-=| Charlie, 17.07.2007 09:45 |=- > I have a problem that I'm not sure > how to fix. The package I have in NEW is 3.3.3.2-1 I had to remove > some window support files (.dll and .exe) from the orig.tar.gz and > reading through the debian manuals I noticed that the package should > have been 3.3.3.2-dfsg-1. I have placed a list of all the files > removed in README.Debian. Should I package it as 3.3.3.2-dfsg-1 or > 3.3.3.2.dfsg-2 since this is actually the second debian version?
I'd use 3.3.3.2.dfsg1-1 Deciphered, this is - upstream 3.3.3.2 - cleaned to comply with dfsg, first take -- above identify the orig.tar.gz - first debian revision using _that_ orig.tar.gz Is the DFSG the reason for that repackaging[1]? If not, you should use "ds" (as in Debian Source) instead of "dfsg". You may want to consult the DevRef 6.7.8.2 to make sure that a re-packaging is really needed. BTW, there is newer upstream version :) [1] The .dll and .exe files are unneeded, yes, but unless they clash with DFSG you can leave them (explaining their origin/authors/license in debian/copyright) -- dam JabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
