Bug#775532: RFS: citeproc-py/0.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Python library for CSL based bibliography processing

2015-06-17 Thread Daniel Stender
I've checked some deeper and found that at least schema/csl.rng is needed by the build in scheme validator in citeproc/frontend.py. In the SVN repo there are some waste experiments towards a +dfsg package - I'll complete everything when the new licenses are declared. DS -- http://qa.debian.org

Bug#775532: license of the CSL scheme files

2015-06-18 Thread Daniel Stender
Great! Thank you very much. Best, Daniel On 18.06.2015 16:37, Rintze Zelle wrote: > http://citationstyles.org/developers/ now says "Note. All versions of > the CSL schema have recently been relicensed under the more > permissible MIT license, and the GitHub repository will soon be > updated to re

Bug#775532: RFS: citeproc-py/0.3.0-1 [ITP] -- Python library for CSL based bibliography processing

2015-06-19 Thread Daniel Stender
The state of the package is: I'm not sure if it's o.k. for it to get accepted into the archive when a DFSG compliant change of the license is declared for the project but the actual file headers state something different. For that I've added a patch which disables the style check over by default f

Bug#789497: RFS: python-requirements-detector/0.4-1 [ITP]

2015-06-21 Thread Daniel Stender
net/debian/pool/main/p/python-requirements-detector/python-requirements-detector_0.4-1.dsc Thanks, Daniel Stender [1] https://bugs.debian.org/788208 ITP: python-requirements-detector -- find and list requirements of a Python project [2] https://bugs.debian.org/781165 ITP: prospector -- Python cod

Bug#789520: RFS: python-setoptconf/0.2.0-1 [ITP]

2015-06-21 Thread Daniel Stender
onf/python-setoptconf_0.2.0-1.dsc It builds all right, but I would be grateful for a suggestion how to get the tests running also for Py3 (the package builds with use_2to3). Thanks, Daniel Stender [1] https://bugs.debian.org/788212 ITP: python-setoptconf -- retrieve program settings from various sources

Bug#789595: RFS: pep257/0.5.0-1 -- static Python code analysis tool [ITP]

2015-06-22 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hi, I'm looking for an uploader resp. sponsor for my new package of pep257 [1]. That's another prerequisite for Prospector [2]. I've injected the package to a new SVN repo of the PAPT: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/pep257/

Bug#789617: RFS: dodgy/0.1.7-1 [ITP,PAPT]

2015-06-22 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hi, I'm looking to an uploaded resp. sponsor for my new package of dodgy [1]. That's yet another prerequisite for Prospector [2]. I've injected the package to a new SVN repo of the PAPT: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/dodgy

Bug#789617: RFS: dodgy/0.1.7-1 [ITP,PAPT]

2015-06-23 Thread Daniel Stender
Automatically I've set up DEP-8 tests, but dodgy might really doesn't need that ... DS -- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org wi

Bug#789680: RFS: pep8-naming/0.3.1-1 [ITP]

2015-06-23 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor resp. uploaded of my new package of pep8-naming [1]. It's another prerequisite for Prospector [2]. I've injected the package to a new Git repo of the DPMT: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/pe

Bug#789699: RFS: vulture/0.6-1 [ITP,PAPT]

2015-06-23 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hi, I'm looking for an uploader resp. sponsor for my new package of vulture [1]. It's a recommendation for Prospector [2]. The package is injected into the PAPT repo: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/python-apps/packages/vulture/trunk/ Buildlog:

Bug#789712: RFS: pylint-celery/0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-06-23 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Hello, I'm seeking for an uploader resp. sponsor of my package of pylint-celery [1]. It's a requirement for Prospector [2]. I've pushed the package to a new Git repo of the DPMT: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/pylint-celer

Bug#789712: RFS: pylint-celery/0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-06-24 Thread Daniel Stender
d app ... :-) Daniel On 24.06.2015 02:16, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 20:20:34 Daniel Stender wrote: >> I'm seeking for an uploader resp. sponsor of my package of pylint-celery > > I'm not sure if I'll be able to sponsor your package

Bug#789680: RFS: pep8-naming/0.3.1-1 [ITP]

2015-06-24 Thread Daniel Stender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 24.06.2015 18:31, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > It's not working: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/flake8", line 9, in > load_entry_point('flake8==2.2.2', 'console_scripts', 'flake8')() > File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dis

Bug#789680: RFS: pep8-naming/0.3.1-1 [ITP]

2015-06-25 Thread Daniel Stender
On 24.06.2015 18:56, Daniel Stender wrote: > On 24.06.2015 18:31, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> It's not working: > >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/usr/bin/flake8", line 9, in >> load_entry_point('flake8==2.2.2', '

Bug#789497: RFS: python-requirements-detector/0.4-1 [ITP]

2015-06-26 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi Raphael, thank you very much! On 26.06.2015 21:20, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > On Sun, 21 Jun 2015, Daniel Stender wrote: >> I'm looking for an uploader resp. sponsor for my package of >> (python-)requirements-detector [1]. > > I took a look a

Sbuild doesn't pick experimental over unstable

2015-07-10 Thread Daniel Stender
ge in Sid and always pulls 1.9.0 [1]. Is this the way it's mend to work? Is there a way to cheat this? Thanks Daniel Stender [1] http://paste.debian.net/280950/ -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#792447: RFS: python-afl/0.2.1-1 -- American Fuzzy Lop fuzzy testing for Python code [ITP]

2015-07-14 Thread Daniel Stender
debian.net/package/python-afl http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-afl/python-afl_0.2.1-1.dsc Build log: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/python-afl_0.2.1-1_amd64-20150714-2243.build Thank you very much for considering, Daniel Stender [1] https://bugs.debian.org/792317 ITP:

Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

2015-07-19 Thread Daniel Stender
itectures block transitions? Thanks in advance, Daniel Stender -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: Build on hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 ... at home

2015-07-19 Thread Daniel Stender
... "convenient way to test build source packages against resp. on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64" ... on a Linux kernel machine. On 19.07.2015 17:52, Daniel Stender wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a convenient way to test build source packages against resp. > on

Bug#868245: RFS: python-latexcodec/1.0.5-1

2017-07-13 Thread Daniel Stender
On 13.07.2017 17:56, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the following package: > > * Package name: python-latexcodec > Version : 1.0.5-1 > Upstream Author : Matthias C. M. Troffaes > *

Bug#873459: RFS: python-singa/1.1.1-1 [ITP]

2017-11-05 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi Moaz, the package looks good, but I can't build it in a clean chroot: Run Build Command:"/usr/bin/make" "cmTC_2ee00/fast" make[1]: Entering directory '/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp' /usr/bin/make -f CMakeFiles/cmTC_2ee00.dir/build.make CMakeFiles/cmTC_2ee00.dir/build make[2]:

Bug#792447: RFS: python-afl/0.2.1-1 -- American Fuzzy Lop fuzzy testing for Python code [ITP]

2015-08-09 Thread Daniel Stender
I've rewritten deb/control and deb/rules to build with two packages, for Py2 and Py3. Fresh mentors upload is available. New buildlog: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/python-afl_0.2.1-1_amd64-20150809-2223.build Thanks, DS -- http://www.danielstender.com/blog/ 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8

Bug#792447: RFS: python-afl/0.2.1-1 -- American Fuzzy Lop fuzzy testing for Python code [ITP]

2015-08-10 Thread Daniel Stender
On 10.08.2015 11:04, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I did a look, and the packaging looks really good (and the upstream > maintainer too :) ). > > However prior to sponsor I would like to see afl working, otherwise it would > be not installable > on sid. > > (I'll try to work on llvm side in th

Bug#792447: Fwd: Re: Bug#792447: RFS: python-afl/0.2.1-1 -- American Fuzzy Lop fuzzy testing for Python code [ITP]

2015-08-21 Thread Daniel Stender
Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Bug#792447: RFS: python-afl/0.2.1-1 -- American Fuzzy Lop fuzzy testing for Python code [ITP] Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:25:34 +0200 From: Daniel Stender To: Gianfranco Costamagna On 21.08.2015 14:19, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: t

Bug#796894: RFS: afl/1.86b-1 -- fuzzy tester for binary formats [ITA]

2015-08-25 Thread Daniel Stender
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, I'm looking for an uploader for my new package of American Fuzzy Lop (afl), which is on ITA [1]. The package is Git-ized here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/afl.git Build log: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/afl_1.86b-1_am

Bug#789699: vulture review

2015-08-25 Thread Daniel Stender
On 25.08.2015 19:17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > > Hi Daniel, I would appreciate if you could provide the python3 package, or > both. > > What do you think? according to setup.py the package is python3 ready, so > maybe > running pybuild --with python3, or providing two

Bug#789699: vulture review

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Stender
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:32:16 +0200 Daniel Stender wrote: > On 25.08.2015 19:17, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > ... yeah, this would be an option, Py3 as default is coming up, anyway. > > This is going to be an enhancement for Prospector, which is on Py2, but I > think it runs

Bug#789699: vulture review

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Stender
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 22:18:02 +0200 Daniel Stender wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 19:32:16 +0200 Daniel Stender > wrote: > For the name of binaries, I would prefer "vulture{,3}" over > "python{,3}-vulture" like Pylint does > it, but it appears Pybuild expect

Bug#797707: RFS: python-subprocess32/3.2.6-1

2015-09-01 Thread Daniel Stender
ubprocess32/python-subprocess32_3.2.6-1.dsc Thanks for consideration, Daniel Stender [1] https://bugs.debian.org/797583 ITP: python-subprocess32 -- Py2 backport of Py3 stdlib subprocess module -- 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 LPI certified Linux Admin (

Bug#789699: ping :)

2015-09-09 Thread Daniel Stender
On 09.09.2015 08:55, Daniel Stender wrote: > On 09.09.2015 08:50, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> Hi, Ping about 789699 (vulture) >> >> :) >> cheers! >> >> G. > > Yes yes yes :-) I was busy with with other stuff. It's coming up! Soon. > >

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-08 Thread Daniel Stender
I'm going to review this. Please expect the results, soon. Best, Daniel Stender -- 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4) http://www.danielstender.com/blog/

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-10 Thread Daniel Stender
docs/sphinx_rtd_theme.zip from the source package (and use the package python-sphinx-rtd-theme). You might want to use "Files-Excluded:" in debian/copyright [a] to created a reduced Debian tarball via uscan. [a] https://wiki.debian.org/UscanEnhancements I'm sure that privacyI

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-11 Thread Daniel Stender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 11.10.2015 10:52, Cornelius Kölbel wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > thanks a lot for all the valuable feedback. > > I will dive into it later. > > Do you have any further recommendations on finding a sponser (after > streamlining the package)? > > THan

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1

2015-10-15 Thread Daniel Stender
On 15.10.2015 11:46, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi > > please fix the mentors issues and remove tag moreinfo as soon as you have > addressed them. > > e.g. ITP bug is needed, the changelog should target unstable not jessie, you > should c

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-20 Thread Daniel Stender
I've gone through the requirements of privacyIDEA (./requirements.txt) yet and there might be a serious problem ... python-qrcode 5.1/5.0.1 python-dateutil 2.4.2/2.2 python-tz 2015.4/2012c snowballstemmer not available python-gunicorn 19.3.0/19.0 python-responses 0.4.0/0.3.0 cookies not available

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-25 Thread Daniel Stender
My idea with this would be, close the RFS for now, then file RFP and wishlist-please-update bugs with blocks against the ITP as a todo list. Needs some aforestation, when everything is available privacyidea goes into NEW. Like said, I think I've seen that most of the packages are group maintained

Bug#801213: RFS: python-privacyidea/2.7-1 [ITP]

2015-10-26 Thread Daniel Stender
On 26.10.2015 10:47, Cornelius Kölbel wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > what do you need me to do? > As the poster of RFS do I need to take action? > > Thanks > Cornelius > > Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2015, 22:00 +0100 schrieb Daniel Stender: >> My idea with this would be,

Bug#803600: RFS: golang-github-mitchellh-iochan [ITP, pkg-go]

2015-10-31 Thread Daniel Stender
_amd64-20151031-1837.build Mentors upload: http://mentors.debian.net/package/golang-github-mitchellh-iochan http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/golang-github-mitchellh-iochan/golang-github-mitchellh-iochan_0.0~git20150529.0.87b45ff-1.dsc Thank you very much, Daniel Stender [1] https://githu

Bug#803620: RFS: afl-cov/0.3-1 [ITP] -- code coverage for afl

2015-10-31 Thread Daniel Stender
Fuzzy Lop). I have a buildlog here: http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/afl-cov_0.3-1_amd64-20151101-0153.build And a mentors upload prepared: http://mentors.debian.net/package/afl-cov http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/afl-cov/afl-cov_0.3-1.dsc Thank you very much for consideration, D

Bug#803620: RFS: afl-cov/0.3-1 [ITP] -- code coverage for afl

2015-11-01 Thread Daniel Stender
000 +0100 +++ afl-cov-0.3/debian/copyright 2015-11-01 11:35:35.0 +0100 @@ -5,21 +5,22 @@ Files: * Copyright: 2015 Michael Rash -License: GPL-2 +License: GPL-2+ Files: debian/* Copyright: 2015 Daniel Stender -License: GPL-2 +License: GPL-2+ -License: GPL-2 - This package is f

Bug#803620: RFS: afl-cov/0.3-1 [ITP] -- code coverage for afl

2015-11-01 Thread Daniel Stender
... "import subprocess32" of course doesn't work but "import subprocess32 as subprocess". Fixed it and refreshed the mentors upload. Daniel -- 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4) http://www.danielstender.com/blog/

Bug#803895: RFS: gox/0.3.0-1 [ITP, pkg-go] -- cross-compilation for Go

2015-11-02 Thread Daniel Stender
ackage/gox http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gox/gox_0.3.0-1.dsc The package builds and works fine, but for some reason the tests don't run through. Thank you very much for considering, Daniel Stender - -- 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 LPI

Bug#803895: [pkg-go] Bug#803895: RFS: gox/0.3.0-1 [ITP, pkg-go] -- cross-compilation for Go

2015-11-03 Thread Daniel Stender
elease watch gets, and refreshed the tarball within the Git repo. >> I recommend suggesting upstream to delete the test, and then packaging a >> new snapshot. I've seen that upstream has already worked on that: https://github.com/mitchellh/gox/commit/733261c Maybe better to switch

Bug#803895: [pkg-go] Bug#803895: RFS: gox/0.3.0-1 [ITP, pkg-go] -- cross-compilation for Go

2015-11-05 Thread Daniel Stender
On 05.11.2015 22:46, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Thanks, uploaded. > > FYI, I’ve opened https://github.com/mitchellh/gox/issues/47 with upstream > and it seems like we can fix the test in question for the next release. Yes, all right. Thx for sponsoring! Best, Daniel -- 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA

Re: scantailor maintainership and alioth

2016-04-28 Thread Daniel Stender
On 27.04.2016 22:41, Jason Crain wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:39:11PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Jason Crain wrote: >> >>> I have a question about Alioth though. The debian package is being >>> maintained at (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/sc

<    1   2