On 26.10.2015 10:47, Cornelius Kölbel wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > what do you need me to do? > As the poster of RFS do I need to take action? > > Thanks > Cornelius > > Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2015, 22:00 +0100 schrieb Daniel Stender: >> My idea with this would be, close the RFS for now, then file RFP and >> wishlist-please-update bugs with blocks against the ITP as a todo list. >> >> Needs some afforestation, when everything is available privacyidea goes into >> NEW. Like said, I think I've seen that most of the packages are group >> maintained >> (with Python group in Maintainers field), that's good. >> >> Daniel
Yes, I didn't closed it because it's not my bug, that should do the reporter. I've made a "afforestation" before for Prospector, there were ... I think ... more than ten things outdated or not available. I'm going to help with uploads in the groups, and I would really see Privacyidea in Debian at the year's turn (depends on how long the missing packages are going to be in NEW), for Debian 9 there's nothing against it. I'm on it (owner of the ITP bug)! Best, Daniel -- 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4) http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
