Help with watch file -- pre-release upstream versions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi mentors, What's the usual way of handling "preX" upstream version numbers in watch files? I'm having trouble because uscan considers 1.0pre3 newer than 1.0. Thanks, - -- cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH

Re: Help with watch file -- pre-release upstream versions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leo "costela" Antunes wrote: > Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: >> What's the usual way of handling "preX" upstream version numbers in >> watch files? I'm having trouble because uscan considers 1.0pre3 newer &

RFS: vamp-plugin-sdk -- audio analysis and feature extraction plugins

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vamp-plugin-sdk". * Package name: vamp-plugin-sdk Version : 1.1b-1 Upstream Author : Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.vamp-plugins.org/ * License

RFS: vamp-plugin-sdk -- audio analysis and feature extraction plugins

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors / Multimedia Team / Sam, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vamp-plugin-sdk". This is needed to build Sonic Visualiser, which is a very interesting piece of software for music analysis. It's far more than a usual audio analyzer. Y

Re: RFS: vamp-plugin-sdk -- audio analysis and feature extraction plugins

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry, the correct web address for Sonic Visualiser is: http://www.sonicvisualiser.org/ - -- cc SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote: > Dear mentors / Multimedia Team / Sam, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vamp-plugin-sdk".

RFS: vamp-plugin-sdk -- audio analysis and feature extraction plugins (3rd try)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors / Multimedia Team / Sam, I am (still) looking for a sponsor for my package "vamp-plugin-sdk". This is needed to build Sonic Visualiser, which is a very interesting piece of software for music analysis. It's far more than a usual audio ana

Re: RFS: libvrb (updated package)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Amaya, Amaya wrote: > Sorry for my really long silence. > I see this version is still not in Debian. Should I upload? Yes, please. Thanks! - -- cc > Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a

Changing source package name

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I would like to change the name of a source package; is there anything non-package-specific thing to do apart from simply using the new name in debian/changelog? I mean adding new header fields, etc. Thanks, - -- cc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

lost ITP?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've sent an ITP on libvrb last night (at about 23:19 CET), but I cannot see it on d-d and in the BTS. However, I got the copy to my personal inbox. I saw ITPs on d-d and in the BTS posted this afternoon. Is it possible that the ITPs are not proc

Re: being_processed has a too-low limit again?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 05:18:47PM +0200, Sz?kelyi Szabolcs wrote: >> I've sent an ITP on libvrb last night (at about 23:19 CET), but I cannot >> see it on d-d and in the BTS. However, I got the copy to my personal >> inbox. > Do

changelog.Debian.gz as a symbolic link

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm packaging a simple library building a shared lib and a development package as usual. The -dev package depends on the one containing the shared library. Policy says that it is permitted in this situation to symlink documentation coming with the

Re: changelog.Debian.gz as a symbolic link

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eddy Petrisor wrote: > Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: >>> I'm packaging a simple library building a shared lib and a development >>> package as usual. The -dev package depends on the one containing the >>> shared library.

RFS: libvrb

on-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvrb/libvrb_0.5.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Székelyi Szabolcs -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE3oC5GJRwVVqzMkMRAnL+AJ9dKEJY+HTzICw

RFS: libvrb -- Virtual Ring Buffer library

bian/pool/main/l/libvrb/libvrb_0.5.1-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Székelyi Szabolcs -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFGYjgGJRwVVqzMkMRArOFAJkBAHgjgvMcD8a1QCywyzxLC4JH7ACcCIt4 feI8bNqPoWgzxWajSJzPDnk= =VpSy -E

Re: RFS: libvrb -- Virtual Ring Buffer library

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Westby wrote: > On (26/09/06 22:09), Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libvrb". This is an update to >> the (so far unsponsored) previous version 0.5.1-1. >> > > H

naming and relationships of development packages (was: Re: RFS: libvrb -- Virtual Ring Buffer library)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Ming Hua wrote: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:10:32AM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: >> James Westby wrote: >> >>> * Do you need Replaces: libvrb-dev as well? >> I have seen similar (ie. development) packages with

Re: naming and relationships of development packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Florent Rougon wrote: > Székelyi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The soversion is usually added to the -dev package name to be able to >> support multiple versions of a library off-line, which means all >> versions

Re: naming and relationships of development packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Florent Rougon wrote: > Székelyi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That's right. But why is Replaces needed in the case of an MTA? If a >> package Providing mail-transport-agent is installed, and the user is &

Re: naming and relationships of development packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ming Hua wrote: > On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 11:14:51PM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Ming Hua wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 01:10:32AM +0200, Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: >>>> James Westby

RFS: libvrb -- Virtual Ring Buffer library

ry: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvrb/libvrb_0.5.1-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards - -- Székelyi Szabolcs -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v

Adopting a package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Mentors, when adopting a package, sould I first contact the original maintainer and the the retitle the 'O:' bug to 'ITA:' or retitle it first and contact the maintainer afterwards? As I remember, a non-dd is allowed to adopt a package, am I rig

No response to RFS -- what to do now?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've posted an [0]RFS about 2 weeks ago, but the package has received no attention from official developers. What is the usual procedure in this case? Wait longer, re-post the RFS or try to accept that the package will never be a part of Debian?

libvrb uploaded (was: Re: No response to RFS -- what to do now?)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Amaya wrote: > Székelyi Szabolcs wrote: >> I've posted an [0]RFS about 2 weeks ago, but the package has received >> no attention from official developers. > > I'll upload it. Sorry I missed your RFS. Thanks. A package

Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, can anyone tell why ftpds do conflict with each other and why httpds do not? In case of MTAs, the conflict is reasonable due to the possibility of accessing a mailbox at the same time, but I can't see the point in the case of ftpds. Thanks, - --

Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Gerrit Pape wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 11:34:14PM +0100, Sz?kelyi Szabolcs wrote: >> can anyone tell why ftpds do conflict with each other and why httpds do >> not? > > Actually the httpds should conflict too as they install listeners on >

Re: RFS: harminv

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Loic Le Guyader wrote: > Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz nul-unu.com> writes: >> I: harminv: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/harminv.1.gz:180 > > I don't have that problem ! My lintian don't report anything like that ! Run lintian with -I :

Re: pbuilder problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Luca Bedogni wrote: > Hi mentors > made my first libpackage and the program is the following. > When i launch pbuilder on another package that uses my library-package i got > that he can't use the include. I use the package from a local reposito

Re: variables from shell output in makefile

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 andremachado wrote: > # EXT_DIR=`/usr/bin/php-config --extension-dir`; > EXT_DIR = $(shell /usr/bin/php-config --extension-dir); This is not an assignment in this form. Try removing the spaces surrounding the "=". Didn't you get something li

broken packages?

Hi, I have a package called morg-mailcommands that depends on Postfix. Trying to install it with aptitude gives > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed > E: Unable to resolve some dependencies! > Some

Re: broken packages?

Hi, > On 1/24/07, Székelyi Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a package called morg-mailcommands that depends on Postfix. > > Trying to install it with aptitude gives > (...) > > You are missing some important pieces of information: > > 1) How

APT crazyness

Hi, I have a package which depends on linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 (from backports.org). I can't install it with apt-get because: The following packages have unmet dependencies: morg: Depends: linux-image-2.6.16-2-686 but it is not going to be installed However, I can install linux-image-2.6.16-2-

Re: make or $(MAKE) ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Charles Plessy wrote: > As one of the program I package was recently automakified, I had to > change debian/rules to deal with this. While comparing with other > packages, I realised that often $(MAKE) is used instead of make in > debian/rules. In case

Re: staying in stable but compiling for sid

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Kemp wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 05:33:29PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > >> I want to run software only from Stable (ie Etch) when I am doing >> non-debian related work. However, when I am doing debian related work >> (ex :- fi

RFS: libvrb (updated package)

/pool/main/l/libvrb - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvrb/libvrb_0.5.1-5.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Székelyi Szabolcs -BEGIN PGP

Re: Change of address in GPL 2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > Should I copy in debian/copyright the old address or the new one? Or > maybe should I change also the address contained in the license > statement in the source code files? debian/copyright is the license for the packaging