Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1

2016-10-20 Thread Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)
On 20 Oct 2016, at 5:08 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > >> I just read the message a bit more closely, and you mention you have the >> backport ACL > >> already. I just checked the PTS and you have the DM bit set for that >> package. Feel free to >> upload it yourself to

Bug#841270: RFS: debrequest/0.2 ITP

2016-10-20 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 10:19 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > * Package name: debrequest >   Version : 0.2 >   Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov > * Url : https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-gue > st/debrequest.git It might be more useful to add this to `devscripts`

Bug#841222: Acknowledgement (RFS: patat)

2016-10-20 Thread Félix Sipma
I've updated patat to 0.3.2.0-1, see With dget: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/patat/patat_0.3.2.0-1.dsc With gbp: gbp clone --pristine-tar https://git.gueux.org/patat.git cd patat gbp buildpackage signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1

2016-10-20 Thread Peter Colberg
Hi Tim, On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 04:56:45AM +, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > I just read the message a bit more closely, and you mention you have the > backport ACL > already. I just checked the PTS and you have the DM bit set for that > package. Feel free to > upload it yourself

Bug#841375: [pkg-go] Bug#841375: RFS: golang-gopkg-square-go-jose.v1/1.1.0-1~bpo8+1

2016-10-20 Thread Peter Colberg
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 09:49:18AM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote: > The packages are not in backports yet and have to go through the > backports NEW queue [1]. If I am not mistaken, the same rules as for > the regular NEW queue apply, such that the initial upload has to be > done by a DD. I had sponso

lintian: spelling

2016-10-20 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Forum, is there a list where we can deal on how correct spelling error as detected by lintian ? For the curious. In the source, there is the sentence: :param int max_no_dec: number of rounds we allow to be stuck and lintian complains as follows: allow to allow one to I

Re: lintian: spelling

2016-10-20 Thread Sean Whitton
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:36:41AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > For the curious. In the source, there is the sentence: > > :param int max_no_dec: number of rounds we allow to be stuck > > > and lintian complains as follows: > > allow to allow one to > > > I am not a native Englis

Re: [ANOUNCE] Debtemplate

2016-10-20 Thread HAYASHI Kentaro
Hi, On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > Maybe it's not suitable for this thread, but I'd like to mention that > there's another approach that implement this on web server side. > - https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2016/07/threads.html#00218 > - https://lists.debian.org

Re: lintian: spelling

2016-10-20 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Sean, thanks for your reply. On 21/10/16 02:43, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:36:41AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> For the curious. In the source, there is the sentence: >> >> :param int max_no_dec: number of rounds we allow to be stuck >> >> >> and lintian complain

Re: lintian: spelling

2016-10-20 Thread Niels Thykier
Jerome BENOIT: > Hello Forum, is there a list where we can deal on how correct spelling error > as detected by lintian ? > > For the curious. In the source, there is the sentence: > > :param int max_no_dec: number of rounds we allow to be stuck > > > and lintian complains as follows: >