[to the list, again]
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Tue, 29 May 2007 11:06:32 +0200 |=-
> Damyan Ivanov ha scritto:
> > While there, is there a need for that *three* changelog entries for
> > 1.125-x?
> >
> > Why not simply change the version of the 1.108-1 entry and leave it
>
> http://web.ticino.com/gfwp/debian/peless-1.125/peless_1.125-1.dsc
>
> I hope now it should be ok
Almost there :)
> P.S. the md5sum of orig.tar.gz and peless.tar.bz2 are obviously not
> the same, but uupdate repackages it automatically during upgrade. If
> this is an issue, the I'll upload a ve
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Sat, 02 Jun 2007 17:14:29 +0200 |=-
> If I try to recompress peless-1.125.tar.bz2 to peless-1.125.tar.gz (as
> suggested above) the md5sum changes, and doesn't correspond to md5sum
> of the peless_1.125.orig.tar.gz generated by uupdate. I actually get 3
> different md5sums!
But
[back to list, again]
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:33:35 +0200 |=-
> I've cleaned up the peless package:
>
> http://web.ticino.com/gfwp/debian/peless-1.125/peless_1.125-1.dsc
>
> *generated from a tar.gz to have md5sums correspondence
> *watch file corrected and tested
> *changelog cle
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:30:51 +0200 |=-
>
> I've prepared a new peless package downloadable at:
>
> http://web.ticino.com/gfwp/debian/peless-1.145/peless_1.145-1.dsc
>
> [...]
> Please take a look at, and, if good, upload it, THANKS!
Done.
Thank you for your contribution to Debi
-=| Giorgio Pioda, Mon, 11 Jun 2007 18:09:09 +0200 |=-
> > One way to fix this is indeed by adding --as-needed to LDFLAGS, but
> > --as-needed is really just a hack. The proper way is to reduce the
> > "-l" parameters to the linker to only those libraries that are used
> > directly by peless.
>
>
-=| Erick Mattos, Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:13:40 -0300 |=-
> * Package name: codeblocks
> Version : 0.0.20070612-1
> Upstream Author : Yiannis Mandravellos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.codeblocks.org
> * License : GPL
> Section : devel
>
> It bu
-=| Damyan Ivanov, Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:57:17 +0300 |=-
> Here's a non-exclusive list in no particular order (:
Additionally, the configure-stamp target in debian/rules misses "touch
$@" at the enc, causing repetitive building.
--
damJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi, Erick,
-=| Damyan Ivanov, Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:04:50 +0300 |=-
> -=| Damyan Ivanov, Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:57:17 +0300 |=-
> > Here's a non-exclusive list in no particular order (:
>
> Additionally, the configure-stamp target in debian/rules misses "touch
> $@&quo
-=| Erick Mattos, Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:10:52 -0300 |=-
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/codeblocks/codeblocks_1.0rc2~svn.20070620-1.dsc
More comments, in several categories :)
Nitpicks:
* debian/codeblocks.desktop contains "GenericName[en_GR]=".
Can you either fill it or remove
-=| Javier Candeira, Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:31:00 +1000 |=-
> * Package name: Spout
> Version : 1.1a-1
> Upstream Author : Kumi
> * URL : http://www.din.or.jp/~ku_/junk/spout11a.zip
> * License : MIT
> Section : games
>
> * Browse : http://rowrcolo.net/
-=| Javier Candeira, Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:37:08 +1000 |=-
> Damyan, Thanks so much for answering, and thanks especially for
> agreeing to work with me on the package.
"Work" is a bit strong :) I'll just review/upload. You are supposed to
do the "work" :)
> Here are my answers to your requests. I h
o bet that the only changes upstream
> will ever make to this game will be to add my licensing wordings, if that.
Packaging something that is not actively developed may pose more burden
on your side (fixing bugs, etc), but since you're the maintainer, that
is your decision to make :)
-
l_2.33-1.dsc
Uploaded.
There is a lintian warning that would be nice to have fixed for the next
revision.
Please sent the manpage fixes upstream if you haven't already.
- --
Damyan IvanovJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Com
that you end up co-maintaining it :)
Please do not take my upload as an act of preference of one's package
over the other's. It was Charles' polite asking that make me consider it
for upload.
- --
Damyan IvanovJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
-=| Krzysztof Burghardt, 16.07.2007 11:24 |=-
> 2007/7/14, Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0cvs20070327-2
>> of my package "libsbc".
>
> It has only 2 small changes to debian/rules and debian/control
> need to be lintian checklist compli
-=| Krzysztof Burghardt, 16.07.2007 16:37 |=-
> 2007/7/16, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I wonder how these tiny changes result in growing the .diff.gz from
>> 2.4K to 230K :) Was this intentional?
>
> It wasn't. Sorry. It seems generated files like Makef
ly useful when you find serious problems with -1
that could make it rejected.
- --
Damyan IvanovJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGnEaHHqjlqpcl9jsRArs0AKCf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Any reason to keep dropping the mailing list?]
- -=| Krzysztof Burghardt, 16.07.2007 18:24 |=-
> 2007/7/16, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Please make the process of creating the .orig.tar.gz more obvious (and
>> reviewab
-=| Charlie, 17.07.2007 09:45 |=-
> I have a problem that I'm not sure
> how to fix. The package I have in NEW is 3.3.3.2-1 I had to remove
> some window support files (.dll and .exe) from the orig.tar.gz and
> reading through the debian manuals I noticed that the package should
> have been 3.3.
-=| Gerfried Fuchs, 18.07.2007 12:36 |=-
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:08:20PM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote:
>> I'll fix the tar in tar solution. The problem will be with
>> vegastrike-data. I'm trying to get rid of all the warnings and one
>> error. Fixing the warnings consist of uploading a new orig
-=| Neil Williams, 24.07.2007 17:32 |=-
> http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsor
Content seems to be missing?
--
damJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ot; instead?
> It builds these binary packages:
> libwhisker2-perl - Perl module geared for HTTP testing
Is this the same package you imported into pkg-perl SVN repository? What
you imported is named "libwhisker-perl" so I am not sure. Please clarify.
- --
Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -=| Jeremiah Foster, 9.09.2007 20:40 |=-
> E: libhtml-treebuilder-xpath-perl: package-installs-packlist
> usr/lib/perl5/auto/HTML/TreeBuilder/XPath/.packlist
> N:
> N: Packages built using the perl MakeMaker package will have a file named
> N: .
-=| Peter Pentchev, Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:50:19PM +0300 |=-
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4-2
> of my package "timelimit" which builds a single binary package:
>
> timelimit - Simple utility to limit a process's absolute execution time
Uploaded. Thanks for your work.
-
Hi,
I am joining late, but I just found this bug, while considering
packaging hyper rogue myself :)
-=| chrysn, 06.08.2013 21:27:17 +0200 |=-
> i therefore still think that the package is suitable for debian from
> my point of view.
I am impressed by the state of the packaging, very good work,
-=| chrysn, 23.11.2013 16:48:55 +0100 |=-
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:22:29PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > I intent to work on all the points and eventually upload the
> > package, if that's alright with you. (I am already member of
> > pkg-games, cc-ed).
>
&g
-=| Damyan Ivanov, 25.11.2013 13:34:43 +0200 |=-
> I think I addressed all my points. The result is in pkg-games
> Git[1]. I hope my contributions are not too invasive.
>
> [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/hyperrogue.git
>
> If the changes look alright to you
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
