Hello mentors,
Since shibboleth-sp2 2.6.0+dfsg1-4 migrated to testing during the
holidays, I'm now backporting it to jessie. So far there is nothing to
change, however piuparts gives me the following error (which does not
appear on stretch):
> 0m34.6s ERROR: FAIL: Package purging left files on sy
[+Gerrit Pape's correct email address]
On 17 January 2017 at 00:17, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Dear Luke,
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:27:22PM +, Luke Diamand wrote:
>> I put in a patch to add a git-p4 package, here:
>>
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773245
>>
>> I was wond
> This has nothing to do with that you have multiple download URLs.
> You are simply missing to replace - with ~ to sort RCs before final versions.
> uversionmangle=s/-rc/~rc/
I will do this change and see if with two URL, uscan upload only one .tar.gz.
I do not want to download two times the s
Hello all,
My name is Damien André, I am french and I am looking for
menthoring/sponsoring for
the openmeca software (see https://gitlab.com/damien.andre/openmeca).
Openmeca is a graphical application for building multibody dynamics
simulations.
It may be usefull for learning and teaching mech
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:27:45AM +0100, dada wrote:
> ** What I have already done for packaging openmeca **
>
> - open an ITP (see
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850590).
>Andreas Tille (from debian-science) tell me that the soft fit well with
> the debian-science field
Le 2017-01-17 10:41, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:27:45AM +0100, dada wrote:
** What I have already done for packaging openmeca **
- open an ITP (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850590).
Andreas Tille (from debian-science) tell me that the soft f
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 11:06 +0100, dada wrote:
> Le 2017-01-17 10:41, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:27:45AM +0100, dada wrote:
> > > ** What I have already done for packaging openmeca **
> > >
> > > - open an ITP (see
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Hi,
On 16/01/17 23:58, Boud Roukema wrote:
> hi Debian-mentors,
>
> Is it reasonable to override the mpirun (openmpi_2.0.2~git.20161225-8)
> default preference of refusing to run as root?
>
> I've started packaging mpgrafic for debian - this is my first
> debianisation, apart from minor private
Etienne Dysli-Metref:
> Hello mentors,
>
> Since shibboleth-sp2 2.6.0+dfsg1-4 migrated to testing during the
> holidays, I'm now backporting it to jessie. So far there is nothing to
> change, however piuparts gives me the following error (which does not
> appear on stretch):
>
>> [...]
>
> So I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-qtpy"
* Package name: python-qtpy
Version : 1.2.0-1
Upstream Author : The Spyder Development Team
* URL : https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtpy
* License
Hello Ghislain.
do you know if this version is compatible with the reverse dependencies already
in Debian ?
python-qtpy
Reverse Depends:
python-spyder
python-ginga
python-qtawesome
python-glue
We are close from the freeze and I do not want to end up with a bunch of autorm
packages due
James Cowgill writes:
> On 16/01/17 23:58, Boud Roukema wrote:
>> Since, in general, there is no reason for mpirun to run as root,
>> the sid version of mpirun (from openmpi) apparently refuses to run as root.
>> (I have not reproduced this behaviour myself - Ole Streicher
>> has warned me about i
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, James Cowgill wrote:
I'm not sure I follow. Debhelper runs the testsuite during the build
target so it shouldn't be run as root anyway. I don't think you need any
workarounds at all for this.
I agree in terms of principles :), but I don't know what actually happens
on the
Hi Fred,
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 19:30 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello Ghislain.
>
> do you know if this version is compatible with the reverse dependencies
> already in Debian ?
First of, the upstream changelog did not mention any breakage, only
fixes and new features (support for
Hi Fred,
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 19:30 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> Hello Ghislain.
>
> do you know if this version is compatible with the reverse dependencies
> already in Debian ?
First of, the upstream changelog did not mention any API breakage, only
fixes and new features (support
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Boud Roukema wrote:
> I've looked a bit at buildd.debian.org, but it's not completely
> trivial to decide which is correct - do the buildd builds on the
> debian build machines run dh_auto_tests as (i) root, as (ii) an unprivileged
> user running fakeroot, or as (i
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Boud Roukema wrote:
I've looked a bit at buildd.debian.org, but it's not completely
trivial to decide which is correct - do the buildd builds on the
debian build machines run dh_auto_tests as (i) root, as (ii) an unprivileg
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Boud Roukema wrote:
> I guess by "both of these" you mean "most of the build steps (apart from
> the 'debian/rules install' step)"?
What I wrote wasn't clear and wasn't strictly true, sorry!
When manually building from source:
You always build/test as a normal u
18 matches
Mail list logo
