Hi,
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 11:21:35AM +0200, Tomas Davidek wrote:
> * I store all the scripts in a tarball, so all I have to do is to unpack
> them in the respective directory during the "make install" stage (i.e.
> no compilation is needed). I succeeded to do so by introducing the
> followi
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 06:45:55PM +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
> Is there a way how could I try to compile this package for all
> architectures and see if everything works? I must admit, I am working on
Sort of, if you are a debian developer. There are debian
machines for all supported archite
On my ITP of the mozart system, annonced on debian-devel, Stephane
Bortzmeyer replied
> On Thursday 1 June 2000, at 9 h 55, the keyboard of Ralf Treinen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > http://www.mozart-oz.org/
>
> Possible name clash with <http://mozart
I'm building a package (mozart) where documentation is provided by
upstream as sgml (about 30 documents), from which a documentation
set can be produced in html, ps or pdf. Since the binary is quite
big (a .deb is about 3 MB) and since the documentation package in
any of these formats (compressed)
What is the best way to register netscape plugins with installation of
a package? This would be information of the type
Mime-type: application/x-oz-application
Suffix: oza
Application: /usr/bin/ozengine %s
Having this pluging installed automatically would be nice since my package
comes with docum
Hi,
the packaging manual (v 3.2.1.0) says in section 8.1:
All fields that specify BUILD-TIME relationships [...] may be restricted to
a certain set of architectures. [emphasis by me]
>From this I conclude that it is not possible to have a (binary) dependency
relationship restricted to a cert
er D/g indicates this (D=DSA, g=Elgamal) :
%gpg --list-keys treinen
pub 1024D/E0BA04C1 2000-02-26 Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uid Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub 1024g/D3DF40EF 2000-02-26
^
|
So my main key is DSA and the sub
Michael Moerz wrote:
> So my problem is now that in the source tree of asc is a
> subdirectory containing poligon triangulization code. asc
> makes use of this code for displaying 3d-objects.
> That triangulization code was written by someone else who
> is not upstream. There is no license accomp
> possible now to get the license of that code. I think that the
> licenses are DFSG compliant, but they are not free licenses that
> are mentioned in the DFSG. Should I move on to debian-legal with
> that licenses ? I suppose I should.
Yes, you should. -Ralf.
> In Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:48:48 -0500 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cum veritate scripsit :
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > I've applied as new mantainer a few days ago.
> > I haven't AM yet.
> >
> > Can I send an ITA in my current status?
>
> I don't know the general concensus about this (som
> Stupid question, its ok that applicants look for sponsors before they have
> been assigned an AM? I'm just curious, because I just uploaded such a
> package...
It is in fact most welcome.
-Ralf.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:21:21PM -0400, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
>
> I am the author of the GNU HaliFAX viewer and I have pre-packaged it
> for Debian GNU/Linux. I have been a maintainer since Saturday and
Welcome !
>
> In http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-upload.en.html,
> par
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:06:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jimmy> I noticed in your protocol that you say the name on the IDs
> Jimmy> must match the name on the key. When I had my key signed, I
> Jimmy> showed ID that had th
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 03:21:54PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> [People from debian-ocaml-mail, please keep -mentors CC'ed.]
>
> * John Skaller [Sun, 12 Jun 2005 16:27:21 +1000]:
> > I could use a 'build-recommends' dependency,
> > but I understand 'recommends'
> > is only available for the b
I'm building a package (mozart) where documentation is provided by
upstream as sgml (about 30 documents), from which a documentation
set can be produced in html, ps or pdf. Since the binary is quite
big (a .deb is about 3 MB) and since the documentation package in
any of these formats (compressed)
What is the best way to register netscape plugins with installation of
a package? This would be information of the type
Mime-type: application/x-oz-application
Suffix: oza
Application: /usr/bin/ozengine %s
Having this pluging installed automatically would be nice since my package
comes with docu
Hi,
the packaging manual (v 3.2.1.0) says in section 8.1:
All fields that specify BUILD-TIME relationships [...] may be restricted to
a certain set of architectures. [emphasis by me]
>From this I conclude that it is not possible to have a (binary) dependency
relationship restricted to a cer
D/g indicates this (D=DSA, g=Elgamal) :
%gpg --list-keys treinen
pub 1024D/E0BA04C1 2000-02-26 Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
uid Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sub 1024g/D3DF40EF 2000-02-26
^
|
So my main key is DSA and the sub is
Michael Moerz wrote:
> So my problem is now that in the source tree of asc is a
> subdirectory containing poligon triangulization code. asc
> makes use of this code for displaying 3d-objects.
> That triangulization code was written by someone else who
> is not upstream. There is no license accom
> possible now to get the license of that code. I think that the
> licenses are DFSG compliant, but they are not free licenses that
> are mentioned in the DFSG. Should I move on to debian-legal with
> that licenses ? I suppose I should.
Yes, you should. -Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
> In Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:48:48 -0500 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cum veritate scripsit :
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > I've applied as new mantainer a few days ago.
> > I haven't AM yet.
> >
> > Can I send an ITA in my current status?
>
> I don't know the general concensus about this (som
> Stupid question, its ok that applicants look for sponsors before they have
> been assigned an AM? I'm just curious, because I just uploaded such a
> package...
It is in fact most welcome.
-Ralf.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:21:21PM -0400, Wolfgang Sourdeau wrote:
>
> I am the author of the GNU HaliFAX viewer and I have pre-packaged it
> for Debian GNU/Linux. I have been a maintainer since Saturday and
Welcome !
>
> In http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-upload.en.html,
> pa
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 11:06:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jimmy> I noticed in your protocol that you say the name on the IDs
> Jimmy> must match the name on the key. When I had my key signed, I
> Jimmy> showed ID that had t
Hi,
you posted to the debian developers list. Please send questions of
this kind to [EMAIL PROTECTED] where beginners questions
are welcome (cc is set in this mail).
To answer your question: You have to set the DESTDIR variable when you
install the binaries in the package build directory. Most p
===
ii g++2.95.4-7 The GNU C++ compiler.
However, when I try to build my package I get an error on an unsatisfied
build dependency:
% dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is texmacs
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.3.5.0-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintaine
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:36:41PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> dpkg sucks; try apt-cache show g++ and check out the epoch in the
> version field...
Yes. "apt-cache show" reveals that g++ has epoch 2. This solved my problem,
thanks to James and everybody else who replied.
BTW, the upstream autho
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:35:01PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> According to the dh_movefiles man page,
>
> dh_install is a much better program that can do everything this
> one can, and more'.
>
> Yet with dh_install I was only able to cp -a files without the addition
> of rm them out o
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:01:04PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
> I recently packaged up KCDLabel, a very nice GUI CD Label creator. IT
> allows for both image and text manipulation, and I find it nice for
> making CD's for friends. From the description field:
In which way is this di
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:32:08PM -0700, justin cunningham wrote:
> So I downloaded his source package orig.tar.gz, .dsc, diff.gz
> i386_changes -- basically all files except the .deb and extracted the
> source, applied the patch and cd into the source tree and ran 'fakeroot
> debuild' and got
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:41:10PM +, Bruno Barrera C wrote:
> become as new mantainer, but i got a problem that there is no chilean
> debian developers , who could sign my GPG key, and i dont have drive
> card.
> It is possible if I send my Chilean Identify Card, as a way to identify
> me?
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote:
> I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
> sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
> facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
> requiring the user to inst
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:41:21PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Should changelog.Debian include changes that precede the inclusion
> in Debian ?
I don't think that this is an obligation. However, if it is more
conevenient for you to keep track of the changes you did then
I don't see a reason no
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:50:14AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
> I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
> but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
> become a member, and until I become a member I'm not that
> enthusiastic.
It is not true that you can't hel
Hi,
you posted to the debian developers list. Please send questions of
this kind to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org where beginners questions
are welcome (cc is set in this mail).
To answer your question: You have to set the DESTDIR variable when you
install the binaries in the package build dire
===
ii g++2.95.4-7 The GNU C++ compiler.
However, when I try to build my package I get an error on an unsatisfied
build dependency:
% dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is texmacs
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.3.5.0-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source maintainer is Ral
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:36:41PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> dpkg sucks; try apt-cache show g++ and check out the epoch in the
> version field...
Yes. "apt-cache show" reveals that g++ has epoch 2. This solved my problem,
thanks to James and everybody else who replied.
BTW, the upstream author
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:35:01PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> According to the dh_movefiles man page,
>
> dh_install is a much better program that can do everything this
> one can, and more'.
>
> Yet with dh_install I was only able to cp -a files without the addition
> of rm them out of
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:01:04PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
> I recently packaged up KCDLabel, a very nice GUI CD Label creator. IT
> allows for both image and text manipulation, and I find it nice for
> making CD's for friends. From the description field:
In which way is this dif
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 02:32:08PM -0700, justin cunningham wrote:
> So I downloaded his source package orig.tar.gz, .dsc, diff.gz
> i386_changes -- basically all files except the .deb and extracted the
> source, applied the patch and cd into the source tree and ran 'fakeroot
> debuild' and got
>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:41:10PM +, Bruno Barrera C wrote:
> become as new mantainer, but i got a problem that there is no chilean
> debian developers , who could sign my GPG key, and i dont have drive
> card.
> It is possible if I send my Chilean Identify Card, as a way to identify
> me?
H
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote:
> I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
> sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
> facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
> requiring the user to inst
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 08:41:21PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Should changelog.Debian include changes that precede the inclusion
> in Debian ?
I don't think that this is an obligation. However, if it is more
conevenient for you to keep track of the changes you did then
I don't see a reason no
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:50:14AM -0500, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
> I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
> but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
> become a member, and until I become a member I'm not that
> enthusiastic.
It is not true that you can't hel
44 matches
Mail list logo
