On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 16:58 -0700, Paul Hardy wrote:
> I have been getting ready to release a font plus sources and auxiliary
> programs for Debian. The Policy Manual requires using the
> update-fonts-dir script when installing a font.
>
> I was going to post a change to the update-fonts-dir scri
On Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:46 AM, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[...]
> You need to make sure the package is listed in
> "packages-arch-specific":
>
> http://www.buildd.net/buildd/Packages-arch-specific
That's a horribly out-of-date (and unofficial) copy. Not altogether
surprising g
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:39 -0300, Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=snake4&ver=1.0.12-4&arch=hppa&stamp=1123556808&file=log&as=raw
>
> at:
>
> /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
> /usr/bin/fakeroot: line 152: 2780 Segmentation fault
> FAKEROOTKE
On Tuesday, October 11, 2005 5:38 AM, Justin Pryzby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:26:55PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote:
[...]
>> Or what should I do with persistent user claiming that he wants to
>> have it fixed in stable? On the other hand, 0.3.3-6 (which is what
>> is in sa
On Wednesday, October 19, 2005 7:22 PM, Justin Pryzby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> You might contact the maintainer, and if you don't receive a response,
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask "is this person mia" (and Cc: them
> in that message).
The recommended method is to mail [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 1:55 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
>> need close or -done (and yes, katie would implement this using
>> -done, just as it already does for maintainer uploads to unstable).
>
> If the BTS w
On Tuesday, January 24, 2006 11:01 AM, Rakotomandimby Mihamina
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 18:59 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
>> To get working dpatches I recommend using the 'dpatch-edit-patch'
>> command.
[...]
> I had a look at the man page, but I did not see how to go on
Roger Leigh wrote, Wednesday, February 15, 2006 9:15 PM:
> john aikins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [nothing]
>
> It's customary to provide details of what you would like sponsoring,
> plus pointers to the sources.
Given his messages of two and four days previously, he appears to want
himself s
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 21:36 +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> Hi,
> Would you know if a package of this software exists:
> http://zippo.taiyo.co.jp/~gotoh/ssh/connect.html
>
> I looked into the orphaned and so on but did not find.
A quick "apt-cache search" yields:
http://packages.debia
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 01:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> Assuming updating the Build-depends field in debian/control (to
> reflect the new package name) is not counted as a source change:
In this context, the difference between "can binNMUed" and "needs source
change" is basically whether an
On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 14:45 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> BTW, it seems to me that libpoco development only happens in experimental
> and unstable does not deserve the attention it would need. Please help
> fixing the problem to make sure the reverse depends can stay in testing.
"Stay" would impl
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 13:59 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20100930-1
> > of my package "mobile-broadband-provider-info".
>
> Uploaded since it matches previous unblocks, please unblock agai
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 22:03 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:12:29PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20110103-1
> > of my package "mobile-broadband-provider-info".
>
> If the release team will indicate that there is an
tag 609947 + pending
thanks
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 22:10 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:1.5.6.5-3+lenny3.3 of
> > the package "git-core".
>
> Uploaded.
and flagged for acceptance at the next dinstall; thanks.
[Reply-To overridden, as I have no idea if the other recipients are
reading -mentors, but reset to there having noted that. Please Cc: me
on replies if relevant as I am not subscribed]
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 21:09 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> It seems to me that no one has replied (in public
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 23:28 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Prach Pongpanich in the mentors list is trying to fix #701134.
> He is removing the Pre-Depends which was added for the
> release of Squeeze, because of #605867, which I filled, but
> can't remember what it was about. The bug report says:
>
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 22:22, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:46:50PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > 2) csmash - a table tennis simulation game
> > > I've fixed one outstanding bug and I like this game very much ;)
> > [...]
> >
> > Hello,
> > I have taken a short
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my
> eyes. Please quote $$i.gz, ie.: "$$i.gz". ;-)
> PPS: I'd use sind find -print0 ... | xargs -0 rm
Even better, xargs -0r rm. That way, rm won't throw an erro
On Wednesday, May 05, 2004 10:31 PM GMT+1, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> PS: for i in imag
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
> On Monday 17 May 2004 03:30, Greg Deitrick wrote:
>
> > Looking at the man pages for various library calls it appears that
> > tmpfile(3) is probably an acceptable means of creating a temporary file,
> > but this returns a FILE *. The upstram sour
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
[...]
> > debian-security is an inappropriate address to sent this type of query to.
> > It
> > is intended for security advisories and alerts.
>
> Codswallop!
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 20:15, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-05-17 "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Or, indeed, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has the same destination as
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] afaik.
> [...]
>
> No (unless this has changed
On Wednesday, June 02, 2004 9:43 AM, Rafal Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I haven't had a chance to look at the actual packages, but:
> Bug#251867: Acknowledgement (ITP: barrage -- Rather violent action
> game)
[...]
>Version :
>Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Geert Stappers wrote, Friday, June 04, 2004 7:38 AM:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:30:12PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> > Geert Stappers wrote:
[...]
> > > Gee, I real need to find back that document that wrote to use
> > >
> > > 1.0-0.1, 1.0-0.2, 1.0-0.3 etc for non official debian packages.
> >
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 16:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > If the current version in the archive is 1.1, and you upload an NMU of 1.2,
> > that NMU should be 1.2-0.1 (so that a maintainer upload of 1.2-1 supers
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
[...]
>> - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes
>> (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when
>> the final 1.0 vers
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
>>
>> Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
> I
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 19:50, Rohit Pidaparthi wrote:
> naim is an ncurses based console IM client that supports various protocols
> including IRC, ICQ, AIM and lily. It supports the TOC protocol and it
> can store buddy lists on the AOL servers. It is great for SSH users who
> want to be able to re
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:50 PM, Rohit Pidaparthi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> naim is an ncurses based console IM client that supports various
[...]
> The source, diff, dsc etc can be found at:
> http://mithrandir.dyndns.org/debs/source/
>
> The packages are policy compliant. (use the 0.11.7
On Friday, August 13, 2004 2:13 AM, Lawrence Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am aware that another hotway package exists in Debian. However, i
> have been unable to reach the maintainer for the past 3 months and it
> no longer works with Hotmail ( due to MS 'upgrades' to the ser
Salvador Abreu wrote, Monday, August 16, 2004 11:55 AM:
> I've tried to deal with this with a control line:
> Architecture: i386 amd64 sparc mips alpha powerpc
> so that it only builds on some architectures.
>
> The trouble is I can't get a hold of any machine of these architectures
> to make bin
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 01:59 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if
> I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at
> least one.
Not that haven't already been reported, afaics.
> This doesn't make any sense, sinc
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 16:58 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20041130T103405+0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > That's to be expected, you appear to be misunderstanding what a
> > Replaces: header does. The purpose of the Replaces: is to say "if I
> > instal
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005 11:21 AM, John Hendrickson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> W: xdm-options: packages-installs-file-to-usr-x11r6
> usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm-option
>
> Is this informational or am I supposed to somehow register this so
> lintian won't complain?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ echo 'W: xdm-o
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 22:22, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:46:50PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > 2) csmash - a table tennis simulation game
> > > I've fixed one outstanding bug and I like this game very much ;)
> > [...]
> >
> > Hello,
> > I have taken a short
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>
> PS: for i in images/*.ppm images/*.pbm; do rm -vf $$i.gz ... hurts my
> eyes. Please quote $$i.gz, ie.: "$$i.gz". ;-)
> PPS: I'd use sind find -print0 ... | xargs -0 rm
Even better, xargs -0r rm. That way, rm won't throw an erro
On Wednesday, May 05, 2004 10:31 PM GMT+1, Goswin von Brederlow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:17, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> PS: for i in imag
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
> On Monday 17 May 2004 03:30, Greg Deitrick wrote:
>
> > Looking at the man pages for various library calls it appears that
> > tmpfile(3) is probably an acceptable means of creating a temporary file,
> > but this returns a FILE *. The upstram sour
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 19:02, Will Newton wrote:
[...]
> > debian-security is an inappropriate address to sent this type of query to. It
> > is intended for security advisories and alerts.
>
> Codswallop! That would be d-s
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 20:15, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-05-17 "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Or, indeed, [EMAIL PROTECTED], which has the same destination as
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] afaik.
> [...]
>
> No (unless this has changed
On Wednesday, June 02, 2004 9:43 AM, Rafal Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I haven't had a chance to look at the actual packages, but:
> Bug#251867: Acknowledgement (ITP: barrage -- Rather violent action
> game)
[...]
>Version :
>Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Geert Stappers wrote, Friday, June 04, 2004 7:38 AM:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 03:30:12PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote:
> > Geert Stappers wrote:
[...]
> > > Gee, I real need to find back that document that wrote to use
> > >
> > > 1.0-0.1, 1.0-0.2, 1.0-0.3 etc for non official debian packages.
> >
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 16:57, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > If the current version in the archive is 1.1, and you upload an NMU of 1.2,
> > that NMU should be 1.2-0.1 (so that a maintainer upload of 1.2-1 supers
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
[...]
>> - the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes
>> (1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when
>> the final 1.0 vers
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
>>
>> Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
> I
On Wed, 2004-07-21 at 19:50, Rohit Pidaparthi wrote:
> naim is an ncurses based console IM client that supports various protocols
> including IRC, ICQ, AIM and lily. It supports the TOC protocol and it
> can store buddy lists on the AOL servers. It is great for SSH users who
> want to be able to re
On Wednesday, July 21, 2004 7:50 PM, Rohit Pidaparthi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> naim is an ncurses based console IM client that supports various
[...]
> The source, diff, dsc etc can be found at:
> http://mithrandir.dyndns.org/debs/source/
>
> The packages are policy compliant. (use the 0.11.7
On Friday, August 13, 2004 2:13 AM, Lawrence Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am aware that another hotway package exists in Debian. However, i
> have been unable to reach the maintainer for the past 3 months and it
> no longer works with Hotmail ( due to MS 'upgrades' to the ser
Salvador Abreu wrote, Monday, August 16, 2004 11:55 AM:
> I've tried to deal with this with a control line:
> Architecture: i386 amd64 sparc mips alpha powerpc
> so that it only builds on some architectures.
>
> The trouble is I can't get a hold of any machine of these architectures
> to make bin
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 01:59 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> My package is a rather unusual change, so it wouldn't surprise me if
> I've uncovered a few bugs in apt-get. I know for certain I've found at
> least one.
Not that haven't already been reported, afaics.
> This doesn't make any sense, sinc
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 16:58 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20041130T103405+0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > That's to be expected, you appear to be misunderstanding what a
> > Replaces: header does. The purpose of the Replaces: is to say "if I
> > instal
On Friday, December 17, 2004 9:38 AM, Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Are you sure that the ROOT license permits binary redistribution? I
> read something different [1] but I have not looked at the license
> myself.
[...]
> [1] http://borex.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/
The license i
On Thursday, May 19, 2005 11:57 AM, Marc Chantreux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> any idea to contact the dh-make-perl team ?
In the same way as any other Debian package:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hth
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
Control: tags 843775 + pending
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 12:43 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> (dropping debian-boot@, adding 845311@)
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Jens Sauer (2016-11-22):
> > Thank you for reviewing this package. It was my first time doing this,
> > I hope everything is alright.
>
> It looks
On Sat, 2016-12-31 at 15:38 +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> I would believe removing tk8.4 by hand from testing could fix the lot of
> associated autoremovals.
>
> Dear release team, thoughts on that?
tk8.4 and tcl8.4 were already re-removed from testing this morning.
Regards,
Adam
On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 22:42 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:22 PM Christian Barcenas
> wrote:
> > Because this changes the versioning scheme from kernel releases
> > (libbpf-dev and libbpf0 currently are at 5.4.13-1 in sid) to libbpf
> > version numbers (0.0.6-1), the epo
On 2020-02-06 08:12, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 06-02-2020 00:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2020-02-05 at 22:42 +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:22 PM Christian Barcenas
wrote:
Because this changes the versioning scheme from kernel releases
(libbpf-dev and libbpf0
On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 00:50 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Control: tags 962669 moreinfo
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 08:18:38PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 13:48 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
> > > On 6/11/20 1:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> &
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 08:21 -0500, Michael Shuler wrote:
>
> On 6/12/20 7:36 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 08:40:29AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > > > Wouldn't embedded setups be more likely to have a hard-coded
>
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 23:06 +0100, Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Hello release team,
>
> Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote on 2015-12-18 04:39:
> >
> > xfe 1.41-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-12-28
> >
> > It is affected by these RC bugs:
> > 806579: xfe: FTBFS: configure:14251:
60 matches
Mail list logo
