I have no other way to contact him.
What should I do?
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lord, what fools these mortals be!
--- William Shakespeare, "A Midsummer-Night's Dream"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
call both dh_autoreconf and
dh_autotools-dev_updateconfig to copy the latest config.{guess, sub},
or is it enough to set the --build and --host options of configure
with dpkg-architecture?
--
Oohara Yuuma
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:16:30 +0200,
Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Oohara Yuuma writes:
>
> > I am packaging a software which uses autoconf and automake. I will
> > regenerate all autotool files with dh-autoreconf.
> > * The upstream tarball contains auto-generated files. Do I
ing still work?
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
enlightened self-interest
--- Nathanael Nerode, on discussion about the reason to contribute to Debian
gt;
> Or, if your like me and a glutton for punishment, try using
> dpkg-scanpackages and dpkg-scansources by hand.
http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/apt-gettable/apt-gettable/index.html
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP Key http
. Be extremely careful when you configure or
use it. (osh is installed in /usr/sbin/osh and its permission is 4754.
It is not for a normal user.)
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/ooha
tes a command. Be extremely careful when you configure or
use it. (osh is installed in /usr/sbin/osh and its permission is 4754.
It is not for a normal user.)
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra
t this license is not compatible with the GPL. This means that
> you can't redistribute the binary of osh if it is complied with libraries
> licensed under the GPL. The debian package is compiled with libc6 and
> libncurses5, which seem to have no problem to me (Oohara Yuuma), but I
o new upstream
version is available.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I t
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:21:23 +0900,
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > debian/rules says:
> > | # to compile with debugging information:
> > | # $ debuild -e DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="d
f the symlink libshhmsg.so was libshhmsg.so.1.3.4 but
the dependency was not strict enough
Dear sponsor, please upload .orig.tar.gz as well as other files.
.orig.tar.gz has already been removed from unstable.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
P
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:17:17 +0900 (JST),
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My .deb of grandfatherclock is available at:
s/grandfatherclock/shhmsg/
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.int
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:17:17 +0900 (JST),
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed the package name because soname is the right thing.
Sorry, this will break snake4. I have already fixed it.
http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/debian-unofficial/shhmsg_1.3.4.orig.ta
On 17 Jan 2002 18:47:14 +0100,
Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:15:13PM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > > I want to adopt osh (#89433), but I am not a Debian developer.
> > &g
retitle 100228 ITA: grandfatherclock -- a clock that tolls time acoustically
thanks
[forwarding to [EMAIL PROTECTED] because I asked for
a sponsor on it]
I adopt grandfatherclock (#100228). David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
will sponsor me because I am not a Debian developer yet.
--
he control file of the package.
* Optionally, apt-ftparchive can generate the contents file.
If you have root privilege on your web server, debarchiver may be useful.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.o
don't know debian/my_package.files, but dpkg-gencontrol
(or dh_gencontrol) will create debian/files.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A
clisp should be changed to i386 (only) or not.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji
I do something wrong here? I don't think an epoch
is for such a case.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away w
in all lower-case.
The Policy says (in 2.3.1):
| Package names must consist of lower case letters (`a-z'), digits
| (`0-9'), plus (`+') and minus (`-') signs, and periods (`.'). They
| must be at least two characters long and must contain at least one
| lett
o
| the following restrictions and understandings.
It says nothing about modification and redistribution of modified works.
Debian needs to tweak the upstream source for packaging.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohar
um
> and high levels. Does medium corresponds to closing an important bug, a
> serious bug... ?
>
> Does anybody have a link explaining this ?
Subscribe to (high volume) [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Some developers explain why the urgency is medium or high
in the changelog.
--
Oohara
Package: penguineyes-gnome
Version: 0.10-21
Severity: serious
[Cc:ing to debian-mentors because I don't know how to fix this bug.
Yes, I am the maintainer of penguineyes, and I want to prevent penguineyes
from entering woody.]
penguineyes and penguineyes-gnome uses debconf in their preinst:
cas
beat the old high score easily. I don't think
the score file is compatible in a gamer's view.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 02:21:37 +0200,
Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 April 2002 01:19, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > 2) The current version of xsoldier puts its score file in /var/lib/games,
> >which is wrong. According to the FHS, it must be in
&g
g to popcon, so I want to package gpgp again. What version number
should I use (0.4-8?), and where should I upload (main or non-US)?
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B
ata"?
allows any version
-> changelog may be out of date if only "package" is upgraded
depneds on the same version
-> forces the user to download huge "package-data" on each upgrade
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695)
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:58:06 -0400,
christophe barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last time I checked (It was not yesterday), gpa was better than
> seahorse.
I tested gpa 0.4.2-2 and it took more than 1 hour to start.
I don't know about 0.4.3-2.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAI
hem is enough to play the game
* I don't see any reason why each game engine should have
its own copy of image data
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170
the wheel, so migration to seahorse or
gpa will be necessary, perhaps by adding Suggests: gpa | seahorse
to gpgp[2]?
[1]
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Chip/3708/gpgp/gpgp-curr.html
[2]
Recommends: is not dselect-friendly
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian develope
, so SDL version will be better.
> Note: Splitting packages up causes more work, and maintenance
> cost.
Yes, splitting a package sucks, but is it OK a X program package suddenly
changes into a SDL program? If so, I will debianize xsoldier as a single
package.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL P
On Sun, 26 May 2002 03:38:09 +0100,
Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just produced a package for the very simple program "numlockx"
> (http://dforce.sh.cvut.cz/~seli/en/numlockx/)
Ariel Shkedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> already filed ITP (see #146098).
-
On Mon, 27 May 2002 12:16:13 +0100,
Chris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Oohara Yuuma ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I've just produced a package for the very simple program "numlockx"
> > Ariel Shkedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> already filed ITP (see
les may cause a duplicated entry of Conffiles:.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, &
nder the same address
>
> http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/lsix/geyer/debian
It looks fine. I can sponsor you if you want.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C
dpkg compresses the diff file differently every time
I build .deb . The uncompressed .diff is same.
Is this an expected behavior?
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D0
[Cc:ing to Debian JP developer list]
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:53:01 +0900,
Botond Botyanszki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:40:11 +0900 (JST)
> Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://gjiten.sourceforge.net
> > > So I'm
; Unfortunatly not.
userdel clamav || true
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I don't die without living.
--- TREASURE &q
d it. So andrea was
> > probably not the right place to look.)
> Go back to http://buildd.debian.org/ and select 'build log database', or go
> directly to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php.
or http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
De
> 3) If I have to create additional files by the postinstall script how to let
> dpkg know that they belong to package, or do I just have to add some rm's to
> the
> prerm/postrm scripts?
There is no way (yet) to tell dpkg about files that are not in .deb .
Use prerm/postrm.
--
Ooha
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
I prefer libglut3-dev .
--
Ooh
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:34:54 +0200 (CEST),
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > I prefer libglut3-dev .
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libgl
other pseudo package is necessary.
How about the RFS (Request For Sponsor) request type of wnpp?
Bugs against wnpp are not forwarded to -mentors by default,
so it won't be flooded. The submitter may forward the initial
request manually, but you will see it on -mentors anyway,
whether Debian use
ueue without a signed GPG key nowadays.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
Let's cry that we do not have a clue.
--- Junichi Ueka
[Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- see Mail-Followup-To:]
Can anyone check if #168383 (buffer overflow in osh, a setuid root shell)
is exploitable? If it is, we may need a DSA.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp
.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
smile to answer
--- Treasure, "Radiant Silvergun", attitude #3 for SBS-130
--
To UNSUB
library, without hardware
> dependencies or other complications.
shhmsg --- basically this is a printf wrapper
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40
f the high score is saved
If such a game is installed, any other game should not remove
/var/games even if /var/games is empty.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B
ncluding /var/games
in .deb is wrong.
The problem on purge is still unsolved, though.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
smile to an
I do not know, who was that kind person,
> so that I may ask him for being a advocate for me.
Import the Debian keyring, download the .changes of your package,
and verify the signature.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/l
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:09:22 -0500,
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > Import the Debian keyring, download the .changes of your package,
> > and verify the signature.
> You mean whole keyring of Debian? How many megs it is? Where
> should I d
at the perl-base package is intended only to provide for
| exceptional circumstances and the contents may change. In general only
| packages which form part of the base system should declare a dependency
| on perl-base rather than perl.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP
is how to get rid of
> that.
build:
ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU),alpha)
$(MAKE) CFLAGS="something"
else
$(MAKE) CFLAGS="something else"
endif
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.t
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:12:39 -0500,
David Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just packaged a small game, called GAV (GNU Arcade Volleyball).
Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> packaged gav and filed an ITP
on Thu, 13 Feb 2003 22:52:24 -0500. See #180935.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL
you just remove the source tree
The best way is to put source files of foo .deb in a tarball and
use that tarball as the "upstream" source of foo-patched .deb,
unpacking it with debnest. cdbs or dpatch will help you if you
modify the non-Debian part of the source a lot.
--
Oohara Yuum
).
Does uploading to Incoming still work?
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
enlightened self-interest
--- Nathanael Nerode, on disc
gt;
> Or, if your like me and a glutton for punishment, try using
> dpkg-scanpackages and dpkg-scansources by hand.
http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/apt-gettable/apt-gettable/index.html
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP Key http
. Be extremely careful when you configure or
use it. (osh is installed in /usr/sbin/osh and its permission is 4754.
It is not for a normal user.)
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/ooha
tes a command. Be extremely careful when you configure or
use it. (osh is installed in /usr/sbin/osh and its permission is 4754.
It is not for a normal user.)
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra
t this license is not compatible with the GPL. This means that
> you can't redistribute the binary of osh if it is complied with libraries
> licensed under the GPL. The debian package is compiled with libc6 and
> libncurses5, which seem to have no problem to me (Oohara Yuuma), but I
o new upstream
version is available.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:21:23 +0900,
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > debian/rules says:
> > | # to compile with debugging information:
> > | # $ debuild -e DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="d
f the symlink libshhmsg.so was libshhmsg.so.1.3.4 but
the dependency was not strict enough
Dear sponsor, please upload .orig.tar.gz as well as other files.
.orig.tar.gz has already been removed from unstable.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:17:17 +0900 (JST),
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My .deb of grandfatherclock is available at:
s/grandfatherclock/shhmsg/
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.int
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 22:17:17 +0900 (JST),
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I changed the package name because soname is the right thing.
Sorry, this will break snake4. I have already fixed it.
http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/debian-unofficial/shhmsg_1.3.4.orig.ta
if it is unset, and PATH is set to
>"/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11".
I missed "DEB_*" and drew a wrong conclusion, that is, debuild reset
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. It is right to say that
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="debug,nostrip" && debuild
won'
On 17 Jan 2002 18:47:14 +0100,
Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 07:15:13PM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > > I want to adopt osh (#89433), but I am not a Debian developer.
> > &g
er yet.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"
sponsor me.
Now he is checking my packages of osh and shhmsg.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I alw
he control file of the package.
* Optionally, apt-ftparchive can generate the contents file.
If you have root privilege on your web server, debarchiver may be useful.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Graduate-school of Science, Kyoto University
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.o
don't know debian/my_package.files, but dpkg-gencontrol
(or dh_gencontrol) will create debian/files.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
clisp should be changed to i386 (only) or not.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away what I take.
--- Ryuji Akai, "Star away"
I do something wrong here? I don't think an epoch
is for such a case.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I always put away w
lower-case.
The Policy says (in 2.3.1):
| Package names must consist of lower case letters (`a-z'), digits
| (`0-9'), plus (`+') and minus (`-') signs, and periods (`.'). They
| must be at least two characters long and must contain at least one
| lett
the following restrictions and understandings.
It says nothing about modification and redistribution of modified works.
Debian needs to tweak the upstream source for packaging.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohar
um
> and high levels. Does medium corresponds to closing an important bug, a
> serious bug... ?
>
> Does anybody have a link explaining this ?
Subscribe to (high volume) debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org .
Some developers explain why the urgency is medium or high
in the chan
Package: penguineyes-gnome
Version: 0.10-21
Severity: serious
[Cc:ing to debian-mentors because I don't know how to fix this bug.
Yes, I am the maintainer of penguineyes, and I want to prevent penguineyes
from entering woody.]
penguineyes and penguineyes-gnome uses debconf in their preinst:
case
t the old high score easily. I don't think
the score file is compatible in a gamer's view.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002 02:21:37 +0200,
Julien LEMOINE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 25 April 2002 01:19, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > 2) The current version of xsoldier puts its score file in /var/lib/games,
> >which is wrong. According to the FHS, it must be in
&g
g to popcon, so I want to package gpgp again. What version number
should I use (0.4-8?), and where should I upload (main or non-US)?
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B
quot;?
allows any version
-> changelog may be out of date if only "package" is upgraded
depneds on the same version
-> forces the user to download huge "package-data" on each upgrade
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695)
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:58:06 -0400,
christophe barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last time I checked (It was not yesterday), gpa was better than
> seahorse.
I tested gpa 0.4.2-2 and it took more than 1 hour to start.
I don't know about 0.4.3-2.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAI
enough to play the game
* I don't see any reason why each game engine should have
its own copy of image data
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4
the wheel, so migration to seahorse or
gpa will be necessary, perhaps by adding Suggests: gpa | seahorse
to gpgp[2]?
[1]
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Chip/3708/gpgp/gpgp-curr.html
[2]
Recommends: is not dselect-friendly
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian develope
, so SDL version will be better.
> Note: Splitting packages up causes more work, and maintenance
> cost.
Yes, splitting a package sucks, but is it OK a X program package suddenly
changes into a SDL program? If so, I will debianize xsoldier as a single
package.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROT
dpkg compresses the diff file differently every time
I build .deb . The uncompressed .diff is same.
Is this an expected behavior?
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5
27;t have one, If you just want to
see gjiten in Debian, file a RFP bug against wnpp.
* README.ja is broken (mojibake). (This is an upstream bug,
not a packaging problem.)
* I don't sponsor anyone who is not in the NM queue or
who doesn't have a GPG key signed by a Debian develo
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:40:11 +0900 (JST),
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at it. Comments:
One more comment:
* According to language-env, the default LANG for Japanese
environment is ja_JP.eucJP, not ja_JP .
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian develop
[Cc:ing to Debian JP developer list]
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:53:01 +0900,
Botond Botyanszki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:40:11 +0900 (JST)
> Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://gjiten.sourceforge.net
> > > So I'm
; Unfortunatly not.
userdel clamav || true
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
I don't die without living.
--- TREASURE "IKA
. So andrea was
> > probably not the right place to look.)
> Go back to http://buildd.debian.org/ and select 'build log database', or go
> directly to http://buildd.debian.org/build.php.
or http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian d
> 3) If I have to create additional files by the postinstall script how to let
> dpkg know that they belong to package, or do I just have to add some rm's to
> the
> prerm/postrm scripts?
There is no way (yet) to tell dpkg about files that are not in .deb .
Use prerm/postrm.
--
Ooha
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
I prefer libglut3-dev .
--
Ooh
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:34:54 +0200 (CEST),
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > I prefer libglut3-dev .
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libgl
On Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:59:54 -0600,
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 07:14:18AM +0900, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 21:08:18 +0200,
> > Holger Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there a tool that
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002 21:08:18 +0200,
Holger Kubiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a tool that generates the "/debian/dists/"-tree?
debarchiver (or the unpackaged katie)
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.inte
you see the source of zblast.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
Better just encrypt it all in your head :-).
--- Derrick 'd
other pseudo package is necessary.
How about the RFS (Request For Sponsor) request type of wnpp?
Bugs against wnpp are not forwarded to -mentors by default,
so it won't be flooded. The submitter may forward the initial
request manually, but you will see it on -mentors anyway,
whether Debian use
ueue without a signed GPG key nowadays.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp/libra/oohara/pub-key.txt
Key fingerprint = 6142 8D07 9C5B 159B C170 1F4A 40D6 F42E F464 A695
Let's cry that we do not have a clue.
--- Junichi Uekawa, diary 2002/8/17
[Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- see Mail-Followup-To:]
Can anyone check if #168383 (buffer overflow in osh, a setuid root shell)
is exploitable? If it is, we may need a DSA.
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian developer
PGP key (key ID F464A695) http://www.interq.or.jp
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo