Hi Denys,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:08:05AM +, Denys Berkovskyy wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dmg2img"
Excellent, thanks for taking care of this!
> Changes since the last upload:
> * New upstream version 1.6.6 (Closes: #778827)
> * New upstream version 1.6.7
> * Fix
Hi,
I want to package a software, "iraf" (with extensions) that uses some
system dependent binaries internally. Some of the extensions will be
available in 32 bit only, so this is a good use case for
Multi-Arch. That means, that the binaries will go to
/usr/lib/${DEB_TARGET_MULTIARCH}/iraf
At ru
Hi!
On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 09:52:23 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> I want to package a software, "iraf" (with extensions) that uses some
> system dependent binaries internally. Some of the extensions will be
> available in 32 bit only, so this is a good use case for
> Multi-Arch. That means, that th
Hi Guillem,
thanks for the quick answer.
Guillem Jover writes:
> On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 09:52:23 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> /usr/lib/${DEB_TARGET_MULTIARCH}/iraf
>
> It that was to be used, then it should be DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH, the
> _TARGET_ variants are for canadian cross-compilers. :) If t
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:14:51AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> In d/changelog: you forgot to include the ITP bug number.
Thanks for the catch; it seems I had included the ITP number in git
(present on my laptop and alioth) but forgot to rebuild before dput...
> In d/copyright: you need to
Hello Sir,
I'm Lily from FEP Mold. How's it going today? Fine very well, i hope.
if not, i also would like become your loyal listener.
As the head of the mold market, Have you ever concerned your molds'
price and quality? or want to find the better su
❦ 24 novembre 2017 17:48 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
:
>> In d/copyright: you need to include the complete CC0 license.
>
> OK; I did so based on what other packages were doing, according to
> codesearch.d.n [0]. If that's an acceptable solution, I will
> - include the whole CC0 license in de
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:21:39PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 24 novembre 2017 17:48 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
> :
>
> > - include the whole CC0 license in debian/copyright
> > (this is already uploaded to mentors.d.n);
> > - open a bug against base-files to ship the CC0 in
> > /usr
❦ 24 novembre 2017 21:25 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
:
>> Any MBF should be discussed first on debian-devel@ first. For me,
>> this seems a small violation and it would be preferable to stick with
>> severity normal to not appear too agressive.
>
> Only 8 source packages are concerned (re: not
Your message dated Fri, 24 Nov 2017 22:27:25 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #882568,
regarding RFS: nq/0.2.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi!
On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 13:59:40 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Guillem Jover writes:
> > On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 09:52:23 +0100, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >> So, how can I canonically (ideally from C) retrieve a sorted list of
> >> supported multi arch paths at runtime? Or is there another good way
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:05:29PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 24 novembre 2017 21:25 +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
> :
> For 8 packages, you can file the bug directly. As for severity, people
> may not agree with the interpretation of the policy: CC0 is equivalent
> to public domain and the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "quickcal"
* Package name: quickcal
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author :
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/quickcal/
* License : GPL
Section
13 matches
Mail list logo
