Re: RFS: john (adopted and updated package)

Hi David! On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.2-1 of the package "john", > which I'm adopting. This one I have interest in sponsoring :-) I will take a look at it and soon I send you a message. Best reg

Re: RFS: macchanger (adopted package)

Hi David! On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:08 PM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.0-2 of "macchanger", which > I'm adopting. I will look at it. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: RFS: disk-manager

Hi David! On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:55 PM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've prepared a new package to be included in Debian: disk-manager (ITP > #486699 [1]). It's missing some dependencies to build: libxml-parser-perl and python-gtk2 Can you verify this? Thank you! Best regards

Re: RFS: disk-manager

Hi! On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:18 PM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (no need to CC me, thanks!) OK :-) > You can get the updated package at the usual URL: Uploaded. Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: RFS: reportbug-ng (closes RC #496544)

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:41:09 +0100 Serafeim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need sponsorship for a NMU that closes RC bug #496544 of the native > package reportbug-ng. Do I have to ask for a release freeze, or would > that be the sponsor? Shouldn't you give more time for the maintainer?

Re: RFS: libnet (adopted and updated package)

Hi David! On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:08 AM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.2.1-3 > of the package "libnet", which I'm adopting (ITA #483710). I will take a look at it. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: RFS: recoverjpeg (updated package)

Hi! On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:51 AM, William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, any DD can help me to upload? the package is clean and it's > updated to upstreams's new version. I will take a look at it. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: RFS: scrot (updated package)

Hi again! On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:05 AM, William Vera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Mentors, any uploader for scrot? the package is clean I will see this one too :-) Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Re: RFS: libemu

Hi! On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Chris Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libemu". I will take a look at it. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Program source including another program source

Hi! Sorry if the email title is a little confusing, but I couldn't find a better title to explain this. When the source code of a program comes with another program inside, and this program is outdated (this program is also released as a tar.gz file and updated), what is the correct to do? I want

Re:Sponsor required for bbpager

ig.tar.gz) on some place or it won't be possible to see if everything is OK with your package. Good luck! Nelson A. de Oliveira

Renaming the package and other things

Hi! I am maintaining a package called mozilla-firefox-biofox. Both ths source and the binary package have the same name. Biofox was always released only to Mozilla Firefox and the Mozilla Suite was not supported. However, upstream author changed this now. Biofox supports both navigators. I a

Re: Renaming the package and other things

Hi! Christoph Berg wrote: Re: Nelson A. de Oliveira in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I am planning to rename the source package to "biofox" only, > instead mozilla-firefox-biofox. Why? The user won't see the source package name change. It's only extra hassle for

[RFC] mozilla-biofox - Extension to Mozilla/Firefox browsers

Hi! Well, I maintain a package called "mozilla-firefox-biofox". It's on Debian archive, with version 1.0.1. A new upstream version was released (1.1). Biofox used to work only on Firefox (as the name says), however upstream author changed and now it works on Mozilla browser too. Because it was

[RFS] pngquant and pngnq

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I am searching for a sponsor(s) for 2 packages. One is pngquant, already on Debian archive. It was sponsored by Philipp Kern. He will be travelling and won't be possible to upload a new revision of pngquant. This new revision is fixing a lot of mi

Re: cdbs and i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexei Chetroi wrote: > Also I've tried to call debian/rules directly with: "nice fakeroot > debian/rules binary" (previously I've used debuild), but the problem > remains. > > Any other ideas? I'm going to try it on other machine, maybe my > curr

[RFS] OptiPNG - advanced PNG (Portable Network Graphics) optimizer

Hi! I am searching for a sponsor for OptiPNG. OptiPNG is a PNG optimizer that recompresses the image files to a smaller size, without losing any information. It losslessly reduces the bit depth, the color type and the color palette of the image, runs a suite of compression methods and str

Re: [RFS] OptiPNG - advanced PNG (Portable Network Graphics) optimizer

Hi! On 1/27/06, Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060126 17:16]: > > I am searching for a sponsor for OptiPNG. > > > > Files can be obtained from: > > http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/opt

Two packages with different version, from the same source

Hi mentors! I have a doubt. I am creating a package of a Firefox/Mozilla extension. Upstream author reselases two .xpi files, one for Firefox and another for Mozilla. Since they are small, I was wanting to create just one source package (including both .xpi files) and generate two binary packages

Re: Native package or not?

Hi Michal! On 2/12/06, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However I'm not sure whether to create native package or not. For now I > prefer native packages. But several times (I think it was even on this > list) I saw that it might not be good idea, but without any arguments > which would co

Re: Some files in /usr/share/doc/foo stay uncompressed, some are compressed

I answered just for Marc, so forwarding it to the list. Hi Marc! On 2/12/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > exim4-doc-html includes the exim FAQ, which is a bunch of HTML files > and some configuration examples as .txt, in > /usr/share/doc/exim4-doc-html/html. The larger of these .txt fi

Re: Some files in /usr/share/doc/foo stay uncompressed, some are compressed

Hi! On 2/12/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:32:05 -0500, Justin Pryzby > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >So it seems that it shouldn't actually be compressing html files; > > It isn't. The files in question are .txt config file snippets that are > linked from the h

Re: Some files in /usr/share/doc/foo stay uncompressed, some are compressed

Hi Marc! On 2/13/06, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please, don't treat me as a clueless newbie. The package in question > is exim4-doc-html, the documentation for Debian's default MTA. The > fact that I maintain that package should show that I have been around > the block multiple times

Re: has webmin disapeared on Etch/Sid?

Hi! On 2/18/06, Rakotomandimby Mihamina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 13:31 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: > [webmin & webmin-* package] > > Any takers are welcome! even non-debian developers can do it! > > Ok, let's say I'll try to take it. > - Where could I find the latest source

Re: change bug# for ITP bug of WNPP package

Hi! On 4/27/06, Gerber van der Graaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > About one week ago my mentor uploaded my package libgpiv. As I don't > find it yet on the debian repository, I have been looking if the ITP bug > has been closed. This seems not to be the case, yet. The bug will be closed just when

Re: optional building of a package

Hi! On 6/3/06, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On the other hand, it could simply build a probcons-extra package by default, with a clear description saying that it is likely that probcons-extra will not be useful to the persons tempted to install it. My opinion is that it's better t

Re: optional building of a package

On 6/3/06, Franz Pletz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 01:46:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > ambiguous names (convert, makegunplut, project) which will not be useful Please keep in mind that there's already a convert binary in imagemagick, so you should either not install

Re: help with gmail-notify

Hi! On 6/1/06, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lintian keeps complaining I do not list a dependancy on python. But no matter what I put, including python in all its forms it still complians. I was wondering if somebody could comment on my package to see what I am doing wrong. It you h

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

Hi! On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, my question is: Can I release a package that bases on not-released sources? If so, I request for an sponsor. Otherwise, what should I do? Wait? Well... you can. I saw on http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=10646&rel

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

Hi Jörg! On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I saw on http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=10646&release_id=241671 > that it's a release candidate version, right? No. The source is here: http://dev.atmarama.org/xindy-2.2-beta2.tar.gz It's really outside of sour

Re: optional building of a package

Hi! On 6/5/06, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a way to make sure that probcons-extra will depend on the probcons package with the same version as itself? Yes. Just use Depends: probcons (= ${Source-Version}) inside the probcons-extra section. Best regards, Nelson -- To

Re: optional building of a package

Hi! On 6/5/06, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 09:29 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Just use > Depends: probcons (= ${Source-Version}) Please don't use Source-Version - from the dpkg-gencontrol manual: "The source package version (f

[RFS] OptiPNG - advanced PNG (Portable Network Graphics) optimizer

Hi! Could someone, please, verify and upload (if there are no problems) an updated package of OptiPNG, please? It's a new upstream version, fixing one bug and one typo. Also, OptiPNG is already on Debian (kindly sponsored by Florian Ragwitz). Files are all available here: http://biolinux.df.ibi

Re: [RFS] OptiPNG - advanced PNG (Portable Network Graphics) optimizer

Hi On 6/17/06, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But is there a reason for using ';' instead of '.' in changelog lines? When I use ; I try to say that there are more itens after the current one. A period means "it's the end, there isn't anything more below this line". It's something like

[RFS] pngnq - tool for optimizing PNG (Portable Network Graphics) images

Hi! Can someone, please, do an upload of pngnq for me? It's fixing a FTBFS. Files are here: http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/pngnq/ Thank you very much! Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [RFS] OptiPNG - advanced PNG (Portable Network Graphics) optimizer

Hi! On 6/18/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > What have changed: > - foo; > - bar; > - bla; > - the last change. > > It's just a personal taste. It is also how lists should be ha

[RFS] pngcrush - optimizes PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files

Hi! Kapil and I are searching for a sponsor for pngcrush. It's a new upstream release, fixing one bug and some typos on pngcrush manpage. Files are here: http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/pngcrush/ And just one thing, please. Build with -v1.6.2-1 so the changes from version 1.6.3-1 will

Re: Build depends....?

Hi! On 6/23/06, Mihai Felseghi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello dear mentors , please tell me if there is a method of finding the build depends for a piece of software (so i can fill the Build-Depends field of the control file)? I tried to use the script from New Maintainers Guide but it gave

[RFS] pngnq - tool for optimizing PNG (Portable Network Graphics) images

Hi! A new version of pngnq was released and I have updated my package. It's building OK on pbuilder and is lintian and linda clean. Could someone, please, upload it for me? Files are available here: http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/pngnq/ Or the direct links: http://biolinux.df.ibilc

RFS (again): pngnq - tool for optimizing PNG (Portable Network Graphics) images

Hi! One week ago I have sent a message (http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/07/msg00148.html) requesting a sponsor for one package (pngnq), but I got no answers :-( The package is very simple and it's already on Debian. It's OK with pbuilder, linda and lintian. If someone could verify an

Advice with static only library

Hi mentors! I am with one doubt. I have a program that creates some binary files and a static library (no shared library). After talking with the upstream author, he said that his program is very stable and it makes everything that he wants (and he won't modify it to include dynamic libraries, fo

Re: Advice with static only library

Hi! On 7/30/06, Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 09:45:45PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Now the doubt: do I provide the static library only or do I create > shared librarys, as suggested? > A fairly simple approach would be: does anythin

RFS: advanced PNG (Portable Network Graphics) optimizer

Hi mentors! I am searching for a sponsor for OptiPNG. It's an updated package (new upstream release). Linda and lintian clean and builds OK on pbuilder. Files are here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/optipng/optipng_0.5.3-1.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/optipng/o

Help with watch file

Hi mentors! I have one watch file with the following lines: version=3 ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-(.*)\.tar\.gz Doing an uscan --verbose, I get: $ uscan --verbose -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile li

Re: Help with watch file

Hi! On 8/4/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the correct line to get versions from a FTP directory, with > files like > ftp://ftp.genetics.wustl.edu/pub/eddy/software/squid-1.9g.tar.gz? Add "debian uupdate" (without quotes) at the end of the line in the watch file. S

Re: Help with watch file

Hi! On 8/4/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I guess the watch file syntax is correct. Maybe some network > problem at your side or at ftp.genetics.wustl.edu? Consider passive mode on/off ? Yes, it was this. Using "uscan --pasv --verbose" with uscan from Sid and from Sarge i

Re: Help with watch file

Hi! On 8/5/06, Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But why on my system it is not working without --pasv? Everybody else > (that answered) just used "uscan --verbose" and it worked... > Can somebody, please, explain this to me? 2. Your network has a transparent proxy setup. This

Re: RFS: advanced PNG (Portable Network Graphics) optimizer

Hi! On 8/5/06, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 04:57 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > I am searching for a sponsor for OptiPNG. Hmm, I thought you would have a permanent sponsor by now. Florian Ragwitz has been sponsoring OptiPNG for me. But I have

Re: RFS: advanced PNG (Portable Network Graphics) optimizer

Hi! Alexander Schmehl uploaded OptiPNG for me. Thank you all. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug not found: what am I doing wrong?

Hi Charles! On 8/23/06, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am a bit puzzled because the bug 136004 exists... http://bugs.debian.org/136004 Does anybody has an idea of what I am doing wrong? I think that it's because the bug is already archived. Archived bugs can't be modified. At th

Re: Bug not found: what am I doing wrong?

Hi! On 8/24/06, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:26:12PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit : > I think that it's because the bug is already archived. > Archived bugs can't be modified. > > At the top of http://bugs.debian.or

Re: Packing WNPP

Hi Henrique! On 9/19/06, Henrique Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I want to adopt rpl, a newcomer package in WNPP. Must I be a DD the adopt this package? Or I pack it and look for a sponsor? You don't need to be a DD! Everybody can create a package for Debian. But it looks that someone alrea

Doubt about license

Hi mentors! I am creating a package of a program that have several files with: * The contents of this file are subject to the Netscape Public * License Version 1.1 (the "License"); you may not use this file * except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of * the License at http:/

Re: Doubt about license

Hi! On 9/26/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Asking the upstream author about the license of the program, he said > that it's legacy code and the program is licensed under GPL only. He holds the copyright on this code? The full copyright message is: * The contents of this file a

Re: Modifying upstream source

Hi Martin! On 10/21/06, Martin Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a package called pyecm where the upstream distributes a pyecm.py file but in Debian I'd like it to be called pyecm as that's a much better command name (it's being used as a shell script and not a module). If pyecm will be

Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts

Hi! On 11/6/06, Jean-Sebastien Pilon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It might not be the best place to aask this, but I have been seeking for help elsewhere and found no satisfactory resolution to my problem and it is package related ;) debian-user maybe. Any idea how i can fix this ? You can f

Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts

Argh, now I saw your problem! You already have it installed. I don't know how to help on this Sorry :-( Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2 ftpds packages conflicts

Hi (one more time) You can get the source of the package, edit debian/control and remove "Conflicts: ftp-server" and "Provides: ftp-server", rebuild the package and install it. You will need to do this with only one package (vsftpd or pure-ftpd). The problem is that if you want to keep it update

Re: Re: RFS: renrot - a program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Neil! On 11/6/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All of the parts which would be needed for a full upload (.changes, .dsc, .orig.tar.gz, .diff.gz, and .deb) can be downloaded from following site: ftp://andriy.asplinux.com.ua/pub/people/andy/renrot/Debian/ Some small things: Since

Re: RFS: renrot - a program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Andy! On 11/6/06, Andy Shevchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Since the package isn't on Debian, it's good to open an ITP bug (so we > avoid duplicated work and everybody will see that you are working on > this package). And this bug

Re: binary files in diff

Hi! On 11/8/06, Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I need to add a binary file (a png icon) to my package. What is the best way to do this, since the "normal" .diff generation does not support this ? Use uuencode. See http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practi

Re: dropping dependencies for a package

Hi Carlo! On 12/30/06, Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If a new version of a package drops a dependency on a previously required package, should an install-time reminder be given to the user? I don't really want to add debconf clutter for such a trivial matter but it is probably not good

Re: SVN snapshot versioning

Hi! On 1/22/07, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess it depends. If there has been no "stable" release with a version number, then something like 20070112svn is what I would use for I would suggest using 0.0.date [1] snapshots between releases, I would do something 1.1.15~2

Re: Required package in build-deps?

Hi Laurent! On 1/29/07, Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sould I add procps package to the build-deps or is this a problem with buildd? I am not 100% sure, but based on the explanation below, I would say that you need to add procps as a build-dep: cdebootstrap has 3 flavours of c

Re: RFS: pam-keyring (Was Re: Required package in build-deps?)

On 1/29/07, Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Could someone upload the new package for me? Uploaded! Thank you for your work. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: quickplot (updated package)

Hi Muammar! On 2/6/07, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.6-3 of my package "quickplot". On debian/changelog there is: * New upstream release. But actually it isn't a new upstream release, right? (as I can see on [

Re: RFS: quickplot (updated package)

Hi Muammar! On 2/6/07, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The new revision of the package can be found on mentors.debian.net: Uploaded! Thank you for your work. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: RFS: mtpaint

Hi Muammar! On 4/9/07, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mtpaint". I will take a look at it and then I send you an email. Nelson -- bash: ~/bin/program-to-generate-a-random-signature: No such file or directory -- To UNSU

Re: staying in stable but compiling for sid

Hi Kamaraju! On 4/13/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there any other elegant solution? I have heard about chroot, pbuilder etc., Will they be of any help in this scenario? Yep. I would go with pbuilder. ;-) Best regards, Nelson -- bash: ~/bin/program-to-generate-a-ran

Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)

Hi all! On 7/11/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.710-1 of my package "ntfs-3g". It's uploaded. Thank you for your contribution :-) And for the support team of mentors.d.n: The package can be found on mentors.debian.net

Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)

Hi Christoph! On 7/11/07, chaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It annoyed me on the todo list so I fixed it and the RFS template now shows the correct URLs. Please let me know if URL are still not working. Thank you very much for your attention and your work! Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: RFS: wmmemload (updated package)

Hi! On 7/25/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "The upstream homepage can be found at http://www.markstaggs.net/."; Please use the Homepage tag like described in 6.3.4 dev-ref. Developer's reference section 6.3.4 is "Supplementing changelogs with NEWS.Debian files". You mean section 6.2

Re: RFS: wmmemload (updated package)

Hi! On 7/25/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 17:48]: > It's a recommendation. It's not wrong to don't use Homepage on the > package long description. Who sad it's wrong? I just asked wh

Re: RFS: ink (updated package)

Hi! On 7/27/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.1-1 > of my package "ink". Uploaded. Thank you! Best regards, Nelson

Re: RFS: qink

Hi again! On 7/26/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qink". Uploaded too. Best regards, Nelson

Re: RFS: qink

Hi Matvey! On 7/31/07, Sikon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qink". qink is already available on Debian :-) http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/qink.html Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)

Hi Adam! On 8/8/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.710-2 > of my package "ntfs-3g". Uploaded. I don't know if you prefer, but you can contact me directly if you need to have another version/revision of the packages that I h

Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)

Hi! On 8/8/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could your remind me which packages have you sponsored ? >From you it's ink, ntfs-3g, ophcrack and qink :-) Best regards, Nelson

Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)

Hi Adam! On 8/8/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you sponsor my wx2.8 ubuntu sync uploads ? Hum... I am afraid that it is more complex than just maintaining a sync from Ubuntu... :-/ If you could contact other interested people in getting wxdidgets2.8 on Debian, like

Re: RFS: aqualung (updated package)

Hi! On 8/10/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9~beta8-1 > of my package "aqualung". Uploaded too. This can be fixed on the next revision/version: W: aqualung: desktop-entry-invalid-category Application ./usr/share/applicati

Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)

Hi Adam! On 8/10/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.810-1 > of my package "ntfs-3g". There :-) Best regards, Nelson

Re: RFS: libinklevel (updated package)

Hi! On 8/10/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.2-1 > of my package "libinklevel". Uploaded. Best regards, Nelson

Re: RFS: boa (updated package)

Hi! On 8/10/07, Francois-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a bit strange, because the package I've uploaded was actually built > using cowbuilder, and it builds flawlessly using that. (I just retried) It fails here too. The patch below fix this: $ diff -urN debian debian.old/ d

Re: RFS: boa (updated package)

Hi again! On 8/10/07, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/10/07, Francois-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a bit strange, because the package I've uploaded was actually built > > using cowbuilder, and it builds flawle

Re: RFS: boa (updated package)

Hi! On 8/10/07, Francois-Denis Gonthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have reuploaded the package on mendors.debian.net. You don't need these lines on debian/rules. Patches are automagically handled by /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make. diff -urN debian.old/rules debian/rules --- debian.old/rules

Re: RFS: deluge-torrent (updated package)

Hi Adam! On 8/12/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.4.1-1 > of my package "deluge-torrent". The first thing is that your deluge-torrent_0.5.4.1.orig.tar.gz is not the original tarball. It have a modified setup.py and a lot o

Re: RFS: deluge-torrent (updated package)

Hi! On 8/12/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, it has been fixed and re-uploaded. > However, lintian still show a warning about debian/menu. I don't > understand why, please ignore it or fix it by yourself if you understand > what's wrong :) >From /usr/share/doc/menu/m

Re: RFS: qink (updated package)

Hi! On 8/15/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.1-2 > of my package "qink". Uploaded. I hope that you don't mind about this: diff -urN debian/changelog qink-0.3.1/debian/changelog --- debian/changelog2007-08-15 13:19:46

Re: RFS: xawtv (updated package)

Hi! On 8/15/07, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.95.dfsg.1-5 > of my package "xawtv". Uploaded. On your next revision you can verify these lintian messages: I: xawtv: possible-non-posix-code-in-maintainer-script config:15 'test -

Re: RFS: ufiformat

Hi! On 8/16/07, David Given <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ufiformat". I will take a look at it. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: audtty

Hi Chris! On 8/17/07, Chris Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I uploaded the corrected package to mentors.debian.net: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/audtty/audtty_0.1.5a-1.dsc I will review it. Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: RFS: ophcrack (updated package)

Hi! On 8/20/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.4.1~debian-1 > of my package "ophcrack". Uploaded. Best regards, Nelson

Re: RFS: cellwriter

Hi! On 8/21/07, Jonny Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * debian/control has a format for homepage URLs, which is *two* spaces >then "Homepage: http://www.example.com/"; It isn't mandatory to use two spaces followed by Homepage: http://somesite People looking at this will think that it's ne

Re: RFS: cellwriter

Nice to see how I sent the wrong email :-( Hi! On 8/21/07, Michael Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 22:38 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote: > > * debian/control has a format for homepage URLs, which is *two* spaces > >then "Homepage: http://www.example.com/"; > > I can't find

Re: RFS: ntfs-3g (updated package)

On 8/30/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.826-1 > of my package "ntfs-3g". Uploaded. Best regards, Nelson

Re: In-Program documentation

Hi! On 9/4/07, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's a little known requirement that packages continue to work after > > /u/s/doc is removed. So it's not allowed to install required files > > there. You could do (2) or (3) with links *from* u/

Re: In-Program documentation

Hi! On 9/5/07, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Note [78]: The system administrator should be able to delete files in > > /usr/share/doc/ without causing any programs to break. > > Is anywhere said when a program break? Are missing help files (available > via menu entry) a breakage? If

Re: RFS: cellwriter

Hi Michael! On 9/6/07, Michael Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've reuploaded the package with these changes. You are using a different source code than the original one (md5sum of them): abfc4789241a09b14a99f27f7d5c5566 cellwriter-1.0.0.tar.gz d1dad3e165314efe605469e015548820 cellwriter_1

Re: RFS: museek+ (updated package)

Hi! On 9/6/07, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.13+svn.20070906.r740-1 > of my package "museek+". Uploaded. Thank you! Best regards, Nelson

Re: RFS: cellwriter

Hi Michael! On 9/7/07, Michael Levin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, your debian/copyright is basically empty and (maybe) you need to > > review debian/rules. > > Fixed the copyright. The rules file works fine as far as I can tell. I know that it's working, but I only asked because of this l

  1   2   >