Re: how use dpatch for binary files ?

2005-07-18 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:51:18PM -0300, Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote: > Im making one package using dpatch. > I changed some binary files (images) and created one patch in > debian/patches > > When I rum dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc > I receive message below. > > 10_testpatch.dpatc

Re: Sponsor request for aspell-uz

2005-07-24 Thread Brian Nelson
Mashrab Kuvatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > I've filed an ITP bug report #319775 for aspell-uz and uploaded the > files I've > built into http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/aspell/deb/ > > Could anybody please sponsor it? No, this package is quite broken: debian/changelog: aspell-

Re: Sponsor request for aspell-uz

2005-07-26 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 12:19:27AM +0200, Mashrab Kuvatov wrote: > Hi Brian, > > thanks for reply. I've rebuilt aspell-uz taking into account your > feedback. Please have a look, it is at > http://www.uni-bremen.de/~kmashrab/aspell/deb/ Almost there, just a few more things: * The urgency should

Re: Sponsor request for aspell-uz

2005-07-27 Thread Brian Nelson
Mashrab Kuvatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 27 July 2005 08:27, Brian Nelson wrote: >> * Your aspell-uz.info-aspell is not correct. See >> http://dict-common.alioth.debian.org/dsdt-policy.html#infofile for >> more info. > > I added language na

Re: Sponsor request for aspell-uz

2005-07-27 Thread Brian Nelson
Mashrab Kuvatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 28 July 2005 00:34, Brian Nelson wrote: >> Mashrab Kuvatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > I added language name in Uzbek into Language section. Is it correct > now? >> >> Well, you shou

Re: Please take a look over aspell-ro_0.50-2-1

2005-10-05 Thread Brian Nelson
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Re: Eddy Petrişor in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Could somebody take a look over it and tell me if I need to make any >> changes before I list it on sponsors.d.n ? > > changelog: > remove the [ ] part > get an ITP and insert it here > > control: > old Sta

Re: Please take a look over aspell-ro_0.50-2-1

2005-10-18 Thread Brian Nelson
Eddy Petrişor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10/5/05, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > you might want to use the new "Archticture: all" packaging variant, >> > see for example

Re: aspell-uz: new upstream release

2006-01-17 Thread Brian Nelson
ar.bz2 >> >> Could anyone please upload it? > > First time Brian Nelson helped me and uploaded it. Could someone else please > do the same this time, if Brian is not available? > > Sorry for bugging, I have no idea on how to proceed. I'm having key troubles at the

Re: anyone give me some advice about split scim-bridge

2007-08-09 Thread Brian Nelson
ZhengPeng Hou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi all, >I've already splited scim-brodge into scom-brodge-agent >scim-brodge-client-gtk, scim-bridge-client-qt, and scim-bridge(a >dumy package for upgrade), but now the upstream has added qt4 >support, so shall I split it into five? lik

Re: RFS: qt-program-starter (new package)

2010-02-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Christian Metscher writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qt-program-starter". > > * Package name : qt-program-starter Version : 1.2.3-1 Upstream Author : > [Christian Metscher [https://launchpad.net/~hakaishi/+archive/qt-program-starter] * License > : [GPL-3] Section : utils > > I

Re: RFS: qt-program-starter (new package)

2010-02-23 Thread Brian Nelson
Christian Metscher writes: > Brian Nelson writes: > >> This looks interesting for a 216-line program ;). I thought about >> writing something similar a few years back but never got around to it. >> I should be able to sponsor it if no one else has stepped up yet. > &

Re: RFS: qt-program-starter

2010-02-25 Thread Brian Nelson
Christian Metscher writes: >> Brian Nelson writes: >> >> Since this is a rather similar (and also very small) tool with > identical >> build dependencies, I think you should merge these into a unified >> tarball. > > I'm not sure about this, bec

Re: RFS: aspell-hsb

2010-02-27 Thread Brian Nelson
Jan Jeroným Zvánovec writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aspell-hsb", aspell dictionary for > Upper Sorbian language. > > * Package name: aspell-hsb > Version : 0.01.1-1 > Upstream Author : Eduard Werner (Edward Wornar) > > * URL :

Re: RFS: go

2010-03-18 Thread Brian Nelson
Ivan Wong writes: > Hi Dominique, > > Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would > like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or > golang? Any other suggestions? '-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languages (e.g. texlive-lang-

Re: RFS: aspell-id

2010-11-24 Thread Brian Nelson
pell-id_1.2-0.orig.tar.bz2 in the parent directory to your build > dir when building the package. > > Perhaps this package should Provides: aspell-dictionary? Brian Nelson > might have more advice; cc-ing him. Yes, aspell dictionary packages should Provides: aspell-dictionary. The dic

Re: RFS: aspell-id ; second try

2010-12-06 Thread Brian Nelson
Mahyuddin Susanto writes: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aspell-id". > > * Package name: aspell-id > Version : 1.2-0-4 > Upstream Author : Benitius Brevoort > * URL : http://translationproject.org/team/id.html > * License : GPLv

Re: [RFS] slimp3 - MPEG Layer III Streaming Server

2003-07-26 Thread Brian Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruno Rodrigues) writes: > Anyone interested in sponsoring my slimp3[1] package and its companions, > libmp3-tag-perl[2] and libaudio-wav-perl[3] ? > > Packages have already been scrutinized by my sponsor Salvador Abreu > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Brian Nel

Re: lintian error "file-in-unusual-dir usr/etc/settings/" with Qt3-Application

2003-08-15 Thread Brian Nelson
Dominik Stadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I started working on a debian-package. The application uses the Qt-Library as > basis (no KDE). During startup, the application looks in a directory > "/usr/etc/settings/" for system-wide settings for the application. This is > not coded in

Re: lintian error "file-in-unusual-dir usr/etc/settings/" with Qt3-Application

2003-08-15 Thread Brian Nelson
Dominik Stadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Why Qt should look in /usr/etc? Configure your program with >> --sysconfdir=/etc flag and everything should be OK. > > Thanks for the hints, but the problem is that the application does not use > autoconf/automake/configure, but the build-tool qmake.

Re: randomplay: command-line shuffle music player

2003-09-08 Thread Brian Nelson
John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Adam Kessel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-07 16:35:14 -0700]: >> It's definitely a "scratch an itch" type program. > > So's emacs. For that matter, so's the kernel itself. :) > >> I'm wondering if something relatively simple (the script is about 340

Re: RFS: icculus's orbital sniper game

2004-10-24 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > Okay, I've renamed this to "orbitalsniper" and adjusted the sources to > > match. > > One thing that stood out was that the binary isn't installed > into /usr/games/

Re: RFS: icculus's orbital sniper game

2004-10-25 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > &g

Re: RFS: bbppp -- PPP tool for the blackbox window manager

2004-03-08 Thread Brian Nelson
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > well, OK, I take it nobody is interested in this package at all, as I > haven't even recieved negative response so far... ;) > > I'll continue to maintain my version of the package until someone > steps forward I can hand it over to who has / doesn't nee

Re: RFS: bbppp -- PPP tool for the blackbox window manager

2004-03-09 Thread Brian Nelson
Florian Ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:52:08PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: >> * The patch that changes 0's to NULL's is pointless. In C++, NULL is >> just "#define NULL 0". > > Definitely true. I preferred QA

Re: PHP/MySQL package

2004-03-09 Thread Brian Nelson
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > I have plans for packaging a little www-based package. It uses PHP and > MySQL, over Apache. > > In the documentation I been searching, I just can find some resources > with packaging which need to be compilated or so. In the package I w

Re: Bengali wordlist for aspell

2004-03-19 Thread Brian Nelson
Soumyadip Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm packaging the bengali wordlist for aspell, for Debian. During > dpkg-buildpackage i get the following errors: > > modak:/home/soumyadip/Debian/aspell/aspell-bn-0.50-1# dpkg-buildpackage > dpkg-buildpackage: source package is aspell-bn-0.50 > dpkg-b

Re: How to deal with SONAME which changes very often

2004-04-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:18:11PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> > Please give me some hints/suggestions what should be done in such >> > situation? Are there any packages with that situation in our archive? >> Since you are the only o

Re: Bug in New Maintainers Guide german translation

2004-04-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > i found a spelling mistake in the german translation of the new > maintainers guide. > i wrote a patch for this bug. the patch is in the attachment of this mail. > please fix it. > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/privat/Doku/debian/maint-guid] $ md5sum > nico_go

Re: RFS: stripclub - Online Comic Reader/Archiver

2004-04-09 Thread Brian Nelson
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure > this is put together correctly, so here goes. > > I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic > reader and archiver. It supports the vast majority of web

Re: RFS: stripclub - Online Comic Reader/Archiver

2004-04-09 Thread Brian Nelson
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian Nelson wrote: > >>Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >>>After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure >>>this is put together correct

Re: RFS: stripclub - Online Comic Reader/Archiver

2004-04-09 Thread Brian Nelson
Jepri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Benjamin Cutler wrote: >> Nicolas Kratz wrote: >>> >> Point made. While I, personally, don't feel any regret (I've been a >> Premium Keenspot member for two years, have every Sluggy book). I'll >> be sticking a splash screen into the next build saying just >> th

Re: CDBS and menu icons

2004-04-10 Thread Brian Nelson
Matt Brubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am adding a menu icon to my "audacity" package, built with CDBS. Can > anyone suggest the best way to install the icons (which are not part of > the original source)? Currently I am using the following lines in > debian/rules: > > ICONS = debian/aud

Re: RFS: stripclub - Online Comic Reader/Archiver

2004-04-10 Thread Brian Nelson
A few more minor problems: * In interface.fl:163: callback {system("xterm -e zless /usr/share/doc/stripclub/readme.txt.gz");} You can't rely on xterm being available unless you depend upon it, and even still, that's bad practice. Instead, you should use /usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator.

Re: Closing bugs.

2004-04-15 Thread Brian Nelson
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello. > > I've got question related to closing bugs. > > Let's say I adopted some package, and with the new upstream version > I should close some outstanding bugs. And I did it in 1.1-1 version. > Then I ask previous maintainer to upload it,

Re: Closing bugs.

2004-04-15 Thread Brian Nelson
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This led to non-closed bugs which are fixed in fact. >> What now? Should I close those bugs manually, or is it correct way to >> upload another version (1.1-3) including changelogs from 1.1-1 to 1.1

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-28 Thread Brian Nelson
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 08:13:32PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: >> > So: I suggest you submit it for addition to renameutils. >> > As a side effect, renameutils and your package get a comaintainer. >> >> Hmmm. Maybe you should see if the rena

Re: RFS: PennMUSH - #3

2004-05-24 Thread Brian Nelson
Ervin Hearn III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > It's been a month since I've last poked at this thread, but I > would once more like to ask if anyone would take a look at my > PennMUSH package and possibly consider sponsoring it. I have > kept it up to date with upstream releases, and tha

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

2004-06-28 Thread Brian Nelson
"Peter Rockai (mornfall)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >> W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0 >> W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu >> W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3 >> W: amarok source: source-con

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-28 Thread Brian Nelson
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]: > >> I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO. > Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding > a backage whic

Re: debconf question

2004-07-13 Thread Brian Nelson
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And while I'm at it: the behaviour change is not really dangerous, but > can cause people to get more spam. (Background: postgrey changed from > --lookup-by-host to --lookup-by-subnet in Version 1.14) So, is a > debconf notice e

Re: RFS: netdump -- Dump kernel crash information over the network

2004-07-15 Thread Brian Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Nahmias) writes: > Hello Chirag, > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:23:14PM +0530, Chirag Kantharia wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for >> a sponsor for this package. > > I took a look at your package, a few issues: > > 0)

Re: Silly question about man page

2004-07-23 Thread Brian Nelson
"Nathaniel W. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote: >> > But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-) >> >> I can say only for myself, but c

Re: CDBS Documentation

2004-07-25 Thread Brian Nelson
debian-devel would probably be a more appropriate place to ask this. Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > i subscibed to the cdbs mailinglist with the intention to support the > project a little bit. I wrote a little german documentation for cdbs: > http://www.ngolde.de/texte/cdbs.html,

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Kevin Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Metzler writes: > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Kevin Glynn wrote: > > > I am the (new) maintainer for mozart. I have one Serious bug > > > outstanding: > > > > > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mozart). >

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:42:49PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: >> Then downgrade it. There's a mismatch there anyway. A serious bug >> should *never* be tagged as wontfix. Either it needs to be fixed or >> it&#

Re: Package Name Choice

2004-08-08 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 01:59:33AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hello Christoffer, > > * Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 01:38]: > > I'm packaging GTK-Qt Theme Engine [0] and have a question about the naming > > of > > the binary package. The name is currently gtk2-engines-gtk-

Re: How to get rid of an epoch?

2004-08-27 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:38:15PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > I'm doing a little houskeeping before sarge releases. > Then I stumble upon this: > > Rejected: jail_1.6-2_i386.deb: old version (1:1.6-1) in stable >= new >version (1.6-2) targeted at unstable. > Rejected: jail_1.6-2_i386.deb:

Re: amarok package review and RFS (II)

2004-09-24 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:03:09AM +0200, Adeodato Sim? wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for my amarok package, which as you may know > is a "new" audio player for KDE. the package is relatively simple and > contains few if not none KDE specific issues. I'm interested in seeing this packag

Re: Suggestions On Getting A Sponsor

2004-09-27 Thread Brian Nelson
I think you're missing the point. It's not that developers think this should not be packaged. It's that packaging a web app is so difficult to get right that only developers with a very strong personal interest in the software would be willing to even look at it. The vast majority will consider

Re: Suggestions On Getting A Sponsor

2004-09-30 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:49:52PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote: > Brian, > > Point taken. But I happen to be the upstream author for this project. > So it's not like I just picked this out of a hat, and it's not like I am > in the position to say, "Well maybe I should just pick something ea

Re: Simple Debian Package Creation?

2004-11-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Zach Garner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > First: > 1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of > scripts built on top of each other is really confusing. Hm? Do you mean the debhelper scripts? Those significantly help simplify the writing of debian/rules. Of course, if

Re: Re: RFS: orphaned 'htp' package, an HTML pre-processor

2004-11-11 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:18:22PM -0500, Jan Medlock wrote: > martin f krafft wrote: > > Do we need htp when there is wml? > > I've not looked at wml, but even if they have the same functionality, > variety has always been a strength of Debian. ...and package bloat is a weakness of Debian... --

Re: Overriding shlibs dep for some packages with higher versions

2005-06-27 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:54:04PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: [...] > In summary, what I want is something like: > debian/control: Depends: ${shlibs-depends}, libfoo (>= x.y) > debian/substvars: shlibs-depends: libfoo (>= x.0) > > => DEBIAN/control: Depends: libfoo (>= x.y) > > Although I did

Re: RFS: stripclub - Online Comic Reader/Archiver

2004-04-08 Thread Brian Nelson
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure > this is put together correctly, so here goes. > > I'm looking for a sponsor for my package stripclub, an online comic > reader and archiver. It supports the vast majority of web

Re: RFS: stripclub - Online Comic Reader/Archiver

2004-04-09 Thread Brian Nelson
Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian Nelson wrote: > >>Benjamin Cutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >>>After dinking around with the build tools for a bit, I'm reasonably sure >>>this is put together correct

Re: RFS: stripclub - Online Comic Reader/Archiver

2004-04-09 Thread Brian Nelson
Jepri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Benjamin Cutler wrote: >> Nicolas Kratz wrote: >>> >> Point made. While I, personally, don't feel any regret (I've been a >> Premium Keenspot member for two years, have every Sluggy book). I'll >> be sticking a splash screen into the next build saying just >> th

Re: CDBS and menu icons

2004-04-10 Thread Brian Nelson
Matt Brubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am adding a menu icon to my "audacity" package, built with CDBS. Can > anyone suggest the best way to install the icons (which are not part of > the original source)? Currently I am using the following lines in > debian/rules: > > ICONS = debian/aud

Re: RFS: stripclub - Online Comic Reader/Archiver

2004-04-10 Thread Brian Nelson
A few more minor problems: * In interface.fl:163: callback {system("xterm -e zless /usr/share/doc/stripclub/readme.txt.gz");} You can't rely on xterm being available unless you depend upon it, and even still, that's bad practice. Instead, you should use /usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator.

Re: Closing bugs.

2004-04-15 Thread Brian Nelson
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello. > > I've got question related to closing bugs. > > Let's say I adopted some package, and with the new upstream version > I should close some outstanding bugs. And I did it in 1.1-1 version. > Then I ask previous maintainer to upload it,

Re: Closing bugs.

2004-04-15 Thread Brian Nelson
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This led to non-closed bugs which are fixed in fact. >> What now? Should I close those bugs manually, or is it correct way to >> upload another version (1.1-3) including changelogs from 1.1-1 to 1.1

Re: RFS: patmv -- a bulk renaming tool

2004-04-28 Thread Brian Nelson
Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 08:13:32PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: >> > So: I suggest you submit it for addition to renameutils. >> > As a side effect, renameutils and your package get a comaintainer. >> >> Hmmm. Maybe you should see if the rena

Re: RFS: PennMUSH - #3

2004-05-24 Thread Brian Nelson
Ervin Hearn III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > It's been a month since I've last poked at this thread, but I > would once more like to ask if anyone would take a look at my > PennMUSH package and possibly consider sponsoring it. I have > kept it up to date with upstream releases, and tha

Re: RFS: amarok - versatile and easy to use audio player for KDE

2004-06-28 Thread Brian Nelson
"Peter Rockai (mornfall)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > >> W: amarok source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.5.8.0 >> W: amarok source: changelog-should-mention-nmu >> W: amarok source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 1.0.0-3 >> W: amarok source: source-con

Re: sponsor wanted for 'ketchup' package

2004-06-28 Thread Brian Nelson
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-28 22:21:14 +1000]: > >> I don't think you should create a debian package for small script, IMO. > Agree. Even if I don't know where it should go, but definiately finding > a backage whic

Re: debconf question

2004-07-13 Thread Brian Nelson
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And while I'm at it: the behaviour change is not really dangerous, but > can cause people to get more spam. (Background: postgrey changed from > --lookup-by-host to --lookup-by-subnet in Version 1.14) So, is a > debconf notice e

Re: RFS: netdump -- Dump kernel crash information over the network

2004-07-15 Thread Brian Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Nahmias) writes: > Hello Chirag, > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:23:14PM +0530, Chirag Kantharia wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I've uploaded netdump package to mentors.debian.net and am seeking for >> a sponsor for this package. > > I took a look at your package, a few issues: > > 0)

Re: Silly question about man page

2004-07-23 Thread Brian Nelson
"Nathaniel W. Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Friday 23 July 2004 09:11 am, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:34:12AM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote: >> > But why on earth would anyone use dh_make when we have cdbs? ;-) >> >> I can say only for myself, but c

Re: CDBS Documentation

2004-07-25 Thread Brian Nelson
debian-devel would probably be a more appropriate place to ask this. Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > i subscibed to the cdbs mailinglist with the intention to support the > project a little bit. I wrote a little german documentation for cdbs: > http://www.ngolde.de/texte/cdbs.html,

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Kevin Glynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Metzler writes: > > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Kevin Glynn wrote: > > > I am the (new) maintainer for mozart. I have one Serious bug > > > outstanding: > > > > > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mozart). >

Re: How to retire a bug tagged wontfix,woody?

2004-08-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:42:49PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: >> Then downgrade it. There's a mismatch there anyway. A serious bug >> should *never* be tagged as wontfix. Either it needs to be fixed or >> it&#

Re: Package Name Choice

2004-08-07 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 01:59:33AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hello Christoffer, > > * Christoffer Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-07 01:38]: > > I'm packaging GTK-Qt Theme Engine [0] and have a question about the naming of > > the binary package. The name is currently gtk2-engines-gtk-qt wh

Re: How to get rid of an epoch?

2004-08-27 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:38:15PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > I'm doing a little houskeeping before sarge releases. > Then I stumble upon this: > > Rejected: jail_1.6-2_i386.deb: old version (1:1.6-1) in stable >= new >version (1.6-2) targeted at unstable. > Rejected: jail_1.6-2_i386.deb:

Re: amarok package review and RFS (II)

2004-09-24 Thread Brian Nelson
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 04:03:09AM +0200, Adeodato Sim? wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for my amarok package, which as you may know > is a "new" audio player for KDE. the package is relatively simple and > contains few if not none KDE specific issues. I'm interested in seeing this packag

Re: Suggestions On Getting A Sponsor

2004-09-27 Thread Brian Nelson
I think you're missing the point. It's not that developers think this should not be packaged. It's that packaging a web app is so difficult to get right that only developers with a very strong personal interest in the software would be willing to even look at it. The vast majority will consider

Re: Suggestions On Getting A Sponsor

2004-09-29 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:49:52PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote: > Brian, > > Point taken. But I happen to be the upstream author for this project. > So it's not like I just picked this out of a hat, and it's not like I am > in the position to say, "Well maybe I should just pick something ea

Re: RFS: icculus's orbital sniper game

2004-10-24 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > Okay, I've renamed this to "orbitalsniper" and adjusted the sources to > > match. > > One thing that stood out was that the binary isn't installed > into /usr/games/

Re: RFS: icculus's orbital sniper game

2004-10-25 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:59:03AM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:09, Brian Nelson wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:00:31PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:59:29AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > &g

Re: Simple Debian Package Creation?

2004-11-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Zach Garner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > First: > 1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of > scripts built on top of each other is really confusing. Hm? Do you mean the debhelper scripts? Those significantly help simplify the writing of debian/rules. Of course, if

Re: Re: RFS: orphaned 'htp' package, an HTML pre-processor

2004-11-11 Thread Brian Nelson
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:18:22PM -0500, Jan Medlock wrote: > martin f krafft wrote: > > Do we need htp when there is wml? > > I've not looked at wml, but even if they have the same functionality, > variety has always been a strength of Debian. ...and package bloat is a weakness of Debian... --

Re: [Dict-common-dev] RFS: aspell-tl - Tagalog (Filipino) dictionary for GNU Aspell

2004-12-04 Thread Brian Nelson
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 07:41:30PM +1100, Jan Alonzo wrote: > Good Day! I would like to request for someone to sponsor my package for > aspell-tl. > apsell-tl contains the tagalog dictionary to spell check tagalog texts. > Currently it > contains more than 14,000 words (and increasing. > > Some

Re: Package split/merge advice

2004-12-08 Thread Brian Nelson
Jan Alonzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > (on somewhat related topic) > > I recently filed an RFP on itagalog and aspell-tl and one of the developers > said that I should consider merging both sources since they use the same word > list. > > > >

Re: RFS: elizatalk simple chatbot for IM

2004-12-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:15:37AM -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 20:08 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > > You will find the files on: > > http://nico.f-451.net/debian/elizatalk/ > > Is the template from debian/rules really yours? > > It seems pretty much a debhelper template

Re: warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Brian Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Jay Salzman) writes: > On Mon 13 Dec 04, 12:10 PM, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:55:28PM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: >> > My first package is ALMOST lintian clean. One warning: >> > >> &

Re: warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Brian Nelson
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 01:02:29PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Jay Salzman) writes: >> > On Mon 13 Dec 04, 12:10 PM, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> On Mon, Dec 13, 2

Re: warning: menu-command-not-in-package

2004-12-13 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:55:28PM -0500, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: > My first package is ALMOST lintian clean. One warning: > >$ lintian -i yadex_1.7.0-1_i386.deb >W: yadex: menu-command-not-in-package /usr/lib/menu/yadex:2 >x-terminal-emulator >N: >N: The menu item specifie

Re: New upstream packages?

2004-12-18 Thread Brian Nelson
Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:12:18 18:23 -0500]: > > > Of course, just after sending this mail, I was directed to: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-update.en.html#s-newupstream > > ...which I somehow managed to miss. It's still a b

Re: Debian QA system lecture at Haifux - help needed

2005-05-10 Thread Brian Nelson
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:57:17AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: [...] > Subjects I'm going to cover are: > 1. The basics of creating a deb > 2. Standard package naming and file locations > 3. The Debian human hierchy (from the sponsored maintainers to > ftpmasters, possibly even up to DPL, if I'l

Request for sponsor: ITA of mysql-navigator

2002-09-18 Thread Brian Nelson
I'd like to adopt the mysql-navigator package so I'm looking for a sponsor. I've packaged the latest upstream source and cleaned up the package a bit. In particular, I've fixed the 2 RC bugs. If anyone's interested, the packages can be found here: deb http://bignachos.com/~nelson/debian/ ./ de

Perl postinst script running external commands

2002-09-30 Thread Brian Nelson
I have a perl postinst script that "gets stuck" when running certain external commands. For example, the line `/etc/init.d/apache restart >/dev/null 2>&1 3>&1 4>&1 5>&1`; will freeze the postinst script so that it must be killed. The problem has something to do with using the debconf module,

Re: Looking for a sponsor for bmf

2002-10-07 Thread Brian Nelson
Tom Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've written a Bayesian e-mail filter, http://sourceforge.net/projects/bmf/ > From the project page: > > bmf is a self contained and extremely efficient Bayesian mail filter. See > Paul Graham's article "A Plan for Spam" for background information. I

Re: adopting a package

2002-10-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Andreas Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I want do adopt the package **larswm**. > > I have several years Linux experience but I'm a newbi to debian. So I need > a quick introdution in "Howto maintain a debian package". http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ -- People said I was dumb, but I

Re: build failures & compiler versions

2002-10-30 Thread Brian Nelson
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello all, > > I am maintaining a package that fails to build on alpha, hppa, and s390. > It appears that the problem is that those architectures use gcc/g++-3.0, > rather than 2.95, as the default compiler. The source would need to be > modified (not hu

dpkg-reconfigure hacking in postinst

2002-10-31 Thread Brian Nelson
Hi Joey, I have a prospective package that checks for the environment variable DPKG_RECONFIGURE=1 in the postinst, and if it decides that it's being reconfigured, it will overwrite its configuration file (not a conffile) based on the debconf answers. The theory is that if a user reconfigures a pa

Tools for parsing apache conf files (Was: dpkg-reconfigure hackingin postinst)

2002-11-02 Thread Brian Nelson
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have fewer qualms about a package that only wipes out a config file > when explicitly reconfigured; most of my ire is reserved for packages, > like apt-listchanges, that drop local modifications to such files on > upgrade. Especially when the files are (as

Re: Request for Sponsor

2002-11-03 Thread Brian Nelson
"Shiju p. Nair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I have packaged phpbb (a bulletin board program in PHP) and looking > for a sponsor who can check and upload this package. Since am a newbie > in debian packaging I expect some help from the mentor(s). > > You can download related files from

Re: build failures & compiler versions

2002-11-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Carlos O'Donell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:25:09AM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: >> > You could just change the Architecture: field in the control file to not >> > attempt to build on the broken arches, for now. >> >> D

Re: Tools for parsing apache conf files

2002-11-03 Thread Brian Nelson
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 10:21:43PM -0800, Brian Nelson wrote: > >> > I have fewer qualms about a package that only wipes out a config file >> > when explicitly reconfigured; most of my ire is reserved for packages, >&g

Request for sponsor: PornView

2002-11-03 Thread Brian Nelson
* Package name: pornview Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : "trem0r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Description : GTK+-based image viewer/manager PornView is a GTK+-based image viewer/manager. Features include t

Re: Request for sponsor: PornView

2002-11-04 Thread Brian Nelson
Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This one time, at band camp, Brian Nelson wrote: >>* Package name: pornview >> Version : 0.1.0 >> Upstream Author : "trem0r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>* URL : http://po

Re: procps

2002-11-05 Thread Brian Nelson
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have built a sid chroot by installing debootstrap and > build-essential. The procps package is installed, but the proc > directory in the chroot is empty. This makes it difficult to install > and start/stop the daemon. > > Can anyone advise

  1   2   >