every tim

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-24 Thread Vasudev Kamath
; --owner root --group root --mode a+rX Ok I will fix it > Have you seen #685611? Just now noticed it. It went to original maintainer who orphaned thanks for pointing out. I will reply for the bug on the bug itself. Will prepare a new source and ping you again Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-25 Thread Vasudev Kamath
7;s > name/group/umask are not leaked: > > --owner root --group root --mode a+rX Done Warm Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net} IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-31 Thread Vasudev Kamath
properly). Any way will fix this tonight Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-31 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 13:16 Fri 31 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-08-31, 16:40: > >>Now I realized that the other tarballs were created in a wrong > >>directory, too. (“This target […] leaves [the tarball] in the > >>current directory.” — Policy §4.9) > >H

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-09 Thread Vasudev Kamath
itory still exist and only just renamed. I will prepare this and ping back to you tonight! Just a note is it okay to change Vcs-* field in this version even though its not mentioned in bug report? -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UN

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 11:03 Wed 10 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-10, 09:16: > >>Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for > >>sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too? > > > >Does source: field allow multiple URL's? According to De

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
a patch for removing FTBFS on Gnu/hurd but this is fixed in >> new version of dmenu do you think it is good to add this patch [1] > > > Hurd is not a release architecture, so I'm pretty sure Release Team won't be > happy about such a change. OK I won't apply it sinc

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 22:10 Wed 10 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-10, 21:55: > >suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low > > > > * debian/control: > > + Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090) > > + Vcs-* fields now points to repository on co

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
hand, has the licence text copied verbatim, but only the > short license name wrong. yes :) So much for doing the work when I was sleepy :(. I will fix it tonight -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-re

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ogether. Let me see Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://li

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-13 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 20:53 Thu 11 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-11, 22:34: > >>>suckless-tools (38-2) unstable; urgency=low > >>> > >>>* debian/control: > >>> + Added myself as maintainer. (Closes: #647090) > >>> + Vcs-

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 11:45 Sun 14 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-13, 22:10: > >>>>> + Converted to copyright-format 1.0. (Closes: #685611) > >>>>"Converted to..." doesn't usually play well with the freeze > >>>>policy.

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:23 PM, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > (meta: I'm Vasudev's AM ;) > > Vasudev Kamath wrote (12 Oct 2012 03:31:39 GMT) : >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: >>> New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
752fc98de1894415f041b3c52de782dd408b;hb=HEAD -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://li

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 22:28 Sun 14 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-14, 16:09: > >>W: suckless-tools source: native-package-with-dash-version > >Yeah I saw these but I think changing the version number will > >cause lot of problem right? > > It's not the

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 14:53 Sun 14 Oct , intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > (meta: I'm Vasudev's AM ;) > > Vasudev Kamath wrote (12 Oct 2012 03:31:39 GMT) : > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > >> New repository for the squeeze branch feels wrong to me &

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 19:08 Mon 15 Oct , intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > Vasudev Kamath wrote (15 Oct 2012 03:43:55 GMT) : > >> * git checkout master && git merge -s ours squeeze > > > Well I don't really think I can merge it back to master! > > I think you should re

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
ppy about it). Could you remove the > extra newline? Well I guess I introduced it while patching from my already finished work! Let me fix it tonight -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.de

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-16 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 23:28 Mon 15 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-15, 20:13: > >Now understood the issue correctly. I was using pdebuild and I > >don't know how it started considering 38-2 as the orig tarball! > >Well now I used the git-buildpackage and it looks f

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-24 Thread Vasudev Kamath
elog as new dmenu fixes it. And I updated the Standards-version to 3.9.4 When I run bhlc on build log of new package I get this http://sprunge.us/CiYR But as far as I know this should be automatically introduced when using compat level 9 with debhelper >= 9 right? Or am I missing somethin

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 16:09 Thu 25 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-25, 11:54: > >>Shouldn't the copyright file also mention download location for > >>sprop (i.e. hg.suckless.org) too? > >> > >>I'd prefer if create_get_orig source down

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-28 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 13:40 Sun 28 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-28, 10:45: > >>>>I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific > >>>>revision of prop (currently ecfe2752b310) rather than tip. > >>>>That would make the scrip

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-28 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 19:27 Sun 28 Oct , Vasudev Kamath wrote: > On 13:40 Sun 28 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-28, 10:45: > > >>>>I'd prefer if create_get_orig source downloaded a specific > > >>>>revision of prop (currently ecfe2752

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-28 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 13:40 Sun 28 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: Anselm got sprop a place in dl.suckless.org so I reverted copyright to its original format and modified create_orig_source to refer dl.suckless.org. Changes are back in the git Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-29 Thread Vasudev Kamath
source > --commit > > .hg_archival.txt is no longer in sprop tarball, so it should be removed from > the repository, too. Ah yes! I forgot to delete it will do it tonight -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net} -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-men

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-10-30 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 17:59 Mon 29 Oct , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-28, 23:06: > >Anselm got sprop a place in dl.suckless.org so I reverted > >copyright to its original format and modified create_orig_source > >to refer dl.suckless.org. > > I can't build

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-11-05 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 20:33 Sun 04 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-10-30, 20:32: > >>.hg_archival.txt is no longer in sprop tarball, so it should be > >>removed from the repository, too. > >Done and changes back in the git. > > I don't see any relevant cha

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-11-09 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Typo in the changelog: ssidd -> ssid. > Fixed > At least for lsw, dmenu and tabbed, copyright statement in > d/copyright don't match those in LICENSE files. Please update the > copyright file. > Fixed -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyninja

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-11-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 01:38 Sun 11 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-10, 11:28: > >>debian/watch contains only a single line "version=3"? Is that > >>intentional? As far as I can see, this change is not documented > >>in the changelog. > >Yes file

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-11-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 09:20 Sun 11 Nov , intrigeri wrote: > Jakub Wilk wrote (11 Nov 2012 00:38:28 GMT) : > > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-10, 11:28: > >>> debian/watch contains only a single line "version=3"? Is that > >>> intentional? As far > >>> as I

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-11-13 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 18:49 Mon 12 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-11, 12:55: > >Done changed to Expat License. > > Changelog now reads: "Changed License to Expat instead of MIT/X > Consortium License as DEP-5 doesn't allow spaces in License name." >

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-11-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 18:37 Wed 14 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-13, 20:13: > >>Changelog now reads: "Changed License to Expat instead of MIT/X > >>Consortium License as DEP-5 doesn't allow spaces in License > >>name." But in 38-2 there were no

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-11-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 11:18 Thu 15 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-13, 20:13: > >>What did this line do, and why it was removed? > >>find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},' > >Not sure why it was removed, it was not present wh

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-11-15 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 17:08 Thu 15 Nov , Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-11-15, 17:22: > >>>>What did this line do, and why it was removed? > >>>> find . -name config.mk | xargs sed -i 's,-s ${LIBS},${LIBS},' > >>>Not sure why it was remove

Re: RFS: fonts-johnsmith-induni

2011-02-20 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hi, I've found sponsor for my package. Thanks to pkg-fonts team which included my package into their team umbrella. Thanks and Regards On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > From: Vasudev Kamath > To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org > Subject: RFS: fonts-jo

Watch file not present - warning message

2011-10-21 Thread Vasudev Kamath
-- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info copyni...@frndk.de (Friendika) vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011-11-05 Thread Vasudev Kamath
/package/dwm is this the reason why my package is not showing up in mentors? Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011-11-05 Thread Vasudev Kamath
I've uploaded all the files at this URL[1] [1] http://silpa.org.in/~vasudev/dwm/ Thanks, -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011-11-07 Thread Vasudev Kamath
t; Cheers. > > Kix > -- > Enviado desde mi teléfono Android con K-9 Mail. Disculpa mi brevedad > > Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> First of all I don't know if this is relevant list of this query but I >> tried sending this mail to supp...@mentor

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011-11-08 Thread Vasudev Kamath
oading it to mentors for sure. I'll upload the orig tar ball to server by tonight. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/vasudev http://twitter.com/vasudevkamath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011-11-08 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hello Arno, On 22:18 Mon 07 Nov , Arno Töll wrote: > Hello Vasudev, > > On 05.11.2011 15:09, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > > > > Sure I've uploaded all the files at this URL[1] > > > > > > [1] http://silpa.org.in/~vasudev/dwm/ > > You are missi

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011-11-09 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 18:28 Tue 08 Nov , Ole Wolf wrote: > Quoting Vasudev Kamath : > >As I mentioned I've uploaded orig.tar ball to above URL. I tried > > uploading the package again today but no luck it won't showup on the > > mentors web inteface. > According to one of the

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011-11-09 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 16:20 Wed 09 Nov , Marco Balmer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:39:54PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > > I tried uploading it again but with no luck. Package uploads > > successfully but it never shows up in the mentors web interface :( > > Is your GPG Key appli

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011-11-09 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 10:34 Wed 09 Nov , Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > Silly question, but can you paste the dput command's output? Are you > sure it's going to debexpo and not ftp-master? > Yes it is going to mentors. Attached dput.upload and upload log written by dput Best Regards -

RFS: dwm (Adapted package)

2011-11-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
th no luck so I uploaded it to a VPS in which I've account Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://blog.copyninja.info vasu...@joindiaspora.com (Ostatus) signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Uploaded package is not showing up in mentors

2011-11-10 Thread Vasudev Kamath
nd this bug is really serious. Yes you are right in my case I can't follow this solution because the previous package is uploaded by some one else and now I really own an ITA for the package. So I uploaded it to a VPS in which I have account and sent an RFS. Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://

Re: RFS: dwm (Adapted package)

2011-11-11 Thread Vasudev Kamath
/bugreport.cgi?bug=557429 Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/vasudevkamath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: RFS: dwm (Adapted package)

2011-11-14 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Hello mentors, I'm still looking for a sponsor for uploading my adapted package dwm. Best Regards On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for package dwm. This package was orphaned > by its previous mainta

Re: RFS: dwm (Adapted package)

2011-11-20 Thread Vasudev Kamath
wm (and hopefully I become DM I can maintain it by myself) [0] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dwm.git;a=summary Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: dwm (Orphaned package)(17days old)

2011-11-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
the source in my vps. Hope some one will review and upload this package for me Best Regards On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > On 15:04 Sun 20 Nov     , David Kalnischkies wrote: > >> I am not a possible sponsor (no-D{D,M} sorry) and i haven't >> e

Re: RFS: dwm (Orphaned package)(17days old)

2011-11-27 Thread Vasudev Kamath
y is created and simply added it to git. Now removed that :) > > And as you try to follow DEP3 for the patches, add to both patches: > Forwarded: not-needed > It would be a shame to let these patches show up in a "untagged patches > which might need to be send upstrea

Re: scl-sandhi debian package

2011-12-01 Thread Vasudev Kamath
r package is signed? Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/vasudevkamath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:

Re: scl-sandhi debian package

2011-12-01 Thread Vasudev Kamath
pload the package Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/vasudevkamath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://l

Re: RFS: xfonts-bolkhov (2nd try)

2012-01-18 Thread Vasudev Kamath
taining it as part of Fonts Task force team Best Regards -- Vasudev Kamath http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com http://identi.ca/vasudev http://twitter.com/vasudevkamath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T