RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

bian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gthumb - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gthumb/gthumb_2.10.7-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards David Paleino

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:22:59 -0600 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Don't override this, it *is* a bug in the package. The propper fix > is to move the library into a private directory inside /usr/lib, say > /usr/lib/gthumb Thank you. Should I call ldconfig in

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:02:10 -0800 Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Should I call ldconfig in post{inst,rm} also in this case then? Lintian > > complains about it: it says it's "usele

RFS: libopenraw -- free implementation for RAW decoding

e repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libopenraw/libopenraw_0.0.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards David Paleino -- . ''`. Debian maintaine

Re: RFS: libopenraw -- free implementation for RAW decoding

Il giorno Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:38:17 +0100 Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > David Paleino scrisse: > > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libopenraw". > > Just a quick review looking after your diff.gz: O

Re: RFS: libopenraw -- free implementation for RAW decoding

Il giorno Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:02:18 +0100 Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > As an additional note, your debian/copyright is incomplete, as it > lacking additional attribution for some sources: As I already said, it was a wrong upload. The right package (yes, I've lost some time checki

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:59:37 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1 > of the package "gthumb", which I'm adopting. > > ... > > The upload would fix

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:18:04 +0100 Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi David, Hi Julien, > I have built the package from the sources available on mentors, and > gthumb cannot load: > > $ LANG=C gthumb > gthumb: error while loading shared libraries: libgthumb.so: cannot op

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:28:30 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > ... > > I must have missed it, let me check the source, I'll report as soon as I get > something :) The package now is fully functional, I've also integrated a patch for yet an

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 08:32:20 +0100 Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > I have built the new release, but still an issue with libgthumb.so - > > gthumb can't find the library: > > $ ldd /usr/bin/gthumb | grep "not found" > > libgthumb.so => not found > > > > I attach the

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:55:55 +0100 Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > However, on my system: > > > > $ ldd /usr/bin/gthumb | grep libgthumb > > libgthumb.so => /usr/lib/gthumb/libgthumb.so (0xb7ef9000) > > > > Are you sure you have the right package? What does > > > >

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:55:55 +0100 Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > ... > > Creating a symlink in /usr/lib does work: > $ ldd /usr/bin/gthumb | grep libgthumb > libgthumb.so => /usr/lib/libgthumb.so (0x2b6e5c45a000) Strangely enough, I've just reproduced it. R

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

(sorry for quoting myself) Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:25:25 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > ... > > Now, there are two possible solutions: > a) creating a symlink (do I need to create a shlibs?) > b) moving everything from /usr/lib/gthumb/

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:37:36 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > (sorry for quoting myself) > > ... > > I'm now compiling with libdir and libexecdir to /usr/lib, I'll also need a > shlibs file and some lintian overrides (package

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 11:18:36 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > ... > > I'll wait for a reply before proceeding. In the meanwhile, I've built a package which works just fine: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gthumb/

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 30 Dec 2007 12:18:01 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > ... > > To me, if there are not other solutions for the unversioned SONAME, this > package is ready to be uploaded. Final version: using -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/gthumb. The package

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:59:37 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3:2.10.7-1 I've prepared a new version (3:2.10.8-1). > > ... > > The package is not lintian clean, it h

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:57:17 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > I've prepared a new version (3:2.10.8-1). (sorry for keeping quoting myself, just didn't want to start a new thread) Please don't upload it yet. I've just found out a minor

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 12:02:58 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Please don't upload it yet. I've just found out a minor issue during build: > after svn-buildpackage the sources are left modified. Looking at it right now. Ok, I can't solve

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:28:33 +0100 Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi David, Hi Julien, > Le jeudi 03 janvier 2008 à 19:22 +0100, David Paleino a écrit : > [...] > > .. > > $ svn status > > M src/GNOME_GThumb.h > > $ >

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Hi Ove, (please don't CC me, I'm subscribed to the list) Il giorno Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:27:55 +0100 Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > David Paleino skrev: > > > Upstream's tarball provides a file, src/GNOME_GThumb.h, which is dynamically > > gene

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Wed, 2 Jan 2008 11:57:17 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > ... > > I've prepared a new version (3:2.10.8-1). Which is finally ready, thanks to Ove Kaaven, who avoided me going mad, and to Julien Valroff, who helped as well. dget http://me

Re: RFS: libopenraw -- free implementation for RAW decoding

Hi Luca, Il giorno Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:38:17 +0100 Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > ... > > Please note that I can't actually check it deeper nor upload it > (semi-vacation period :). For now, please fix these issue, and feel free > to ping me back after 6th January if you haven't

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:52:03 +0100 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Could you please make the yelp dependency a Recommends? May I ask why? I believe "yelp" is better suited as a Depends (AFAIK, to read "gnome-doc" documentation, you need yelp) Kindly, David -- . ''`. De

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Sun, 13 Jan 2008 10:53:37 +0100 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > David Paleino wrote: > > > I believe "yelp" is better suited as a Depends (AFAIK, to read "gnome-doc" > > documentation, you need yelp) > > gthumbs main pur

Using symbols files

Hi all, one of my packages, libopenraw, has just been uploaded to NEW. My sponsor (lucab, thanks Luca!) noted that I should've read [1] and [2], to write proper symbols files. Unfortunately, I've not been able to fully understand how to implement this. Can anyone give some help? That would be appr

Re: RFS: rafb

Il giorno Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:00:43 +0100 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi Moe, > * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: > [...] > > It builds these binary packages: > > rafb - Reads text from stdin and posts it to the pastebin at rafb.net > > Why should someone

Re: RFS: gthumb (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:32:57 +0100 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Michael Biebl wrote: > > David Paleino wrote: > >> > >> dget > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gthumb/gthumb_2.10.8-1.dsc > > > > T

Re: DD lite

Il giorno Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:51:22 + David Given <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > I've had it suggested to me that there's a new streamlined Debian > Maintainer role, that gives DD-like privileges over a limited number of > packages. Some quick web searching doesn't reveal anything. Does a

RFS: libx86 (adopted package)

ev=0&sc=0 - svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-maint/deb-maint/libx86/trunk/ I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards David Paleino -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `.

Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)

Il giorno Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:18:44 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hello, Hi, > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.99-2+ds1 of the package > > "libx86", which I want t

Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)

Il giorno Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:18:44 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Some remarks: > 1. The Ubuntu package seems to have some additional > patches are these relevant to Debian? I've merged the Ubuntu patch, and mentioned it in debian/changelog: http://me

RFS: syslog-summary (updated and adopted package)

le at collab-maint: - svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-maint/deb-maint/syslog-summary/trunk/ - http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-maint/deb-maint/syslog-summary/trunk/?rev=0&sc=0 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards David Paleino -- . ''`. Debian maintaine

RFS: log-analysis (QA - updated package)

net/debian/pool/main/l/log-analysis/log-analysis_0.45-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards David Paleino -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `&#

Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:38:43 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Good work. I will examine your package tonight (about 12 hours from > now) and tell convey any further suggestions. Thank you, > Meanwhile, could you explain the logic behind the version number 0.99-2

Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 8 Feb 2008 09:38:15 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > ... > > Well. 0.99-2 because the archive already has 0.99-1. The "+ds1" part means > that it has been repackaged ("Debian Source"), and 1... well, I didn't l

Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:44:23 +0100 gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > ... > > So I suggest you use e.g. 0.99+ds-1 for your package. Thank you. A new package is available on m.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libx86/libx86_0.99+ds-1.dsc Kindly, David --

Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)

Il giorno Sat, 9 Feb 2008 12:40:31 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hello, > > On Sat, 09 Feb 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > > I have not yet done the rest of my review so you may want to wait a > > while before uploading a new version to mentors. > > Since you a

Re: RFS: libx86 (adopted package)

Il giorno Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:45:48 +0100 Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > David Paleino scrisse: > > > I decided to use your suggestion as the version number, with revision > > number 1 (i.e. "0.99.ds1-2"), because it's the first release wi

Re: RFS: syslog-summary (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:57:06 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.13 of the package > "syslog-summary", which I'm also adopting (ITA: #455005). Anyone interested in thi

Re: [uploaded] RFS: libx86 (adopted package)

Il giorno Sat, 9 Feb 2008 22:45:23 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Uploaded. Thanks for your work on this package. Thank you for reviewing and uploading it. Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 -

RFS: xpn

would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards David Paleino -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BA

Re: RFS: dictconv (5th try)

Il giorno Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:31:11 +0100 Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi, Hi Francesco (piacere, David :), > > ... > IANADD, but I have some suggestions for your package: 1) why is it Priority: extra? Put it "Priority: optional", if there is no specific reason to put i

Re: RFS: xpn

Il giorno Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:53:10 +0100 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi David, Hi Nico, > * David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-09 19:46]: > > > * URL : http://xpn.altervista.org/index_en.html > > The upstream homepage res

Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

Hi *, I'm packaging gnome-translate (ITP #292909), and everything builds fine. A lintian check on the .changes file throws: E: gnome-translate source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.guess 2003-07-02 N: N: The referenced file has a time stamp older than year 2004 and the N: package does

Re: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:40:07 -0600 Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Build-Depend on autotools-dev, move the ofending files aside and put > the new copy in thier place before running ./configure, copy the > originals back at the end of clean. > > Autotools-dev's documentatio

RFS: talkfilters

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "talkfilters". * Package name: talkfilters Version : 2.3.8-1 Upstream Author : Various, see #465086 * URL : http://www.hyperrealm.com/main.php?s=talkfilters * License : GPL-2, PD Section : games

Re: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:10:20 +0100 Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 01:40:07PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > > > Build-Depend on autotools-dev, move the ofending files aside and put > > the new copy in thier place before running ./configure, copy the

Re: Bug#465086: RFS: talkfilters

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:48:43 -0500 Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please see http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/filters/talkfilters-email : > > | How did you manage to get valspeak, postmodern, pansy, and fudd, whose > | authors are unknown to be GPLed? According to the info page, > | > |

RFS: libtranslate

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libtranslate". * Package name: libtranslate Version : 0.99-1 Upstream Author : Jean-Yves Lefort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/libtranslate * License : BSD-3 Section : libs I

Re: RFS: talkfilters

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:12:28 +0100 Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Too bad, there's a lot of file conflicts with Joey Hess' "filters" which > serve the same purpose. In fact, filters which conflict are either very > same files or reimplementations of those due to license problems. Ple

Re: RFS: syslog-summary (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Thu, 7 Feb 2008 10:57:06 +0100 David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.13 of the package > "syslog-summary", which I'm also adopting (ITA: #455005). > > It builds

Re: RFC: Howto exclude config.sub and config.guess updates from .diff.gz

Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:55:04 -0500 Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > A set -e shell script doesn't terminate if a nonzero return value is a > part of a conditional/test. However in a makefile, the exit status of > the shell can be nonzero even if it was a due to a test "faili

Re: RFC: Howto exclude config.sub and config.guess updates from .diff.gz

Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:50:33 +0100 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On 11/02/2008, David Paleino wrote: > > This seems to me more hackish than it should; is there a cleaner way > > to do it (maybe I'm just complicating myself and don't see

Re: RFC: Howto exclude config.sub and config.guess updates from .diff.gz

Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:23:46 +0100 Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Sorry, I broke the subject with my last post. I wanted to adjust it, but > forgot finish the subject line. Really sorry. ...and I read this post a second later having sent my reply. Please fix the subject o

Re: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:17:54 +0100 Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > We simply copy config.sub and config.guess into the build directory for > some years now and I never observed any problem with this. > > I'm really wondering why you want to make the situation complicated?

Re: RFC: Howto exclude config.sub and config.guess updates from .diff.gz

Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:36:03 +0100 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On 11/02/2008, David Paleino wrote: > > Not true: > > [Snip unrelated logic stuff.] I can't understand how what I wrote is "unrelated", but let's go on. &

Re: Lintian: outdated-autotools-helper-file

Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:53:48 +0100 Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > I suggest to mandate "remove all generated files in the clean target" > (formulated in a way which includes "generated by upstream", not only > "generated by the build target), which implies "rebuild everything

Re: RFC: Exclude config.sub and config.guess from

Il giorno Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:19:08 +0100 Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Copy the config.* scripts after the clean target has been called (e.g. > in the config.status target) then they are simply not part of the > diff.gz. Of course they would be after a second build run. If you

Re: signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)

Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:53:21 +0100 Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi David, Hi Nico, > * David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-12 14:50]: > [...] > > I usually sign all my emails -- but when I include commands to the BTS I > > can

Re: How to set BTS tags nicely

Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:35:46 +0100 Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hi, Hi, > There is a trivial question I've been asking myself for some time, > and I guess it will be best abswered here. > > Sometimes, I want to send new information to a bug report and set > tags

RFS: gfxboot

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for "gfxboot". * Package name: gfxboot Version : 4.0.1-1 Upstream Author : SUSE LINUX AG, Nuernberg, Germany Steffen Winterfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.novell.com/products/linuxpackages/suseli

Re: RFS: syslog-summary (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:58:34 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hello, Hi Kapil, > On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote: > > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - dget > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/

Re: RFS: syslog-summary (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:58:34 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Could you please clarify the following issues: > 1. The package does not seem to be Debian specific. > Yet it is packaged as such. FYI: https://sourceforge.net/projects/syslog-summary/

Re: RFS: syslog-summary (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:39:31 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > FYI: https://sourceforge.net/projects/syslog-summary/ > > I was going to suggest Alioth but you were too quick for me! :-) Isn't Alioth for Debian projects only? Maybe I have to read the FAQ again

Re: Writing get-orig-source targets to conform with policy

Il giorno Sun, 17 Feb 2008 11:02:21 -0500 Andres Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On Sunday 17 February 2008 4:04:41 am Bas Wijnen wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 02:39:03PM +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: > > > > To find the path, $(dir $_)/script can be used, to make sure it works > > from

Re: ITP takeover?

Il giorno Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:30:28 -0300 "Erick Mattos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hello David, Hi Erick, > I am the owner of the ITP and I had been trying to add Code::Blocks to > Debian repositories. > I had created the packages more than once but always having to change > something to

Re: Writing get-orig-source targets to conform with policy

Il giorno Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:59:51 -0500 Andres Mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On Sunday 17 February 2008 11:37:54 am David Paleino wrote: > > > Why not using $(CURDIR)? It should give you the dir where debian/ is > > located (i.e. $(CURDIR) == debian/../). I

Re: RFS: syslog-summary (updated and adopted package)

Il giorno Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:58:34 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, David Paleino wrote: > > > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > > - dget > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/syslo

RFS: libtranslate

ean. The upload would fix these bugs: 292907, 418329 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libtranslate/libtranslate_0.99-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards David Paleino -- . ''`.

RFS: pinot

Hi *, I am looking for a sponsor for "pinot". * Package name: pinot Version : 0.82-1 Upstream Author : Fabrice Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (and others) * URL : http://pinot.berlios.de * License : GPL, GPL-2+, LGPL-2+, LGPL-2.1 Section : x11 It builds t

GPG key change

Hi all, is there any procedure to follow in case one needs to revoke his GPG key (thus creating a new one)? I mean, I have some packages in Debian, which are signed by my current key (0x1392B174). Is it sufficient to start signing new packages with my new key? I've also applied NM, but I'm in an

Re: GPG key change

Il giorno Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:39:17 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Hello, Hi Kapil, > The only real reason to revoke the primary GPG key would be when > there are security concerns about it like: > 1. You feel that you have chosen a key size which is too >

Re: GPG key change

Il giorno Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:08:57 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > Its a while since I played around with GPG but IIRC, the sub-keys are > signed (and thus revoked) by the signing key. So having access to the > signing key ought to be enough to generate a revocation c

Re: RFS: pinot

Il giorno Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:53:18 +0100 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > David Paleino wrote: > > > Pinot is a D-Bus service that crawls, indexes your documents and monitors > > them for changes. > > It also has a GTK-based user interface t

Re: RFS: pinot

Il giorno Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:46:20 +0100 Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > The package looks fine at first glance. The only issue I found is this > in diff.gz: > > [..] > > [..] Did this slip into diff.gz unnoticed [..] Yes, sorry. > Also, shouldn't pinot depend on (or at least r

Re: signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:44:09 +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:05:25PM +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > To be honest, last time I tried sending a signed mail to control@ was > > something like a year ago. Something may have changed since then, since > > I

Re: RFS: pinot

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:21:13 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi David, Hi Michael, > A few more comments: > 1.) debian/patches/01-fix_pinot.desktop.patch > The desktop file seems to be correctly encoded in UTF-8, so removing the > Encoding line seems wrong to me. > Could you elaborate why this pa

Re: RFS: pinot

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:12:03 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > David Paleino wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:21:13 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > >> The directory /usr/lib/deskbar-applet/handlers/ is not used anymore by > >> deskbar-applet, so installin

Re: RFS: pinot

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:01:16 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > > ... > > P.S.: After this final round I think the package is ready for > sponsoring, which I'll happily do. The package is ready, at the usual URL. Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino :

Re: [DONE] RFS: pinot

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:24:23 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > David Paleino wrote: > > > The package is ready, at the usual URL. > > Uploaded. Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http:/

RFS: john (adopted and updated package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.2-1 of the package "john", which I'm adopting. It builds these binary packages: john - active password cracking tool john-data - active password cracking tool - character sets john-data is a new package, which contains archi

Re: RFS: john (adopted and updated package)

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:30:55 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi David! Hi Nelson, > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:19 AM, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.7.2-1 of the package > > "john", which

Keeping packages in unstable and experimental

Hi all, I'm posting this to -mentors since I believe it's a basic question, which may be useful also to others. I currently maintain gthumb, and I've recently uploaded a svn snapshot to testing. Now this is the situation: $ apt-cache policy gthumb gthumb: Installed: 3:2.11.0~svn2319-1 Candidat

Re: Keeping packages in unstable and experimental

On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:35:27 +0200, Luca Bruno wrote: > David Paleino scrisse: > > > Secondly, I've just adopted john. The old maintainer kept 1.6.x > > series in unstable, and a "1.7-2" in experimental. Now I've uploaded > > 1.7.2-1 into unsta

RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)

to be lintian clean; I've added a lintian override for The upload would fix the ITA bug: 477829 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/greenwich/greenwich_0.8.2-4.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for m

Re: RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)

On Fri, 02 May 2008 11:53:22 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Hi David, Hi Raphael, > David Paleino wrote: > > > > > > The package appears to be lintian clean; I've added a lintian override for > > You forgot that :) > > $ licensecheck src/greenwic

Re: RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)

On Fri, 02 May 2008 12:57:26 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > debian/rules: > > dh_installexamples > ... > > dh_strip > ... > > dh_shlibdeps > > you don't need them, do you? :) Hm, right :) > Btw, don't you think there's a better place for the contents of > debian/README.Debian? I've not writt

Re: RFS: greenwich (updated and adopted package)

On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:25:48 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > David Paleino wrote: > > > On Fri, 02 May 2008 12:57:26 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > > >> Btw, don't you think there's a better place for the contents of > >> debian/README.Debian?

RFS: libanculus-sharp -- utility library for C# projects

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libanculus-sharp". * Package name: libanculus-sharp * Version : 0.3.0-1 * Upstream Author : Ben Motmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://libanculus-sharp.googlecode.com/ * License : MIT * Section :

Re: RFS: vidalia

On Sun, 25 May 2008 17:17:04 +0300, George Danchev wrote: > I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. [..] 2) even > not being officially published, this source package is in the wild and it is > a bad idea to just reset its versioning (well unless using epoch which would > be compeltely unnee

Installing init.d scripts

Hi all, I'm packaging dkms [1] (ITP #481590), and it needs to install a script into init.d. I have a ./debian/dkms_autoinstaller.init, which should be placed in /etc/init.d/ by dh_installinit. And it does its job. But dh_installinit manpage also states: It also automatically generates the p

Re: Installing init.d scripts

On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:54:47 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO Pendant le repas du lundi 02 juin 2008, vers 19:41, David Paleino > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > > > W: dkms: > > script-in-etc-init.d-not-registered-via-update-rc.d > > /etc/init.d/dkms_

Re: Installing init.d scripts

Please don't CC me. On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:18:06 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du lundi 02 juin 2008, vers 20:01, David > Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > > > Forgot to mention that, sorry (I already did this check before). >

RFS: dkms

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dkms". * Package name: dkms Version : 2.0.19-1 Upstream Author : Dell, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://linux.dell.com/projects.shtml#dkms * License : GPL-2+ Section : admin It builds th

RFS: macchanger (adopted package)

se bugs: 391400, 481102 (ITA) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/macchanger/macchanger_1.5.0-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards David Paleino -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wik

"Fixing" source-contains-cvs-{conflict-copy,control-dir}

Hi all, I'm adopting libnet (ITA #483710), and lintian -iI warns me about the two tags in subject: I: libnet source: source-contains-cvs-control-dir CVS ... I: libnet source: source-contains-cvs-conflict-copy sample/.#icmp_unreach.c.1.2 ... I've always submitted clean packages to mentors.debian.n

Re: "Fixing" source-contains-cvs-{conflict-copy,control-dir}

On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 08:25:00 + (UTC), Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2008-06-07, David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Any opinion about this? Is there a consensus on how to behave? Is that a ma= > > tter of taste? > > Leave it and educate upstream. Yes, sure.

Re: RFS: dkms

Hi Daniel, I seem to have missed your mail, sorry. On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:01:39 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > David Paleino wrote: > > DKMS is a framework designed to allow individual kernel modules to be > > upgraded without changing the whole kernel. It is also very

RFS: webkit-sharp

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "webkit-sharp". My usual sponsor (Bart Martens ) won't be able to upload any package in the next few weeks. * Package name: webkit-sharp Version : 0.2~svn105589-1 Upstream Author : Everaldo Canuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL

  1   2   3   >