-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-04-28 01:02, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 23:59, Mats Erik Andersson
> wrote:
>> This potentially could make fairly many override instances
>> inapplicable for present day packaging, so I hope to hear
>> an initiated v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-05-06 03:35, Andres Mejia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to update my outdated public key signed by one DD (it's a 1024D key).
> I
> already have a new key (4096R key) signed by at least one other DD (not the
> same DD). I've signed my new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-05-10 11:53, Christian Lins wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jchart2d".
>
> * Package name: jchart2d
> Version : 3.2.1-1
> Upstream Author : Achim Westermann
> * URL : http:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-04-13 21:07, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "triggerhappy".
>
> * Package name: triggerhappy
> Version : 0.3.4-2
> Upstream Author : Stefan Tomanek
> * URL :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-05-10 22:51, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
> Dies schrieb Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
>
Hi
>> debian/copyright says it its GPL-3 or any later, but the license header
>> in the source files merely say:
>>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-05-11 00:08, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
> Dies schrieb Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net):
>
>> To say "GPLv3" or "GPLv3 or any later"? (I did not check the tarball for
>> the reasons listed below)
>
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-05-23 04:15, Regid Ichira wrote:
> debian/control of the nut source package has about 7 binary debs,
>
> say A ... G. They are built using cdbs. What should I put in debian/rules in
> order to build only A and B?
> The rules file tha
On 2011-07-07 23:05, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Paul Wise wrote:
>> [...]
>
> I think three things are currently unclear:
>
> - lintian should be run on the .changes file before uploading a
> package to mentors, in order to check both the source and binary
> package (I know I
On 2011-07-08 00:34, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 23:05:03 +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Paul Wise wrote:
>>> It is rare to see an RFS that says "The package appears to be lintian
>>> clean." and the package (especially binary ones) actually be lintian
>>> clean. I
On 2011-07-10 16:45, Peter Bennett wrote:
> Hi Benoît
>
Hi
> I am about to release a new version of jampal, and I have addressed most
> of these issues (see below) in my latest debian build. However I still
> have a couple of questions.
> I am using wheezy/sid x86_64
> This is the lintian report
Hi
On 2011-07-11 23:46, Samuel Lidén Borell wrote:
>
>> Please recheck with lintian, I'm getting a couple of warnings here:
>> W: fribid source: debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
>> W: fribid source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2)
>>
>> Please check debi
On 2011-07-26 22:01, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Kilian Krause wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> * output from lintian -IX --pedantic
>
> Difficulty: 0 (super easy)
>
> (step 0: get the latest code from git)
>
> Step 1: edit debexpo/plugins/lintian.py
>
> Right now, we call lintian like th
On 2011-07-27 10:17, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 08:23:42AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Kilian Krause writes:
>>
>>> [...]
>> Should Lintian's recommendation be changed?
>
> Quite possibly, I'm sure the lintian maintainers would be happy to have
> improved help text. [...]
Hi
I
On 2011-07-30 21:47, Ben Webb wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libstring-tokenizer-perl".
>
> * Package name: libstring-tokenizer-perl
> Version : 0.05-2
> Upstream Author : Stevan Little,
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Stri
On 2011-08-01 10:28, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> «...]
>
> BUT, I would like your opinion about a dpkg-gensymbols concern.
> I uploaded this package [1] to obtain the build log and then modify the
> symbol files depending on the arch
> It seems that the patch generated by dpkg-gensymbols dur
On 2011-07-31 10:06, Martin wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jscribble".
>
> * Package name: jscribble
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : Martin Ueding (me)
> * URL : https://launchpad.net/jscribble
> * License : GPL v2
>
On 2011-07-31 10:06, Martin wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
Hi,
I have reviewed your package and there some issues with it. It may
appear as if I am tearing your package completely apart, but it is
intended as constructive criticism to improve your package.
The package does not close an ITP (Intend To
On 2011-08-02 03:42, Martin Ueding wrote:
> Dear Niels,
>
Hi,
>
>> I have reviewed your package and there some issues with it. It may
>> appear as if I am tearing your package completely apart, but it is
>> intended as constructive criticism to improve your package.
>
> Thank you very much for
On 2011-08-03 11:28, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>> the wmaker package includes some libraries in the upstream source.
>> One of this libraries includes some files (WMaker.h and libMaker.*).
>> This files are not in the source tree now (were removed from the git
>> because they are n
On 2011-08-05 01:01, Rodolphe Pelloux-Prayer wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dfu-programmer".
>
> * Package name: dfu-programmer
>Version : 0.5.4-0.2
>Upstream Author : weston_schm...@alumni.purdue.edu
> * URL : http://dfu-pr
On 2011-08-06 15:31, Christopher Baines wrote:
> [...]
> Thanks, I have now fixed these, issues and uploaded the fixed package.
>
> After finally guessing the correct syntax for the lintian config file
> (~/.lintianrc), I was able to make the -I and --pedantic options
> permanent:
> pedantic = 1
On 2011-08-17 19:58, Paul Elliott wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2011 04:46:30 AM Arno Töll wrote:
>> [...]
>> By the way, dh_install also has a -X option ...
>>
>>-Xitem, --exclude=item
>>Exclude files that contain item anywhere in their filename
>> from being installed.
>
On 2011-08-17 22:19, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I've split roxterm in to three packages:
>
> roxterm-legacy: binaries compiled and linked with GTK2
> roxterm: binaries compiled and linked with GTK3
> roxterm-common: All the other files
>
> roxterm-legacy and roxterm Conflict with each other and both
On 2011-08-18 08:24, Carsten Ringe wrote:
> Dear debian-mentors,
>
Hi
> I'm trying to build a package for s3fs. The package was originally
> built by Loïc Minier and I started with his files in the debian
> directory.
>
> But there are some lintian messages that I'm trying to solve now. This
>
On 2011-08-22 02:34, Wookey wrote:
> I've been packaging a couple of java applications, using javahelper.
> This has all gone very well except that I have a problem getting
> non-class-file resources into the jar files. Both apps are GUI apps.
> terraintool has an 'images' directory and tunnelx has
On 2011-09-23 15:18, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Ole Streicher , 2011-09-23, 15:08:
>> I have the feeling, that lintian is quite lazy about shared libs; at
>> least it does not complain about a missing shlibs file.
>
> Of course it does.
>
dh_makeshlibs generates such a shlibs file for you in your bui
(BCC'ed to mentors as well to avoid duplicate work)
On 2011-10-24 18:59, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear mentors and java packagers,
>
Hi Jakub,
First of thanks for looking at the eclipse plugins, it is greatly
appreciated. :)
I see you have not added yourself to uploaders of this package, despite
own
On 2011-10-25 20:02, Jakub Adam wrote:
> Dear mentors and java packagers,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "libgnujaf-java".
>
> [...]
>
Hi,
> Package is already in Debian, but installed jar archive is missing OSGi
> metadata in its
> manifest that I need there to be able to use this
On 2011-11-05 19:52, Boris Pek wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eiskaltdcpp".
>
> Package was uploaded to m.d.n almost month ago (09 Oct 2011). And nobody
> interested to upload it in Debian. So I make this request.
>
> There are such changes in this updated
On 2011-11-10 08:20, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hi
> I have been trying to split indep operations from the rest on the
> activiz.net package, see:
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/debian-med/trunk/packages/activiz.net/trunk/debian/rules?view=markup
>
> However the -indep rule
On 2011-11-10 10:01, Björn Esser wrote:
> Hi there!
>
Hi,
> I'm just working on packaging. When I build on source into 2 pkgs.
>
> Theese are the two packages:
>
> jailkit -- here go all the c-binaries
> jailkit-common -- here go python-scripts, manpages, other no-arch
>
> After building
On 2011-11-10 10:59, Ole Wolf wrote:
> I've noticed that the lintian check on my mentors uploads are a bit more
> strict than the lintian checks on my PC; for example, lintian on mentors
> catches version numbering intended for debian native packages. I want to
> eliminate such warnings and errors
On 2011-11-10 11:55, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
> On 10.11.2011 10:01, Björn Esser wrote:
>> jailkit -- here go all the c-binaries
>> jailkit-common -- here go python-scripts, manpages, other no-arch
>
> why? Wouldn't it make slightly more sense to put the manpage where the
> corresponding executa
-- scrotwm-0.9.34/debian/changelog 2011-11-09 18:04:29.0 +0100
+++ scrotwm-0.9.34/debian/changelog 2011-11-10 12:37:38.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+scrotwm (0.9.34-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Use buildflags.mk from dpkg-dev to set default buildflags.
+- Enables hardning flags.
+
+
On 2011-11-10 17:08, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:56:57PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the subject suggests I am willing to sponsor the package. :)
>
> I’m glad to hear that!
>
Hi,
>> But
>> before I do; h
On 2011-11-11 11:22, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:13:04PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
Hi
>[...]
>>
>> If you are going to send a patch upstream anyway, you might as well make
>> it possible to insert user *FLAGS after the "upstream flags
On 2011-11-12 01:16, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:19:16AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>>> I’ve also noticed that the makefile snippet exporting the hardening build
>>> flags takes care of enabling optimization and handling
>>> DEB_BUI
On 2011-11-14 06:12, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> trying to pass dpkg-buildglags' settings to an upstream build system
> (http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-med/bwa.git), I found no other way than
> patching their makefile, basically replacing
>
> CFLAGS = -g -Wall -O2
>
> with
>
On 2011-11-21 22:29, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:48:12PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>> Reject Reasons:
>> most: lintian output: 'binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath usr/bin/most
>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu', automatically rejected package.
>> most: If you hav
On 2013-02-20 09:56, Olе Streicher wrote:
> Just override lintian?
>
> Best
>
> Ole
Yes.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51249588.8060...@
On 2013-02-08 08:16, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "awstats". I have problems
> getting in touch with the Debian Developer (Jonas Smedegaard) that
> I've originally worked with. Could someone else update my DM flag as
> per new procedure[1
On 2013-02-22 16:59, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I think I could be convinced to do at least a onetime upload of the package.
>
> Thank you. Let's hope someday I can handle package myself, as before.
>
Indeed.
On 2013-02-23 12:26, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
>> The reason I am asking is that if we do this upload to unstable and
>> later we find an annoying important bug (i.e. severity important), then
>> we can no longer fix it for Wheezy[1].
>
> Looks like there is testing-proposed-updates for that, isn'
On 2013-03-18 18:15, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:17:01PM +0200, Andrii Senkovych wrote:
>> Hello, debian-mentors
>>
>> I'm sorry in advance if this is the wrong list to ask.
>>
>> TL;DR: how to build and upload properly packages that provide
>> both arch=all and arch=any bin
On 2013-04-20 23:56, Nathan Owens wrote:
> Is there a way I can find out who my previous sponsor for my package
> 'dwb' is?
>
>
who-uploads dwb
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
On 2013-05-11 20:32, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-05-11 20:17 +0200, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
>
>> On 11/05/13 20:10, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>> On 2013-05-11 19:50 +0200, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
>>>
Does anyone know why lintian would think that libmpich-dev, which is a
On 2013-06-17 11:59, Thomas Moulard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> So what you need to do is move the building of the documentation into
>> the build-indep debian/rules target (instead of the build target).
>> That way it will not be built and thrown away
On 2013-06-30 18:21, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm having some problems using pdebuild recently. I'm pretty sure this
> command worked before, and I have updated my pbuilder chroot.
>
> I don't have a orig.tar.gz, so I ask it to build a binary package, but I
> get this:
>
> ***
On 2013-07-08 21:04, Tong Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> I'm trying to fix the following issues:
>
> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number
> 0.9.5-2
>
> I don't want to do a NMU because there hasn't
On 2013-09-24 14:38, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> The package that I want to pick up has a status:
>
> "The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian
> Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.4 instead of 3.8.3)".
>
> I never knew the details of Debian Policy before, but did try
On 2013-09-24 14:48, Dominik George wrote:
>> If I can fix all lintian reported issues, it'll be safe to say that I've
>> > bring the package to the last version of Debian Policy, right?
> No. It is safe to say that if, and only if, you bump the
> Standards-Version field to 3.9.4 and *then* have
On 2013-09-24 16:42, Dominik George wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Shadura schrieb:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George wrote:
>>
lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic
>>> lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto
>>
>> Properly reads as -Evil :)
>
> Hi,
>
> please fix your
On 2013-10-07 19:37, Wookey wrote:
> I just packaged caveconverter (a fairly small simple command-line java
> package), which uses ant as a build system.
> (currently in new:
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/caveconverter_0~20130921-2.html )
>
Hi,
> This all worked fine, except that using
> De
On 2013-12-22 03:45, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to adopt the par2cmdline package, but on its QA page,
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/par2cmdline.html
> it says,
>
> ,-
> | "This package is part of the ongoing testing transition known as
> | auto-libunwind. Please avoid uploads unre
On 2013-12-28 16:20, Willi Mann wrote:
> Hello Sergey, Hello Niels,
>
> I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks
> OK to me.
Hi Willi,
Thanks for considering.
> Is there a packaging-related reason why Niels did not upload
> it for you so far?
>
> Bye
> Willi
>
On 2014-01-03 21:28, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the cause (and fix) of the following error?
>
>dpkg-source -b dbab-1.0.1
> dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)':
> version does not contain a revision
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b dbab-1.0.1 g
On 2014-01-05 10:06, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/05/2014 04:55 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> since some days I noticed that a `dch -i` creates an entry with
>> "urgency=medium" instead of "urgency=low". Anybody with the same
>> observation and what might be the reason for this?
>>
>> Kin
On 2014-01-21 19:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Andreas and d-mentors,
> I hope this is the correct list to ask this questions - if not please
> redirect me (and also please CC me in your reply). [debian-mentors in
> CC as well - may be some other people have a similar problem.]
>
Seems l
On 2014-01-22 00:43, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 21/01/14 18:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> However, it is kicked because of an "old libffi" dependency. I realised
>> that it had in fact
>>
>>libffi6 (>= 3.0.4)
>>
>> in its dependencies which was included via
>>
>>${shlibs:Depends} or
>>
On 2014-01-27 20:30, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody have a clue how to fix this C++ issue?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
It is not a C++ issue, but a change in bison you are looking at. I had
a similar issue with mscgen not too long ago[1].
~Niels
[1] http://packages
On 2014-01-27 20:30, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody have a clue how to fix this C++ issue?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
It is not a C++ issue, but a change in bison you are looking at. I had
a similar issue with mscgen not too long ago[1].
~Niels
[1] http://packages
On 2014-01-27 22:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> I guess you want to tell me that I want something like
>
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/mscgen.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/language.y-parse-param.patch;hb=HEAD
>
> applied to maude code. I need to admit that I'm
On 2014-01-27 23:41, Etienne Millon wrote:
> * T o n g [140127 23:37]:
>> $ lintian -EviIL +pedantic --color auto --display-experimental
>> ../*.dsc
>> [...]
>> I.e., when I invoke lintian manually, I didn't see problems reported
>> by debuild.
>
> Hi Tong,
>
> Lintian can check both source p
On 2014-01-30 09:33, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
CC'ing the FTP masters.
> I was trying to move a package (iausofa-c) from main to non-free with a
> new version. In the developers reference [1], the according paragraph is
> 5.9.1:
>
>
>> If you need to change the section for one of your
On 2014-02-09 16:51, Felix Natter wrote:
> hi,
>
> I couldn't find a short version of the "CC-BY-SA-3.0" license.
> -> now I am using this:
>
> Files: ./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.svg
>./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.png
> Copyright: 2013-2014 Robert Gibson
> License: CC-
On 2014-02-09 17:29, Felix Natter wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Niels Thykier writes:
>> There is no "short" version you can use in d/copyright - you have to
>> list the full license of CC-BY-SA-3.0 as it is not in common-licenses.
>> Though, if you have it in a s
On 2014-03-02 12:05, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after I moved one of my packages (iausofa-c) from main to non-free, I
> had for some time the problem that the source still appeared in
> main. This, however, was solved "somehow" without any notice.
>
> However, now I get the migration "excuse"
Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> * Set compatlevel at debian/compat to 10.
>>
>> Is using compat 10 already officially endorsed/allowed?
> The manpage says "This compatibility level is open for beta testing;
> changes may occur."
Gianfranco Costamagna:
> Hi,
>
>> I have uploaded a new package to mentors, with the two outstanding
>
>> issues fixed.
>
> not sure...
> I see you forgot to probably run dh_clean
> (I see debian/autoreconf.before and debian/autoreconf.after files)
>
> [...]
>
> G.
>
That needs a "dh_autor
Jerome BENOIT:
> Hello Forum, is there a list where we can deal on how correct spelling error
> as detected by lintian ?
>
> For the curious. In the source, there is the sentence:
>
> :param int max_no_dec: number of rounds we allow to be stuck
>
>
> and lintian complains as follows:
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:46:32 +0200 Alex Mestiashvili
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: mailatgo...@gmail.com
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> [...]
>
> Best regards,
> Alex
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your contribution.
Have you informed up
J.T. Conklin:
> [...]
>
> A complication is that each platform config package installs the same
> set of files, so the normal package build technique of having all files
> being installed to a common staging directory and each package's files
> being selected by the debian/.install doesn't work.
>
J.T. Conklin:
> My question, in the case where the same organization/people are
> responsible for both the software and the debian packaging, is whether
> there is a preference of which method is used.
>
> --jtc
Hi,
If you are (working on/with) upstream and doing the packaging, I believe
ma
Andreas Tille:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to fix the autopkgtest of njplot. The current code in Git[1] is
> executing:
>
> xvfb-run --auto-servernum --server-num=20 -s '-screen 0 1024x768x24 -ac
> +extension GLX +render' /usr/bin/njplot -psonly example.phb
> X server has no GLX extension - required to
Etienne Dysli-Metref:
> Hello mentors,
>
> Since shibboleth-sp2 2.6.0+dfsg1-4 migrated to testing during the
> holidays, I'm now backporting it to jessie. So far there is nothing to
> change, however piuparts gives me the following error (which does not
> appear on stretch):
>
>> [...]
>
> So I
Etienne Dysli-Metref:
> On 17/01/17 18:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>> E: libshibsp7: postinst-must-call-ldconfig
>>>> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libshibsp.so.7.0.0
>>
>> This lintian error:
>>
>> * is aimed at stretch or later, and
>> * shou
Hilmar Preuße:
> Hi,
>
> we got bug #820984 on debconf a while ago. I'm not very familiar w/
> debconf, hence I had a look into the templates/config delivered w/
> debconf itself.
> I'm my eyes the code in proftpd is about a 1:1 copy of the code in
> debconf, nevertheless it does not work as expec
On 2014-06-25 07:40, Paul Elliott wrote:
> [...]
>
> Therefore, I would like to request additional delay to sometime
> after libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev reaches testing. As matters
> now stand there is no way I can reach the deadline of
> -- maitreya 7.0.5-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 201
On 2014-07-12 09:36, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 12 juillet 2014 05:19 GMT, T o n g :
>
>> Do I need to care about the lintian problems from the binary package that
>> I maintain/build?
>
> Yes, you need to handle at least errors and warnings.
>
>> For the following problems, I have no idea whe
On 2014-10-25 13:00, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc
>
> says:
>
> beast-mcmc/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libnucleotidelikelihoodcore0 (>=
> 1.8.0-1)
>
> but I have asked ftpmaster for removal of beast-mcmc from arch i386 and
> packages.de
On 2015-02-28 16:37, Daniel Stender wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've got the official Python logo image [1] here in a package.
>
> 1) what would be the proper license for that file in deb/copyright?
>
> 2) what's the best place in Debian to ask copyright/licensing related
> questions like this in the
On 2015-04-01 08:06, Werner Detter wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> just a short question - a bug which has already been taken care of for wheezy
> and jessie is
> still listed as RC bug at
> https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/debian/all.html
>
> Package: policyd-weight (debian/main).
> Maintaine
On 2015-06-02 20:10, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> [...]
> If I were the maintainer, I believe that I would have closed a bug like this.
> The actual maintainer however (now emeritus) is smarter than me. He did not
> close it. This suggests that he knew something I do not understand about
> prop
On 2015-06-18 14:55, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> what am I supposed to do for unblocking ?
>
> You started a (minor) transition without involving the release team,
> please read this:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
>
>
On 2015-06-19 02:48, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> On 18/06/15 14:55, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>
>>> what am I supposed to do for unblocking ?
>>
>> You started a (minor) transition without involving the relea
On 2015-06-19 15:21, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hi Again:
>
> On 19/06/15 14:52, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> On 19/06/15 08:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>[...]
>>>
>>> Yes, provided it depends on the correct -dev packages. Though it might
>
On 2015-07-07 14:50, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello Niels and all:
>
> As the last package of ovito, which does not depends on tachyon any more,
> has reached testing, I think that the tachyon package can now migrate to
> testing:
> how can we unblock its migration ?
>
> Thanks,
> Jerome
>
> [..
On 2015-07-15 08:45, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Vincent Cheng writes:
>> There are tools available in the archive to make this entire process
>> relatively painless (dput-ng)
>
> But dcut-ng is not in Debian?
>
> $ apt-get install dcut-ng
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
Ole Streicher:
> Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 08:42:37PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>> * Not touching package due to block request by adsb (check
>>> https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html if update is
>>> needed)
>> https://release.debian.org/britney
Ole Streicher:
> Hi Nils,
>
Hi,
> Niels Thykier writes:
>> Ole Streicher:
>>> Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 08:42:37PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> The package is affected by the same issue that chocolate-doom was in the
&
أحمد المحمودي:
> Hello
>
> The package pcb builds 2 arch. dependent packages (pcb-gtk & pcb-lesstif) and
> an arch independent package (pcb-common) which contains data and
> documentation. Hence the arch. dependent packages depend on this arch
> independent package.
>
> Previously I ran:
> dh
Control: owner -1
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:45:58 -0200 Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "keychain"
>
> * Package name: keychain
>Version : 2.8.4+dfsg-1
>Upstream
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> [...]
Hi,
I have done an initial review of the changes and I have a few remarks.
Please CC me directly on any follow ups to this bug.
>
> Changes since the last upload:
George Shuklin:
> On 05/03/18 14:35, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:08 PM, George Shuklin wrote:
>>
>>> There is a big question with torture me for awhile. Why some purely
>>> declarative operations are performed by non-standard postinst scripts?
>> Probably dpkg doesn't support decla
Mattia Rizzolo:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:25:44AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> since yesterday packages using cmake are failing.
>> Nothing inside libbpp-seq was changed that should affect the build
>> process. I have the same problem with other cmake based packages.
>>
>> Any clue what might
Antonio Russo:
> On 6/22/18 4:17 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>>
>> as promised, and unfortunately delayed a bit longer than I wanted.
>> thanks for the initial push - some of the points are more for a
>> discussion with upstream regarding their inclusion of some variant of
>> this, some are for d
Control: tags -1 moreinfo -pending
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 15:09:00 + itd wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> @Nico: I added myself to Uploaders. Please shout, if that is not what
> you meant in #890995 [1].
>
> [...]
>
> Changes since the last uplo
itd:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the review!
>
> Niels Thykier:
>> # The remark:
> Oops! Fixed, thanks. (Updated Build-Dependency on debhelper.)
>
Ack. :)
>> * Relicense the patches to the same as upstream (requires approval from
>>the previous maintaine
Nicholas D Steeves:
> Hi Ben and readers of debian-mentors,
>
> Solution at bottom.
>
> [...]
>
> "export DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=nodoc ; gbp buildpackage" does not work,
> although I expect "DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=nodoc ; export
> DEB_BUILD_PROFILES ; gbp buildpackage" should.
>
Rather, I think there
Andreas Tille:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to upgrade elastix[1] but I'm running into:
>
>
> ...
> [100%] Built target itkMevisDicomTiffImageIOTest
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/elastix-4.9.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
> /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_start
> /build/elastix-4.9.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gn
101 - 200 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
