Re: Gurpreet Singh Grewal in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I would like to help by whatever programming help I can give and
> wwould be glad if someone
> mentored me for a while and helped me become a hacker .
Have a look at http://www.debian.org/devel/join/ for ways of getting
started.
Christoph
--
[EM
Re: Martín Ferrari in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have a package ready, but before filing an ITP, I would like to have
> feedback on this. Webxml is a QT editor for tomcat's web.xml files, it
> seems to work OK and can be very handy, specially when you're not
> familiar with that kind of configuration
Re: Torsten Werner in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> DO NOT DO THAT AGAIN!
>
> RFH does not mean, that the package is not maintained. You should have
> coordinated the upload with the current maintainer - at least the ITA
> mail should be send some days/weeks *before* the upload.
It would have helped if y
Re: Stan Vasilyev in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >I think the question is: "If I create a package of this, will someone
> >sponsor
Hi,
just go ahead an create updated packages. Ask for a sponsor here; I'm
willing to sponsor uploads of adopted packages, especially if people
do care about the packages t
Re: Giuseppe Martino in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >But what's more important. The build failed here:
> >
> >configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in config
> >./config
> >make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>
> The problem is a missed Build-Depends aboud automake1.9.
The proper way to
Re: Bas Wijnen in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Please provide an updated upstream tarball.
> >
> > This will allow you to drop the build-dependency on the autotools,
> > which is considered evil by most people anyway.
>
> Huh? Looking at the output of bootstrap, it runs the autotools. Or do you
> me
Re: Stan Vasilyev in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am looking for a sponsor for a series of packages I adopted and rebuilt:
>
> bbsload (new upstream version)
> bbappconf (same version, fixed some documentation)
> bbpager (same version, fixed some documentation)
>
> Coming soon:
> mindterm, ksocrat, un
Re: Patryk Cisek in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Name: xmms-musepack
> Version: 1.2
> Section: sound
> License: BSD
> RFP -> ITP: 241287
> Upstram home page:http://musepack.
Re: Giuseppe Martino in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:44:14PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > The proper way to fix that is to ship a bootstrapped .tar.bz2.
>
> Ok, I replaced every link with a copy of its normal file
> (`config/install-sh' `
Re: Frédéric BOITEUX in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > According to the bts, there's only a RFH, not an O. Did he forget to do
> > this?
>
> I don't know if he has really orphaned it, but in the fact, he don't have time
> to maintain it and didn't found another DD to help him, only some outside
> Debi
Re: Nelson A. de Oliveira in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am planning to rename the source package to "biofox" only, instead
> mozilla-firefox-biofox.
Why? The user won't see the source package name change. It's only
extra hassle for you and the ftp-masters. If you really want, rename
the binary packa
Re: Craig Small in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > IMO, the description should be about the application, it shouldn't
> > > be a comparative.
> >
> > Agreed. I'd say rather that enough information about the application
> > should be included so that the reader can make their own comparison.
>
> You can
Re: LI Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I need a uploader for the new version of qterm. it's not lintian and
> linda clean(without-manpages). I have uploaded it to mentors[1], and
> submit it at sponsors.
Why not write a manpage? There are tools that automate that. (And if
you do not like roff, yo
Re: LI Daobing in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> a manpage for a gui program without argument supporting is useless,
> and many one do not write manpages[1]
>
> [1] http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tbinary-without-manpage.html
Citing linitian warnings as an excuse not to fix bugs is certainly
strange.
>
Re: Timo Weingärtner in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> pam_group is good, exactly what I need. A few weeks ago I searched for such a
> module and only found this one.
>
> Shall we close this ITP?
Yes, as there's a better alternative already in Debian.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.d
Re: Ryan Schultz in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Package name: xmms-oggre
> Version : 0.3
> Upstream Author : Lars Siebold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/my-xmms-plugs/
> * License : GPL
> Description : ogg disk output plugin for X
Re: Norbert Preining in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Add yourself to the Uploaders field.
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-collaborative-maint
>
> Can I do this when I am not a DD till now, ie don't have a @debian.org
> email?
Think of "Uploaders:" as "Co-Maintainer
Re: Marcin Wrochniak in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Aptsh is an application similar to apt-shell from Conectiva's apt4rpm
> - it is a shell-like frontend to Apt's command line tools, with
> features that let users work faster: command completion (which de
> facto works like bash-completion, with one exce
Re: Oleksandr Moskalenko in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Package: lprof
Uploaded.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Thaddeus H. Black in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Pierre Machard wrote:
> > Do not worry if I set my name as uploader, so that it's easy for me to
> > track packages I am sponsoring.
The PTS does perfectly suit this, and you can even subscribe to a
package before it is in the archive. There is no nee
Re: Sylvain LE GALL in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I am looking for a sponsor to fbgetty. This package has been orphaned
> and i want to take his maintainance.
>
> I have prepared a package, that can be found here:
> http://sylvain.le-gall.net/debian-public
Please fix your ServerName (or post URLs tha
Re: Matthew Palmer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The primary reason I've seen expressed for desire to be added to the
> Uploaders field is so that the sponsor can get a quick summary of a
> sponsored package's state from the excellent developer.php script on
> qa.debian.org. I've noticed that being abl
Re: Eddy Petrişor in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Could somebody take a look over it and tell me if I need to make any
> changes before I list it on sponsors.d.n ?
changelog:
remove the [ ] part
get an ITP and insert it here
control:
old Standards-Version
you might want to use the new "Archticture:
Re: Thomas Friedrichsmeier in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I don't really have the ambition to become a new maintainer, but if that's
> what's needed, I might consider going through this. I'm a debian user, and a
> software developer, and what I'm really trying to do, is get one of my
> projects into d
Re: Peter S Galbraith in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> How many releases do we keep transition packages?
>
> For example, debview was a real package in oldstage and is a transition
> package in stable that depends on debian-el. Can I remove the
> transition package now? Or must I wait after the next re
Re: Ryan Schultz in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I believe all of the code in PCSX is DFSG-free, after research (see the ITP
> bug #137355 for more info).
Are there free games for PCSX? Otherwise it should probably go into
contrib. (Like scummvm prior to 0.5.1-2 [1] and probably other
interpreters/engin
Re: Adeodato Simó in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Perhaps if you post your keyid somebody can take a look and tell you
> whether it's fine or not?
The "official" test is:
GPGOPTS=" -q --no-options --no-default-keyring --no-auto-check-trustdb
--keyring $DESTDIR/nm.gpg --trust-model always"
echo "Le
Re: Jose Carlos do Nascimento in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> version=2
> opts=dversionmangle=s/\./-/ \
> http://www.phpconcept.net/pclzip/
> \.\./download.php.file=pclzip-([\d\-]+)\.tgz.*
>
> but in Debian Quality Assurance, versions are wrong showed.
>
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php
Re: Jose Carlos do Nascimento in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think that "Debian Quality Assurance" run "uscan".
developer.php just wgets a DB file from dehs.alioth.d.o, you have to
check their code. (I guess they are using some custom thing; uscan is
not particularly well scriptable/parsable.)
Chris
Re: Mario Iseli in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have now overworked my package - it doesn't contain mistakes anymore.
> Would be nice if someone is interested in sponsoring!
Hi,
some comments:
* the upstream URL in debian/copyright "may still be available for
registration"
* since there's no new .o
Re: Florian Weimer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'd like to create a cron entry which is run once a day, at some
> random time. This is necessary because the cron entry will result in
> a request over the network, and I want to avoid that all hosts in a
> time zone pound the server at the same time.
Re: Bas Wijnen in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I haven't seen anything in policy either, but I can't see any use for having a
> shebang line without execute permissions. Can you give an example?
Sometimes that's the easiest way to trick $EDITOR to get the syntax
hilighting right (and it's portable betwe
Re: Alejandro Exojo in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm trying to generate a diff.gz in which only the debian/ directory is
> included.
filterdiff -z -i '*/debian/*'
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Michael Stilkerich in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is there any special reason why dh_installmenu does not call update-menu with
> the --remove option upon package removal? Should I add the command to the
> script myself?
If you already have a prerm script, make sure it contains the
#DEBHELPER# line.
Re: Aníbal Monsalve Salazar 2006-08-31 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>See http://merkel.debian.org/~myon/sponsorstats/
>
> The packages Charles is referring to are listed at:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-med-packaging%40lists.alioth.debian.org
My script handles packages where the
Re: Michael Tautschnig 2006-10-25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Furthermore, I'd like to add some notes: Probably brickos and the Lego
> Mindstorms Kit is the only use of this and related packages. As such I wonder
> whether it is worth trying to upgrade to binutils 2.16.x and gcc-4.x, because
> this very
Re: Florian Rothmaier 2014-01-21 <52de8102.8040...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de>
> Currently, my "debian/control" has the following structure:
>
> Source: q3c
> ...
>
> Package: postgresql-8.4-q3c
> ...
>
> Package: postgresql-9.0-q3c
> ...
>
> Package: postgresql-9.1-q3c
> ...
>
>
> While looking a
Re: Florian Rothmaier 2014-01-24 <52e2acbf.1090...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de>
> It should be mentioned that my "debian/rules" is still based on an
> outdated version of "pg_buildext" from
> "postgresql-server-dev-all" (129). So the next step will be to use v152
> of this script which includes the "loop
Re: Florian Rothmaier 2014-01-29 <52e94292.7000...@ari.uni-heidelberg.de>
> If I look at other extension packages, e.g.
> http://packages.debian.org/de/jessie/amd64/postgresql-9.3-ip4r/filelist
> I can see that "README..gz" always goes to
> "/usr/share/doc/postgresql--/".
>
> Your hint, the workar
Re: RFS : Slune and dependencies [Duck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sat, Aug 09, 2003
at 06:36:53PM +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> My gnupg key has already been signed.
I can't find it on the keyservers.
Maybe you could also include your real name in your mails.
Christoph
--
Ch
ian.net provides a service that is useful for this purpose".
You have to stress that people actually upload the _source_ package. If
not told, they tend to provide i386 binaries.
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.df7cb.de
Wohnheim D, 2405, Uni
be downloaded from.
# Provide a publically accessible place where all of the files
relating to your package can be downloaded from, that is both the source
package (.orig.tar.gz, .diff, and .dsc files) and binary packages along
with .changes files.
[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/
ckages, not
only i386 binaries. (I'm wondering if this shouldn't be an architecture
"all" package anyway.)
See also: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.df7cb.de
Wohnheim D, 2405, Universität d
it rather
annoying if packages would have hardcoded paths compiled in.
Some weeks ago there was a discussion whether mutt should call
/usr/bin/gpg rather than gpg because "gpg was security critical". I have
a ~/bin/gpg that calls a agent-enabled version of gpg, which makes
perfectly s
re specific which
program you are talking about? It probably isn't part of Debian
GNU/Linux, so you will have to send your question to the author of that
software.
More info about Debian can be found at www.debian.org.
Christoph Berg
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www
ct.
stat(2):
S_IFDIR 004 directory
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.df7cb.de/
Wohnheim D, 2405, Universität des Saarlandes, 0681/9657944
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Aaron MartineZ Kill All Windows in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey there people my name is Aaron Martinez i being working with Debian
> for like 2 to 3 years seriously hard i will like to maintance a packaged
> for eggdrops or Bitchx since i'm a developer on Bitchx i will like to
> help Debian in any
Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >* how packages like those go in the repository for the first time?
>
> By ignoring build-depends while in some way you've made your system to
> actually be able to build the package. I.e., you've for example
> bootstrapped the compiler. Then
Re: Aaron MartineZ Kill All Windows in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey there people my name is Aaron Martinez i being working with Debian
> for like 2 to 3 years seriously hard i will like to maintance a packaged
> for eggdrops or Bitchx since i'm a developer on Bitchx i will like to
> help Debian in any
Re: Jeroen van Wolffelaar in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >* how packages like those go in the repository for the first time?
>
> By ignoring build-depends while in some way you've made your system to
> actually be able to build the package. I.e., you've for example
> bootstrapped the compiler. Then
Re: Fabio Tranchitella in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> $ ln -s dir1/dir2 dir2
> $ cd dir2
> $ pwd
> /home/kobold/dir2
> $ mv file ..
>
> The file is moved into /home/kobold/dir1 instead of /home/kobold
> Is this right? IMHO it's confusing for the user. If pwd returns
> "/home/kobold/dir2", .. should be r
Re: Steve Langasek in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Regardless of the maintainer's comments, DDs should not sponsor NMUs; it is
> the responsibility of the uploading developer to personally verify the
> correctness of the changes in an NMU, and it is incorrect to upload changes
> in an NMU that have not fi
Re: Nick Lewycky in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >--- /usr/bin/dpkg-source2004-11-11 21:15:52.0 +0100
> >+++ /home/ifi/bin/dpkg-source 2004-12-08 14:45:00.0 +0100
> >@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@
> >$ENV{'LC_ALL'}= 'C';
> >$ENV{'LANG'}= 'C';
> >
Re: Roland Gruber in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >ftp://ftp2.sf.net//<2_first_letters>//
>
> so the problem might be that I use HTTP in my watch line?
I'd always use http in favour of ftp. ftp is obsolete.
For sf.net, use the following page to watch (works for every project
that has released any files
Re: Luk Claes in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lam/
>
> The problem is that this kind of URLs
> (http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net) do not work with dehs.
Of course you have to tack the filename with the () pattern to the end.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http:
Re: Rafael Fernández López in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm looking for a package that I like to keep it care of.
You have to find one yourself. For example, browse the WNPP bug list
(if you are really interested in Debian, you know what this is) to see
if there's something interesting.
> I've some q
Re: Jereme Corrado in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have been fixing some upstream bugs that I discovered in one of the
> packages I maintain. I plan to package a new version with these fixes
> soon but I am waiting for upstream as they may release shortly, and
> include these fixes. Should I file bugs
Re: Adeodato Simó in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Given the above premise, 5.0-betaX, 5.0-preX, 5.0.0 is a possibility.
> I use this for amarok.
Or use 5.0-rel, which sorts after -beta and -pre.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Shachar Shemesh in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As someone who has only recently tried to scale the "new developer"
> documentation, I can tell you that there is room for improvement. I have
> been going over those docs several times in the past few days, and each
> time I find myself lost in front
Re: Hugo Vanwoerkom in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Another question: there are certainly enough of them on this list, but
> are they answered? E.g. a note by a Debian Developer "Yes I will sponsor?"
I guess that in most cases a reply is also sent to the list, i.e. if
there is none, no sponsor was found
Re: Christian Heller in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> we are looking for a sponsor for our CYBOI package.
> I've already sent an ITP roughly describing it (see below).
> Our project members would be glad to see the package in Debian soon :-)
It helps if you post a URL to the package here.
See also http:/
Re: Michelle Konzack in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> curently i am working on some manpages and po files
> for german. Specials for "katoob".
>
> I like to know whether I should put the german manpage
> into the "katoob" package or into "manpages-de".
Into katoob. manpages-de should contain translatio
Re: Nelson A. de Oliveira in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is it allowed to release a package that don't have the source codes
> available?
> For example, program XYZ just have a binary of it, but no source code.
No one will prevent you from releasing it. It can't go into Debian
though, because it won't b
Re: Matthew Palmer in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Make a note in the ITP that you are keenly interested in seeing Open Xchange
> in Debian, and offer to help the initial ITP filer in any way, noting that
> if you don't hear anything, you'll commence packaging it yourself. If that
> doesn't get a respons
Re: Frank Küster in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Isn't there an "owner" tag for WNPP bugs? Then Shachar could set
> himself as the owner.
This won't get you the messages forwarded either.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Willi Mann in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What's your definition of "owner"?
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control -> owner
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Jamie Jones in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can anybody suggest some good revision control systems for maintaining
> Debian packages. I'm about to outgrow using RCS on the debian directory
> and wanted to get an idea of what other maintainers are using for their
> packages.
svn-buildpackage.
Christo
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> i want to join Debian as a developer .
> and i want be debian developer.
> i mean to say that i want to join Debian organization as a permanet
> job/Employee so can any one tell me that what is the procedure , so i will
> follow that procedure.
Hi,
D
Re: Marc Chantreux in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I wrote a patch for dh-make-perl that ease its use by adding some
> warnings. I wrote a mail to the maintainer but have no answer.
File a wishlist bug against dh-make-perl requesting the inclusion of
your patch.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http:/
Re: René van Bevern in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I think merely marking the list "subscribers only" would do the job better.
> > It would also leave most of the spam out of it.
>
> This would prevent non-scubscribers from posting here and reading answers
> via the list archives or a usenet gateway
Re: Njes Nilsen in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What I want is to edit the installation so the user get another option
> here, which will install some given packages.
> I've read some of the information about how to hack the installer on the
> debian wiki page, but can't find any information about how
Re: RFS : Slune and dependencies [Duck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at
06:36:53PM +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> My gnupg key has already been signed.
I can't find it on the keyservers.
Maybe you could also include your real name in your mails.
Christoph
--
Ch
ian.net provides a service that is useful for this purpose".
You have to stress that people actually upload the _source_ package. If
not told, they tend to provide i386 binaries.
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.df7cb.de
Wohnheim D, 2405, Universität des Sa
be downloaded from.
# Provide a publically accessible place where all of the files
relating to your package can be downloaded from, that is both the source
package (.orig.tar.gz, .diff, and .dsc files) and binary packages along
with .changes files.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/
ckages, not
only i386 binaries. (I'm wondering if this shouldn't be an architecture
"all" package anyway.)
See also: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.df7cb.de
Wohnheim D, 2405, Universi
it rather
annoying if packages would have hardcoded paths compiled in.
Some weeks ago there was a discussion whether mutt should call
/usr/bin/gpg rather than gpg because "gpg was security critical". I have
a ~/bin/gpg that calls a agent-enabled version of gpg, which makes
perfectly s
re specific which
program you are talking about? It probably isn't part of Debian
GNU/Linux, so you will have to send your question to the author of that
software.
More info about Debian can be found at www.debian.org.
Christoph Berg
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www
ct.
stat(2):
S_IFDIR 004 directory
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://www.df7cb.de/
Wohnheim D, 2405, Universität des Saarlandes, 0681/9657944
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Makefile uses CFLAGS internally to store
> pkg-config output. Is there a way to tell Make to append to the CFLAGS
> variable?
In the Makefile, try "CFLAGS += -your_options".
Also, you can try "CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) $(MAKE)" instead, as this will
less-rigidly override the settings insi
given package, but TCP ports have to. But then, you can add
more than one name per port.
It just looks much better if "netstat -a" shows names instead of
numbers.
If there's more than one package for a port, the user could decide which
one he prefers more. (cf. /etc/alternatives/*)
C
a binary perl module)
Why not libsigc-perl-0.2 and libsigc-perl-dev to be consistent?
^^
Christoph
--
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 0681/9657944
http://rw4.cs.uni-sb.de/~cb/
Universität des Saarlandes, Compiler Design Lab
pgpHUgNcGRrzC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[tl;dr: Richard is disappointed that I didn't advocate him for DM,
while I did advocate other team members shortly after.]
Hi Richard,
Re: Richard B Winters 2016-06-22
<204e2c0e01254a766699d615036d2...@mail.mmogp.com>
> During that time I worked with Christoph Berg, he advised no
Re: Thomas Koch 2018-07-22
<153227007588.243719.10944164547288454279.report...@thk1.roam.corp.google.com>
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rurple-ng/rurple-ng_0.5+16-2.dsc
Hi Thomas,
the pa
Re: tho...@koch.ro 2018-07-29 <538053082.16587.1532857614...@office.mailbox.org>
> thank you for taking a look. I fixed the clean step by adding a slash after
> "build" in d/clean. I remember I was happy when I saw this finally working:
> https://bugs.debian.org/511048
Oh cool, I had not seen th
Hi Sepi,
there's a missing copyright attribution:
./cmake_modules/Findlibusb-1.0.cmake:
# Adapted from cmake-modules Google Code project
#
# Copyright (c) 2006 Andreas Schneider
#
# (Changes for libusb) Copyright (c) 2008 Kyle Machulis
#
# Redistribution and use is allowed according to the ter
close 954076
thanks
--
Mit freundlichen GrüÃen,
Christoph Berg
--
Senior Berater, Tel.: +49 2166 9901 187
credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080, USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
Unser
Re: Sepi Gair 2020-03-18
<370975eaac3fc60a4dc57cb13d003dc9ac47d78b.ca...@email.cz>
> * Package name: libxtrxdsp
>Version : 0.0.1+git20190830.eec2864-2
Hi Sepi,
I suggest we wait with this upload until the -1 version has passed
NEW.
Christoph
close 956619
thanks
Hi Taowa,
some comments on the package:
The list of Depends is borked, I don't think you need any of the go
packages at runtime as everything is statically linked.
Why is libax25 there? It should be pulled in via shlibdeps, not
explicitly.
The description doesn't mention anything about hamradio
Re: Francisco Vilmar Cardoso Ruviaro
> wwl (1.3+db-3) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * QA upload.
> * Set Debian QA Group as maintainer. (see #970369)
Hi Francisco,
I'd like to keep the package in the hamradio team, there is little
reason to set the QA group as maintainer just because one of t
90 matches
Mail list logo
