aylist file, or hand append files, but that's it. It also
doesn't die when you relaunch the X server, which is rather nice when
doing X driver work :)))
It also is a true C application, and not a bunches of script. It uses
libxine for playing sounds.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to 8-9000 packages should scale the same way up to 30K or
> 40K packages?
You are aware that some mirror are already on the very limit of not
having enough place on their 100Go partition for the debian archives and
were asking for near term solutions.
That said, a small (arch: all probably)
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:45:37PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:37:40AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Adam Kessel wrote:
> > > > I've written a fairly simple com
tions anyway, but some of you still seem to need/use it ;)
BTW, the attachement is of md5sum b09e26c292759d654633d3c8ed00d18d.
Anyone know of an easy way to filter out emails where a given
attachement has a particular md5sum ? My tries with uudeview, grep, sed
and med5sum where not that much of
ntf ("%sMessage", __func__, ...);
Works, but seems a bit ugly, and there are _lots_ of those lines.
Is there a compiler switch to consider __func__ as string literal or
something such ?
Naturally, using 2.95 kinda works, but i don't think this is a good
idea.
Thanks for your help.
F
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:26:42PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:59:43PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > I have some code that was using :
> >
> > printf (__func__ "Message", ...);
> >
> > This doesn't build a
this discussion will be void.
I have really came to know him only since the oldenburg meeting a bit
less than a month ago, but i guess he would be no worse than our average
DD, and he has sure done more work in this last month that our average
DD does, especially on the debian-installer work.
F
tor &
gnome-randr-applet). When gnome is launching, there are little icons in
the splash screen, and one of the applets (hardware-monitor) doesn't
show a little icon, only the small gnome foot used for icon-less
applets.
Any idea on how to add such a gnome splash screen icon ?
Friendly,
ce of debian
supports it, and make it a release goal ? I doubt it is still time for
sarge, but maybe for sarge+1 ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:40:35PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 03:07:59AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > Of course, UTF-8 whereever possible is a nice goal to strive after,
> >
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:48:01PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Depends how practical that is, I guess. For example, it's still unknown
> &
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:44:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:22:36PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > &g
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:45:41AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I choose fr_FR.UTF8 or something such in gnome GDM.
>
> And it IS just like that in your /etc/locale.gen as well? fr_FR only won't
> do.
I have man
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 01:48:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:23:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:44:35PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 07:00:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > We
fered way of doing this ?
Thanks for your help.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s is available when using debootstrap, since it is
needed in base-install on debian-installer.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:20:10AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yeah, seems reasonable, now i only need to find out how to call it
> > from perl.
>
> %arch = split /[=\n]/, qx(dpkg-architecture) or die q(dpkg-architecture failed);
hat didn't
> work well.
Build it in a pbuilder, and add everything it is missing.
Or alternatively in a clean chroot, is actually faster. look at the
debootstrap manpage for info on how to build one.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ave the full
> support of the upstream authors, and have myself contributed to the
> upstream development of mpc and mpd.
BTW, how does it compare to quark, which also has the same client/server
design, and which i package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
nd
that this be a release criteria for sarge+1 ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e me.
you can enhance the different size of tex by modifying
/etc/texmf/texmf.cnf and running texconfig init as root afterward.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l is desesperately empty,
and learning directly from the interface is not the best of solutions.
Also some examples would be welcome in such a argouml-doc package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ise you have to repack the source tarball (removing it yourself).
Or you could ask them to upgrade the debian directory to your new work,
so other people can easily rebuild out of CVS and other such things.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
> Most dependencies on glutg3 are versioned, and a Provides: can't satisfy
> versioned dependencies.
Are there any plans to fix dpkg so it finally supports versioned
provides ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eed to remove the conffiles from /var.
> >
> > Why not just ship the files in /usr/lib or something and then in the
> > postinst copy them to the place the package access them from if they
> > aren't already there?
> >
>
> I like this idea. Thanks for the tip.
>
> One drawback I see is that crafty-books-medium install a 30MB opening
> book file, if we go copying it from /usr/lib to /var/lib, we're
> wasting 30MB user's disk space, he might not like it.
What about a symlink ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
build a staging area, i need some
kind of copy of the dinstall scripts or something such and run them on
a private subdirectory somewhere ?
Any help or hint to information would be welcome.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
hat i did with gshutdown in gnome, gnome2 does not seem to
have gshutdown, so i am out of luck).
That said, you still would need to have the corresponding user having
sudo privilege, and i think this need to be done by hand.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
uld have been usefull if you provide links to your packages,
and/or a a short description of those.)
Also, feel free to join the debian-ocaml-maint mailing list, which
altough is devoted to maintainers of ocaml related packages, may be of
interrest to you, especially regarding the moscow ML freeness stuff and
other.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
f he wants, i think. There may be other issues i guess, and
the INRIA legal department don't seem to be very aware of Free Software
issues, so ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
have an entry point? Like -mentors?
>
> | It is a matter of practice. The one Raphaël is proposing would not
> | be annoying at all.
>
> For me it would, because of the amount of noise. The BTS is quite
> noisy.
And -mentors is not ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
d you may consider subscribing to debian-ocaml-maint, where issues
regarding packages built with/for ocaml are discussed.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
such a thing possible, how can it be done.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:06:37AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:09:38AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > I wish to be able, in a package postinst, to be able to know the
> > previously installed version of the package, so i can take different
> > act
ing to be installed at the same time). This would create a
symlink when both packages are installed.
Saddly, the current way dh_installmanpages handle this is broken (well i
was told it would be fixed post woody release) and it does not really
work (the symlink is to the original name, not the gzipped one).
I create the symlink by hand in a postinst.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 07:42:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 08:21:09PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > >
> > > Provided your packages conflict, you can make two files,
> > > debian/
uot;Version numbering").
>
> OK, I will try, even if it's not exactly what I meaned.
Well, you could also use the ugly :
Provides: package_name-1.0.0 or something such.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ke i did for ia64
and powerpc, where the 3.04 native code compiler was broken, then there
suddenly is a previous version of the ia64 and powerpc packages to
contend with.
But then, in the case of the bug above, the native code compiler would
not have compiled from the start anyway.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ld depend, and worry later if this don't work.
Or is there another list where we could ask.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:15:16AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > Mmm, but what if there is a bug found in ocaml's native code compiler,
&
good such
package i could use as example ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 05:15:59PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Sven,
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 05:05:27PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Ideally, i would build depend on kernel-headers-2.4, and have a option
> > that i can pass to debian/rules which would detec
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:21:15PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:01:05PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 05:15:59PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > > > How do other module packages handle this, do someon
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 12:23:31PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am packaging unicorn :
> >
> > unicorn- Kernel modules for the Bewan ADSL PCI st modem
> >
> > The upstream source come with a make file enabli
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 03:33:53PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
> alsa-source does not patch the kernel. It builds only addition kernel modules.
Yes, so i have seen since.
Also, i didn't know about versioned kernel symbols you talk in the other
mail.
Thanks, ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
> I think policy should reccomend third-party modules to be installed
> in the the directory common for all kernels with the same minor
> release.
How do you handle the case when the module in question only works with a
subset of the kernels (let say a 2.4.x module will only work ith kernels
later than 2.4.7 or something such ?).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 12:20:05AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 03:31:57PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> >
> > > I think policy should reccomend third-party modules to be installed
> >
t. So what is the best way to build only the
arch:all packages, or maybe i should hand generate the .changes file for
upload ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
>
> [...]
>
>
> > After a bit more looking, i noticed that the arch: all packages were not
> > autobuilt, which seem
ecret key there,
> > and this may be unwanted.
>
> See debsign in the devscripts package ;-)
Mmm, i didn't know about this one, i did the signing by hand.
But this doesn't sole my arch:all only upload, i guess i will have to do
a new version of the package just for that :
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Die, 2002-09-24 at 08:17, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, i tried to build only the arch:all package on voltaire also, but
> > without sucess. If you can rebuild only ocaml-source for ocaml 3.06-6
> &
remote machine and signing locally. It'd be nice if it
> could operate the other way round.
I imagine that it would also work nicely if you copy the .changes and
.dsc files to your local box and sign them there locally ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
kage manager that apache-ssl-ywesee has the same
> functionality as the named packages, so that any dependency that relies
> on one can depend on apache-ssl-ywesee instead.
Mmm, is Provides a superset of Replaces, or do you have to specify both
?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
most probably run with
problems on versioned dependencies, do someone know what is the problem
with that, if there is a fundamental flaw with doing them, or if it is
only the manpower to implement them which is at fault.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:12:52AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven LUTHER:
> > Is there a way to handle this so that apt will get the native code
> > package if it is available, and resort to the bytecode one on arches not
> > supporting the native c
, or select randomly ?
Alternatively, we could also have the both a foo_1.0-1_all.deb and a
foo_1.0-1_i386.deb (for example) in the archive, and have the per arch
PAckages file point to the native code one (foo_1.0-1_i386.deb) when it
is available, and to the byte code one (foo_1.0-1_all.deb) if it is not.
But then this will not allow an user to install the bytecode executable
unless he hand installs it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:20:34PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther:
> > In case i submit a patch or something such, should i discuss things
> > first, or just go ahead and implement it ?
> >
> Probably talk about it first... though frankly I
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:44:50PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Fre, 2002-10-04 at 10:09, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 09:12:52AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > >
> > > Sven LUTHER:
> > > > Is there a way to handle th
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 11:25:55AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Since the bytecode executables are arch independent, i think it would be
> > nice to build them arch: all, since this would mean, apart from smaller
> > sized packages, also that we don'
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:38:05PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Well, what about the coq for example, which is 7 MB package (on i386, so
> > maybe it is bigger for other arches) and 20MB installed.
>
> I guess it's on the line.
I thought so, But
gt;
> Provides can not provide a version (currently, may change some day). You can
> ask for people to depend on cron | dcron. Although the question is now, why
> a new cron??
Or fix versioned provides. But then i was told it is a dpkg issue.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
eekly and
other will retry when they have time for it.
You could wait a week or so, and if the situation doesn't improve,
contact the autobuilder maintainer.
Alternatively, you could login on a debian paroject machine, and build
the program yourself.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
said, but in general i don't think
being impatient with the autobuilders warrants the upload of a new
version.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
have to wait for are :
alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, powerpc and sparc
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:21:05AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:23:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Also notice that the s390 is not a released port, so it will not stop
> > your package from entering testing, so i would not worry too much ab
the current release. And this
does not include non-us if you happen to be in the us.
BTW, something similar exist also with the testing script.
Does the testing script verify only the dependencies of a package for it
to enter testing, or also the build-deps ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:49:37AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Package: cupsys-pt
> Version: 1.0.2-1
Ok, i will look at the package and upload it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:09:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:49:37AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > Package: cupsys-pt
> > Version: 1.0.2-1
>
> Ok, i will look at the package and upload it.
Ok, package uploaded.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ch.
If your upload is one such, then you may contact martin shulze, and see
if your package may be a good candidate for inclusion in one of the
future woody point release.
If it is not the case (most probably i think) then just upload to
unstable.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:20:08AM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:26:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > please tell me why you needed to patch the config.guess and
> > config.sub thingy ? Could the plain upstream provi
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:13:48PM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it
> > needs a new entry in the override file, and thus human
> > intervention
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:13:48PM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it
> > needs a new entry in the override file, and thus human
> > intervention
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:44:11AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 03:13:48PM +1000, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Yes, i uploaded it to ftp-master, but as it is a new package, it
> > &g
should
add the debconf template in the distributed package ?
Note that it is a multi-binary package.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 10:39:03AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > I created a templates file, put it in the debian directory, created a
> > config file and a postinst file, like was adviced.
> >
> > Now, the package builds fine, i tried running the p
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:05:59AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > Maybe this should be more proeminently said in
> > /usr/share/doc/debconf-doc/tutorial.txt.gz, no, there is only a quick
> > mention about installing in debian/tmp/DEBIAN/, which i missed, and
> it lets you unpack the file as is without having to worry about
> > overwriting the debianized version.
>
> Use a temporary directory. You should get into the habit of doing this
> when unpacking random tarballs anyway.
Especially since some random tarballs don't install in a subdirectory.
Maybe there is even tar option that helps you do it directly, read the
manpage.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:15:47AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:24:16AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:54:28AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:46:51PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > >
does not work
with unicorn-source, which needs to be root (with sudo). I tried
looking into the alsa-source code, but it is a huge and complex stuff,
and i am a bit lost.
Thanks for your help,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 02:47:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello, ...
>
> I have packaged the unicorn driver for the Bewan ADSL PCI st and USB
> modems. There are still some licencing issues which will be solved in
> the next upstream release, but basically the package is rea
and the packaging changes go into the .diff.gz. You are free
to send the changes also upstream, so when the next release happens, the
.diff.gz would be empty. There is no problem in sending the debian
directory also upstream in this way.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
uccess.
I also had the problem, but then after a time the package built
correctly. You could simply look at it today to see if it is already
solved.
That said, the PTS seems to have frozen on november 2/3 or something
such, so you would need to look at the build logs directly.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Oliver,
> > > I got same the problem wit
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:46:52AM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:35:09AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 07:15:06PM +0100, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > >
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:56:29AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> Am Freitag, 8. November 2002 10:35 schrieb Sven Luther:
>
> > > > That said, the PTS seems to have frozen on november 2/3 or
> > > > something such, so you would need to look at the build logs
> >
previous one ?
Using it requires patching all over the source to change the ndbm.h
includes into gdbm-ndbm.h ones.
Is using /usr/include/gdbm-ndbm.h the right solution, or does a copy of
/usr/include/db1/ndbm.h still be included in a non obvious place ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ed or are removed by
clean though.
I have such a case in one of my packages, and i move them around during
the build and restore them when cleaning.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
remote mount it on multiple
system, which may not all be using the same arch, while /usr/lib is arch
dependant.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
non-free or maybe even
non-debian packages, but i don't really know how the testing scripts
could handle this.
That said, you could try using one of the free java suites, but maybe
nbio does not build with them. kaffe, jikes and gcj come to mind, but i
have no particular experience with any of them.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
#x27;t build nbio build with those suites, so I'm
> stuck with Blackdown for now.
:(((
> Thanks for the information...
No problem,
Friendly,
Sven Luther
very package that provides java-common will work with my package?
You should list the working package first :
working-java | java-common
This way, the autobuilders will pick the first option first.
> Thanks, all of you, for the help. Sorry if I'm rambling. It's 3:00am
> and I should stop hacking and go to bed. :-)
good night then, but i think nights are the best hack times.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
install PREFIX=$(CURDIR)/debian/package_name
or something such.
Then, check the upstream makefile, if it supports the PREFIX thingy or
not, and modify it so it works as you want.
This would be a first step, if this don't work, we can search further.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
ml compiler/runtime suite does not easily know how
to handle more than one directory.
That said, it could well go into /usr/share/ocaml.
Finally, i don't know, but are they all that much people really using
/usr/share shared between different arches ? Does dpkg/apt even allow
this to work without breaking all kind of things ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:18:14PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 10:14:26AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> AS>>> "Ruby sucks". Ignore it. Arch-indep to share, arch-dep to lib,
> AS>>> screw everything else.
> DB>> That di
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
> > > java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:49:10AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven> BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
> Sven> complain about a missing j2se-common. Is th
an unstable box would be fine, it needs nasm added to the
build-depends (is nasm available on all arches, its description says
it generate i386, so maybe the package for other arches are
cross-assemblers ?).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Can everyone agree that this is correct? If not, can someone suggest a
> line that will satisfy everyone?
Seems fine to me.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
re is an open bug about pppoatm support in the ppp
debian package, but i think it is mostly ignored).
Friendly,
Sven Luther
he official ppp
package, i may be willing to provide a ppp+pppoatm package or something
such. That said, ideally this would be included in the CVS version in
ppp upstream, and hopefully when it is released (any ETA for it ?) then
we would have pppoatm without needing to patch ppp.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:29:27AM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:25, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:57:15PM +0800, Matthew Bell wrote:
> > > Once again, I rear my head from the deep, and bring news that I have a
> > > version of
201 - 300 of 332 matches
Mail list logo
