Hi,
>to be honest, i don't have a good reason besides testing the resulting deb and
>that is
>my existing workflow
I usually do two dpkg-buildpackage, one for my system, and the source one for
ftpmasters
the second one is usually really fast, because it just requires a source pack,
no real
On 2016-11-23 20:50, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
* Update manpage. (Closes: #800669)
+ cp doc/openbox.1.in openbox.1
I don't get this:
how do you plan to update stuff like
@configdir@/openbox/autostart.sh
and similar?
I don't get it,
Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:07:31 + (UTC)
with message-id <221972147.1764331.1479982051...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#844599: RFS: confget/2.0.0-2 -- updated packaging
has caused the Debian Bug report #844599,
regarding RFS: confget/2.0.0-2 -- updated packaging
to be ma
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:07:31AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >I am looking for a sponsor for a new Debian upload of my package
>
> >"confget" to refresh some aspects of the Debian packaging.
>
>
> I also granted you dm for it :)
Thanks! :)
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev
Hi,
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 08:44 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
> and sponsored in deferred/5.
Where can I find the deferred package? I found nothing at
https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred/
I'd like to confirm the package you sponsored shipped
the correct patch, since the original one
Hi,
>Where can I find the deferred package? I found nothing at
>https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred/
you can't.
Nobody can, just ftpmasters.
(and I did even upload to a queue that is not visible there)
>I'd like to confirm the package you sponsored shipped
>the correct patch, since the ori
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:37 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
> I don't think it was a bad upload, because I used DoM to build and
> test it.
Thank you for confirmation. I checked the package at DoM and
it is correct. So let's wait for maintainers' comments.
On 2016-11-24 11:21+0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads?
>
> i did a lot of binary+source uploads in the last days without an issue (after
> removing
> .buildinfo from .changes)
Sure!
- First I was told to remove the .buildinfo from the bin
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> On 2016-11-24 11:21+0800, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> > can i ask you why are you doing source-only uploads?
> >
> > i did a lot of binary+source uploads in the last days without an issue
> > (after removing
> > .buildinfo from .
Control: tags 843775 + pending
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 12:43 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> (dropping debian-boot@, adding 845311@)
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> Jens Sauer (2016-11-22):
> > Thank you for reviewing this package. It was my first time doing this,
> > I hope everything is alright.
>
> It looks
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "asl"
* Package name: asl
Version : 0.1.7-1
Upstream Author : Avtech Scientific
* URL : http://asl.org.il
* License : AGPL-3
Section : science
I
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:01 PM, lumin wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 14:37 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> I don't think it was a bad upload, because I used DoM to build and
>> test it.
>
> Thank you for confirmation. I checked the package at DoM and
> it is correct. So let's wait for
Dear David,
Here's another review, based on your 4pane-debian-dir repo.
Must-fixes
--
1. At least one of the files added by AddExtraM4Files.patch isn't
accounted for in d/copyright.
2. Vcs-* still point to the upstream code, not your 4pane-debian-dir
repo.
3. d/copyright says that only
Hi Sean,
Thank you very much for all your help and for this review! Would you
please pull my working copy from here:
git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/muse-el.git
here:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-emacsen/pkg/muse-el.git
or consult this:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-emac
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 20:39 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>
> Your changes seem to be correct. I plan to upload the attached diff
> in some hours if you don't mind.
I see it in the NEW queue, thank you!
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 07:25:29PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > 5. There are a lot of Lintian warnings. Please make the package
> > Lintian-clean.
>
> I'm having trouble with "W: elpa-muse: syntax-error-in-debian-news-file
> line 68 "found eof where expected first heading", and have tried
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2016 04:29:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #844184,
regarding RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
17 matches
Mail list logo
