Hello,
>>> Maybe I don't understand. The version of xpdf I'm proposing is no
>>> longer dependent on poppler. So why are you talking about
>>> poppler?
>>
Probably I don't get it either, but there is the EmbeddedCodeCopies repository,
where you can list such "exceptions" just in case
https://w
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcptun"
first you need to fix golang-github-xtaci-smux and remove moreinfo tag
G.
control: close -1
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-xtaci-smux".
>Previous upload was rejected by ftpmaster, with following comment:
both done, the kcptun was missing an "help2man" build dependency.
(attached the new debian directory, not sure if I dcutted in time the p
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "genwqe-user"
Hello,
>since I'm using arpwatch and it has been orphaned for a while now, I am
>thinking about adopting this package. I've started picking a few
>easy enough bugs in the BTS and fixed them. Before I'm ready to
>officially declare my intent I wanted some advice in particular on
>supplying system
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-zxcvbn":
here we are:
+python-zxcvbn (4.4.14-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New maintainer (Closes: #855638)
+
^^ remove this newline
+ * Fixed change upstream source to the active fork (Closes:
Hello,
>yesterday I upgraded pbuilder from jessie-backports on a Jessie machine:
>
>$ grep pbuilder /var/log/dpkg.log | grep " installed"
>2017-03-16 11:02:36 status installed pbuilder:all 0.228.5~bpo8+1
>2017-03-27 09:22:52 status installed pbuilder:all 0.228.6~bpo8+1
>Since then I get for any
Hello,
sorry for not doing this earlier, but life happened, some
showstoppers were preventing me from uploading them and somebody else
sponsored it.
(and new packages can't go in Stretch, so during freeze there is no real hurry
to upload them)
However (even if I didn't upload the package), I wou
Hello,
>> 3.22.9-1 is a whole new upstream release, with changes that actively break
>> unrelated packages. As you just mentioned, it does at least require themes
>> to be updated, and, as usual for GTK 3 new releases, probably a bunch of
>> gtk-3 using programs as well.
>
>That's not usual for
Hello again!
>I don't understand this change
the previous entry is UNRELEASED, just remove
it
something like
[ yourname ]
* fixed a
* new release b
* fixed b
[ the other developer ]
* changed VCS stuff (keep the message entry)
-- signature
>I compiled the new version of the porting, what e
Hello,
>thank you so much Gianfranco for your response and the advice
nice to see the package improving fast :)
while you get accepted to the team, lets see:
compat level 10 means debhelper >=10 :)
(or well, 9.something, but 10 is easier to remember)
+- Added new Python3 package port
+-
Hello,
>
>I've made final changes you've told me and sent the request to the DPM team!
>If there are other problems in the package, let me know.
really better now :)
maybe you can put some spaces (3) on changelog line 8 to put "and" under
"update" word, but this is really a nitpick
so, when y
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osmose-emulator"
> * Update to debhelper 10
> * debian/osmose-emulator.desktop:
>- Added keywords and changed category
> * debian/watch:
>- Fixed github hyperlink
none of them seems suitable f
Hello,
- $(INSTALL) -m 555 -o bin -g bin arpwatch $(DESTDIR)$(BINDEST)
+ $(INSTALL) -Dm 555 -o bin -g bin arpwatch $(DESTDIR)$(BINDEST)
this should work too (as said above) and is less invasive :)
G.
Hello,
The reason for not using a "dirs" file is that in general the upstream build
system should
work "alone", without external helping from our side.
This patch is upstreamable, and fixes the issue for other distros out there.
Having such custom hacks in debian packaging hides the problem, an
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package “gnss-sdr":
your package looks good, unfortunately we are during freeze, so I would say we
should
upload in experimental and then in unstable once Stretch is released.
How do you feel about that?
also, som
le, so a new line with "add x, y to build-dependencies because of foo/bar"
would be nice indeed.
Please ping when you have a new package ready
(I see you cc'd Iain, so in case feel free to sponsor the package or require
more/less changes from him :) )
G.
El 7 abr 2017, a las 1
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fortune-zh"
(Reading database ... 15451 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack /tmp/fortunes-zh_2.2_all.deb ...
Unpacking fortunes-zh (2.2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/
Hello,
>Oops, the file '/usr/games/fortune-zh' is moved from "fortune-zh" to
>"fortunes-zh".
>Should I add conflict: fortune-zh (<= 2.1) for binary package
>fortunes-zh to fix this?
https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransitionG.
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hello,
>I did the patch myself.
do you really need to patch:
Makefile.in.in
and add a new config.rpath file?
also, please drop the last part of the patch:
@@ -443,4 +443,4 @@
;(new-figure "Ma figure")
;(define a (Numeric "a" 'free 0 0 1))
-;(define p (Point "o" 'inter
Hello,
>Secondly, testing-proposed-updates is highly inconvenient for the
>release team. It requires manual intervention and slows everything
>down. So we shouldn't upload to unstable unless we *expect* it to be
>unblocked.
also, TPU means that semi-automatic bug reports (e.g. piuparts, ftbfs
Hello Lucas
Can you please fix your script? :)
rmadison -u debian snap-aligner
snap-aligner | 1.0~beta.18+dfsg-1 | testing| source, amd64, arm64,
mips64el, ppc64el
snap-aligner | 1.0~beta.18+dfsg-1 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64,
mips64el, ppc64el
snap-aligner | 1.0~beta.18+dfs
Hello Roger,
>Targeting t-p-u need pre-approval from release team, while targeting
>unstable doesn't.
>
true
>I didn't targeting t-p-u. What I meant was if:
>- my upload to unstable don't get unblock permission from release
>team
>- the original version of this package in stretch get a new RC ne
Hi,
>> 3. In case of darcs package, debcheckout tried to download source code from
>> Darcs repository.
>> (anonscm.debian.org/cgi-bin/darcsweb.cgi)
>> But, that failed. Because, the project doesn’t exist in the repository. Is
>> this working well?
>
>If it failed, probably the answer is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I would like to request a sponsor for this package [1] already packaged on
mentors.
The patches from two DDs fixes two RC bugs.
cheers,
Gianfranco
[1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/kaya
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-me
Hi Vincent, Julian, Jordi and debian-mentors,
unfortunately this morning on irc Julian Taylor pointed out that this release
breaks tcl/tk 8.6 underlinking
Seems that the upload of -15.1 was not completely correct
5.8.0-15.1
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Look for TCL and TK in the multi-arch
Ops, ubuntu folks were slightly faster than me
here the debdiff
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/179006161/vtk_5.8.0-17.3_5.8.0-17.3ubuntu1.diff.gz
cheers,
Gianfranco
Il Lunedì 30 Giugno 2014 17:13, Gianfranco Costamagna
ha scritto:
>
>
>Hi Vincent, Julian, Jordi and debia
Hi tobias, I'm ccing debian-legal for the license issue
>(Please note, I just can review, but I can't sponsor you.)
thanks for the review, it was highly appreciated
>d/control:
>- XSBC-Original-Maintainer is ubuntu specific, please remove.
already removed a while ago
>- The versioned depen
Hi again, according to
https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus/issues/69#issuecomment-48609594
there is no more license issues.
For this reason I put a unicode.LICENSE file into debian directory, and
documented this on the copyright file.
thanks for reading,
Gianfranco
--
To U
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binwalk"
* Package name : binwalk
Version : 2.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Craig Heffner
* URL : https://github.com/devttys0/binwalk
* License : Expat
Hi Pabs,
> Il Giovedì 14 Agosto 2014 5:39, Paul Wise ha scritto:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binwalk"
>
> binwalk is already in Debian and is maintained by some
> Il Giovedì 14 Agosto 2014 9:20, Paul Wise ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 08:08 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
>> The maintainer didn't answer for more than one month (cc'd again),
>> however, he publicly stated that he is looking for a c
Hi Vincent,
> Il Martedì 19 Agosto 2014 11:09, Vincent Cheng ha scritto:
> > Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>>
>&g
lp2man binwalk --version-string=v2.0.1 > binwalk.1
should I file a bug there?
Sorry but I don't feel good in fixing automatically created files... do you
have any advice for this?
Still many thanks for the review, I'm attaching the patch I just added on
mentors for your convenience
Hi again Andrey,
> Il Lunedì 25 Agosto 2014 6:47, Andrey Rahmatullin ha
> scritto:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:26:47AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> > At least some of the d can be made r, such as mtd-utils.
>> I don't fully agree (I don't
>Hi Łukasz, Gianfranco,
hi Tobi!
>I've just got 30 minutes for a short review...
really appreciated :)
-> d/patches: the patches need a dep3-header and needs to
ack, changed
-> d/changelog should be just "Initial Release."
ok
-> d/control VCS-Browser does not work (404)
-> d/control VCS-
Hi al
> Il Mercoledì 27 Agosto 2014 9:24, Mathieu Malaterre ha
> scritto:
> > Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Tobias Frost wrote:
>
>> Malat, this is great, but could you also drop a note to the BTS if you
>> are doing that to avoid double work, especially if there is activiy and
onfigure-indep target... (I cant
> test because I'm not near my PC right now)
>
I didn't see dh_auto_configure-indep target, so I tweaked the rules in this way
debdiff lucene++_3.0.6-2.dsc lucene++_3.0.6-1.dsc
diff -Nru lucene++-3.0.6/debian/changelog lucene++-3.0.6/debian/changelog
-
++ (3.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
-
- * Update copyright file.
- * move doxygen to Build-Depends-Indep.
-
- -- Gianfranco Costamagna Tue, 26 Aug 2014
11:36:24 +0200
-
lucene++ (3.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #750148).
diff -Nru lucene++-3.0.6/debian/liblucene
Hi Tobias
> Il Domenica 31 Agosto 2014 14:15, Tobias Frost ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 08:23 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> Hi Tobias, sorry for top posting, I'm on vac and mobile :-)
>>
>> The reason for the VCS not created is that I'm
can wait for upstreams' reaction, but we can also go on; just decide and
>
> let me know.
Would be nice to go on, in this way ftpmaster can look at the package, since
the freeze is approaching ;)
As soon as the package is accepted I'll take care of ask for a new release,
fixing a
Il Mercoledì 3 Settembre 2014 8:24, Tobias Frost ha scritto:
>
>
>On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 11:01 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>
>> > Il Lunedì 1 Settembre 2014 15:42, Tobias Frost ha scritto:
>> > >> Hi Tobias
>> >>
>> >
lib2.patch
-use-local-scans-dir.patch
-remove-unused-js-scripts.patch
* Add install-changelog-once.patch, avoiding double
changelog installation.
* Patch refresh.
* Change rules file, dropping workarounds not needed anymore.
-- Gianfranco Costamagna Tue, 02 Sep 2014
15:4
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "amap"
* Package name: amap
Version: 5.4+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : 2003-2005 van Hauser and DJ RevMoon
* URL: http://www.thc.org/thc-amap/
* License: GPL-
>
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> Well, amap has been previously been removed from Debian due to licesnse
> reasons. (Please see #346313) You write in #753704 that is no longer is the
> case -- I just saw that LICENSE.AMAP is still there without any further
> digging; can you briefly update me?
>
Hi Tob
Hi Tobias,
> Il Venerdì 5 Settembre 2014 8:46, Tobias Frost ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:36 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Hi Gianfranco,
>> >
>> > Well, amap has been previously been removed from D
Hi Markus,
sorry for taking part of the discussion.
If you think the FTP master position is contraddittory I suggest you to open a
thread in debian-devel with ftpmasters cc'ed.
Anyway in my opinion duplicating the lines is better also because copyright
file is shown in packages.qa.debian.org/pa
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binwalk"
* Package name: binwalk
Version : 2.0.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Craig Heffner
* URL : ttps://github.com/devttys0/binwalk/
* License : Expat
It
Following up after upstream issue [1], I slightly changed my opinion and
committed [2].
I think the best solution is now just remove ssdeep support, since it will be
removed anyway in the next release.
(on mentors you will already find the updated version)
[1] https://github.com/devttys0/bi
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi Vincent,
>Please either implement a get-orig-source target in debian/rules, or
>(since you're using copyright format 1.0) Files-Excluded in
>debian/copyright, so that a sponsor (or anyone, really) can reproduce
>your new orig tarball.
done, and pushed on git and m
se.
* Drop patches, accepted upstream.
* change doc file location.
* Update watch file.
[ Gianfranco Costamagna ]
* Change debian packaging to gpl-2+, to ease upstream patch forwarding.
* Remove old scripts from rules file.
* Add setuptools b-d, needed to build the package in a clean environment
Hi Harlan!
(ccing Mikhail so he can ack/nack the GPL-2 to GPL-2+ change)
>The most concerning issue to me is the change in d/copyright from GPL-2
>to GPL-2+ for the files under debian/. Matching them to upstream is
>best practice, to be sure, but to do so needs the permission of the
>authors
Hi Paul,
>All good points Harlan. I also won't be sponsoring this.
thanks to you too!
(now we have the ack)
>That tool doesn't appear to be run at build time to generate the>manual page,
>which means that if downstream folks patch the command
>they won't get an updated manual page. I'd strongl
Hi Paul
> I opened upstream issue 505
> https://github.com/s3tools/s3cmd/issues/505
>Could you also suggest removing the manual page from git and tarballs
>so it is always built from source?
I just noticed Matt here is also upstream, bad me I didn't check :)
>Personally I'd suggest upstream
>Agreed, getting upstream to fix them and start using these tools is
>the best option.
Hi Paul, upstream fixed all the issues, so the next version will drop all our
patches.
I hope we can avoid pushing upstream to release, right?
let me know,
cheers,
Gianfranco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi Paul,
>Either way is fine, but I generally subscribe to the "release early,>release
>often" principle. Releasing also benefits the rest of the Free
>Software community, as Debian has promised to do. Of course it is
>completely up to upstream as to when they do releases.
I completely agree, b
Hi, following an irc conversation I did a quick look at the package, and looks
mostly good.
I never used pmake, so I don't know if this is the right approach, and I can't
review fully the rules file.
Just some licenses are not mentioned in the copyright file, and I listed them
below
cd_disec
Hi again,
after following up again on irc seems that licensecheck wrongly lists them as
BSD, while
to be BSD they need the "redistribution clause".
IANAL, so I give up on this to somebody with more knowledge about the BSD
license.
So the package might be only needing some typo fix and the man
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mlucas"
missing changes:
bump std-version
change of CFLAGS
change VCS fields
please ask Release Team if such changes are allowed for an unblock,
or remove them
(in any case changelog has to be verbose)
G.
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
>I've updated the package with a lot of updates/corrections.
missing copyrights, e.g.
Copyright (C) 2015 Brent Baude
Copyright (c) 2003-2005 by Peter Astrand
Hello,
> rnahybrid FTBFS on armel:
>
the warning above is somewhat important
(too many nested loops), and this usually relates badly with
high optimization levels
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g
-O0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/locutusofborg/rnahybr
hello,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "highwayhash"
sponsored but please try to have less different symbol files, and more human
readable
e.g.
cat debian/libhighwayhash0.symbols |c++filt
gives you a better readable file, and marking
symbols as optional can reduce even more the num
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
^^ this is to let Enrico review it, and I'll NMU in case he is ok
>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861291
the packaging seems fine, the patch differs from the upstream one for some bits
https://github.com/LuaJIT/LuaJIT/commit/0c6fd
Hello,
>I found an unfortunate mistake in my previous patch for dhelp[1]. It
happily sponsored after changing VCS-GIt field (removing cgit)
VCS-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/dhelp.git
this is the correct version.
thanks for fixing it! (I sync'd it in Ubuntu and probably d
Hi,
>Thanks that you noticed this bug.
>
>But removing apache2 looks like a dirty hack. This error occurred
>because of the bad merge. Take a look at a fix[1], please.
well, with apache2 installed, the whole package is not working
http://localhost/doc/HTML/index.html
I think you have to configu
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package libgdamm
the package as is is a no-no.
lots of useless stuff in packaging, incomplete copyright, wrong VCS-Git
field (and missing repo), debhelper 9 instead of 10, missing package
description, rules file
that should be fixed (
last thing: there seems to be already an Ubuntu package, so for sure you should
start from that
packaging.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgdamm5.0
G.
David,
> If something was not appropriate 2 months ago, it is even less so now...
please go for experimental and remove moreinfo when done.
G.
> I've uploaded to mentors a rebuild of the same package - this time I've
> changed from unstable to experimental.
somebody (thanks) already sponsored it, I sync'd it in Ubuntu.
G.
control: reopen -1
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
Remove moreinfo once you have something ready.
G.
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2017 04:27:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: visual-fill-column/1.11-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #861705,
regarding
Hello Ross,
>#858563 reports that debian/rules cannot be invoked directly on efl.
>The suggested fix is to add "include /usr/share/dpkg/default.mk".
another fix might be to do something like
DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS ?= $(shell dpkg-architectur
control: reopen -1
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
> Package pyvtk has been removed from mentors.
>
I would like to sponsor this package, any news?
G.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Also, binaries shorter than three chars should be avoided IIRC
G.
Hello Ben,
>Actually I tried changing it to 10 and ran in to issues. All of the
>documentation I can find about actually creating Debian packages
>says to use 9 and never change it.
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/chapel-minimal/1.13.1-1/lintian
I used it and it seems to
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hello, I will sponsor it,
but please have a deep look at missing copyrights for a next upload, e.g.
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 taaem
other things:
I don't understand why you prepended debian/tmp to install files, but as you
wish
2) FTBFS
http://deboma
Hello, still bad
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1/buildlog
probably experimental is using a different apt solver so it picks up some
new/different toolchain.
BTW still useless this change
-usr/include
-usr/lib/lib*.so
-usr/lib/pkgconfig
-usr/sh
Also unstable is sad:
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1/buildlog
G.
Il Venerdì 12 Maggio 2017 20:27, Gianfranco Costamagna
ha scritto:
Hello, still bad
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/budgie-desktop/10.3.1-1
control: close 862479
control: close 862478
control: close 862477
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
./testdata/gowiki.html
this seems to have a different license.
G.
Il Giovedì 4 Maggio 2017 11:09, Diego M. Rodriguez ha
scritto:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my pack
hello,
>"golang-github-nebulouslabs-fastrand"
LGTM
G.
Hi,
>It also fails to build for me on i386 with an error that looks like SSE2
>related (but I'll let you look at it).
does this mean having to restrict telegram to amd64 and eventually only i386?
this would exclude a lot of architectures
G.
Hi,
>Since I had no news I got to do other things but I'm eager to
>fetch new version of the package if any and repackage it.
>
>Are you still interested in?
yes, if you still need the package!
G.
Hi,
>* Package the thing with this actual bug, but as far as I'm concerned I
> consider it as grave, so I'm not really a fan of this idea.
me neither
>* Patch the issue myself, as a debian patch, and package the thing with it.
unmaintainable on the long run
>* Fork the project (it's BSD 2
control: close -1
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logdata-anomaly-miner"
I sponsored it in experimental (due to the freeze), but please:
1) drop the patch (python2.6 is dead now)
I don't see lintian complains without that patch.
(waiting eventually for a -2 in experimental :) )
hi, note that we can't sync in Ubuntu until you move the files in the correct
location :)
(otherwise you will need breaks+replaces)
G.
Hi,
>when libraries were build with gcc 5 'v5' was added to the soversion
>inside the library name. Should this extension be kept even if there is
>a new soversion. For instance for the package libbpp-core2v5 which has
>now soversion=3. Should the new package be named
>
>libbpp-core3v5
>or
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I'm looking for a sponsor for my curvedns package here :
>CurveDNS is an alternative for DNSSEC based on ECC curves.
nice
>be possible to become a member of pkg-security team ?
yes, please join the team
lets review:
debian/copyright has s
Hello,
> gbp clone --pristine-tar
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-go-ini-ini.git
lets review (the mentors link)
+golang-github-go-ini-ini (1.27.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium
+
+ * New upstream version 1.27.0
+ * update Standards-Version and debhelper version
+
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
> * New upstream version
missing changes, e.g.
"add myself to uploaders"
ccing Free to this email, so he is aware of your intentions :)
thanks!
Gianfranco
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
>https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-security/curvedns.git/
>I've made some changes but the blhc issue is still here :/
I think it might be worth to ask on debian-mentors mail list why PIE flag is not
injected anymore by debhelper...
Anyhow, the hacky approach works
http://debomatic-amd
Hello,
>Closes:123456 stanzas require a # before the number.
they seems to have been closed anyway... Strange
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850512
G.
>
> * debian/control
> + build dependency to asciidoctor-base. (Closes: #850369)
> + use the secure URLs for the GIT repositories.
> * debian/watch
> + use the secure URL.
>
>
hello, the freeze is over, feel free to reopen this bug if you still want the
package uploaded.
>Assumpte: RFP: vinca -- Reverse VNC for remote support
this is an RFP, not RFS, so please try to persuade somebody
maybe on -devel to package it, if you really think this is an important tool.
Otherwise package it by yourself and convert/open a real RFS bug.
Mentors is about helping people be
>I'm understanding the "package it by yourself", if it only means to
>publish somewhere a .deb package or it's related to doing this in some
>Debian host.
it means create the "debian" directory and ask us to sponsor it into
the archive.
https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
>If it's the
Hello,
>While the package maintainer's is on the LowNMU list, a new upstream release
>with a 447407 line diff is not appropriate here, especially that the bug has
>been reported only 6½ days ago and is only severity:important.
>
>Please get an ok from the maintainer.
this is true in general, unf
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
> So, if you want I can take care of this one
lets put the review in the bug:
1) please delete the two useless patches
2) the upstream tarball is... full of useless stuff
they included a subtarball with 3.2.17 inside)
this makes the debdiff look sc
hurray!
>I didn't notice this when I ran the tests because I already have
>libexiv2-dev installed. I see now that I could have run the tests in an
>sbuild schroot.
another issue fixed by a good testsuite!
however not quite ready
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/gexiv2/
yep, removing it
G.
Il Mercoledì 28 Giugno 2017 17:48, Jason Crain ha scritto:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 03:15:20PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> /gexiv2_0.10.6-1_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
> 9-day/libgexiv2-doc_0.10.6-1_all.deb
> Either you already uploaded it, or
Hello
>Quick question. I can see the moka-icon-theme v5.6.1 source has
>entered the unstable archive - but I don't see the built binary
>
>(all.deb).
>http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/moka-icon-theme/
some autodecruft removed the binary because of slow builders
https://ftp-ma
>I'd like to keep this package up to date inside the Debian repos.
>
>Polybar is a status bar similar in functionality to i3bar, it aims to be
>a replacement for your system status bar and is commonly used in window>
>managers such as i3 and bspwm.
you should start by contacting the person alrea
501 - 600 of 1488 matches
Mail list logo
