Hi,
On 18 July 2016 at 06:55, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
>
>> Note: This is a small revision because I don't have the hardware
>> appropriate to test the new patches :(
While I don't have access to b43 hardware right now, I can gain such
access (
Hi Sergio,
>Oh, I have a solution! Get rid of this proprietary software on Debian!
>;-)
lol :)
>Seriously, though. I've also had to do a few modifications to the
>get-orig-source.sh script, and you'll also need to run uscan with the
>--no-symlink option, but this should work. Oh, and you w
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jul 2016 10:20:53 + (UTC)
with message-id <1147299283.1384565.1468837253651.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#830569: RFS: z3/4.4.1-0.1 [NMU] [4xRC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #830569,
regarding RFS: z3/4.4.1-0.1 [NMU] [4xRC]
to be marked a
Hi!
I would need some advice about the following bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820434
Stephen mentioned there I should provide a shlibs minimum version.
I am not entirely sure what that means.
Do I need to put a file under debian/shlibs with the following line?
libjsoncp
Hi,
On Mon, 2016-07-18 at 12:48 +0200, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote:
> I would need some advice about the following bug:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820434
>
> Stephen mentioned there I should provide a shlibs minimum version.
> I am not entirely sure what that means.
> Do I n
Hi,
>Symbols files are usually better since you get more fine grained
>control of dependencies, but they take a lot more time to maintain
>(especially for C++ libraries).
In this very specific case, I think we don't need it, as I explained here [1]
and you can see how upstream is taking serious
Hi,
I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
build was not tried again.
I did a build with harris (ssh) and the build
ran fine.
I can do something about the status of the
package on reproducible-builds ? Or just
wait for a new try by them ?
regards,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
> build was not tried again.
Which package?
> I can do something about the status of the
> package on reproducible-builds ? Or just
> wait for a new try
* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-07-18, 11:53:
Symbols files are usually better since you get more fine grained
control of dependencies, but they take a lot more time to maintain
(especially for C++ libraries).
In this very specific case, I think we don't need it, as I explained
here [1] and y
Hi,
>I don't see what upstream dedication to ABI compatibility has to to with
>symbol files.
typo :)
>Anyway, the reason we're having this thread is because apparently
>libjsoncpp broke ABI without SONAME change, so maybe they're not taking
>it seriously enough. :>
actually after sending
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I would like to know if upstream is using some different service now
The replacement service is here but it doesn't check jsoncpp:
http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/
It might be interesting to have a service like this for all Debia
Hi,
>http://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/
thanks, I asked upstream
https://github.com/open-source-parsers/jsoncpp/issues/499
>It might be interesting to have a service like this for all Debian
>packages containing C/C++/Java libraries.
that would save a lot of segfaults and time :)
thanks,
G
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors, Gianfranco,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "skiboot". This is a packaging
update :
skiboot (5.2.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Forced no-pie for Ubuntu 16.10 as previous change was not enough : in 16.10
gcc's def
package: sponsorship-requests
severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com, max.c...@gmail.com, 073p...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shadowsocks-libev"
* Package name: shadowsocks-libev
Version : 2.4.7+20160630+ds-3
Upstream Autho
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:11:11 + (UTC)
with message-id <1457957365.1676995.1468854671642.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#831692: RFS: skiboot/5.2.4-2 update
has caused the Debian Bug report #831692,
regarding RFS: skiboot/5.2.4-2 update
to be marked as done
Your message dated Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:19:13 + (UTC)
with message-id <593830157.1708207.1468855153577.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#831694: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.7+20160630+ds-3 --
lightweight and secure socks5 proxy
has caused the Debian Bug report #831694,
rega
I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor, but:
On 07/18/2016 04:53 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> * debian/rules:
> - Add param "--disable-ssp" to dh_auto_configure command.
> Thanks to Aaron M. Ucko and Boyuan Yang. (Closes: #829498)
Please don't disable the SSP unconditionally, because it's a u
Dear Christian,
Thanks for your review!
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor, but:
>
> On 07/18/2016 04:53 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>> * debian/rules:
>> - Add param "--disable-ssp" to dh_auto_configure command.
>> Thanks to Aar
On 07/18/2016 05:40 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> Please don't disable the SSP unconditionally, because it's a useful
>> defense-in-depth strategy. Especially since you are packaging a
>> network service, I would really recommend not doing
* Christian Seiler , 2016-07-18, 17:21:
I'm not a DD,
Sounds like a bug to me!
--
Jakub Wilk
On Monday, July 18 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Seriously, though. I've also had to do a few modifications to the
>>get-orig-source.sh script, and you'll also need to run uscan with the
>>--no-symlink option, but this should work. Oh, and you will also need
>>to specify downloadurlmangle
On Sunday, July 17 2016, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Sergio Durigan Junior writes:
>> On Saturday, July 16 2016, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>
>>> Sergio Durigan Junior writes:
> What is wrong here? I thought that mk-orig.tar.gz should be called only
> when it is a tar archive?
Yeah, usca
Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
> > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> > it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
> > build was not tried again.
>
> Which package ?
dvbackup
https://tests.reproducible-bu
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:51PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> >
> > > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> > > it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
> > > build was no
Hi,
I tried to upgrade eigensoft[1]. The build fails with:
...
cc -Wl,-z,relro pca.o eigensrc/eigsubs.o eigx.o nicksrc/libnick.a -lgsl
-lblas -lgfortran -lrt -lm -o pca
eigx.o: In function `eigx_':
/build/eigensoft-6.1.2+dfsg/src/eigx.c:100: undefined reference to `dspev_'
eigx.o: In function
25 matches
Mail list logo
