Hi On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:12:02 +0100 Andreas Hoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any reason why not to use /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make and including > > dpatch rules direcly? > > Both ways are described as possible in the dpatch man page, but yours > looks more elegant. Adapted. Where does clean1 target come from now? I don't see any reason for it. > > I think it is cleaner not to have things like "if [ -f > > debian/lintian.overrides ]" in debian/rules. You know whether there is > > lintian override when you create package. > > My argumentation is as follows: For some releases I need overrides, for > others not. I prefer to change only one location (overrides file > itself) than additionally the rules file. But this seems to be > arguable. Thus changed. It's better to fix reason why you need override than adding one on so,e releases. And one more note - watch file could be simplified to this and use uscan support for sourceforge: http://sf.net/dblatex/dblatex-(.*)\.tar\.bz2 -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
