On Friday 10 April 2009 10:27:06 Peter Pentchev wrote: > Hi, Hello Peter,
> I've been seeing this for the past two weeks: > > http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=dante > > libdsocksd0/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libc6.1.1 (>> 2.9) > libsocksd0/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libc6.1.1 (>> 2.9) > > ...and I'm not exactly sure what the problem is. Okay, so I see > that libc6 has some weirdness on alpha (building a libc6.1 instead > of libc6), It is 6.1 which correlates with the SONAME progress for that particular architecture, alpha and ia64 in that case. Similarly, it is libc0.3 for hurd-i386 and libc0.1 for kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64. > but still I'm really not sure where the libc6.1.1 instead > of libc6.1 comes from. I saw Dato answered this question. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
