"Details about package" page there is a delete option, but no way
to delete earlier versions of the package, (which may be obsolete), without
deleting the whole thing!
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 M
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libswe".
* Package name: libswe
Version : 1.77.00.0003-1
Upstream Author (code): Dieter Koch , Alois Treindl
Upstream Author (autotools package): Paul Elliott
* URL
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "swe-standard-data".
* Package name: swe-standard-data
Version : 3-1
Upstream Author (data): Dieter Koch ,Alois Treindl
Upstream Author (tarball): Paul Elliott
* URL
correct?
I ask these questions, because I have encountered someone who believes
differently.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
On Saturday, November 19, 2011 07:27:14 PM you wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:03:19PM -0600, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Is there any requirement that a shared library be reentrant, if the
> > upstream wrote it that way?
> >
> > Am I correct in my assumption, t
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 03:01:57 AM Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Paul Elliott]
>
> > B
> >
> > > If all linkings are shared, it is my understanding that the global
> > > state of the multiple-linked library would be shared by all
> > > referen
On Monday, November 14, 2011 11:41:40 PM Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Paul Elliott blackpatchpanel.com> writes:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libswe".
>
> I'll do it. There has been a longstanding request for the Swiss Ephemeris
> from users. I
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:18:24 AM Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> Paul Elliott blackpatchpanel.com> writes:
> > Thank You for looking at it.
>
> Sorry, only got a chance to look at over the weekend. Both packages are
> looking good but I do have some questions. Why
Is it OK to have a shared library multi arch with
the corresponding -dev package not multi arch?
The the -dev package contains some utilitiy arch dep executables and
thus can not be made multi arch?
Thank you.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli
What is the official way to add additional -D definitions
to the gcc command line from the debian/rules file?
Is it DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND ?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
ount 2) as true!
What do the Debian experts think?
I always update the debian/libsweX.symbols file for a new
release. In this case it shows no new symbols.
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blv
unter arguments against removing the version number
from the .pc filename?
Thank you for considering this question.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ A
and reciever need to share a privledged port.
What is the official way of getting one of these allocated in
/etc/services?
Thank you.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http
how scarce such ports are.)
>
The reason to make it privileged would be to prevent
spoofing by non-privileged users.
perhaps one of the crpto based authentication strategies, (ssh, ssl)
would be better for the general case. But these are expensive of cpu
cycles.
--
Paul Elliott
I am looking at upgrading my gpg key.
What parameters should I use?
Is there a standard way to get all the people that signed
the old key to sign the new key?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com 3300 Plaza Drive
. The users want to put sbuild back to
the way it was just after sbuild was installed.
What is the proper way to do that?
Thank You for your answers.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com 3300 Plaza Drive, apt 1
http
I was getting a different error complaining
that debfoster does not exist under "testing". BTW why does debfoster fail
to exist under testing?
Any ideas what the problem is with the above error? As far as I can figure
out sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy does not eve
Is there any way to figure out what directory does not exist? (control
member)
Thank You
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Paul Elliott
wrote:
> Ok, I deleted my old sbuild chroot for debian testing.
>
> I then created two sbuild chroot according to the wiki instructions.
>
> For
of work around that will let you
keep working somehow?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX 78758-3117
---
"Encryption works. Pro
F4, F5...)? Did you
> try a previous kernel from the grub boot menu?
I logged in using ctrl-alt-f1. Tried restarting gdm3, then
stopping gdm3, using kdm instead. Did not work.
Stopping the dm, and login as user, and startx did not work.
The previous kernel did not help.
>
> Best,
>
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:56:49AM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Le dimanche 11 mai 2014 à 21:33 -0500, Paul Elliott a écrit :
>
> It happened to me this sunday (got caught by the llvm-3.4 upgrade).
> I carefully downgrade each package recently updated, as logged
> in /var/log/apt/hi
files, which does
to leave unclear subprocess, which is well documented and whose
build-depends dependencies are clear and documented.
What are others experience?
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd
nd the new functionality, how do I find its
include files and how do I link to it?
In my opinion they should not be removing old functionality
without saying exactly where the new functionality is in the same
message!
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-
t;autorm" from testing may sound a bit scary, but it's really just
> a way to make transitions less painful. If a package does get
> removed by this, once a fixed upload is made to unstable, it'll
> migrate back to testing in the usual way. But it's 4 weeks off, so
>
list, probably also have to
use unstable.
So I ask what is a inexpensive video card for a PCI express 16
slot, that works well under unstable with free drivers?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric
update the changelog and the version number
with "dch -i" and import that into git.
Then I will check that I have not broken anything, and that
maitreya still builds and works.
I will then notify my DD about the new package release and the
need for an upload.
I have slowly learned this
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:04:28PM +0100, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:45:19AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Is there any way the removal of maitreya from testing
> > can be delayed until after the new version of sqlite3
> > becomes available in unstable?
&
et the one package that is not in unstable
(libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev) into sbuild's list of packages for a
test build?
Thank you for considering this question.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Bl
is for an idea?
Use /etc/schroot/sbuild/copyfiles
to copy the .dep files into the sbuild chroot
then use --pre-build-commands "dpkg -i my.dep"
on the command line to install the additional packages.
Do you think it would work?
What would go wrong? What should I lookout for?
Thank Y
Because of hard links and other software
smoke and mirrors?
What are the pitfalls?
Thank You.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/ Austin TX
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:25:41AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > ...
>
> Your mail doesn't include which package/data you are talking. It is
> very hard to give you correct advice when we aren't being given the
&
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:55:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> > The new package contains data most people won't want. It is big. 69M
> > But those who need this data, need it. By creating a different package,
>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:22:46PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> > The two sets of data are disjoint.
>
> Your initial mail made it sound like two packages have data in common.
> Since they actually have no data in com
shape for debian.
Package now has no lintian errors, except for lack of PGP
signatures, and that is an upstream problem.
Best wishes to all, and thank you.
--
Paul Elliott 1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com PMB 181, 11900 Metric Blvd Suite J
http
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:39:21PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
your other points appear to be correct, I will work on it.
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:42:36 -0500
> Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Please criticize the package I have been working on
> > https://github.com/pelliott80/si
ght:
> *DEP-5 convention is to use GPL-3+ instead of GPL-3.0+
> *Remove the "<" and ">" signs from the "Source:" field.
> *Include the licensing information for the build files like aclocal.m4,
> configure, m4/* and build-aux/*
> *There are some file
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
