Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

= 5), autotools-dev, doxygen (>= 1.5.1-1), refblas3-dev, libfftw3-dev, texlive-latex-base, gs, lapack3-dev Clearly, refblas3-dev is provided, so lapack3-dev shouldn't need atlas3-base-dev, right? What am I missing? Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

(Annotation at the end) On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:30:14AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Debian Mentors, > > This is with reference to a package of mine, libitpp, whose latest > version I have packaged and it is available at: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/p

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

w, if apt-get is called faithfully in this order, atlas does not come in. But if it is reordered, the lapack3-dev dependencies are honoured first, and that pulls in atlas3-base, which is the first alternate dependency, and is satisfiable. Now, the question is, where is the reordering

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:49:53AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > See this old log. The apt-get command follows the same order as > specified in the package's Build-Depends: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=octave2.9&ver=1%3A2.9.17-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1195174

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

dev, and not one of them. I don't want atlas3 coming in. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Finding out why a Build-Dependency is fetched.

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:23:49PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Well, I've filed one already with a patch and severity serious! It > does affect common behaviour from earlier though. Let me downgrade it > if it comes to that, or the maintainer objects. OK, the verdict from #

Re: RFS: localizator

ea; here are a few: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course, consider joining the Python Application Team as well. Hope the input is useful. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: localizator

intian -i -I on the changes file, and observe the warnings and advice to correct them. If you go through these steps carefully once, it'll be very easy to do them the next time onwards. I'll check your package again tomorrow, but if someone else (preferably a DD) comes up for checking

Re: RFS: localizator

ail. It doesn't seem to build if I do dpkg-buildpackage;dpkg-buildpackage. Am I doing something wrong? 2. Priority should be `optional', not extra. 3. Please don't use smileys in the description. :-) There may be a few more issues, I'll let a DD suggest these, as I also have s

Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.

and doing a dput/dupload of packages built on them. Would look awesome to stand apart with a mips(el) or s390 upload, when others are doing only source+{i386,amd64}. :-) Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.

(Removing CC to debian-mips, as your last mail got the point across). On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:01:55AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 05/02/2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > lam FTBFSing on mipsel due to a gcc bug: > > http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=lam&ve

Re: List of out-of-date packages on a given architecture.

On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:21:24AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 05/02/2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > (Removing CC to debian-mips, as your last mail got the point across). > > Well, that was on purpose... I know, and that was the right thing. > > > Enjoy 4.3 serie

Re: How uploaded zerofree?

t was Christoph Haas. You can find out by going to your QA page, and putting the mouse over the NEW link: http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Once uploaded, you may wish to use the who-uploads package in devscripts. HTH. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Techno

Re: How uploaded zerofree?

nsor it. (but as I saw now, I forgot to CC > him, so he doesn't get that email, since he wasn't subscribed.). Argh! Yes, I am sorry. The first package on that list, which is yorick-spydr, was uploaded by Christoph. The second one, naturally, says winnie. :-) Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah,

Re: What is the urgency field (in debian/changelog) for?

You give Britney 5 days for a transition attempt. urgency=high: For fixing critical bugs (esp. security). 2 days for transition. Please see: http://www.debian.org/devel/testing HTH. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: BTS Command to get messages to a BUG#

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:40:51PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Mentors, > > Please can you tell me the BTS/PTS command (and the E-Mail) > which I must use to get all messages to a Bug#. If you need an mbox: bts --mbox show HTH. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Ho

Re: foo.diff.gz "difficult to read"

On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:59:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > When I look at a diff.gz, I use "zgrep '^+++ ' foo.diff.gz". If the > > zcat foo.diff.gz | diffstat Just for the record, diffstat foo.diff.gz would do. :-) Kumar -- Kumar App

Re: buildd analog for new maintainters

only Debian developers have access to such machines, and you may have to directo your architecture spcific queries and requests to debian-@lists.debian.org. HTH. Kumar P.S. Please don't recycle threads. -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 03

Re: Query about Debian

bian.org/debian/sid main The entries you want would be: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sid main deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sid main HTH. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please clarify: to bugreport or not bugreport

that most likely points to a serious bug. You can find the documentation of pbuilder here: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/software/pbuilder-doc/pbuilder-doc.html Hope this helps; else please tell me if I have misunderstood something. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please clarify: to bugreport or not bugreport

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:54:41AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/11/2008): > > The most foolproof way of testing whether the package in question > > builds in pbuilder. pbuilder starts with a clean chroot, downloads the > > build

Using pbuilder to test packages with gcc-snapshot

ng gcc-snapshot testing with pbuilder? Either way, I promise to update the wiki page with the solution I get, and will then request the person filing the gcc-snapshot FTBFS bugs to point to that page, if possible. Thanks in advance. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Using pbuilder to test packages with gcc-snapshot

/people.debian.org/~pabs/tmp/pbuilder.tar.gz Thanks, but I really want it to be automated for gcc-snapshot, so the solution you suggest with the original trick on the Wiki works perfectly for me. Thanks for the information. I have updated the Wiki as well. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Using pbuilder to test packages with gcc-snapshot

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:25:16PM +, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:19:38PM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > I was wondering if you could suggest a nice way to use pbuilder to > > test package builds with gcc-snapshot. > > Just a note to point out that sb

goopy package

http://kumar.travisbsd.org/debpackages/ (I have uploaded all files I used to generate the deb package). Thanks a lot. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: python-goopy

visbsd.org/debpackages/ (I have uploaded all files I used to generate the deb package). There are two debs, one is python-goopy, which depends on the other - python2.3-goopy. I'd request a sponsor to look into the packages in her/his free time. Thanks a lot. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna

Re: RFS: python-goopy

2.3 version. Please do verify whether they adhere to the necessary standards. I have uploaded them again to http://kumar.travisbsd.org/debpackages Thanks again. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: python-goopy

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 04:44:24PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > You're only supposed to have a single source package generating the > appropriate binary packages. Then I have done the right thing; I used the same sources to compile modules for python2.3 as well as python2.4. Kumae

Re: RFS: python-goopy

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Kumar Appaiah wrote: > You're not using a *single* source *package* to generate the binary > packages, though. > Note that "multiple binary packages" is territory difficult enough for > the NM guide t

Re: RFS: python-goopy

this or do I write some sed substitution do do it? Thanks, Christoph and Thomas for your patient response. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: python-goopy

On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:29:37PM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:40:35AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > 1.docs: Upstream claims that they have docs, but there aren't > > any. Anyway, the source is well commented. What should I do with the >

Re: RFS: python-goopy

s probably the only thing left, unless you find something else... I have uploaded the packages (again) to http://kumar.travisbsd.org/debpackages Please inform me of any other flaws, and whether this package can become my first contribution to the universal operating system :-) Thanks. Kumar -- Kum

Re: RFS: python-goopy

On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 07:41:45PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > However, I have NOT done anything to the docs, and feel that the docs > aren't neccesary; users are expected to look at the source for > docs. Moreover, the docs in the package are misleading, as has been > pointed

Re: RFS: python-goopy

On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:40:53PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 04:51:51PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > Sorry for going on and on! > > Don't worry. We'll be done complaining about the package soon. ;) I am sure about that! :-) > &

Re: RFS: python-goopy

ooked through the policy, and find that the changes in policy have not affected my package. So, you've helped me remove the last warning lintian gave me. I have synced my packages with the web server, so please look at it if you want to. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: python-goopy

guess they are there now, please check. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Advice on a Python package: HarvestMan

on2.3 version) while installing the other? Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFP: python-harvestman: A multithreaded web crawler

rections as appropriate. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: python-harvestman: A multithreaded web crawler (was RFP!)

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:08:13PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: [snip] Sorry, it should have been RFS! -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: python-harvestman

s almost lintian clean; upstream uses two changelog files, on of which is called Changes.txt, so that causes a warning. Please send in your comments, so that I can improve it. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Des

Re: RFS: python-harvestman

On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:52:00PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > On 2/15/06, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Please send in your comments, so that I can improve it. > > There's a small typo in the README.Debian file: "you can also sue the

Re: RFS: python-harvestman

arning: Non-ASCII character '\xe5' in file /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/HarvestMan/strptime.py on line 81, but no encoding declared; see http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0263.html for details Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: python-harvestman

vestman", to http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs/ Now, the bug I have filed (#352012) calls the package as python-harvestman; what do I do about the bug report? Also, do the mentors need another RFS? Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology M

Re: RFS: python-harvestman

web server has not allowed us to display document directories, hence the trouble. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: python-harvestman

did not give these errors... but it's pbuilder to the rescue, I guess. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: python-harvestman

On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:47:47PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 21:52 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > And, there was a source indentation error in feedparser.py, which I > > noticed while byte compiling. I have corrected that as well. > > I haven'

Re: RFS: python-harvestman

On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:57:31AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > On 2/18/06, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/debpkgs > > As they are built using pdebuild, I guess this would be really all > > right. > > Ok, it

Regarding co-maintaining a package

close it? Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: harvestman - web crawler - needs updation!

know, so that I can correct them as necessary. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: HarvestMan web crawler needs updation!

-python list, and I think it is good enough; though if you find some flaw, do inform me and I shall correct it. I'd request mentors who have time to check upload it into Debian. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai - 600036 pgpMWpIp

Re: RFS: HarvestMan web crawler needs updation!

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 07:51:36PM +1000, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > FYI, the term is 'updating', not 'updation'. Right! The error is regretted. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.a

HarvestMan web crawler - update Python version

ime: http://kumar.travisbsd.org/debpackages/harvestman_1.4.6-4.dsc Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: HarvestMan web crawler - update Python version

he package here, and check and upload it when you have the time: http://kumar.travisbsd.org/debpackages/harvestman_1.4.6-4.dsc Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: libitpp

7-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Kumar Appaiah -- Kumar Appaiah 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai - 600036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: libitpp

On 02/01/07, Daniel Baumann wrote: Kumar Appaiah wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.10.7-1.dsc Please find the new files here; I am having problems with Debian Mentors: http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~ee03b091/Upload/libitpp_3.10.7-1.dsc http://www.ee.iitm.ac

What to do if my package doesn't build on some architecture

hat I should somehow block this architecture now and keep my fingers crossed hoping it gets solved automagically later? How am I to act? Besides, I don't have access to such a machine! Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 60003

Re: What to do if my package doesn't build on some architecture

On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 12:52:29PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > So, check whether upstream can solve it and/or tag the bug 'help' and > send a mail to the relevant porters list. Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I shall act accordingly. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamun

Re: your mail

requirements of the policy and will upload it into Debian on your behalf. See http://mentors.debian.net and browse for details. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Packages + Maintainer e-mail address change

Dear Debian Mentors, Though I don't face this problem now, I may have to do this later. What do I do if I wish to change the e-mail address I use with my Debian packages? Is there an easy way out, or do I orphan my packages and adopt them using my new e-mail address? Thanks. Kumar --

Re: Packages + Maintainer e-mail address change

On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:44:29PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:08:27AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > Dear Debian Mentors, > > > > Though I don't face this problem now, I may have to do this later. > > > > What do I do if

Closing a bug report, late, but elegantly

, or do I add a closes to my next upload (which I should've done long back!)?. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: libitpp (updated package)

be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Kumar Appaiah -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: ITR: libitpp (updated package)

Neil Williams debian.org> writes: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.99.2-1 > > of my package "libitpp". > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/libi/libitpp.html > > When asking for a sponsor, please mention whether the package already > exists in Debian - i.e. whether you have had

Re: ITR: libitpp (updated package)

I promise a more proactive role in the Debian packaging procedure. After all, I am to be "mentored", right? :-) > > > The package is lintian clean. > > > > No, it is not. It is now. Thanks a lot for your inputs. I am sure the package is a lot better now, but pleas

Re: ITR: libitpp (updated package)

On 02/07/07, Kumar Appaiah wrote: I have a new package ready at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc And I just spoke to upstream about this issue. The author has assured me that no feature will be missing if I have have LAPACK, BLAS and FFTW3. This means

Re: ITR: libitpp (updated package)

I actually _did_ this for the 3.10 series, but forgot to do it. *Sigh* I guess I'm just learning how imperfect I am... Thanks for the patient response. Since I am not on my sid machine anymore today, I can't do anything till tomorrow morning. So, will prepare things with the changes you mentio

Re: ITR: libitpp (updated package)

am unable to figure out a way to avoid the old gcc depends (through libg2c0). I think you could at least try a pbuilder run with--with-cblas=gslcblas enabled in your ./configure arguments. I'll do that. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology

Re: ITR: libitpp (updated package)

ebian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc However, I am yet to try it out with GSL. Will give that a shot now, though I feel using GSL just for cblas, that too, when atlas is an optional dependency, is not worth it. Thanks a lot! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, India

Re: ITS: libitpp (updated package)

checked with pbuilder, installed, uninstalled, purged and all is fine. > > Uploading now. Dear Neil, Thanks, not just for the upload, but for the hints which made me become a wiser maintainer! Will you be in a position to sponsor future uploads as well? The package receives updates once every

Re: ITS: libitpp (updated package)

nd this list but feel free to contact me direct if > you want. I'll try to keep you updated when I'm away etc. In any case, since you seem to follow the list, I guess posting to the list is fine. Thanks again! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology

RFS: disksearch

in/d/disksearch/disksearch_1.2.0-1.dsc Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: disksearch

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 01:50:04PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Also, I found the Ubuntu package source, at the site mentioned in the > project's home page, but then, I guess I can still vouch for my > package, since it isn't an official Ubuntu package. Oops. I goof

Re: RFS: disksearch

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 01:26:22PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/disksearch/disksearch_1.2.0-1.dsc OK, some self-made corrections. I now use binary-indep only. Also, I have removed unnecessary commented out lines from debian/rules. T

Re: RFS: disksearch

all your disks to it." Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: disksearch

ell, locate probably does that too!). Also, it's a GTK+ (pygtk) based interface. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai - 600036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ITR: libitpp (updated package)

r the tip. I'll follow it. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RFS: elfrc

e and then access the data in constant time without making the compiler or linker eat loads of memory. Please do send me your comments, if you find something lacking. I shall make the corrections and make a new upload later (tomorrow). Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian

RFS: moe

clarify how you want me to name the package and alter the changelog, should you want me do upload an updated revision to mentors. Needless to say, the package is Lintian (v1.23.32) clean. The debs uploaded have been made with pdebuild. Many thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel,

Re: RFS: moe

On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 04:40:43PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Debian Mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moe". Christoph Haas has sponsored my package. Thanks a lot! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras

List of (un)sponsored packages on Mentors (approximate)

ant. But I have spent quite some time in getting it this far. So, if someone wants to improve it, please do so; I'd be happy. Many thanks to Gurkan Sengun, Christoph Haasand Sune Vuorela to inspire me to write this. Hope it's useful. Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Ho

Re: List of (un)sponsored packages on Mentors (approximate)

7;t think this is meant to be incorporated into the mentors portal as such. It was merely to provide an indication of which packages did get sponsored at least once, and which didn't. Also, I shared the news since people on #debian-mentors also thought it'd be good to provide this info to debian-d

RFS: libitpp (minor update)

bug #434252. Extremely sorry for the carelessness. Please consider uploading the new revision to fix the bug. dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-2.dsc Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600

Re: ITS: libitpp (minor update)

On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 08:14:00PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > I'll sponsor it. Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: ITS: libitpp (minor update)

hat more changes won't be necessary. dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-2.dsc Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ITS: libitpp (minor update)

d > keep the original -1 files but next time, please use 'dch -i' before the > rebuild if you need to update the package on mentors. Accepted. I got the point now. > Uploaded. Many thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Sponsorship guidelines for codehelp - now online.

Great! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: List of (un)sponsored packages on Mentors (approximate)

ptions to check this are available (courtesy this thread). So, don't bother too much; that page is going away in a while! :-) Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: List of (un)sponsored packages on Mentors (approximate)

by the modified script: > http://files.myopera.com/atomo64/files/output.test.html Very nice! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 462, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: pkpgcounter

wondering if someone would be interested in packaging it. It is available at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pkpgcounter/pkpgcounter_2.18-1.dsc It's lintian clean (I guess :-), but if you have suggestions for improving or correcting the package, please do tell me. Thanks! Kumar --

Re: RFS: pkpgcounter

On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:31:16PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > Sponsored. Thanks a lot, Christoph! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: kplayer

yer Priority: optional Section: kde Installed-Size: 2312 Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i386 Version: 1:0.9.4a-2 [snip] Description: media player for KDE KMPlayer is a simple frontend for MPlayer/Xine/ffmpeg/ffserver/VDR. [snip] Is it different?

Creating /usr/bin/ entries to scripts the right way

then copy it and set the permissions for it using install? Or is there a more elegant way of getting over this? Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: kplayer

_ playing spoilsport), so it's great that you have packaged it. All the best in finding a sponsor! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Creating /usr/bin/ entries to scripts the right way

, if I run a wrapper installer they provide, and I don't do that. Or should I just create such a file of that type using dpatch? That way, I keep the diff clean. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc

Re: Creating /usr/bin/ entries to scripts the right way

make another upload with Python 2.5 as current. Is that correct? Thanks! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Creating /usr/bin/ entries to scripts the right way

On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:35AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > echo -e "#!/bin/sh\nexec /usr/bin/python2.4 \ > /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/HarvestMan/harvestman.py \"[EMAIL > PROTECTED]"" > harvestman OK, so it's actually this: echo -

RFS: harvestman (updated package)

e wondering what has suddenly rekindled my interest in the package. It's just that upstream is developing a new version, and I wanted to see what shape the package is in well before the next upstream release. -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai

Re: RFS: harvestman (updated package)

man.1 - escape hyphen ("\-") in line 116, 122, 126, 890, 921 Done. Since a version bump is not necessary, please find the updated package here: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/harvestman/harvestman_1.4.6-4.dsc And thanks a lot for the quick response and sugge

Re: RFS: harvestman (updated package) - uploaded

On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:13:18PM +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: > thanks Thanks from me too! :-) Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: harvestman (updated package)

t; > Because Python itself provides a XML implementation, in this case > /usr/lib/python2.4/xml/parsers/expat.py. That I realized after a relook. I guess performance is the criterion for this choice, after reading up a bit. Thanks for the suggestion! Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, J

  1   2   >