Re: RFS: dblatex: long term / current release 0.2.8-3

ot seem to exist. Otherwise it looks in quite good shape and I think I can upload it. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: dblatex: long term / current release 0.2.8-3

Hi On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:12:02 +0100 Andreas Hoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any reason why not to use /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make and including > > dpatch rules direcly? > > Both ways are described as possible

Re: RFS: dblatex: long term / current release 0.2.8-3

> contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dblatex/dblatex_0.2.8-5.dsc Uploaded, thanks for your effort. Next time you want to upload it, please ask directly me with [sponsoring] in subject. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com

Re: RFS: Thousand Parsec packages.

e nice. - "Work in progress.." in changelog? > On of the big things I need to know about are the copyright files. > Upstream doesn't specify any years for Copyright that I can find. Didn't get to copyright files at all for now ;-). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: Thousand Parsec packages.

eparate ITP for each package. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: Thousand Parsec packages.

ere exactly should I be putting that? To setup.py install call. This way you avoid byte compiling modules while installing, which makes no sense as you should not include byte compiled files in package and something (I guess pycentral) deletes them anyway. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com

Re: RFS: Some packages

Hi On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:45:45 +0530 "Kartik Mistry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mpy-svn-stats (new upstream release) > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpy-svn-stats/mpy-svn-stats_0.4.1-1.dsc I use it so I reviewed it and it looks okay, so I will upload. --

Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.

l&state=Needs-Build http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=mips&state=Needs-Build So you can see you are not alone :-). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: failmalloc

ian/rules, eg. "Sample debian/rules that uses debhelper." and the version and major crap at the beginning which does not seem to be used at all. - I don't think that debian/libfailmalloc-dev.dirs is needed. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: failmalloc

Hi On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:35:19 +0900 Hideki Yamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:11:25 +0900 > Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Do you really need to include changed config.sub and config.guess in > > diff? (hint: delete th

Re: ITR: ustr (updated package)

ll to put it in a > prominent place in the RFS. Have you read subject? :-) -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: FTP no more available

build-dep testdisk; > > but receiving the following error log , which means those dependency file > are no more there at the specified address. Maybe you should run 'apt-get update'? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: NMU: gqview -- A simple image viewer using GTK+

MIA. This has resulted in this > package being pulled from testing. Any reasoning why have you chosen this patch and not the one using g_file_set_contents()? (Not that I would prefer either of them, I'm just asking) -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: parcellite

ple dh_installexamples does not have to be there. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gtkvncviewer

iewer I: gtkvncviewer: desktop-entry-contains-encoding-key /usr/share/applications/data/gtkvncviewer.desktop:2 Encoding W: gtkvncviewer: description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly W: gtkvncviewer: spelling-error-in-description GTK GTK+ W: gtkvncviewer: spelling-error-in-description GTK G

Re: RFS: gtkvncviewer

c > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. I sent such a > request last month and got a comment, which I acted upon, but it seems > then the package got forgotten. That would be great if someone could > have a new look at it. Also gtkvncviewer_0.2.2.orig.

Re: rfs: gtkvncviewer

e-for-upstream-changelog usr/share/doc/gtkvncviewer/CHANGELOG W: gtkvncviewer: new-package-should-close-itp-bug -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: rfs: gtkvncviewer

tral I: gtkvncviewer: desktop-entry-contains-encoding-key /usr/share/applications/data/gtkvncviewer.desktop:2 Encoding -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: rfs: gtkvncviewer

on-gconf which is not available in Debian. PS: Also you should choose just one way of modifying sources, doing one change by dpatch and one by direct patching is a bit confusing, but both changes are minor and I guess you will integrate in next upstream version, so it really does not matter. -

Re: rfs: gtkvncviewer

got it; sorry about that. The > python-gconf dependency is not needed in Debian: I made a new package > which doesn't depend on it, installed it in my Debian unstable, and the > program runs just fine, including the feature that uses gconf. > > I uploaded the new package. T

Re: RFS: apt-howto (package update; fixes RG bug 484372)

-3.1.dsc failed -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: python-minimock

ain this package within Python Modules team... Why do you set all these variables in debian/rules which you don't use? Why you can not use simply 'dh install'? You can use 'dh --with python_central binary-indep' in binary-indep (and build-dep on python-central (>

Re: RFS: python-minimock

.3)"), but > alright, done. You should use lintian from unstable for checking packages you want to upload. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: python-minimock 0.8-2

deeper at the package: Please fix debian/copyright, minimock.py is not under Expat license, but: Licensed under the MIT license: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: python-minimock

On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:02:54 +1000 Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:58 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:46:03 +1000 > > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Un

Re: RFS: python-minimock 0.8-2

se the package. Ah okay then. I uploaded the package without DM-Upload-Allowed, if you need it to upload new version, just drop me an email with [sponsoring] somewhere in subject. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Lintian warning messages

- Some of these are > necessary (cache, assets, etc.) and some aren't (test). Can I turn > these off? Yes, add override for these. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: No sponsor found for weeks, what to do now?

new machine readable format, see http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat) -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: phpmyid

er-to-common-license-file-for-gpl (It shows also another problem in your package - mismatch between debian/compat and debhelper build dependency). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: phpmyid

Hi Dne Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:41:43 +0200 Andreas Schildbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > Hello Michal, > > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 22:07 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > > > > - also license information in debian/copyright does not seem to be > > > > s

Re: RFS: mz

.dsc > > I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me. Package uploaded. Just small issue to fix in next upload: - binary-indep doesn't have to do anything if you don't build arch:all package -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: dbconfig-common

the postinst to debconfig-common Have you looked at debconfig-common docs? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: dbconfig-common

Dne Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:44:35 -0500 "Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > 2008/9/17 Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi > > > > Dne Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:29:35 -0500 > > "Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto" <

Re: dbconfig-common

e script > to makeit with dbconfig-common, no more... and honestly, I did'nt know > what mus be the way, you give a solutions Just switch scripts to use dbconfig-common. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: dbconfig-common

case could be more appropriate and it definitely won't get lost so easily. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: cfi (adopted package, 2nd try)

arget - doc-base section Books seems to be more appropriate - why you no longer suggest dvi viewer when package still contains dvi document? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: cfi (adopted package, 2nd try)

Hi Please reply to mentors list. Dne Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:35:20 +0200 "Krzysztof Burghardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > 2008/9/25 Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > - doc-base section Books seems to be more appropriate > > I changed it back, but

Re: Packaging with CMake

Any examples of an invocation of > cmake from debian/rules for build and clean? as i would be quite > interested to see if I am doing it correctly or not. For another example, you can look at gammu package... -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: airoscript

nstall] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/airoscript-2.0.7b1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 Also there are several useless things in debian/rules (configure target, commented out commands, ...). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: debpool - Debian package archive maintenance utility (updated package)

source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 5 - you almost use machine-interpretable debian/copyright[1], why not to switch completely to that format? [1]:http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: debpool - Debian package archive maintenance utility (updated package)

Hi Dne Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:12:35 +0200 "Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:44, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.5 > >> of my package "debpool"

Re: RFS: cuneiform

ebian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cuneiform/cuneiform_0.4.dfsg.1-1.dsc Not Found. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: cuneiform

Dne Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:53:57 +0800 "Paul Wise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> - dget > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cuneiform/cuneiform_0.4.dfsg.1-

Re: RFS: toshset (updated package, ITA)

ration of built-in function ‘exit’ Also do you plan to address #487154? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: debhelper package and excluding config.guess config.sub from diff

rget and copy them in place in build target. This way you will use up to date version and they will not show in diff. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: toshutils (updated package- ITA)

o -mtune=k8 also does not look like a good idea. I think it would be better to drop -mtune from CFLAGS at all. Please include README.source describing what changes you do to the tarball and also about dpatch, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource -- M

Re: RFS: bzr-diffstat

. Other: I think it would be better to install NEWS as changelog using dh_changelog. Having debian directory in upstream and patching is not the best way to go. I think you should remove it from upstream and distribute it in Debian diff. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: bzr-diffstat

Hi Dne Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:07:34 + "David Futcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > On 29/10/2008, Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Lintian -I: > > > > I: bzr-diffstat source: debian-watch-file-is-missing > > I: bzr-di

Re: RFS: winff (updated package)

n winff Manual"? Is there something specific to Debian in the document? debian/control: - I don't know Lazarus thing, but do you really need IDE for compiling? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: lintian complaining about modified files

ring clean phase as removed files are ignored from diff. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gnome-keyring-query

NOME Keyring Can you give reasons for having separate package for single C source? Would not be better to add this to GNOME Keyring package? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: libmetalink

- short description should not start with capital letter - Vcs-Bzr: lp:libmetalink ... is this standard way of specifying bzr repositories? - including README as documentation for users is not useful as it only describes build -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gnome-keyring-query

582 > > Do you think I should file a bug report on the gnome-keyring package in > Debian to see if the maintainer would include this as a patch? I think it is better way to go than introducing new package for this. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

dh_install and dh_installdirs should do the job better and nicer. Anyway most of these dirs do not have to be created (examples) or look simply wrong to me (/etc/default/dhcp-probe) -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

which is not relevant for our users) > > Further, the current contents of README.Debian is a general info and nothing > Debian specific, it should rather be dropped. Right, maybe both files should be simply dropped, because there is no Debian specific information... -- Michal Čih

Re: RFS: exact-image

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exact-image/exact-image_0.6.7-1.dsc Also debian/rules is wrong as configured does not seem to generate config.status. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: dhcp-probe, another try to request with a lot of update

but may be i am wrong ? The test is okay, but why do you invoke debian/rules? If you need config.status to be up to date, just make it a dependency of rule where you need it. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: xli (RC bug fix)

this package for me. Uploaded. However for next time please address following issues: - add debian/README.source describing that you use quilt - update standards - use $(MAKE) in debian/rules instead of directly calling make - all build-indep targets look useless -- Michal Čiha

Re: RFS: crip (fixing RC/important bugs, adopting)

ght-notice W: crip: debian-changelog-line-too-long line 3 -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: crip (fixing RC/important bugs, adopting)

Hi Dne Tue, 2 Dec 2008 01:12:22 -0800 Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:45:11AM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > > Hi > > > > Dne Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:20:33 -0800 > > Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> naps

Re: RFS: crip (fixing RC/important bugs, adopting)

Dne Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:11:07 -0800 Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 11:14:19AM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > [...] > > > > And is there any particular reason why you did not apply patch for > > important bug #457749?

Re: RFS: librcd

o enca, which supports several languages including Russian? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: librcd

kage. - There is no need to include upstream changelog here (dh_installchangelogs should install the upstream one anyway). debian/control: - Library package should include soname in name, eg. librcd0 - Please use current standards version. - Please create better description, especially long on

Re: RFS: giplet

, I doubt it really needs it. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: giplet

for just existence of gtk module. PS: No need to CC me on reply. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: giplet

n you will want to upload next version contact me. You can find some hints here: http://people.debian.org/~nijel/sponsoring/ (notably use [sponsoring] somewhere in subject). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: librcd

Hi Dne Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:29:07 +0300 ivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > I fix all of this bugs, but don't understand what meen > > - Also you could use more of debhelber 7 capabilities... Use see dh(1). PS: No need to CC me on reply. -- Michal Čihař | htt

Re: RFS: tuxcmd

, namely gnome_vfs, unrar_plugin and zip_plugin.". What is problem in actually providing plugins? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: tuxcmd

Dne Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:00:46 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > Hi > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:29:15PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 03:06:00PM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote: > > > Dne Sun, 7 Dec 2008

Re: RFS: tuxcmd

or > having best possible description. > > Is this a good approach to this? Or do you think it's still better to > import also the "free" modules into the upstream source and repackage > the tarball? Just create new package with plugins (if some of them have excess

Re: RFS: tuxcmd

in normal copyright file. In this case I'd stick with 2004-2008 (or whatever range matches all files). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: tuxcmd

Hi Dne Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:52:01 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a): > I reuploaded corrected version with copyright file again to mentors > repository. Uploaded. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Desc

Re: RFS: gtklp (updated package)

rib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtklp/gtklp_1.2.6-1.dsc What is reason for changes in configure.in? I simply do no see reason for removing these parts. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: gtklp (updated package)

iff bigger at no real advantage. > Thanks for the question; I look forward for others :) In debian/copyright, you miss license for include/gettext.h and whole intl directory as well as for couple of files in m4 directory. Maybe also authors for translations should be listed... -- Michal

Re: RFS: cimg (updated package)

maintainer). Also do you have some good reason for NMUing new upstream version? -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: cimg (updated package)

Hi Dne Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:59:37 -0600 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso napsal(a): > 2009/1/21 Michal Čihař : > > You make a NMU without any sign that maintainer has been contacted > > Hm, okay, I'll try to contact Sam and Christophe. Hi Sam and > Christophe! Can I update your c

Re: RFS: scmbug

config.status 7. Source should match the one available on upstream website: $ md5sum SCMBUG_RELEASE_0-26-13.tar.gz scmbug_0.26.13.tar.gz a5c92c23e8c2fa5f67a389e12c04aacd SCMBUG_RELEASE_0-26-13.tar.gz d5645be5bc4a620f8f9db67a11662f0b scmbug_0.26.13.tar.gz -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: sl-modem (updated package)

use --pedantic when checking packages to sponsor, but more like a pointers what to check than like real errors. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: What to do if the original tarball contains a debian subdirectory

orig tarball. How to handle this? Probably safest way is to repackage the tarball without debian directory and ask upstream to change this practice in next versions. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS - enca - charset analyzer

/unstable/text/enca> -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com pgpourhl42SLg.pgp Description: PGP signature

RFS - gammu - mobile phone utility - ITP #180632

.net> PS: python-gammu (ITP #326711) bindings and wammu (ITP #326710) graphical frontend will probably follow soon and I thing it would be better if one sponsor can handle all these. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com pgp7hwkFzLB4s.pgp Description: PGP signature

RFS - wmmp - mpd applet client - ITP #327473

rejected due to missing information about all licenses. I hope I filled in with this upload. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com pgpLX4R2nxr0b.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS - enca - charset analyzer

Hi On Tue 29. 11. 2005 21:34, Christoph Haas wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 19:49, Michal Čihař wrote: > > I've ready new version of enca to upload, but current sponsor > > doesn't have time for this, can somebody look at it and possibly > > further versio

RFS: wammu, python-gammu, gammu - phone managing software

iemens, Alcatel, ... Written using wxGTK. All of them are available in my repository: deb http://debian.cihar.com/ unstable gammu deb-src http://debian.cihar.com/ unstable gammu Or directly if you prefer manual download: http://debian.cihar.com/pool/gammu/ -- Michal Čihař | h

RFS: polld -- Polling demon

Hi all In case discussion in debian-devel doesn't persuade me that this program is useless and there is some better solution, I'm looking for sponsor of this simple demon. ITP : 345977 * Package name: polld Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Michal Čih

RFS: python-bluetooth

en on comments so that this package can enter Debian soon. 1. http://bugs.debian.org/326710 2. http://bugs.debian.org/349705 -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Native package or not?

questions...). What is best practice for packaging own software? Thanks for hints. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Native package or not?

being native. If someone will do a > NMU of it, just making a minor change, they will have to upload the > full package (1 MB), instead just a diff file. Thanks, I didn't realize this. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Looking for sponsors

also some other stuff. There are no sources available and you should file ITP for each package before looking for sponsor. [I'm not DD and can not sponsor you.] -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Making multiple-version Python packages with debhelper?

o > that found in /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debianm/rules, which > exports DH_OPTIONS, and calls a "binary-common" rule with it set to > either "-i" or "-a". I expected there is nicer way to do this, but couldn't find working example, thanks. --

Re: [RFH] Compiling a Gnome app / GTHREAD or XDamage error

tool, libgtk2.0-dev If build system is using it, pkg-config is missing. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: mpdscribble

main deb-src http://debian.cihar.com/ unstable main 1. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/sound/mpdscribble 2. http://debian.cihar.com/pool/main/m/mpdscribble/mpdscribble_0.2.10-1.dsc -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpdscribble

Hi On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 20:09:27 +0200 Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:44:16PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > I'm looking for sponsor to upload new upstream version of mpdscribble. > > It is already in archives [1], but origina

Re: RFS: mpdscribble

On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 20:09:27 +0200 Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:44:16PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > I'm looking for sponsor to upload new upstream version of mpdscribble. > > It is already in archives [1], but origina

RFS: mpdscribble

ob.nl/scribble.html 2. http://packages.debian.org/unstable/sound/mpdscribble 3. http://debian.cihar.com/pool/main/m/mpdscribble/mpdscribble_0.2.10-1.dsc -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: mpdscribble [Uploaded]

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:51:19 +0200 Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:12:19AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > I'm looking for sponsor to upload new upstream version of > > mpdscribble[1]. It is already in archives [2], but original sp

Re: grep / perl

nformation about packages is available at http://packages.debian.org (for grep is http://packages.debian.org/unstable/utils/grep). -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: stardict-english-czech

would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Homepage in debian/control (was: RFS: queuegraph (take two))

bian/control. I always wondered why there is no proper support for Homepage:... -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

RFS: stardict-english-czech

.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature

  1   2   3   >