On (26/09/06 09:35), Luca bedogni wrote:
> Il giorno Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:07:59 +0100
> James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > On (23/09/06 13:36), Luca bedogni wrote:
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "webcam-server".
> >
&
an important linda warning
W: blacs1-pvm; The library libblacs is not in a shlibs file.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
-clause BSD
> license also used by GHC.
>
> Daan, I tried to find the specific licencing terms of DData but could
> only find two emails [1,2] in which is stated that you have a specific
> BSD-style licence for DData:
Hi Arjan,
Has there been any progress on this issue?
James
--
On (21/09/06 15:55), Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 14:01, James Westby wrote:
>
> > Not the tarball that I downloaded. It only contained a .tar.gz. I see it
> > is fixed in this version though. Thanks for that.
>
> Anybody to sponsor it? Please. :-
On (28/09/06 02:20), Arjan Oosting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hereby renew my request for sponsorship.
>
> I have update the package after some remarks of James Westby and
> Stephane Bortzmeyer and hope that someone is willing to upload it,
>
> * Package name: frown
The p
hould
be ready for sponsoring.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (19/09/06 19:30), Philipp Benner wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:46:35 +0100
> James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
Can I suggest to metion that you have uploaded a new version if you do
when you reply to comments, and mention the URL as well, it makes it
On (27/09/06 23:50), holoturoide wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:57:58 +0100, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On (25/09/06 19:01), holoturoide wrote:
> >> Dear mentors,
> >>
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.6
toppers, so I believe the package is ready
to be sponsored.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drapes/drapes_0.4.97-3.dsc
>
You have lots of lintain warnings of the form
I: drapes source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
If you fix these I think the package will be ready for sponsoring.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http
On (29/09/06 22:13), Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On 9/26/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Please drop the use of ${Source-Version}, see
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/09/msg00228.html
>
> I read
On (30/09/06 23:12), Daniel Baumann wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> > The only changes I would make would be to add a watch file and to change
> > "License" to "License and Copyright" in debian/copyright.
>
> Since Tobias is also the upstream author,
han "make" in debian/rules.
* You have given a different license to debian/rules from that you
state the packaging is under in debian/copyright.
The package looks good apart from these though.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
the stuff Copyright this guy as
you say it is not needed.
* Remove the blank line from debian/docs.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRI
es a few
I: vbuf: hyphen-used-as-minus-sign usr/share/man/man1/vbuf.1.gz:66
that you might like to fix.
The binary packages look good though.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)T
On (01/10/06 11:09), Philipp Benner wrote:
> The new package has been uploaded:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cunit/
Hi,
Looks good to me, I believe it is ready for sponsoring.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
s
dpkg-source: error: file otserv_0.5.0.orig.tar.gz has size 1005244
instead of expected 935205
Can you please correct this?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/ni
On (26/09/06 22:08), Henrique Haas wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:20:15 +0100, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/trueprint/trueprint_5.3-4.dsc
Hi,
The package looks good to me now, I think it is ready for sponsoring.
Jam
On (01/10/06 13:18), Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> On Sunday 30 October 2006 19:43, James Westby wrote:
>
> > I have found just one more problem, lintian says
> >
> > I: uzbek.wordlist source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
> > dictionaries-common-dev
> > N:
&
S_ARGS = -V in debian/rules seems a little tight.
Are you sure you want this?
* Please add a watch file.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To
n-support is not the usual way of using it, it
looks more like python-central from the control file.
* You should register the documentation with doc-base.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>
On (01/10/06 18:28), Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> > Hi, I cannot sponsor, but I have a few comments.
> >
> > * You shouldn't use ${Source-Version} in debian/control any more
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/09/msg00228.html
On (01/10/06 18:34), Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> > Have you contacted formorer to see if he will sponsor this version as
> > well?
>
> Roberto C. Sanchez was sponsoring the first version of this package as part of
> his NM proccess. Alexander Wirt o
On (01/10/06 18:56), Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
> James Westby wrote:
> >
> > See
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383040
> >
> > for an example bug that is the fault of using this field.
>
> The bug is about using ${So
On (26/09/06 12:09), Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0-1
> of my package "page-crunch".
>
Uploaded.
(Nothing to do with me, but I wanted to keep the list up to date).
James
--
James Westby -
the maintainer is
"Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
Hope this helps,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pond. The
cynical view would be that it was also the best way to get a response.
I appreciate how hard it is to want to contribute but be held back by
something, and I hope that you manage to get this sorted.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
s
ackages that repack a .tar.bz2 and don't document it.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ckage build-depend on it? Does the package get
installed?
I wont explaina chroot to you, as I will assume you know what one is,
but if you don't I suggest you go and look it up, that knowledge is
crucial to understand some things about pbuilder?
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13
r method of handling them though that some packages
use, where the files are updated as required, but they do not appear in
the diff.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - sec
e all the databases are
on the system?
I may have some of this wrong, apologies in that case.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XT_DIR} is empty? Some obvious things to rule
out.
1) /usr/bin/php-config --extension-dir produces no output
2) It produces output on stderr (I believe this wont be caught.
3) The value is overriden by the environment.
I hope this helps, but if not someone with more make skills might be
able to
On (24/11/06 22:27), Joachim Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> James Westby wrote:
> > There is a cleaner method of handling them though that some packages
> > use, where the files are updated as required, but they do not appear in
> > the diff.
>
> can you explain the pr
On (25/11/06 06:30), Andreas K. Foerster wrote:
> Am Freitag, dem 24. Nov 2006 schrieb James Westby:
> > No, don't delete them, they are there for a reason, please read
> > /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
> > where it is explained.
>
> Now I'm r
o news from the current maintainer.
>
Does this mean that you are not the maintainer of bmpx? You are not
listed as the maintainer on the PTS.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0
cowbuilder chroot, so I guess that mpb doesn't have
the same dependencies, but it might be worth an email to the maintainer
confirming that they meant to do this. (Note that I wont be doing this
myself).
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
t is included why do you just talk about a frontend in the
description, and not about the tool itself?
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
On (29/11/06 22:05), José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> El mié, 29-11-2006 a las 20:18 +0000, James Westby escribió:
> > This should really be an answer to the ITP, but I am posting here for
> > expediancy reasons.
> >
> I guess you're refering to the I
listbugs list
IIRC). I'm also not sure if it can do multiple packages at once.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
ITP bug closed. This package spent quite a long
time packaged but not uploaded, but has been available publically. If a
potential sponsor would prefer a different arrangement please let me
know.
Kind regards
James Westby
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestb
ding on this subject.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Once you got
> that, feel free to ask again.
>
The original request should have stated that this is an NMU with
permission. See #405445.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0
le other 3 clauses) BSD license. So maybe we do not need to
> care.
If poco has parts GPL and parts 4-BSD then you have the problem without
even getting OpenSSL involved.
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A
ays I have more ideas than time.
My premise for most of this email has been that it has been repetition
that has sparked off this thread, but I also think there are other
things going on here that I haven't highlighted, and don't have the
quick fixes that I have mentioned.
Thanks for reading,
Hi,
I am resending this request as I have had no response yet.
I saw recently that the package may be rejected if the changed-by date
is too old in the upload. If the date seems like that might apply I
would of course be happy to update it.
Thanks,
James
On (07/01/07 17:57), James Westby
ation though.
You can add as much Makefile madness to this as you like to generate the
targets that you need, but the basic idea should work.
Note that I have never packaged a package like this, so you might hit a
snag with this method, if so I suggest you look at other examples.
Thanks,
James
some way to
try and achieve it, and if it happens regularly it will get very ugly.
Also if only a minority of programs are going to link to the secondary
library you can reduce dependencies by splitting it out. This would also
help in any transitions that you have to do.
Thanks,
James
--
kaging should be considered carefully, but .ds standing for Debian
source is a common choice for suffix.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
-
On (09/03/07 23:50), James Westby wrote:
> On (09/03/07 23:54), Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > How do I invoke dpkg-source to create the .orig.tar.gz file?
> >
>
> I would say that you don't need dpkg-source to, tar + gzip should work
> just fine.
>
> Most (all?)
right to modify the code.
> Furthermore, permission to include the code is not permission to modify it
> nor
> sell it in another software.
There's an RMD160 implementation in libgcrypt under the LGPL, could that
be used instead?
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B57
robably a bug. Some
dependencies are hard to specify in a pleasant way though, so it might
get a little ugly.
I hope this helps,
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - se
t, I'm considering dropping all the debconf magic, converting the
> current script with a config-setup helper. I expect this would faciliate
> upgrades, but I'm still a bit undecided.
>
Could you tell me what config-setup is please?
Apologies if I looked too little and got
v/null`" ];
> then update-menus; fi
That should be $1 (or is it $2?) in the first set of quotes. Whatever is
writing this out is probably a shell or perl script that isn't escaping
it. I don't have internet access to check your script now though.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westb
On (19/04/07 23:01), Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 18:09]:
> > libapache-mod-php4 depends on apache-common, which in turn depends on
> > apache, so that works ok.
>
> I do not see that:
>
> $ apt-cache show apache-
) just remove -arch or -indep and use eg
> binary:. Since your install script seems to be installing just perl
> and shell scripts, this shouldn't be a problem.
>
Policy dictates that you must keep an empty target.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-debianrules
r way of working, so I am not sure how it will suit
you.
Thanks,
James
--
James Westby --GPG Key ID: B577FE13-- http://jameswestby.net/
seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:23 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> > All'incirca Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:23:54 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sembrerebbe aver scritto:
> >
> >> You just need to make the package accomplish the Debian policy, t
Hi all,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the new version of seccure. This new
version makes use of gcrypt's secure memory, so we can drop the patch
that disables memory locking.
You can find the updated packages at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~jamesw/packages/seccure-0.4/seccure_0.4-1.dsc
Thanks,
101 - 158 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
