> Is there some tool for checking files on licence automatically?
You can try this:
licensecheck --copyright -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 >
debian/copyright_
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
ons:
1) How can I build the package in pbuilder (--othermirror option did not
work)?
2) May I upload such package to mentors.debian.net?
I would appreciate any comments or links, where I can find a solution for
the problem.
Thank you.
Anton Gladky
Thanks all for suggestions, I have done it!
So, if the package requires even 1 depending from "experimental" it should
be targeted as "experimental"?
Anton Gladky
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 02:22:42PM +01
Thanks all for your valuable answers!
I have successfully uploaded a package.
Anton Gladky
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Etienne Millon wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 09:24:46PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > Thanks all for suggestions, I have done it!
> >
> > So, if
ain/y/yade-0.60
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yade-0.60/yade-0.60_0.60-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Anton Gladky
;yade" are
not compatible, that is why we have to support several stable versions.
Anton
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 03:40:03PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package &q
Thanks, Sven, for suggestions!
I will fix those things.
Anton
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:55:38PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > "yade-0.60" provides virtual package "yade". We want to h
is the usual
time after submitting bug and getting the corresponding email?
Thank you.
Anton
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Thanks, Sven, for suggestions!
> I will fix those things.
>
> Anton
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Sven
Thanks, Etienne for the advice!
Anton
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Etienne Millon wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:11:44AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have fixed that. But I have a question about filing ITP-bug. I have used
>> reportbug t
t 11:57 PM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:55:38PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> "yade-0.60" provides virtual package "yade". We want to have multiple
>> versions installed in parallel. This is a very specific software. Mo
if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Anton Gladky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimavvqxrawsx3tgjjiexfg_-mvzdq8-_-49q...@mail.gmail.com
Thanks, Ansgar, for the package review.
I have fixed the package according to your suggestions and would be
glad if you have a look at them.
Thanks
Anton
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anton Gladky writes:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for
gt; Hi,
>
> Anton Gladky writes:
>> I have fixed the package according to your suggestions and would be
>> glad if you have a look at them.
>
> The package builds fine and DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip works as well.
> Some issues remain (some of them are new, but all easy to
Hi,
Thanks a lot for suggestions and reviewing.
I have updated the package again, hopefully the last time for now ;)
Anton
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anton Gladky writes:
>> I just want to ask, how do you get those warnings, for example
I have fixed that.
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=admesh
Thanks for suggestion
Anton
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anton Gladky writes:
>> Thanks a lot for suggestions and reviewing.
>>
Thank you!
Hope next time I will do everything without mistakes.
Anton
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anton Gladky writes:
>> I have fixed that.
>
> I uploaded admesh to unstable. Thanks for your work :)
>
> Regards,
> An
is package for me.
Kind regards
Anton Gladky
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikkwscrnpkwx+fmx8+dy5-p08oydnu6wes4x...@mail.gmail.com
Thanks, Niels for reviewing and suggestions!
I will try to fix that.
Anton
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2011-01-09 10:33, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am loo
,
maintainer).
Thank you.
Anton
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2011-01-09 10:33, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.2-5
>
Hi, Niels,
I have re-uploaded that.
Thanks.
Anton
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2011-01-17 22:04, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Hi, Niels,
>>
>
> Hey
>
>> I have upload
Ups, sorry.
Uploaded.
Anton
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2011-01-18 12:15, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Hi, Niels,
>>
>> I have re-uploaded that.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
&g
.
Thanks
Anton
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yade-0.60".
> * Package name : yade-0.60
> Version : 0.60-1
> Upstream Author : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> * URL
Thank you!
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2011-01-18 17:38, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Ups, sorry.
>>
>> Uploaded.
>>
>> Anton
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
get
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yade-0.60/yade-0.60_0.60-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Anton Gladky
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I have received a valuable advices and suggestion
Thank you,
I have sent a request on joining in alioth.debian.org/projects/debian-science/
Anton
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 11:29 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> * Package name : yade-0.60
>>
e available
* code compilation complains about warnings, some of them can be
serious (it is up to you)
Cheers,
Anton Gladky
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Vadim Lopatin wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cr3".
>
> * Package name
Hi, David,
thanks for your interest in Debian.
I am not a DD, but I will try to give you some comments on your package.
1) orig.tar.gz should contain the folder pencil-1.2.0/, and there
should be all other files. All of your files are in "root" of the
tarball.
2) lintian over your .dsc file with
Hi, Bastien,
I am not a DD, but I can try to give you some tips:
1) lintian -IE --pedantic over .dsc gives you 2 warnings:
P: adms source: debian-control-has-unusual-field-spacing line 18
E: adms source: unknown-file-in-debian-source git-patches
2) patch should correspond to dep-3[1], and it s
Hi, all
I have a similar question. I am using:
override_dh_auto_build:
make doc
...
How to perform this section only on binary-independent packages?
Thank you.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
I have solved the problem by this way:
=
#! /usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh $@
binary-indep:
dh --before dh_auto_build $@
$(MAKE) doc
dh --after dh_auto_build $@
binary-arch:
dh --before dh_auto_build $@
$(MAKE) bins
dh -
paraview_3.10.1-5 has just been uploaded and building. It should fix an issue.
Anton
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Sounds like you got bitten by a transition:
>
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libav.html
>
> Until it gets rebuilt you will need to have testing
Uploaded!
Thanks.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CALF6qJn+t_G4V+tTM0jX3UMo2v5TvU11CMHaO=noqujagmk...@mail.gmail.com
Hi Daniel,
it looks the package is ok for uploading. But is it ok for you,
if it will be uploaded into experimental, as we are in freeze now?
Thanks,
Anton
2013/1/31 Daniel Echeverry :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my pa
Hello,
thanks for maintaining this package, but I have some notes/questions:
1) Please, use compat-level 9, your package builds in this case fine and
removes "hardening-warnings" from lintian.
2) Changelog is the mess:
a) A lot of "UNRELEASED"-words.
b) Warnings due to bad format
Hello Benjamin,
some notes on your package:
1) Please, use DEP-3 for patches, just add at least short Description,
Author and Last-Update fields.
2) Where is it possible to download a tar.gz, which is shipped with the
package?
3) Please, use VCS for maintaining your package. You can do it on
co
Hi Dimitrios,
I was trying to build your package from git (on deb-science) to check
the issue. But it fails to build at the last stage:
=
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@
fl_XdndURIList@Base 2.1.2
fl_access@Base 2.1.2
fl_alphasort@Base 2.1.2
- fl_ascii_strcasecmp@Base 2.1.2
+#MISSING:
2013/2/15 Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos :
> Hello Anton,
> Thanks for looking at it. I have built the package with pbuilder under
> distribution experimental and architecture amd64. Other combinations (unstable
> + amd64, experimental + i386 etc.) will probably fail due to symbols
> mismatches.
I think,
Hi Benjamin,
2013/2/15 Benjamin Eltzner :
> 2) The source code is not distributed as .tar.gz archive but as .zip
> archive by upstream. The .zip archive is available at
> http://www.tipp10.com/en/download/tipp10_source_v2-1-0.zip
Ok, please, add a small 3-lines script, which unpacks zip and creat
g 2013-02-18 21:03:26.0 +0100
@@ -1,10 +1,18 @@
python-gnuplot (1.8-3) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Josue Ortega ]
* New Maintainer. (Closes: #699039)
* Added debian/source/format file
* Changed to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format.
* debian/copyright updated to format versio
The modified package uploaded into experimental.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CALF6qJk7AA27=XDr=YDsBQSO8Ea_e=d6vr4gbiott1jc9it...@mail.gma
Hi Mateusz,
thanks for updating the package. But I have a couple of questions/notes:
1) Do not edit the old changelog-entries, even there are some mistakes.
2) You listed yourself as a maintainer instead of an old one, but the
package was not orphaned. Did you coordinate that?
3) Why do you use a
Hi Mateusz,
some comments/notes on your package:
1) run lintian on ,changes-file of built package. It will show a lot of
warnings, which need to be fixed.
2) use dh 9 instead of 7. It will fix hardening-warnings.
3) set the newest Standards-Version.
4) use VCS for maintaining the package.
Thanks
Hi Markus,
as I understood from #583862, you have found a sponsor for the package,
right? Anyway, there are some technical notes on the package.
1) Use DEP-3 for patches (at least Description, Author, Last-Update).
2) Remove the fix-makefile.patch, which is not listed in debian/patch/series
3) Ch
Hi Scott,
thanks for adopting the package. There are a couple of notes/questions:
1. Why do you use compat level 8, not 9?
2. The current Standards-Version is now 3.9.4.
3. Why VCS-field is commented out? It is better to use VCS for packaging.
4. Why libsdl1.2debian is injected to Depends manual
Hi Joachim,
thanks for trying to bring a new software into Debian.
A couple of notes/questions about your package:
1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to "stable"
release. It is impossible. Use "unstable" instead. Also you should put
your name there.
2) compat-level 7 is relati
Hi,
On 02/25/2013 07:52 AM, Joachim Langenbach wrote:
>> 1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to "stable"
>> release. It is impossible. Use "unstable" instead. Also you should put
>> your name there.
>
> So this stable or unstable line refers to the distribution status the pack
On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format.
>
> Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a
> recommendation, not a rule. Thanks.
>
Hello,
ok, agree, my "typo". But I think it is desirable to ask for DEP-5 for
Hi,
On 02/25/2013 01:48 PM, Scott Leggett wrote:
> I used compat level 8 and Standards-Version 3.9.3 because these are
> the versions which dh_make automatically inserts when debianising an
> application. Thanks for the heads-up regarding the new versions - I've
> fixed the packaging.
>
> For fut
Hi Jose,
thanks for adopting this package. You have done a good job on packaging
and I have not found there any critical errors there. So I uploaded that.
But there are a couple of fix, which, please, prepare for your next upload:
1) Add CVS for packaging (preferable Alioth-services).
2) Conside
Hi Willem,
thanks for adopting these the package. But there are some
questions/notes regarding it:
1) Remove quilt and hardening-includes from BD, they are useless there.
2) Vcs-Browser: ";a=summary" is not needed.
3) Convert copyright file into DEP-5 format.
4) debian/docs is not used? If so - r
Hi Marco,
some notes on your package:
1) Target an upload to experimental instead of unstable due to a
freeze-period.
2) Changelog-entry #2, add short bug description.
3) Consider to use compat-level 9.
4) Update "Format-field" in copyright-file, DEP-5 is released.
5) dirs-file is useless.
6) Bar
Hi all,
my 2 cts.
On 02/27/2013 12:07 AM, Philip Ashmore wrote:
>
> First - a weighted sponsorship priority queue - all packages get a
> rating and higher-rated packages will get sponsored sooner than others.
I agree with that. On my opinion the package "weight" should be
calculated, considerin
Hi Arno,
a couple of minor notes regarding this package:
1) Use experimental instead of unstable as target branch due to
freeeze-period.
2) dpkg is in depends-section. Is it really necessary for rrep?
The package looks fine.
Cheers,
Anton
On 02/26/2013 05:40 PM, Arno Onken wrote:
> Package: s
and your notes.
>
> On 02/27/2013 10:14 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> 1) Use experimental instead of unstable as target branch due to
>> freeeze-period.
>
> Done.
>
>> 2) dpkg is in depends-section. Is it really necessary for rrep?
>
> I removed dpkg | in
Hi Marco,
I have uploaded the package. But I used the "tar.gz"-tarball, which is
available on github, instead of "tar.bz2". Did you repack it yourself?
Thanks,
Anton
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/01/2013 07:40 AM, Marco Balmer wrote:
> Dear Anton,
>
> I've created the tarball with the following command:
>
> $ git archive --format=tar --prefix=fadecut-0.1.2/ 0.1.2 | bzip2 >
> ../fadecut_0.1.2.orig.tar.bz2
I have simply downloaded a tar.gz from tags-page [1]
>
> Do I need to reques
Hi,
2013/3/1 Saulo Moraes :
> So my quest is may someone help me to get involved? How or Who can support
> me in my first package upload ? I am reading the documentation available but
> I think is time to start in practice.
alternatively, you can adopt any of orphaned packages [1].
Anton
[1]
Uploaded. Please, use next time the same tarball, which was in Debian
uploaded previously, otherwise the package will be rejected.
Thanks,
Anton
2013/3/1 Marco Balmer :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "couriergre
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for working on this package. I think it is ok to switch to a fork
as the original software is not developed any more.
Some notes/questions on your package:
1) Remove changelog.new.
2) Use VCS for maintaining the package and uncomment corresponding lines
in control-file.
3) C
On 03/02/2013 02:23 PM, Lanoxx wrote:
> Note that I'm targeting unstable not experimental, because I believe
> that given the amount of bugs my package fixes makes this package more
> stable than the one which is currently in unstable.
Due to a freeze, I would suggest to target it to experimental
hing else,
not sure).
>> 5) Standards-Version is already 3.9.4
>
> Corrected. (No changes required.)
^^^
This should be in changelog.
Thanks for contribution.
Anton
From 6aac113f900cf8163323976ad6e3608bcf5e6e35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anton
Uploaded. Thanks for contribution.
Anton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/calf6qjm9rm8nw8jt-wppe6z8sn7eo1-gy6zs76aflrdabcj...@mail.gmail.com
Hi Sebastian,
On 03/10/2013 03:48 PM, Lanoxx wrote:
> Added autopoint as build dependency, now it should work. But when I run
> pbuilder --build to build it inside a debian chroot, then I still get
> some configure errors. I have to assume that some build dependencies are
> missing, but I really d
Hi Sebastian,
I asked you to clean debian/rules. See an attachment.
Anton
On 03/19/2013 03:56 PM, Sebastian Geiger wrote:
> I just uploaded the package again. I have added a comment explaining
> that I have run blhc to confirm that the hardening warning override in
> lintian is justified and als
On 03/19/2013 11:26 PM, Lanoxx wrote:
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if
> debian/tilda/usr/bin/tilda was not linked against libcairo-gobject.so.2
> (it uses none of the library's symbols)
>
> Do you know how to fix that?
You can try to add "--as-needed" param
Hi,
please, have a look at the page of your package [1]. There are
a log of warnings, which need to be fixed. The lintian-checker produces
those warnings, if you start it over your .changes-file.
Cheers,
Anton
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/libaria
On 03/21/2013 04:34 PM, Srećko Jurić-K
Hi Srećko,
I did not look at the package precisely. So I am not able to give you
concrete advices, sorry.
Lintian works in most of cases just fine. Please, do not ignore its
warnings and fix them.
On 03/21/2013 11:40 PM, Srećko Jurić-Kavelj wrote:
> Starting from the source package:
> - source-c
Hi,
there are some comments on your package. It looks ok now, but:
1. Use DEP-3 for patches
2. 2.7.5.2-1 version was not in Debian. Remove from changelog.
3. Use VCS for packaging (preferable on alioth).
4. Remove libaria-dev.dirs (it seems, it is useless).
5. Copyright-file should not contain th
Hi Yves,
thanks for your work! Though it is your first upload, it looks fine! I
did not look precisely, but I do not see any large problems with your
package.
The only doubts I have, whether the package will be useful for Debian at
all, if it is targeted only on Raspberry PI (CC-ing debian-arm to
Hi Mike,
thanks for providing a new package for Debian! But I have some
notes/questions about your package.
First of all I would like to propose you to maintain your package under
the debian-science team [1], which I think the most suitable team for
such kind of software.
You created an autotool
I would agree with that. But there is a problem of package building. It
means, we can upload only the binary-version (source-based uploads are
still not implemented in Debian unfortunately), which was built on
armel, what is not always simple or difficult. Also if the package will
require NMU, one
Hi Tom,
there are a couple of examples, where cmake is used.
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/freecad.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules;h=13572c82de9745afbad232c87cf52d5b8147de31;hb=refs/heads/experimental
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/gmsh.git;a=
Hi Eriberto,
considering the relatively long list of the packages, which you
maintain, I sponsored that without asking to fix some minor issues.
But for the future uploads, could you:
1) Use debhelper 9
2) Use VCS for package maintainance
3) Remove comments in debian/rules
4) Add --parallel opti
Hi Alexandre,
your package looks fine and I do not have any notes/question regarding
packaging.
But we have already snake-package in Archive [1], and it is actually orphaned.
Are there any advantages in your implementation.
Thank you,
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/snake4.html
[2] http://b
dates and zeroes the chance of it ever becoming orphan.
>
> Finally, it would be a nice addition to the other text-based packages
> already on
> the Archive [0].
>
> [0]:
> http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=ncurses+game&searchon=all&suite=stable§ion=a
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/snake4.git
On 04/24/2013 08:21 PM, Alexandre Dantas wrote:
> Thank you a lot, Anton!
>
> Following your suggestion earlier, I was trying to adopt snake4. It's on
> #581387 now.
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Anton Gladky wrote
Hi Jakub,
On 04/26/2013 11:50 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I don't feel comfortable with sponsoring a package that is maintainer
> within a team I'm not memeber of; and I have no intention to join
> debian-science any time soon.
you have done a great job on reviewing/fixing this package.
Debian-scie
Hi Joao,
thanks for taking into account my previous notes.
Uploaded!
Anton
On 05/01/2013 02:45 AM, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bittwist"
>
> * Package name: bittwist
>
Hi Alexandre,
thanks for adopting the package!
It looks fine, but I have 2 minor notes due to the packaging:
1) You are using dh 9, but there are no notice in the changelog.
2) Use VCS for package maintainance.
3) Optionally you can try to use dh-autoreconf ( --with autoreconf), but
it is up to y
Hi Alexandre,
thanks for adopting the package. I did not look into the package
precisely, sorry, but there are a couple of notes.
1) It seems, you have taken the version 2.1a-7.1 as the base, but in
unstable the version 2.2a-1 is available and there are a lot of
"packaging" changes there.
2) Do n
Hi Oliver,
thanks for providing the new version of the package!
But to do such uploads you should be or (co)maintainer of the package or
at least to get a permission from the current maintainer (CC-ing him),
as the package has not been orphaned.
From the technical point of view the package needs
; [0]: http://mentors.debian.net/package/zatacka
> [1]: https://github.com/alexdantas/zatacka
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexandre,
>>
>> thanks for adopting the package!
>> It looks fine, but I have 2 minor notes
Hi Alexandre,
I have uploaded your package.
I just made 2 minor changes in patches:
==
diff -Nru xbomb-2.2a/debian/patches/hardening_flags.patch
xbomb-2.2a/debian/patches/hardening_flags.patch
--- xbomb-2.2a/debian/patches/hardening_flags.patch 2013-05-
Hi Andrey,
I would sponsor your package, but it seems, md5sum of your tarball is not
the same as of original one. Did you repack it?
Thanks,
Anton
2013/5/5 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package
On 05/05/2013 05:04 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> I would sponsor your package, but it seems, md5sum of your tarball is not
>> the same as of original one. Did you repack it?
> I didn't repack it, I generat
Sorry, forgot to mention. I used an original tarball from the upstream's
website. There are no differences between yours and original's one. Only
md5sum was different.
Cheers,
Anton
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Srećko,
the package looks ok for me. Just a couple of notes:
1) Please, add "--parallel" to dh to get a faster building.
2) Is it difficult to add some kind of auto-test? Better to add one more
target into makefile (you patch it anyway), so it can be picked up by
dh_autotest.
3) Do you plan to
Hi Timur,
I have sponsored your package. Thanks for contribution!
Anton
On 05/14/2013 12:21 PM, Timur Birsh wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cd-discid"
>
> * Package name: cd-discid
> Version
Thanks, Eriberto, for clarifying. That is exactly, what I meant.
Anton
2013/5/15 Eriberto
> 2013/5/15 Ильяс Гасанов :
> > Sorry, I didn't get it. Do you mean, use source format like 3.0 (git)
> > instead of 3.0 (quilt)?
>
> Hi Ilyas! No! Anton said you should use a VCS, as git, to store the
>
Hi Ильяс,
a couple of minor notes:
1) unite versions 20030310-1 and 20030310-2 in changelog into 20030310-1
2) put the full text license into copyright file
3) debian/rules:
2013/5/16 Ильяс Гасанов
> Done. The package with suggested changes made has now been uploaded to
> the mentors. Here's
2-n d part of the message, sorry :)
3) debian/rules:
a) all ".PHONY:" should be removed
b) try to escape override_dh_auto_install and override_dh_installdocs
Just commit fixes into VCS, no need to reupload the package to mentors.
Thanks for your work,
Anton
2013/5/16 Ильяс Гасанов
> Done.
Hi Ильяс,
2013/5/17 Ильяс Гасанов
>
>
> Sorry, but else I can't figure, just how in the world would the patterns
> be installed into the filesystem with no upstream makefile of any sort?
>
>
> > and override_dh_installdocs
>
> In such a case README.source will not be installed in docs. So then
Hi Timur,
I have uploaded your package. Thanks for contribution.
Anton
On 05/17/2013 01:37 PM, Timur Birsh wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inadyn"
>
> * Package name: inadyn
>Version
2013/5/18 Ильяс Гасанов
>
> I'd do this if the patched file still used TeX syntax. Alas, LibreOffice
> does not understand the TeX command \patterns{ } so I had to get rid of
> it, hence it's no longer a TeX file. Also I don't see any point of
> storing the effective file (especially with no descr
Uploaded. Thanks for contribution.
Anton
2013/5/19 Ильяс Гасанов :
> Hello.
>
>
> On Sat, 18 May, 2013 at 11:45:17 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> Ok, no problem. Let me know, when you are ready.
>
> Ready, as you have asked. The updated package is reuploaded to
Hi Oliver,
> lintian reports three problems with this package, which I don't
> know how to fix:
>
> P: dcraw: no-upstream-changelog
> There really is no upstream changelog. What to do?
Id upstream does not ship it, you can do nothing with that.
> W: dcraw source: package-needs-versioned-debh
Hi Oliver,
2013/6/3 Oliver Sander :
> [...]
> Currently getsource doesn't run due to some minor upstream format change.
Can you fix that?
> It is what you get when following the official Debian instructions
> for switching from source format 1.0 to 3.0 (quilt).
Yes, but in the previous uploaded
Hi Arno,
the versions 1.3.5-1 and 1.3.6-1 were not uploaded in
Debian. Thus, please, put all changelogs-entries into a 1.3.6-1 and
drop 1.3.5-1 and 1.3.6-2 entry.
Cheers,
Anton
2013/7/1 Arno Onken :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a spo
Uploaded. Thanks for contribution.
Anton
2013/7/1 Arno Onken :
> Hi Anton,
>
> On 01.07.2013 15:42, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> the versions 1.3.5-1 and 1.3.6-1 were not uploaded in
>> Debian. Thus, please, put all changelogs-entries into a 1.3.6-1 and
>> drop 1.3.5-1 and
Uploaded.
Anton
2013/7/2 Andrey Rahmatullin :
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "librsync"
>
> * Package name: librsync
>Version : 0.9.7-10
>Upstream Author : Martin Pool
> * URL
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
