Hello,
I packaged linkchecker and need someone to sponsor it.
Package: linkchecker
Version: 1.2.10
URL: http://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/
License: GPL
LinkChecker can check HTML documents for broken links.
thanks, Bastian Kleineidam
-8<- original ITP 8<--
Package
)
Greetings,
Bastian Kleineidam
Hi,
if you test my linkchecker .deb package:
I just noticed that lintian gives the following warnings on my 1.2.12
package of LinkChecker:
W: linkchecker: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
W: linkchecker: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
This is a lintian (or debconf) bug because I see the fol
Sean,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Is there a way to make a site-packages/foo/foo.py without requiring a change
> in programs calling foo?
No, and I dont think its wise to create an own subdirectory for a single
file. Just leave the file in site-packages/.
> Also, sorry to g
Hello,
I subscribed to the sponsorship program at
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/
How popular is this web page? It is linked from
http://www.debian.de/devel/join/
but I think that very few potential sponsors are reading this.
Bastian Kleineidam
Mikael,
> I think I ought to produce an architecture:any package instead, am I
> right? Anyone want to confirm, or test it?
Use 'all' if you
- have only .py files
- use only platform independent Python modules
- have no C extension modules
Use 'any' if you
- use only platform independent Python
Hi,
rob caSSon wrote:
deb http://styro.dyndns.org/debian/ ./
deb-src http://styro.dyndns.org/debian/ ./
everything seems lintian clean and such, but all comments are
welcome...application details below...
Usage of /usr/X11R6/{man,bin}/ is deprecated (see policy 12.8.7).
You
ards,
Bastian
- --
,''`. Bastian Kleineidam
: :' :GnuPG SchlÃssel
`. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E
`-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB/3hxeBwlBDLsbz4RAm7ZAKCZWV1dcwPXNkDVRmh8uBDFO
Hello,
I packaged linkchecker and need someone to sponsor it.
Package: linkchecker
Version: 1.2.10
URL: http://linkchecker.sourceforge.net/
License: GPL
LinkChecker can check HTML documents for broken links.
thanks, Bastian Kleineidam
-8<- original ITP 8<--
Package
)
Greetings,
Bastian Kleineidam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
if you test my linkchecker .deb package:
I just noticed that lintian gives the following warnings on my 1.2.12
package of LinkChecker:
W: linkchecker: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
W: linkchecker: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
This is a lintian (or debconf) bug because I see the fo
Sean,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Is there a way to make a site-packages/foo/foo.py without requiring a change
> in programs calling foo?
No, and I dont think its wise to create an own subdirectory for a single
file. Just leave the file in site-packages/.
> Also, sorry to
Hello,
I subscribed to the sponsorship program at
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/
How popular is this web page? It is linked from
http://www.debian.de/devel/join/
but I think that very few potential sponsors are reading this.
Bastian Kleineidam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Mikael,
> I think I ought to produce an architecture:any package instead, am I
> right? Anyone want to confirm, or test it?
Use 'all' if you
- have only .py files
- use only platform independent Python modules
- have no C extension modules
Use 'any' if you
- use only platform independent Python
Hi,
rob caSSon wrote:
> deb http://styro.dyndns.org/debian/ ./
> deb-src http://styro.dyndns.org/debian/ ./
>
> everything seems lintian clean and such, but all comments are
> welcome...application details below...
Usage of /usr/X11R6/{man,bin}/ is deprecated (see policy 12.8.7).
Marc,
simply re-upload.
Marc Haber wrote:
> I recently goofed and invoked debsign twice on a package. This
> resulted in a Signature on a Signature on my .dsc file, causing katie
> (?) to reject my upload.
>
> Can I simply re-upload a correctly signed package, or do I need do
> bump the versio
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> But I don't understand why I also have to make both a statically and a
> dynamically linked version of the package, as reqested by 12.8.
Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
to have your pac
Hello,
what is the correct procedure to get a new GPG key into the Debian
keyring? My old one expired unnoticed by me :(.
I mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED], but my three mails seem to be dropped
silently.
My key Infos:
Old key ID 959C340F
New key ID 32EC6F3E (signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED])
URL:
http://
Tore,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:46:45PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> So, should I accept the redundancy and let dh_installmodules do its job,
> or should I use the postinst/rm approach? Or the insanely clever solution
> one of you are going to suggest? :-)
If you have identical files in your p
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 07:08:26PM -0700, David Caldwell wrote:
> Instead of building in the source dir, create 2 build directories, cd to
> each and ../configure with different options. Then in the make section, cd
> into each build dir and make. So essentially you are building the differe
Hi folks,
some people may have noticed that my linkchecker package [1] is very
out of date.
Well, this is mainly because my GPG key expired and I am waiting now
a long time to get the new key [2] into the keyring.
In the meantime, would someone please sponsor an upload of the current
version 1.4
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 11:06:59AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> That sounds redundant, what's wrong with building once with -g, linking
> shared, stripping, calling that one package, and then linking w/o
> stripping for the -dbg package?
The configure.in has different -D defines for debugging,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 01:22:58PM -0500, Luis Bustamante wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 04:44:29PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > some people may have noticed that my linkchecker package [1] is very
> > out of date.
> > Well, this is
Hi,
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 06:00:02AM -0500, BugScan reporter wrote:
> Bug stamp-out list for May 24 00:03 (CST)
>
> Total number of release-critical bugs: 112
Some bugs in this list affect architectures I dont have (have only
i386)
How am I supposed to use Debian machines to test/fix these b
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:10:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a package which installs a programme in /usr/sbin but lintian gives
> the following warning on the package:
> W: libpam-mount: file-in-unusual-dir usr/sbin
>
> There are plenty of other Debian packages which put a file in
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:08:00PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there some canonical fast way to check in a script whether inn,
> inn2 or cnews is installed on the system?
What dpkg does is parsing /var/lib/dpkg/status.
I recommend using dpkg - its error prone to rely on an implici
elp?
Try this in config:
> db_input high nvrec/nvrec_build_optimised
db_input high nvrec/nvrec_build_optimised || true
db_go || true
Greetings,
--
.~.
/V\ Bastian Kleineidam · Unleash the power. Use Linux.
/( )\
^^-^^
msg06511/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ch
is one of the best Tux art I've seen.
Greetings,
--
.~.
/V\ Bastian Kleineidam · Unleash the power. Use Linux.
/( )\
^^-^^
msg06800/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
astian
--
Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · GPG key ID 32EC6F3E
msg06914/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n some emacs package (*shudder*).
So this leads sometimes to packages split into "foo-common",
"foo-gnome", "foo-gtk" or sometimes just compiled without gome/kde support.
Cheers, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · GPG key ID 32EC6F3E
msg06933/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it
> OK -- or better -- to let it depend only on B?
You should depend on that what you are using. So if you have for example
#!/usr/bin/python in one of your script, depend on the "python" package.
Trusting on implicit dependencies is not a guarantee for your package to
work in
lintian I get one message I am worried about -- "strange
> interpreter" -- it appears that lintian doesn't know that python2.2 is a
> valid interpreter.
Yes, see bug #114164.
cu,
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin
s you are providing a virtual package libogg0, which does
not work in all situations.
cu,
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
msg07129/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t; build second package - move it aside etc.
The ./configure as well as the make can be done in a target subdir, so
there is no need to scratch or clean the source tree.
You'll find a beautiful example of this at the fox package (libfox1.0
et al.)
Tschöö, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
msg07176/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eam debian/ is good. A minute saved is a minute earned.
cu,
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
msg07289/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n (>=2.2), python (<<2.3)
You can also join the debian-python mailing list if you need more
sophisticated answers :)
Hope this helps,
Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
msg07300/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
python version. You must have
> > Depends: python (>=2.2), python (<<2.3)
>
> But I guess that if upstream absolutely want to use a specific Python,
> there isn't any reason not to leave Depends: python2.2.
> I don't see any problem here.
Sure, its not
popmail.so -lfreecdb -lfreecdbmake -ldl
> /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so -lz -lm -lnsl -lcrypt
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
libz.so is missing. You should install zlib1g-dev.
Hope this helps,
Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frédéric,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:35:26PM +1100, Frederic Schutz wrote:
> 1) I'd like to add a binary file to the upstream source (an image, so that
> all images are available locally and no Internet connection is needed).
> Obviously, the diff fil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed that my linkchecker package is gone[0] from unstable, but the
last upload was ok[1]. There are strange debcheck errors on the
package tracking page[2] which I dont understand, all buildd logs are
successful.
Can someone point me to whats
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:51:14AM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> Robster still hasn't uploaded tsclient 0.56 since promising to
> sponsor/upload it on Sunday, so my RFS still stands, and is repeated
> below. Thanks in advanced to any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:50:18AM +, Mark Howard wrote:
> Hi,
> is it possible to determine the name of the current package at the
> build stage of debian/rules (multi-binary source), so that only the
> parts required for the current package are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:58:11PM +0100, pp wrote:
> I posted my problem some time ago.
>
>
> postinst script:
Hmm, this looks like a debian/config script, not a postinst script.
But the debconf docs are fading already in my minds, so it might be ok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:21:13PM +0100, pp wrote:
> so my question is :
> how to display message without db_input??
db_input ... || true
Same is for other db_ commands which might fail:
db_go || true
db_stop || true
Cheers, Bastian
-BEGIN PGP S
either to become
a Debian Developer or to file an RFP.
Tschöö, Bastian
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+LFiCeBwlBDLsbz4RApevAKCy6n5R5UXJGVRRjcQtseA+u1
n.org/bts-unreproducible.html
[3] http://ddtp.debian.org/how_it_works/get_involved.en.html
Cheers, Bastian
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+MC79eBwlBDLsbz4RAkzYAKCv+VuSANTRGgS1D
#x27;t stop. ;)
I second that emotion .)
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+NcFpeBwlBDLsbz4RAofyAJ9otkjgLPXXBbT+X8uaUQCuAG3aoQCeKmdL
53eKu5o50SKarAFiVCpJdfY=
=h/V9
-E
2.html#s2.4
for lintian overrides.
Cheers, Bastian
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Nvt4eBwlBDLsbz4RAh2jAJ0QSg3DHTDfTR+jcpPU4bWhm1wQ9QCZAbiI
H2vDo/WygF0alSZcfGhBdas=
else.
I am suggesting the xtraceroute package 'xt'. It is written in
C and has some bugs to fix, notably catching error conditions.
Cheers,
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1
is not checking (and vice
versa of course).
Cheers,
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+PnLmeBwlBDLsbz4RAg90AJwKjzO8yFcqbP4v4k6WbEPapHVriQCdHIBP
TvQcycpPS43IqK0hGncM
ng on either of the library packages. The user can decide
which pythoncard version to use for the samples.
python2.2-pythoncard Depends: python2.2
python2.3-pythoncard Depends: python2.3
pythoncard-doc Depends: python2.2-pythoncard | python2.3-pythoncard
Greetings,
- --
Bastian Kleineid
ore info.
Cheers,
Bastian
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+TmqZeBwlBDLsbz4RAlehAKC3E9R6h7xJwYSa7gaSI22Pwv8yHwCfQB5n
Aydfj28mE/2BdH3xj2G+qm4=
=Oc8+
-END PGP SIGNAT
port the not-yet-in-debian phoenix
browser[2] which I am using right now. I symlinked the mozplugger.so
from /usr/lib/{mozilla,phoenix}/plugins/ to make it work for both
browsers.
[1] http://people.debian.org/~calvin/debian/
[2] http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/
Cheers, Bastian
- --
Ba
short-sighted (private package, I needed it, not much
time, you know the deal ;)
cheers,
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+V6keeBwlBDLsbz4RAppSAJ9/d86T+mnpyue9hju
tions to this check include configuration
scripts called from the package's post-installation script.
Cheers,
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: G
ers, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
#!/usr/bin/perl
$_ = <> until ($mode,$file) = /^begin\s*(\d*)\s*(\S*)/;
open(OUT,"> $file") if $file ne "";
while (<>) {
last if /^end/;
next if /[a-
deb-src file:/home/joe/myarchive ./
e) make it available for others by putting myarchive on a webserver.
Then others can have
File /etc/apt/sources.list:
# my http repository
deb http://www.joesdomain.org/~joe/myarchive ./
deb-src http://www.joesdomain.org/~joe/myarchive ./
Cheers, B
ive it another try.
Cheers,
Bastian
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+X78deBwlBDLsbz4RAs9qAJ487FxPBfMMsFGsnaRgW6nWzzD+pgCeLviv
6S8xEvoxxvQlvbLSMMHXgL0=
=pLbb
-E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 08:19:51PM +0100, Henning Moll wrote:
> Thanks for you tips! But still some questions remain:
>
> On Friday 28 February 2003 16:33, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > Native Package or not?
> > ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:38:33PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > > Hmm, dh_make is trying to do a similar approach. Why not use that way?
> > I like to have the original .tar.gz exactly as I downloaded it. d
can do it yourself with awk/sed/whatever though.
> Does a maintainer script know the package version, so that it can
> write the version number to a file?
# example: current bash version number
BASH_VERSION=`grep-available -P -s Version -n -r '^bash$'`
Ciao,
Bastian
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I updated my previously posted tips for building and maintaining
unofficial packages.
Url is http://people.debian.org/~calvin/unofficial/
Changes are (thanks to some of your suggestions):
* mention the official packaging guide, the Developers Ref
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:26:30PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there any automatic behind the (Closes: #12345) in the changelog?
Yes.
> Is this parsed after upload to close bugs?
Yes.
ciao,
- --
F: Warum heist ein Löwe eigentlich L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 02:29:28PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 08:36:15AM +1000, Sven Dowideit wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I made some updates the twiki package to the latest upstream release
> > (01Jan2003) about
s?
Some tips:
- - put " quotes around the url
- - check if you use a proxy ($http_proxy is set)
- - check if you are blocked by a firewall
Ciao, Bastian
- --
.~.Bastian Kleineidam . calvin (at) debian.org
/V\
/( )\ GnuPG Schlüssel http://kampfwurst.net/gpgkey.txt
^^-^^
Ste
a Unix system: I asked about an editor
and my neigbour said "vi". After many beeps I got frustrated and asked if
there was something else. He said "yeah, there's ed". Thank god this
did not drive me mad...
Ciao, Bastian
- --
.~.Bastian Kleineidam . calvin (at) debian.or
ormat, indexed by source/binary package.
2) Have an archive of all the changelog.Debian.gz files. This way I
can reuse apt-listchanges functionality.
3) Have an archive of all the .deb files (ie an FTP mirror).
Same as 2), only I have to extract the changelogs.
Ciao, Bastian
- --
.~.Ba
Marc,
simply re-upload.
Marc Haber wrote:
I recently goofed and invoked debsign twice on a package. This
resulted in a Signature on a Signature on my .dsc file, causing katie
(?) to reject my upload.
Can I simply re-upload a correctly signed package, or do I need do
bump the version number fo
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:10:55PM +0100, Stefan Schwandter wrote:
> But I don't understand why I also have to make both a statically and a
> dynamically linked version of the package, as reqested by 12.8.
Some people might not want to install the non-free libmotif, but want
to have your pack
Hello,
what is the correct procedure to get a new GPG key into the Debian
keyring? My old one expired unnoticed by me :(.
I mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED], but my three mails seem to be dropped
silently.
My key Infos:
Old key ID 959C340F
New key ID 32EC6F3E (signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED])
URL:
http://b
Tore,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:46:45PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> So, should I accept the redundancy and let dh_installmodules do its job,
> or should I use the postinst/rm approach? Or the insanely clever solution
> one of you are going to suggest? :-)
If you have identical files in your pa
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 07:08:26PM -0700, David Caldwell wrote:
> Instead of building in the source dir, create 2 build directories, cd to
> each and ../configure with different options. Then in the make section, cd
> into each build dir and make. So essentially you are building the differen
Hi folks,
some people may have noticed that my linkchecker package [1] is very
out of date.
Well, this is mainly because my GPG key expired and I am waiting now
a long time to get the new key [2] into the keyring.
In the meantime, would someone please sponsor an upload of the current
version 1.4.
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 11:06:59AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> That sounds redundant, what's wrong with building once with -g, linking
> shared, stripping, calling that one package, and then linking w/o
> stripping for the -dbg package?
The configure.in has different -D defines for debugging, s
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 01:22:58PM -0500, Luis Bustamante wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 04:44:29PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > some people may have noticed that my linkchecker package [1] is very
> > out of date.
> > Well, this is
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 07:08:00PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there some canonical fast way to check in a script whether inn,
> inn2 or cnews is installed on the system?
What dpkg does is parsing /var/lib/dpkg/status.
I recommend using dpkg - its error prone to rely on an implicit
elp?
Try this in config:
> db_input high nvrec/nvrec_build_optimised
db_input high nvrec/nvrec_build_optimised || true
db_go || true
Greetings,
--
.~.
/V\ Bastian Kleineidam · Unleash the power. Use Linux.
/( )\
^^-^^
pgpRFW7ChpQBI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is one of the best Tux art I've seen.
Greetings,
--
.~.
/V\ Bastian Kleineidam · Unleash the power. Use Linux.
/( )\
^^-^^
pgpk55cbWeF5p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
astian
--
Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · GPG key ID 32EC6F3E
pgpijsBiRLzdK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n some emacs package (*shudder*).
So this leads sometimes to packages split into "foo-common",
"foo-gnome", "foo-gtk" or sometimes just compiled without gome/kde support.
Cheers, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam · [EMAIL PROTECTED] · GPG key ID 32EC6F3E
pgp6Nmc2RPmfm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it
> OK -- or better -- to let it depend only on B?
You should depend on that what you are using. So if you have for example
#!/usr/bin/python in one of your script, depend on the "python" package.
Trusting on implicit dependencies is not a guarantee for your package to
work in
lintian I get one message I am worried about -- "strange
> interpreter" -- it appears that lintian doesn't know that python2.2 is a
> valid interpreter.
Yes, see bug #114164.
cu,
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
ca
s you are providing a virtual package libogg0, which does
not work in all situations.
cu,
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
pgpD6xPXhhtRR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
er module packages handle this, do someone know at a good such
> package i could use as example ?
The current ALSA packages (apt-cache show alsa-source) are doing it
this way.
cu, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.or
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:01:05PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 05:15:59PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> > > How do other module packages handle this, do someone know at a good such
> > > package i could use as example ?
> > The current AL
t; build second package - move it aside etc.
The ./configure as well as the make can be done in a target subdir, so
there is no need to scratch or clean the source tree.
You'll find a beautiful example of this at the fox package (libfox1.0
et al.)
Tschöö, Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
pgp5F1fshdlDo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ebian/ is good. A minute saved is a minute earned.
cu,
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
pgpDHnKOsK5RT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n (>=2.2), python (<<2.3)
You can also join the debian-python mailing list if you need more
sophisticated answers :)
Hope this helps,
Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.net
calvin AT debian.org
pgpvU7dUjBj01.pgp
Description: PGP signature
python version. You must have
> > Depends: python (>=2.2), python (<<2.3)
>
> But I guess that if upstream absolutely want to use a specific Python,
> there isn't any reason not to leave Depends: python2.2.
> I don't see any problem here.
Sure, its not
popmail.so -lfreecdb -lfreecdbmake -ldl
> /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so -lz -lm -lnsl -lcrypt
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz
libz.so is missing. You should install zlib1g-dev.
Hope this helps,
Bastian
--
Bastian Kleineidam
reflexionsniveau AT web.de
calvin AT users.sf.ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frédéric,
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:35:26PM +1100, Frederic Schutz wrote:
> 1) I'd like to add a binary file to the upstream source (an image, so that
> all images are available locally and no Internet connection is needed).
> Obviously, the diff fil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I noticed that my linkchecker package is gone[0] from unstable, but the
last upload was ok[1]. There are strange debcheck errors on the
package tracking page[2] which I dont understand, all buildd logs are
successful.
Can someone point me to whats
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 01:51:14AM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> Robster still hasn't uploaded tsclient 0.56 since promising to
> sponsor/upload it on Sunday, so my RFS still stands, and is repeated
> below. Thanks in advanced to any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:50:18AM +, Mark Howard wrote:
> Hi,
> is it possible to determine the name of the current package at the
> build stage of debian/rules (multi-binary source), so that only the
> parts required for the current package are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:58:11PM +0100, pp wrote:
> I posted my problem some time ago.
>
>
> postinst script:
Hmm, this looks like a debian/config script, not a postinst script.
But the debconf docs are fading already in my minds, so it might be ok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:21:13PM +0100, pp wrote:
> so my question is :
> how to display message without db_input??
db_input ... || true
Same is for other db_ commands which might fail:
db_go || true
db_stop || true
Cheers, Bastian
-BEGIN PGP S
e either to become
a Debian Developer or to file an RFP.
Tschöö, Bastian
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+LFiCeBwlBDLsbz4RApevAKCy6n5R5UXJGVRRjcQtseA+u1kkXACfVtPC
gPC+mRMjLVSaPsnRHhK48cc=
=NS65
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
n.org/bts-unreproducible.html
[3] http://ddtp.debian.org/how_it_works/get_involved.en.html
Cheers, Bastian
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+MC79eBwlBDLsbz4RAkzYAKCv+VuSANTRGgS1D
#x27;t stop. ;)
I second that emotion .)
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+NcFpeBwlBDLsbz4RAofyAJ9otkjgLPXXBbT+X8uaUQCuAG3aoQCeKmdL
53eKu5o50SKarAFiVCpJdfY=
=h/V9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
2.html#s2.4
for lintian overrides.
Cheers, Bastian
- --
Bastian Kleineidam
Atombombe · Plutonium · Fat Man · Do it Yourself · Tim Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+Nvt4eBwlBDLsbz4RAh2jAJ0QSg3DHTDfTR+jcpPU4bWhm1wQ9QCZAbiI
H2vDo/WygF0alSZcfGhBdas=
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
