On 8/26/05, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rogério Brito wrote:
> > What exactly should I do? I would like to host this somewhere where
> > others could have access to a svn repository. I think that I can
> > register a new project on BerliOS, but suggestions are welcome.
>
> alioth.debian
Hello all,
I am trying to package qingy (qingy.sf.net) for which there are 2 RFPs
- 309672 and 236706 - in BTS for a looong time.
I have tried it on my system and seems ok, although there seems to be
some kind of race condition in the code resulting in a deadlock if the
user changes the tty back
On 9/6/05, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Could someone else also comment on how applications should deal with
> > shared libraries which are not intended to be used by other programs?
>
> If they aren't used by other programs, there's no
On 9/7/05, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 07:59:29PM +0300, Eddy Petri?or wrote:
> > On 9/6/05, Frank K?ster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Could someone else also comment on how applications should deal wi
Hello,
The application I want to package, qingy, is in fact a replacement for
getty and it needs to modify /etc/inittab.
Is it allowed for my package to do this automatically? Any idea how
can I do this automatically?
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination
Hello,
I have packaged and released unofficially an aspell-ro package. I
would like it to be uploaded as an official package, although the word
database is really slim.
Could somebody take a look over it and tell me if I need to make any
changes before I list it on sponsors.d.n ?
The package can
On 10/5/05, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Re: Eddy Petrişor in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Could somebody take a look over it and tell me if I need to make any
> >> changes before I list it
On 10/18/05, Nicolai Ehemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >>> get an ITP and insert it here
> >
> >
> > not done yet, as I want to have the package fully prepared, then I
> > want to upload it.
>
> I think you missed the sense of an ITP bug: it is
On 11/7/05, Radu Spineanu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Let's say i would like a package to add some system-wide path to
> /etc/profile.
>
> Is it possible to do this without writing postinst/postrm scripts that
> actually write in that file ?
Writting to that file will bring curses on yo
On 1/4/06, Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'll just try to restart the discussion with a proposal:
> Currently I maintain one package (min12xxw, see [1]) for ubuntu, have filed an
> ITP (#334093) in debian but haven't tried hard enough to find a sponsor yet.
>
> Since this packa
On 1/13/06, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
> We've been recently talking about creating a group to maintain games in Debian
> in a collaborative way. As a starting point, I've created a mailing list in
> alioth for coordination, and also for create discussion threads about th
On 1/13/06, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can ome packaging can be done for non-free games?
> Seconded. This Debian user would be much better pleased by Debian's
> efforts going to improving the packaging and coordination of free
> software games.
I agree that free software is the pr
On 2/14/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > I've split the package into two, as I said. I have a problem with lintian
> > anyway, the manpage for all the programs is the same, with links. Thus, the
> > gui program does not
On 2/16/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 07:45:50PM +0200, Eddy Petri?or wrote:
> > On 2/14/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:53:48PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > > > I've split the package into two, as I said. I hav
On 2/21/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One technique for finding these is to grep for
> included headers, something like grep -r '^#include <' . |sort -u
May I suggest:
grep -r "\s*#include\s\s<" . |sort -u
as it perfectly legal to place the includes at some whitespaces away
from
On 2/21/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May I suggest:
> grep -r "\s*#include\s\s<" . |sort -u
I ment
grep -r -e "\s*#include\s\s*<" . |sort -u
--
Regards,
EddyP
=
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
On 3/7/06, gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:11:29PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>
> (shortening cc:-list)
>
> > > clusterssh opens xterms with ssh sessions, multixterm opens multiple
> > > xterms (with whatever contents). So if you want to control several
>
On 3/10/06, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It "Conflict"'s with gaim so that if you don't want gaim 1.5 removed you
> > can just prevent gaim-snapshot from installing if you don't want it.
> I don't think this is a good idea. You should remain with the gaim
> package name, just
> > Can anybody review (and hopefully upload) those? I have nor sponsors nor
> > advocates, by now.
> It may sound rude, but I hope all will say no. I don't think messing
> with an existing package would be good; ask the gaim maintainer,
> Robert McQueen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> about blessing. OK, we
On 3/14/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can anybody review (and hopefully upload) those? I have nor sponsors nor
> > > advocates, by now.
> > It may sound rude, but I hope all will say no. I don't think messing
> > with an existing packa
On 4/7/06, Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bernhard R. Link schrieb:
>
> >>http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.dsc
> >>http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7.orig.tar.gz
> >>http://jean.parpaillon.free.fr/wormux/wormux_0.7-1.diff.gz
>
> > The md5sum of th
On 4/11/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I recently asked for the adoption a new game named Wormux.
> I fixed most of the issues people have found after I posted the mail. I
> think you can reasonably test the package again. I gave too the address
> of the upstream package on my pers
On 4/11/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 11.04.2006 02:45, Eddy Petrişor a écrit :
> >On 4/11/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Could you please fix the (upstream) issues I have reported[1][2] and
> >commit the updated ro.po file in the repo
On 4/12/06, Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear DDs and DPMs (Debian Package Maintainers who might not be a DD)
>
> The problem is really is that original upstream author is hard (if
> possible at all to reach) -- there is no official webpage since
> mozilla.org rejected some recen
On 4/12/06, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First posting and
> i need a little help from friends;-)
>
> I have a package which is almost "debian ready", the debian dir exist
> and necessary files in there.
>
> But there is no changelog, only a changelog.in as a template.
th
On 4/12/06, Gerhard Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gruesse!
> * Eddy Petri?or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am [12.04.06 17:39]:
> > >
> > > Then i run autogen.sh which builds a changelog from the above template.
> > > Or i
> > > create a new with dch --create foo bar
> >
> > autogen does not h
On 4/12/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 11.04.2006 19:07, Eddy Petrişor a écrit :
>
> >>I'm asking to the core team if they wants to release another version,
> >>like 0.7.1.
> >But my point was to fix the issues in the upstream repository ;-
On 4/20/06, Marco Bertorello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folk,
>
> I've three packages:
>
> denyhosts-python2.3
> denyhosts-python2.4
> denyhosts-common
>
> the binaries are stored in packages -python2.X but the manpage (common
> to alla packages) is stored in denyhosts-common.
>
> E: denyhost
On 4/26/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have released a new version of the game wormux. The package source has
> been updated to handle this new release. Can anybody test this version
> and adopt the package ?
> The 0.7.1 release is here:
> http://download.gna.org/wormux/wormu
On 5/4/06, Panu Kalliokoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some issues seem to come up time and again when somebody inspects RFS'd
packages. Some of these are not breaches of policy but simply bad
practices, like leaving quoted dh_* commands in debian/rules. Some are
breaches of policy but common e
On 5/5/06, Fabian Guter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
> So to summarize, using `make CXX=g++-4.1' should do.
OK, that looks simple! But how about passing parameters to make when using
svn-buildpackage. I looked into the documentation (also of dpkg-buildbackage)
but didn't find anything helpful
On 5/17/06, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- check the Standards version (lintian warning)
- linda warning:
wormux; The font wormux-0.7.1/data/font/DejaVuSans.ttf in package
ttf-dejavu is considered to be a duplicate.
Isn't that _only_ in the source package?
--
Regards,
EddyP
==
On 5/18/06, artefact <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - use wormux.install and wormux-data.install files instead of
> "dh_install -pwormux" and "dh_install -pwormux-data".
> Matter of taste though.
>
Data files from upstream is moving really often and is much more simpler
for me to use the method
On 5/18/06, John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
like getting
Etch out the door before 2012, for example[1]
[1] Sorry, couldn't resist that one. :P
Doing that will get you fishslapped by the release managers and people
caring about etch. ;-)
Seriousely, I have much faith in Andy, Steve
On 5/19/06, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Zak,
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the `gnome-ppp' package. I got to ITA it
> around 10 days ago,[0] due to my touching it for Ubuntu, and I noticed
> that it needed a new developer to love it =)
> [1] http://mentors.debian.net/de
Hello all,
I don't know if this is the best place to ask this question, but I
suppose I will get some pointers (I suspect -devel to be a better
place, but I might be missing something due to my lack of knowledge,
thus my choice).
I started creating a local mirror via debmirror sometime ago and t
On 5/24/06, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
""=?UTF-8?Q?Eddy_Petri=C5=9For?="" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I don't know if this is the best place to ask this question, but I
> suppose I will get some pointers (I suspect -devel to be a better
> place, but I might
On 5/24/06, Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060524 15:21]:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Try using http. Or try reprepro instead. I'm considering orphaning
> > debmirror in favour of reprepro.
>
> does reprepro support 'real' mirroring of Pa
On 6/1/06, Indraveni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am creating a deb package which will install some type of converter into
the system and it is working fine. NOW..I want to add an entry into the
Applcaitions/Office menu of my debian system for that particular application
which is inst
On 6/3/06, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Salut, Jean...
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 04:36:48PM +0200, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
> Fixed it. When I "cleaned" calls to dh_* scripts, I removed
> dh_shlibdeps... Shame on me ;-)
>
> New version is 0.7.2-3.
Yes, this one looks good. I had upload
On 6/5/06, Sander Marechal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I am the developer of Hearts for GNOME (http://www.gnome-hearts.org) and
I just packaged the upcoming 0.1 release for Debian. I am looking for a
sponsor who is willing to check and upload the package for me.
You could take care of th
On 6/6/06, Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vedran Furaè <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What if I receive a bugreport which I don't know how to solve? For
> example, a FTBFS on some "exotic architecture"?
For this specific example, you should look for appropriate mailing-lists
(the porter
On 6/13/06, DusteD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, i would like to help the debian project if
there is any need for a english > danish translator.
Where do i go from here ?
You should subscribe to the debian-l10n-danish list[1] and present
yourself/ask for more info there.
[1] http://lists.deb
On 6/15/06, Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:11:32AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I don't think any part of packages (description or separate field) are
> the correct place for the Homepage field.
Yes, that's because it's an unneeded duplication of what's already
On 6/15/06, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Policy does not talk about
URLs, it just explains what the extra space is for.
It matters if you have
http://www.my.real.long.and.cool.domain.name.that.i.so.love.net/all/my/projects/package/html/
C'mon, how often does that happen? 1 in
On 6/15/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> Think about somebody wanting to NMU because a bug has a fix in
> upstream and the current mainatiner is too busy or MIA. How
> difficult is it to get to the upstream? Is REALLY hard
On 6/15/06, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a point, but still the users might find the link useful.
> Also, checking if something fresher is present is in upstream could
> be facilitated because there is no need to look for the copyright
> file and ge the info from there.
Thi
On 6/19/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure I'm not doing it correctly. How do you correctly apply .patch
> files without cdbs?
At this point you should probably learn to use dpkg v2 source
archives, which allow patches without "third party" patch applying
code (and build dep
On 6/19/06, Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/19/06, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm sure I'm not doing it correctly. How do you correctly apply .patch
> > files without cdbs?
> At this point you should probably learn to use d
On 6/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
How implement conditions following?
1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo
source package
2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon
3) debian/control contains libfoo0 (
On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi.
>
> How implement conditions following?
>
> 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo
>source package
> 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon
> 3)
On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All this is quite a lot of automake patching and if you can get upstream
>> onside it will be a lot easier.
>
> Running autotools i
On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
>> ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools
>> before cdbs runs was my point.
>
> Err, yes, my bad, indeed, you did not say that.
OK, I see the problem. I'
On 30/06/06, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, until new B is packaged to debian, it blocks marking bug 123456 in
> A done. How should this be handled in BTS system? Should the bug be
> reassigned to package B?
File a bug against library B requesting that the new upstream release be
pa
On 21/07/06, Deepak Kumar Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Mentors,
First, do not use HTML/RichText/Doc email on Debian lists.
I am Deepak and I asked this question many times that how will start
contribution in Debian (particularly in perl or python / ruby area).
But I have
On 21/07/06, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Minor point: You mention the homepage in the package desciption, but
not as the developer reference recommends [1]. It would be nice, if you
could fix that with the next version.
Said Alexander on a „fix Homepage: semiheader URLs" ramp
On 27/07/06, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:28, martin f krafft took the opportunity to write:
> also sprach Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.27.1124
+0100]:
> > > Or just dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main//pkg.dsc
> > >
> >
: Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 27-Jul-2006 15:00
Subject: Re: "Glest ITP is RFP" or "I will be disconnected for an
undefinite period of time"
To: debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org
Am Donnerstag 27 Juli 2006 13:15 schrieb Eddy Petrişor:
On 27/07/06, Reinhard Tartler
On 02/08/06, Kit Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I asked a similar question on debian-user, and was recommended to come here
instead.
At my job, we would like to use apt to distribute certain packages, such as
WWW applications written in PHP, to certain other of our machines. The way
I had be
Please read wiki.debian.org/Backports, there are several things which
are not ok for an inclusion to bpo (unstable instead of testing, wrong
versioning etc).
Jean, you should undo thosse changes related to standards version:
"Do not lower the standards version, that's just useless."
I wanted to
On 28/08/06, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have for all of my tools/packages manpages (de and fr too) and
using dh_installman wich works perfectly.
Now I have read I must register manpages from the "postinst" script.
How can this be done?
All Debian packages I have chec
On 31/08/06, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But unfortunatly it can not rename files while using dh_install and
I like to see a dh_installpo like the dh_installman which put the
.CC.N in the right CountryCode section...
So, if dh_installpo can do this with the CC.po ...
.po files
On 31/08/06, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.31.1639 +0200]:
> Please no, as tools will start to use X-Homepage, you will have to
> keep compatibility for long time. And if tools won't use it, it
> makes no use to include it in debi
On 19/09/06, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting your site:
>
> "A Debian native package is a package that is specific to Debian, and
> would not be of interest to say Fedora. Godd examples are dpkg and apt
> tools."
>
> Actually, apt and dpkg are used by at least one project outsid
64 matches
Mail list logo
