Bug#999550: RFS: rserpooldemo/3.0.6~test0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rserpooldemo ": * Package name: rserpooldemo Version: 3.0.6~test0-1 Upstream Author: Thomas Dreibholz mailto:dre...@iem.uni-due.de>

Bug#999555: RFS: lebiniou/3.63.3-1 -- user-friendly, powerful music visualization / VJing tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lebiniou": * Package name: lebiniou Version : 3.63.3-1 Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel * URL : https://biniou.net * License : GPL-2+ Se

Bug#999564: RFS: urlwatch/2.24-1 -- monitors webpages for you

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "urlwatch": * Package name: urlwatch Version : 2.24-1 Upstream Author : Thomas Perl * URL : https://thp.io/2008/urlwatch/ * License : BSD-3-clause * V

Bug#996592: RFS: workflow/0.9.8-1 [ITP] -- Parallel computing and asynchronous web server engine

Hi Lance, The filenamemangle in the debian/watch file is not correct. Please test it with uscan. Please consider relicensing debian/* or at least debian/patches/* to the same license as upstream (Apache 2). The problem with the debian/* license being more restrictive than upstream is that your

Bug#996681: RFS: vixl/5.1.0-1 [ITP] -- ARMv8 Runtime Code Generation Library

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:18:28 +0100 Andrea Pappacoda wrote: > Please fix: > E: libvixl-dev: doc-base-file-references-missing-file libvixl-dev.libvixl-dev:11 /usr/share/doc/libvixl-dev/aarch64/*.html I believe that this happens because the docs are generated based o