On Sunday 03 September 2006 19:18, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 03.09.2006 at 19:04:49 +0300, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 September 2006 17:10, Eric Cooper wrote:
> > > (I don't think I can justify asking upstream to publi
On Thursday 07 September 2006 08:14, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:48:42PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I've seen many recommendations that the 'debian/' directory should not
> > > be part of the 'foo_X.Y.orig.tar.gz' tarball but shoul
On Thursday 07 September 2006 09:42, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That's what I do for releases as well. For normal testing builds though
> > (that's to see if the package builds and works without planning a
> > release), creating a tarball and unpacking it firs
On Thursday 07 September 2006 11:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello
Hello,
> > * lintian errors:
> > E: lisaac-doc: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl
> > E: lisaac-common: copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl
> > E: lisaac: copyright-should-refer-to-common-l
On Friday 01 September 2006 15:38, George Danchev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.10.2-1
> of my package "bobcat".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libbobcat1 - run-time (shared) Bobcat library
> libbobcat1-dev -
buildserver.net/build.php?arch=&pkg=bisonc%2B%2B
Kind regards
George Danchev
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
pgp2txU5dJXzq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
changelog entry closes the ITP bug #386060. Thanks.
Kind regards
George Danchev
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
pgpThIj9ZwGNR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 08 September 2006 00:05, tony mancill wrote:
> Hello George,
Hello,
> I'm looking at this package. Here are a couple of comments so far:
Thanks for looking at the package and your comments.
> debian/control:
>
> * The package Architecture should be "all" instead of "any" - this will
On Thursday 07 September 2006 23:43, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 9/8/06, George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Upstream Author : [fill in]
> > * URL : [fill in]
> > * License : [fill in]
>
> It would be nice to actually fill these in.
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 08:05, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:48:21PM +0100, James Westby a écrit :
> > The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> > included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> >
> > Any person wishing
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 17:14, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 12.09.2006, 15:56 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I currently try to understand, what I need to do to make my packages
> > binNMU-safe (I package several libraries). For a package I want to put
> > into De
Ok, FYI: that has been uploaded to NEW queue. Thanks.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
We face a strange error [1] on mipsel [2] wrt processing some innocent LaTeX
code, while it is doing fine on all other architectures. Could that be any
sort of environment issue being temporarily available on that buildd ?
Any help is appreciated. Should I contact mispel at buildd.d.o to
On Saturday 16 September 2006 07:45, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
Hello Kapil,
> I wrote earlier on 03 Jul 2006:
> > I would like someone to sponsor an adoption/hijacking or NMU'ing
> > of a more recent version of "dvipng" than is available in the Debian
> > archive.
>
> (Package descript
On Saturday 16 September 2006 09:58, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, George Danchev wrote:
> > > Just to let you know that these are 'Not Found'. Why don't you upload
> > > to ment
Hello,
FYI: that has been uploaded to NEW queue. Thanks to Tony Mancill.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 17 September 2006 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi guys from the Debian Developer Team,
Hello acid,
> i am a little open software developer and wanna ask you if you would like
> to have two of my project for debian, so for the debian ports collection.
This is of course cool ;-).
H
On Sunday 17 September 2006 15:19, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > 3) In general, is there a policy about MSWord documents?
>
> I don't think there is a clear policy. But since the format is proprietary
> I wouldn't put it into a Debian package anyway. I would suggest you remove
> that documents from th
On Monday 18 September 2006 20:07, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 7.6-1
> of the package "malaga". It'd be the first step in having Debian include
> the new high quality, GPL'd Finnish spellchecking Voikko
> (http://hunspell-fi.org/tied
[-devel and Wouter Verhelst excluded.]
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 16:30, Rodrigo Tavares wrote:
> > Tavares wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > When I run the command below, come this error
> >
> > message:
> > > mypc:~/script-1.4# dh_gencontrol
Avoid working as root for no good reasons. Work as m
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 00:40, Neil Williams wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
>
> Turns out that (answering my own question):
>
> > Does every package in the virtual man-browser package need to provide
> > the 'man' command or can some require a different command (without a
> > symlink)?
>
> No
On Thursday 21 September 2006 10:27, James Westby wrote:
> On (21/09/06 12:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, James Westby wrote:
> > > On (20/09/06 15:00), Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Could someone please sponsor a New Maintainer
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 23:17, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
> > Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > > the files clearly indicate that they're under
> > > GPL, but contain the confusing "See the GNU Library General Public
> > > License for more details".
> >
> > Just a note: This could be
On Thursday 21 September 2006 16:51, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.21.1526
+0200]:
> > I think the reasoning is that it is the extra step for sponsors to
> > build with -v.
>
> ... and sometimes -sa.
That is a sponsoree job to mention to... as a ma
On Thursday 21 September 2006 17:21, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach George Danchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.21.1608 +0200]:
> > That is a sponsoree job to mention to... as a maintainer note.
>
> Agreed. Ideally, the dpkg-dev tools should be more cautious too.
>
On Thursday 21 September 2006 18:49, hi wkby wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello Hiro,
Looks fine, and here are some minor points you might want to address
first:
* debhelper compat 5 (and make changes if needed)
* you might want to use your real name rather than a nick ? ;-)
* debian/copyright
On Sunday 24 September 2006 14:00, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a bug which is not a bug in my package (packagesearch). However,
> reassigning it to the package that causes that bug (apt-file), would
> leave it no longer visible for my package, and thus probably result in
> the bug to
On Monday 25 September 2006 16:19, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> Hello
>
> > > Options I have thought about, but found not to be optimal:
> > > * File a bug report against apt-file, and block the bug against
> > > packagesearch by the new one - close the bug against
> > > packagesa
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 15:39, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 15:20 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > On Monday 25 September 2006 16:19, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > > > clone 12345 -1
> > > > reassign -1 apt-file
> > > > reti
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 01:25, François Févotte wrote:
> The package is lintian clean.
Hello,
* Lintian complains about a templated README.Debian.
* Upstream changelog says exaile uses gamin to monitor directories, but your
package doesn't depend on it.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
f
nd regards
George Danchev
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
pgpD63wLuovyx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 06 November 2006 10:41, Martin Loschwitz wrote:
--cut--
> You can find out who sponsored an upload by checking the signature of the
> .dsc-file that was uploaded. In this case, the .dsc-file is:
... or use `who-uploads sourcepackage' to do the job for you.
p.s. who-uploads(1) is in the
On Monday 06 November 2006 17:51, Mike Hommey wrote:
--cut--
> FWIW, jhead already does all that, except that it's not a perl script.
FWIW, I'm much in favour of having one or two alternatives. Sometimes this
provokes competition, and would save functionality if one of the alternatives
gets unma
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 12:02, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> >>Thanks for explanation.
> >
> > Just use the package "reportbug" and the command "reportbug wnpp".
>
> I've filled all needed forms and send ITP bug.
You need to close that bug report (the bug number you
On Thursday 09 November 2006 14:11, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.0-1
> of my package "radvd".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> radvd - Router Advertisement Daemon
>
> The package is lintian clean.
>
> The upload would fix
On Friday 17 November 2006 00:49, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
--cut--
> I'd really expect it to be more up-to-date.
> Anyway, it seems to be in the process of being updated now (changelog
> and copyright are not there ATM).
Sounds much like a severe performance issue to me -- p.d.o is a constantly
ove
On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:04, Andreas K. Foerster wrote:
--cut--
> > - My guess is you are not building the binaries in a sid environment. You
> > must do that. Actually you should build in pbuilder. In the process, you
> > will be setting up a chroot, that you can also use to run the right
> >
On Monday 27 November 2006 19:13, Andreas K. Foerster wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 26. Nov 2006 schrieb George Danchev:
> > Anyway, I can do some test for you,
> > when I have the time to do so and if the debootstrap'ed system
> > is still not a feasible option for you.
>
On Saturday 09 December 2006 15:06, Mashrab Kuvatov wrote:
> On Saturday 09 December 2006 10:20, Daniel Baumann wrote:
--cut--
> > * you could save hunspell-uz.dirs by using install -D in rules.
>
> What is it? Can you please explain more?
`install -D' will create the leading path for you and th
On Saturday 30 December 2006 09:57, Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I'm looking for the Debian package which may be used as an 'hello
> world' example of properly packaged shared library.
>
> I picked up several random libraries on my system, but was unlucky to
> find one usable to serve as ex
On Saturday 30 December 2006 10:25, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:57:40 +0600
>
> Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm looking for the Debian package which may be used as an 'hello
> > world' example of properly packaged shared library.
>
> (Nervous about putting head
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 12:37, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 21:34 +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > What exactly are the advantages and disadvantages of making a
> > Debian-native package, and is there any real policy or practice?
Hello,
> I think this is a good rule:
>
>
On Sunday 28 January 2007 21:46, Maximilian Wilhelm wrote:
> Hi!
Hi,
> I get the following warnings when checking my package with linda:
> | $ linda -i *.dsc
> | W: conntrackd; Maintainer script postinst uses debhelper, but does not
> | use #DEBHELPER#. The maintainer script shown above is includ
On Thursday 01 February 2007 21:30, Warren Turkal wrote:
> The new packages are at [1].
>
> The newest packages remove the libnetcdf++4 package as I don't think it's
> needed.
>
> Please check out these packages, and help me get them ready for upload to
> debian.
>
> [1]http://penguintechs.org/~wt/
On Wednesday 07 February 2007 04:22, Jeff Carr wrote:
Hi Jeff,
> I've uploaded a new package called xc3sprog. It's used for programming
> Xilinx FPGA's. I've never quite understood the "right" way to package
> up a debian package so there are probably a lot of really dumb things
> I've done wrong
On Friday 11 May 2007, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
Hi,
> I am trying to buls some older tools from but get strange
> errors (It compiles fine under Slink and Potato :-)) )
Usually the newer compilers are stricter and afaics the newer's compiler
warnings are quite reasonable, facing thes
On Thursday 17 May 2007, Paul Elliott wrote:
Hello,
> ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/ubuntu.704/peless_1.108-1.diff.gz
> ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/ubuntu.704/peless_1.108-1.dsc
> ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/ubuntu.704/peless_1.108-1_i386.build
> ftp://ftp.BerliOS.de/pub/peless/ubuntu.7
On Tuesday 26 June 2007, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
>I am trying to upgrade a package but I have the problem that the line
> endings in the original tarball are in DOS mode and this makes boring
> problems with dpatch.
>How can I fix that without changing the original tarball? I
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:00:44 am Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 00:31:29 +0200
> >
> > Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:42:52PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > > Is this a result of the need to a
On Sunday 15 July 2007, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 12:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
--cut--
> Something like this ?
>
> packagename (0.1.0-8) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Updated debian/watch to recognize both ".tar.gz" and ".tar.bz2",
> now revealing the real latest upstream
On Sunday 15 July 2007, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Colin Tuckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.15.1618 +0200]:
> > No, I saw it and assumed that is what would happen in the case
> > where the uploads use ~r1 etc and the final upload to Debian by
> > the sponsor deleted the extra part of th
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Florent Rougon wrote:
> Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why does this matter? I don't see every other package specifically
> > mentioning who made it or what OS it was originally developed for.
>
> Of course it matters. I don't know whether there is an offici
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am using svn-buildpacakge to manage the debian directory of the emboss
> pacakge, but at build time it ignores subdirectories - that is,
> debian/manpages and debian/patches are not included in the .diff.gz.
>
> http://svn.debia
On Saturday 21 July 2007, Daniel Leidert wrote:
--cut--
> > Or, alternatively, create an emboss-manpages package (arch: all) to
> > Depend on (as I already stated).
>
> Where is the advantage of such an effort? There is none. You would have
> to install two packages instead of simply one and you do
On Sunday 29 July 2007, Ben Finney wrote:
> Brendon Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have those files listed below (Excepting the
> > package_1.0-1.diff.gz) as there are no differences that need to be
> > applied for debian. So a "source distribution" would just include
> > the .dsc and .tar
On Friday 23 November 2007, George Danchev wrote:
> On Friday 23 November 2007, Erick Mattos wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codeblocks".
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for packaging codeblocks! I can't spponsor, b
On Friday 23 November 2007, Erick Mattos wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "codeblocks".
Hi,
Thanks for packaging codeblocks! I can't spponsor, but you can count me as a
thankful user of that package ;-)
Compilation yields the following error:
infopane.cpp:
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Subject: RFS: unicornscan
Hi,
why is Architecture: field set to amd64 ? I failed to see any amd64 specific
bits in the source code, so you should use Architecture: any.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
--cut--
> there is no special reason for this field. I set this to amd64, because I
> have only amd64-architecture available. I am sure, it can also be built on
> i386.
Your amd64 with be fine with arch: any.
> You may change this field, or I w
On Friday 14 December 2007, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
Hi,
> I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
> However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
> bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
> version of the gcc-snap
On Saturday 07 January 2012 18:48:29 Tobias Winchen wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
(a bit late, but anyway ...)
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer".
> The package is an update for engauge-digitizer 4.1, which is already in
> debian. The update closes the following bugs: #6
On Sunday 22 January 2012 17:08:48 Tobias Eliasson wrote:
Hi,
--cut--
> > There are multiple implementations of telnet in Debian. Does quickrdp
> > really need this particular one provided by the "telnet" binary
> > package? If not, then the recommendation/suggestion should be changed
> > to "tel
Hi Vibhav,
Please have a look at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=327263
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=508109
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:37:45 +, Tony Houghton
wrote:
Hi,
I maintain roxterm. The source package of that name generates a
number
of binary packages: roxterm-common, roxterm-gtk2, roxterm-gtk3 and
roxterm (a virtual package depending on roxterm-gtk3).
A user has reported 2 bugs with sligh
On Monday 19 March 2012 15:52:38 Tobias Winchen wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hi Tobias,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer"
> * Added patch fixing passing double as qreal. Closes: #656943 (FTBFS on
> armel and armhf)
While the original reporter of bug #656943 did his bes
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:39:41 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt
wrote:
On 04/24/2012 03:16 PM, Whit Armstrong wrote:
I would be looking for 6-64999, assuming my package eventually
made it into debian, I suppose it would need to have a 'globally
allocated' uid. The idea is simply not to give users exe
On Monday 16 July 2012 11:58:23 Slavko wrote:
> Hi Thibaut,
Hi,
> thank you for quick reply.
>
> Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:30:35 +0200 Thibaut Paumard
>
> napísal:
> > It's not easy to get a sponsor, especially during a freeze (please
> > read my previous message from 15min ago entitled "Re: fre
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:07:19 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Dear mentors
>
> I am looking for sponsorship for my package 'copher' (Paul Wise
> sponsored last time). It closes a serious bug #513710, and also includes
> the VCS fields now that I have converted my repository to git.
>
> The dsc i
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 14:35:27 Helmut Grohne wrote:
Hi,
> > Can you give an example of a ???debian/rules??? that does not work, and
> > what the desired behaviour would be?
>
> Well my basic idea was to add a .PHONY line to the 3-line example like:
>
> #!/usr/bin/make -f
> %:
> $@
> .
On Monday 02 March 2009 22:02:47 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.29-1.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks for your work.
P.S. Could you please change the version in subject line next time, to avoid
possible confusion.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
On Friday 06 March 2009 17:15:57 Christopher Schramm wrote:
> Jelle de Jong wrote:
> > I agree this package is welcome in debian, somebody fancy to sponser?
>
> Since nobody was yet: Is there any problem with sponsoring the package?
Hi,
It is not necessary for the package to have any technical or
On Sunday 08 March 2009 03:43:00 David García Garzón wrote:
--cut--
Hi,
> Well, no problem. We are also volunteers so i understand. I hope we can
> find an sponsor soon or someone that could take it a closer look to find
> more issues.
You may also want to check your sourses with cppcheck as fo
On Sunday 08 March 2009 21:29:51 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
Hi,
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.30-1.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks.
P.S. Providing upstream Changelog would be very much appreciated by the
cppcheck users, though it is unlikely they haven't seen diff, diffstat
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 11:43:40 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "confget".
>
> * Package name: confget
> Version : 1.01-1
> Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev (myself)
> * URL : http://devel.ringlet.net/
On Thursday 19 March 2009 23:12:22 Peter Pentchev wrote:
--cut--
> > It took me some time to assimilate the hardening notes at wiki.d.o [1],
> > I'm remotely familiar with, though this document is informative enough
> > about potential build and run-time failures on different architectures
> > wrt
On Sunday 22 March 2009 02:17:30 Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hello,
> Well, actually what I did was take this change, another couple of
> things (the example files, a small fix to the testing framework), and
> just go ahead and release a new upstream version, confget-1.02.
>
> A Debian package for it i
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 14:54:41 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.19.dfsg-3
> of my package "dante". This version does not fix any problems
> listed in the Debian BTS; what it DOES fix is a serious problem
> with libsocksd
On Monday 30 March 2009 17:23:48 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
> This is not even an RFS :)
>
> Now, seriously - I've prepared a package for dma, the DragonFly Mail
> Agent, as ITP'd in my #511410, I've uploaded it to mentors.d.n, and
> I've sent out a request for debconf tra
On Thursday 02 April 2009 20:59:08 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8.3-1
...
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bindfs/bindfs_1.8.3-1.dsc
Uploaded. Thanks!
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Friday 10 April 2009 10:27:06 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Hi,
Hello Peter,
> I've been seeing this for the past two weeks:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=dante
>
> libdsocksd0/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libc6.1.1 (>> 2.9)
> libsocksd0/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libc6.1.1 (>> 2.9)
On Sunday 12 April 2009 21:45:04 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
Hi,
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contr
On Sunday 12 April 2009 23:09:42 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> George Danchev wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 April 2009 21:45:04 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> >> Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> >>> Dear mentors,
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> The package can be found on mentors
Quoting Magnus Holmgren :
On lördagen den 2 maj 2009, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
2009/5/2 Magnus Holmgren :
> On torsdagen den 26 mars 2009, Michal Čihař wrote:
>> Dne Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:21:29 +0100
>>
>> Adam Ziaja napsal(a):
>> > The package appears to be lintian clean.
>>
>> It does not:
>>
>
Quoting Paul Wise :
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:26 PM, George Danchev wrote:
Running just lintian on m.d.o is not enough, what is indeed needed is
lintian from *sid* to be run over the package. I'm guessing that m.d.o is
running lintian from stable which knows less than the lintian from si
On Sunday 03 May 2009 13:24:12 Luca Niccoli wrote:
> 2009/5/3 George Danchev :
> > Nod. I'm in favour of removing any lintian assertions from m.d.o, since
> > that might be misleading.
>
> Maybe write something like:
> [Check the package with lintian --pedant
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 20:43:08 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Chow Loong Jin schrieb:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sigx".
> >
> > * Package name: sigx
> > Version : 2.0.2-1
> > Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> > * URL
On Saturday 09 May 2009 17:24:13 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ethstats/ethstats_1.0-3.dsc
Package uploaded. Thanks for your work!
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
On Saturday 09 May 2009 17:44:58 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:37:47AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
...
> > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> > dget -x
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wwwstat/wwwstat_2.0-5.dsc
Package uploaded
On Sunday 10 May 2009 22:28:43 Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> Reijo Tomperi wrote:
--cut--
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cppcheck/cppcheck_1.32-1.dsc
Package uploaded. Thanks for your work.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.deb
On Sunday 24 May 2009 21:14:10 krzysz...@burghardt.pl wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/poco/poco_1.3.5-1.dsc
Looks good. I also checked buildability of clamfs with poco 1.3.5-1 (the only
package in the archive which build-depends on libpobo-dev).
The o
On Thursday 28 May 2009 17:20:53 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello Peter,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.3-1 of my
> package "libdebug". This is an attempt to adopt the package,
> turn it into a non-native one, become upstream, bring the Debian
> packaging up to t
> Reijo Tomperi wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cppcheck".
> >
> > * Package name: cppcheck
> > Version : 1.25-1
> > Upstream Authors: Daniel Marjamäki
> >Reijo Tomperi
> > * URL : http://cppcheck.wiki.sourc
Hi,
> Why it should be in Debian: there are ~ a hundred text editors, but none
> of them are like this, at least not that I know of. I personally
> couldn't write my novel without it - that's why I made it! :)
>
> cheers
> Dave
>
>
> PS. I hope everything is in order here, but if not, please let
Quoting Patrick Matthäi :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Bannister schrieb:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:14:23PM +0200, Thomas Dreibholz wrote:
Dear Patrick, Thijs, Paul,
thank you for your review of the SubNetCalc package. The updated package at
http://mentors.debian.net/
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 05:16:48PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pslist".
>
> Here we go again, with my changes after Ben Finney's recommendations,
> and a Standards Version bump to the just-released Policy 3.8.2 :)
>
> * Package
> Hi,
Hi,
> in a new upstream version which I'm working on, I get warnings from
> dpkg-shlibdeps which I don't understand. And I can't find a way to find
> out, so I'm asking here.
>
> The warnings are multiple occurrences of
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: binaries to analyze should already be inst
> Frank Küster writes:
> > Maybe some other tool "usually" also creates DEBIAN, but not in my case?
>
> I'm really confused by this too, since the calling sequence for a binary
> build also runs dh_makeshlibs before running dh_installdeb,
> dh_makeshlibs seems to assume that the DEBIAN directory a
> George Danchev writes:
> > dh sequencer also calls dh_installdebconf earlier in the call sequence
> > (which Frank's rules was actually missing), which takes care to create
> > debian/pkg/DEBIAN/ directory. So, when dh_makeshlibs and dh_shlibdeps
> > enter
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wmanager/wmanager_0.2.1-6.dsc
Ok, that is now uploaded. Thanks for your work.
--
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
> On 2009-06-12, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > I am seeking a sponsor for this new package, gvpe. It builds an secure
> > virtual ethernet between multiple endpoints and gateways, rather than a
> > straight end-to-end VPN tunnel. This makes it more resilient to failures
> > of individual nodes par
201 - 300 of 508 matches
Mail list logo
