Re: debian/copyright file

ed to be > repeated each time. > In free text format it is, in my opinion, OK to mention "the files in the directories ... are copyrighted by a combination of some of the following copyright holders: ... and are licensed under the terms of ...". > > Just wanted to check the *correct* way to do do things. That is obviously very good. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dupload

d i don't know what can i put in this file > because it's the first version of my tool, moreover i don't find > information about the changes files :/ > > Maybe someone can give me some advice? See "man dupload". Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: Requests for sponsors to upload NMUs

lliams on his call to debian-mentors to follow the NMU rules. Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Requests for sponsors to upload NMUs

orphan the > package and make it a QA upload. No, I don't think so. Depending on your time and interest, I would suggest to limit the changes in the NMU to only changes that are allowed in an NMU, or to talk to the maintainer to agree on some other approach. Regards, Bart Martens s

Re: Requests for sponsors to upload NMUs

On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 14:57 +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 23:37 +, Neil Williams wrote: > > > > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rca

Re: Becoming a new contributor

[moving to debian-mentors] On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 12:18 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I have never done any development in Debian before, and I would like > to contribute a single program. Great, welcome ! Which "single program" ? > How should I go about this? > > I have alread

Re: Becoming a new contributor

e" (RFP) as described on this page ? http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#l2 Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC/RFS music123 package

n-nmu and source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number disappear, make sure that your name and e-mail address are identical in debian/control and in debian/changelog. For example, replace "ROBACHE" by "Robache" in debian/control. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: How to include information about a source package ?

On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 01:52:17PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > If I were sponsoring a -1 release of a package in which the maintainer > repackaged the upstream source, which is what I was originally > addressing, I would read the implementation of that target, read the > information in debian/copy

Re: How to include information about a source package ?

On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:05:19AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-origtargz > > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyr

Re: debian/rules::dh_* comments as rejection criteria (Was: Re: A list of common gotchas in Debian packaging)

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:51:25PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One can certainly argue both sides of this, but on this point in > > particular, ftp-masters actually made a ruling and asked people to remove > > the commented-out lines. > > > > See

Re: How can a non-DD fix broken packages?

to fix the package only once, then a "non-maintainer upload" (NMU) may be the way to go. http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu If you are interested in keeping the package up-to-date regularly, then you may want to offer co-maintainership to the cur

sponsored NMU (Re: How can a non-DD fix broken packages?)

g, and that most docs that seem to be for DD's also apply for non-DD's working via a sponsor. -- Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 30 May 2006 21:00:57 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How can a non-DD fix broken packages?

are of that responsability. But maybe I'm missing something? -- Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 30 May 2006 22:02:12 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

sponsored NMU's to be forbidden (Re: How can a non-DD fix broken packages?)

*are* responsible for it, and it is not nice > to make it so easy for one to forget he NMUed something, after all. You sure do have a point here. But that seems to apply to both DD's and non-DD's. I still don't see why a sponsored NMU would be bad. -- Bart Martens <[

Re: sponsored NMU's to be forbidden (Re: How can a non-DD fix broken packages?)

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:03:43AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Bart Martens wrote: > > You sure do have a point here. But that seems to apply to both DD's and > > It would appply to those who can upload (i.e. DDs right now). > >

connect-proxy is already in Debian (Re: look for a package)

lp. This is already in Debian. http://packages.debian.org/connect-proxy http://packages.qa.debian.org/connect-proxy -- Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:37:22 +0200 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How can I help Debian best?

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:18:19AM +0200, Christian Hütter wrote: > I've the wish to contribute to Debian. However, from all the stuff > needed to be done I would be best at coding, I guess. ... > Now I'm completely unsure what to do in order to help Debian as good as > I can: > (a) "Just" writing

Re: s390 build box?

On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 11:37 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote: > Please see: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375 > > I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except > I don't have access to an s390 box. :-/ I asked Bastian if he would be > will

Re: Please tell if you found a sponsor

On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 18:59 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > Dear package maintainers... > > a sponsor of Debian packages today sent an email to the mentors.debian.net > support email address and I would like to forward the suggestion here. > Please tell us if you found a sponsor. I often found my

Re: upstream tarball repackaging from bz2 to gz

is of course very true. Maybe the long term solution is that Debian supports the .bz2 format. Hope this helps, Bart Martens (non-DD) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

re: RFS: gstm -- gnome ssh tunnel manager (updated package)

Hi Thierry, I'm interested in sponsoring your package gstm 1.2-3. I will review your package and contact you via e-mail. (I'm still in the NM queue, but my AM requests me to prepare a sponsored package as part of my NM procedure.) Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Descriptio

Re: binary files in diff

On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 21:01 +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote: > Hi, > > I need to add a binary file (a png icon) to my package. What is the best > way to do this, since the "normal" .diff generation does not support > this ? The "sharutils" package contains uuencode and uudecode. You can uuencode the

Re: What is "disparity error" ?

On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 18:18 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > Recently I received following messages after a DD uploaded package for > me: > > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the > override file for the following file(s): > > edb_1.21-15_all.deb: package says

upstream author requests inclusion in debian (Re: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org)

r package somewhere online and post a link to it here on debian-mentors, requesting a review. Enjoy! Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Package is not moved to "Being Worked on" section

On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 20:56 +0530, Suresh Rajashekara wrote: > Hi, > > I raised an ITP for the package "intro-linux" (bug number #310762 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=310762) on 30th Nov. > I got a copy of the mail from the debian bug tracking system as well. > The mail said t

Re: RFS: Legends: The Game

On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 09:29 +, Neil Williams wrote: > If you seek to simply "get the > package into Debian" and then abandon it, there is no reason for Debian > to include it in the first place. No, then there is a reason for someone else to maintain the Debian package. :) If Tim would abando

Re: "changelog has a useless empty line" (was: Re: RFS: speedometer)

On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 02:40 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Saturday 13 January 2007 23:59, Daniel Baumann wrote: > > Jari Aalto wrote: > > > http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/debian/speedometer/speedometer_2.4-1.dsc > > > * changelog has a useless empty line at the end of the file. > > The dh_ma

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 15:39 +0100, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > if you insist on keeping the useless stuff, i consider the package as to > > ugly according to my mesures of beauty, and hence i'm not sponsoring it. > > I think it would be better if yo

Re: Choice between ubuntu or brand new package

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:31:43 + David Newgas wrote: > > > Debian. It is currently already in Ubuntu > > > (http://packages.ubuntu.com/kzenexplorer). I created a brand new Debian > > > package (lintian clean except for lack of a man page) before noticing it > > > was in Ubuntu. Which is preferr

copyright and license problems (Re: Legends The Game, new debian package)

ribute this version of "Legends The Game" in this state, not even in the non-free section. As far as I know, there's no ITP, so you're free to go ahead without consulting me (but you're welcome to contact me if I can help). Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

n the game, see my previous e-mail. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

vious e-mail. > Ok, I already posted your first email (hope u dont mind...) in the > legends-forum. Hope one of the devs could help. I don't mind. > Thanks for helping My pleasure. Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

0 rm legends-0.4.1.42/legends_release/libvorbis.so.0 rm legends-0.4.1.42/legends_release/libopenal.so rm legends-0.4.1.42/legends_release/OPENAL32.DLL rm legends-0.4.1.42/legends_release/ReadMe_legals.txt rm legends-0.4.1.42/legends_release/runlegends rm legends-0.4.1.42/legends_release/install.sh tar

Re: Legends The Game, new debian package

On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 12:15 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > - -=| Bart Martens, 4.03.2007 01:11 |=- > > Related to what Roberto wrote above about the shared libraries, here is > > how I would create the .orig.tar.gz : &

Re: How to put a license (question) in preinst/debconf

7;s best for your package, because I haven't seen your package yet. :) Maybe my explanations above help you to make your own choices. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: How to put a license (question) in preinst/debconf

the license allows this kind of packaging. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: libconfig-general-perl new release.

> lintian clean! > > Sources: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libconfig-general-perl/ OK, I'll sponsor this package. I'll contact you via private e-mail. Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

about "RFS libqt-perl" and "RFS libtie-cache-perl"

re interested then you can look at libqt aslo. Have you processed all comments from Romain and Gunnar? > > i have fixed all the thing whatever you have suggested . > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libtie-cache-perl You have not yet fixed all the things I have suggeste

Re: RFS: sigit (updated package)

/mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sigit/sigit_0.3.2-2.dsc > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > Kind regards > Rasmus Bøg Hansen Hi Rasmus, I will review this package and send you

Re: staying in stable but compiling for sid

On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 17:33 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > Hi all > I want to run software only from Stable (ie Etch) when I am doing > non-debian related work. However, when I am doing debian related work > (ex :- fixing some bugs in the BTS) I want to work in unstable (ex :- > compile

Re: RFS: drapes

On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 12:10 +, Francesco Namuri wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "drapes". I'll have a look. I'll contact you via private e-mail. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

possible inactive adopter (Re: RFS: tilda)

On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 17:46 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tobias Richter ha scritto: > > > Exactly like you he has version 0.09.4-1 ready for sponsoring: > > I'm sorry, I didn't know it. > I wrote many mails to Zak Elep when I propose myself has co-maintainer, > if necessary, but I didn't get

Re: RFS: wavbreaker

hat fixes usability issues, adds a .desktop file, manpages and i18n support. Are these changes large enough to fork? Maybe Timothy's version 0.7 can be packaged in Debian as 0.7-1, with your improvements added in the .diff.gz file. Maybe Timothy is interested in copying some improvements

Re: RFS: wavbreaker

Hi Thomas, On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 11:10 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hi all, > > |--==> Bart Martens writes: > > BM> On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 23:27 +0200, Thomas Perl wrote: > >>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wavbreaker". > >

same sponsor or not

ager is free to choose whether or not to ask the same sponsor again. I'm not saying that I would want to get rid of you. :) Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian

st a sponsor on debian-mentors@lists.debian.org . Sponsors might want to watch these pages to select packages to sponsor: http://people.debian.org/~bartm/borg/needssponsor.html http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist More information on the Utnubu subproject can be found here: http://wiki.deb

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 03:58 -0600, Warren Turkal wrote: > On Tuesday 01 May 2007 03:21, Bart Martens wrote: > > However, some packages have no working debian/watch file, and then it is > > not always easily seen whether there are newer upstream releases > > available for these

Re: packages newer in Ubuntu than in Debian (reduced false positives)

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 11:49 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-01 11:21]: > > Another approach for identifying packages to be updated in Debian to > > newer upstream releases is by comparing Debian with Ubuntu. Here is a > >

Re: new here

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 18:17 +0200, Nahuel ANGELINETTI wrote: > What should I do when I choosed a package which interest me ? Fix any bugs, update the package to the newest debian-policy, package newer upstream releases, ... and enjoy stepping in the wonderful world of Debian packaging! :) Note th

already being sponsored (Re: RFS: nautilus-image-converter)

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 18:08 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > (changing subject and cc'ing to Debian Mentors > ) I'll answer this via private e-mail. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

already being sponsored (Re: RFS: nautilus-image-converter)

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 19:09 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Paleino ha scritto: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nautilus-image-converter". > > > > ... > > > > The package now correctly builds in a clea

sponsor (Re: RFS: gnofract4d)

On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 01:18 +0200, francesco namuri wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnofract4d". > > Package name: gnofract4d > Version : 3.3-1 > Upstream Author : Tim Whidbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > URL : http://gnofract4d.sourc

request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?

Hi Mentors, Is there some agreed abbreviation that can be used in the subject of messages posted on debian-mentors to indicate that a mentor intends to sponsor a package? If not, could ITS = intent to sponsor work? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?

On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 05:48 -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > > If not, could ITS = intent to sponsor work? > > Would a 'review without ITS' be done by a simple reply to the RFS > without a subject marking? > Yes, I wasn't

Re: Copyright issues GPL-PHP license

On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 17:43 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > I've successfully packaged "nanoweb". > There already is a bug open [3], but if you read over there, there are (were) > some copyright issues. In fact, the program itself is released under GPLv2 > (and > later), while it is based on PHP, wh

Re: Copyright issues GPL-PHP license

On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 13:22 -0300, Alex Queiroz wrote: > Hallo, > > On 5/6/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I also share Vorlon's opinion about the package as a whole: > > > > > In addition, the concept of a webserver written entirely in PHP is > > > utterly abominable, an exam

Re: Copyright issues GPL-PHP license

On Sun, 2007-05-06 at 20:20 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > 2007/5/6, Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > > > On Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007, Alex Queiroz wrote: > > > This is a very sad opinion. Is Debian censoring programming > > > languages now? > > > > No, but it is already a lot of wor

Re: bugreport, debian, ubuntu

g wrong? Send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject "RFP: peless -- short package description" and with this in the body: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Followed by some information about the software. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ITS (Re: RFS: libasterisk-agi-perl)

deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libasterisk-agi-perl/libasterisk-agi-perl_0.09-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. I intend to sponsor this package. I w

ITS (Re: RFS: crank (updated package))

> - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/crank/crank_0.1.4-4.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. I intend to sponsor this package. I will contact Manuel via e-mail. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: inactive maintenance

On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 01:10 +0400, Al Nikolov wrote: > Hello, mentors > > I'm wondering if there is a practice to force package to be orphaned in a > case of chronic lack of maintenance? Yes: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-beyond-pkging.en.html#s-mia-qa -- To UNSU

ITS (Re: RFS: libsvg-perl)

On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 09:47 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsvg-perl". I'll sponsor this package. I'll contact David via private e-mail. > > * Package name: libsvg-perl > Version : 2.33-1 > Upstream Author : Ronan Og

cancel (Re: ITS (Re: RFS: libsvg-perl))

On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 10:19 +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 09:47 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsvg-perl". > > I'll sponsor this package. I'll contact Da

Re: RFS: libtie-cache-perl (updated package)

Hi list, I'm already sponsoring this package. I'll answer to the packager via private e-mail. Hi Deepak, no need to post a RFS on debian-mentors if you already have a sponsor. Unless you want to get rid of me. :) On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 18:27 +, Deepak Tripathi wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I

RFS libnet-smtp-server-perl debnest debian-builder (was: Re: RFS: libtie-cache-perl (updated package))

On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 19:54 +0200, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi list, I'm already sponsoring this package. I'll answer to the > packager via private e-mail. > > Hi Deepak, no need to post a RFS on debian-mentors if you already have a > sponsor. Unless you want to get rid

Re: Change in my sponsorship requirements

I prefer only one added block in debian/changelog per upload to Debian, although I allow multiple blocks if the packager wants that. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Change in my sponsorship requirements

rfs.1 And when it's finally allright, then the package (containing a debian/README.Debian-source) can still get this version and revision when uploaded to Debian: 1.0-1 Or is this "over the top"? Maybe it needlessly complicates things for newbie packagers... Non-DD's

Re: Change in my sponsorship requirements

On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 12:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:23:48 +0200 > Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 10:33 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > > > I think it is easier for everyone if every change > > &g

Re: Change in my sponsorship requirements

On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 16:47 +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Sunday 15 July 2007, Bart Martens wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 12:02 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > --cut-- > > Something like this ? > > > > packagename (0.1.0-8) unstable; urgency=low > > >

uploaded (Re: RFS: pmidi)

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 13:42 +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pmidi". > > I've adopted it, the only change I've made is the change to cdbs packaging. Uploaded. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: List of (un)sponsored packages on Mentors (approximate)

edssponsor.html This list shows only packages - sitting at Mentors, - with a newer version at Mentors than in Debian unstable, - with an ITP or ITA. So this list does not include packages with RFS messages on debian-mentors. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

takeover (Re: RFS: gscan2pdf (updated package))

On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 07:03 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.16-1 > of my package "gscan2pdf". Have you agreed with John Goerzen that you take over maintenance of this package? http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gscan2pdf.html >

Re: takeover (Re: RFS: gscan2pdf (updated package))

On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 07:24 +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > On 30/08/2007, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have you agreed with John Goerzen that you take over maintenance of this > > package? > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gscan2pdf.html > &g

Re: takeover (Re: RFS: gscan2pdf (updated package))

On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 14:39 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 07:24:13AM +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe a écrit : > > On 30/08/2007, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Have you agreed with John Goerzen that you take over maintenance of this &

Re: ITR: gnomermind - failed review

On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:54 -0400, Chess Griffin wrote: > My intent here was to help with a very old package and learn some > things along the way, Sure, go ahead. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Re: RFS: prboom (updated package)

thing is that you seem to be motivated to contribute to Debian, and it really OK to make some mistakes while learning. I still remember the horrible mistakes I've made myself, and fortunately I had good sponsors with lots of patience. :) Hope this helps, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

automatically parseable debian/copyright

n/copyright files must be formatted as described on the wiki page quoted above. Or did I miss some decision ? Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: automatically parseable debian/copyright

ht. But I think that debian-mentors is not the best place for that. It is, in my opinion, better that all sponsors on debian-mentors stick to current policies and practices. Regards, Bart Martens signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

burp FTBFS (was: Re: Problems with build)

3) I don't see that on https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=burp so where are the build logs for the two platforms you mentioned ? And can you confirm that we're talking about burp 1.3.4-2 ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Bug#670375: RFS: chromaprint/0.6-2 -- Minor fixes

Simon, I cannot find this copyright notice anywhere in the upstream source code. Copyright: 2010-2013 Lukáš Lalinský Why put it in debian/copyright ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Bug#671701: RFS: autofs

Hi William, You wrote on 671436: > Now working with Dmitry Smirnov on RFS #671701 > will work together on this package in the future. Please remove this package from mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/autofs5 Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentor

Bug#659082: RFS: nestopia/1.40g+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System

Hi Stephen, I don't see the package at mentors. What happened ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2012

Bug#659915: RFS: radlib/2.11.3-1 [ITP] -- rapid application development library

Hello Bas, I don't see the package at mentors. What happened ? http://mentors.debian.net/package/radlib Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Bug#669599: RFS: python-django-evolution/0.6.7-1 [ITP] -- Schema evolution for the Django web framework

Hi Dmitry, I don't see the package at mentors. What happened ? http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-django-evolution http://mentors.debian.net/package/django-evolution Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Bug#672133: RFS: webacula/5.5.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Alexander, I don't see the package at mentors. What happened ? http://mentors.debian.net/package/webacula Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb

Bug#660955: RFS: gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg/4.6.2-1 [ITP] -- documentation for GCC 4.6

Hi Samuel, Why do you use suffix "~naesten4" on your package at mentors ? http://mentors.debian.net/package/gcc-4.6-doc-non-dfsg Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#659805: package marked "needs sponsor = no" at mentors

Hello, The package at mentors is marked "needs sponsor = no" on this page: http://mentors.debian.net/packages/index You may want to change that to "needs sponsor = yes" since you are obviously looking for a sponsor via this RFS. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCR

termit : hijack or adoption with permission

Hi Thomas (Koch), Did you get permission from Tomas Fasth to adopt the package ? http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/termit.html http://mentors.debian.net/package/termit Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.6-5 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

2012-05-24 16:05 Uploaded: 2012-05-24 15:04 Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120524183625.ga26...@master.debian.org

Bug#674477: RFS: frogatto{-data}/1.2+dfsg-1.1 [NMU] -- 2D platformer game starring a quixotic frog

Hi Vincent, I'm not sure whether an entry on the "Low Threshold NMU" list makes it OK to package a newer upstream release via NMU. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Bug#670212: RFS: pentobi/1.2-1

Hi Dean, Why not pentobi 2.0 ? http://sourceforge.net/projects/pentobi/files/ Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.

Bug#665354: RFS: viennacl/1.2.1-1

Hi Michael, Why not 1.3.0 ? http://viennacl.sourceforge.net/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/viennacl/files/ Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Arc

Re: RFS: new powertop version

ia NMU ? Also, I'm not sure about new upstream releases via NMU. Have you offered to co-maintain ? Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http:

Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1

.flc contains a license contains a license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute". Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Bug#673096: RM: figlet -- RoQA; license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute"

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove figlet 2.2.2-1 from unstable, testing, stable and oldstable. The package contains material that must not be distributed. One example is that the file fonts/8859-3.flc contains a license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute

Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1

license problem must be solved before figlet can re-enter Debian. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120528

Bug#673096: RFS: figlet/2.2.4-1

Hi Jonathan, This seems an easy solution for figlet 2.2.4-1 : ftp://ftp.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/ISO8859/8859-3.TXT Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.

Re: how often should ask for upload?

; or each bug deserves an upload? I don't think so, no. Did you receive a notification for the comment that was added on this page ? http://mentors.debian.net/package/vavoom Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: RFS: new powertop version

r > mistake in NMUs. I also agree that changing this aspect does not belong in an NMU. > > Thanks for your efforts, and don't get too discouraged, more experienced > contributors make similar mistakes. That is unfortunately very true. I also learn while sponsoring packa

  1   2   3   4   5   >