control: owner -1 !
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hello Dmitry,
I thought you were finished after evil and its dependencies :) Glad to
see more ELPA packages. Here's a review for you.
1. The "-el" suffix on the source package name is pointless because the
name already contains "elisp" so it's c
Hi,
>3) Any reason why you're using debhelper version 10? It's still
>experimental, so you probably should be using version 9.
I'm not sure about this, some days ago debhelper 11 implementation started, so
I think compat
level 10 is somewhat considered stable?
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/d
Hello,
Try removing the call to dh_auto_build from your override_dh_auto_build.
It's doing a bunch of byte compilation that is unnecessary because
dh-elpa will do that later on.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:01:41PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> In general, do we have any script, that automates pro
Hi,
>> > Unfortunately, upstream maintains only list of contributors. So seems
>> > best thing we can do is to count 60 years from last debian upload.
>>
>> I'm not sure whether this is likely to be acceptable to the ftp-masters
>> or not. Perhaps someone more experienced on debian-mentors can
On 2016-06-23 at 18:53:08 +0900, Sean Whitton wrote:
> 2. In d/copyright, I think you need to specify copyright years for the
>copyright holders. Just their names is not enough, since on a desert
>island ~60 years from now with no newer versions of evil available
>for download, the cod
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:32:48 + (UTC)
with message-id <990447787.5405285.1467189169010.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828710: RFS: apvlv/0.1.5+dfsg-1 [QA] -- PDF viewer
with Vim-like behaviour
has caused the Debian Bug report #828710,
regarding RFS: apvl
* Elena ``of Valhalla'' , 2016-06-29, 10:13:
2. In d/copyright, I think you need to specify copyright years for the
copyright holders. Just their names is not enough, since on a desert
island ~60 years from now with no newer versions of evil available for
download, the code would become public
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 09:29:53 + (UTC)
with message-id <1376916126.5549866.1467192593411.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#828104: RFS: sollya/5.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- library
for safe floating-point code development
has caused the Debian Bug report #82810
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:44:55 + (UTC)
with message-id <952958708.5493364.1467189895152.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828030: RFS: gdbm/1.12-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #828030,
regarding RFS: gdbm/1.12-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:54:07 + (UTC)
with message-id <224149580.5457092.1467190447147.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #825532,
regarding RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:54:07 + (UTC)
with message-id <224149580.5457092.1467190447147.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1
[ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #827082,
regarding RFS: libcorkipset/1.1.1+201
control: owner -1 !
control: tags-1 moreinfo
Hi,
control:
description should be extended a lot
some build-dependencies might be useless, did you check that? e.g. dh-buildinfo
intltool (note: I'm not checking the above)
"python2.7" <-- what?
I don't see any Python script here, and I see only
./
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 10:24:36 + (UTC)
with message-id <689901840.5597135.1467195877007.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828938: RFS: tetzle/2.0.3-1 [QA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #828938,
regarding RFS: tetzle/2.0.3-1 [QA]
to be marked as done.
This
Hi Tung,
thanks to the very helpful and detailed response of Christian Seiler
which I would like you to read below in detail since it explains the
patches applied in the Debian packaging I was able to build the latest
iqtree version. You can find all patches that are applied to iqtree
here:
Dear G,
Greetings after 1+ months for this thread!
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
>
> Hi, alternative proposal
>
>>Now I understand my todo-list, briefly:
>>- package libraries first: libcork/ipset
>>- create debian/watch and ds repack
>>- RFS shadowsocks-libev
On Wednesday, June 29 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>3) Any reason why you're using debhelper version 10? It's still
>
>>experimental, so you probably should be using version 9.
>
>
> I'm not sure about this, some days ago debhelper 11 implementation started,
> so I think compat
> level 10
Hi,
>Now I already have acess to collab-maint (though I didn't do any work
>yet), and I have become DM [0].
you already are a DM, you need the guest account, but it isn't requested
for collab-maint access
>Could you kindly help to set up a git repo for shadowsocks-libev on
collab-maint?
./
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > I agree that its not necessary to copy files around. However, I like
> > d-shlibs to ensure that debian/control is properly designed.
>
> It does appear to not fully support all architectures though, if
> you look at the b
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:53:42 + (UTC)
with message-id <826975038.5945849.1467212022977.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828988: Subject: RFS: dosage/2.15-2 [QA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #828988,
regarding Subject: RFS: dosage/2.15-2 [QA]
to be marke
Hi Andreas,
[please cc me on replies - I am not subscribed to this list]
Quoting Andreas Tille (2016-06-29 15:10:10)
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > > I agree that its not necessary to copy files around. However, I
> > > like d-shlibs to ensure that debia
Your message dated Wed, 29 Jun 2016 16:35:07 + (UTC)
with message-id <259888311.6066244.1467218107804.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#828996: RFS: ripole/0.2.0+20081101.0215-2 [QA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #828996,
regarding RFS: ripole/0.2.0+20081101.0215-2 [QA]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udftools"
* Package name: udftools
Version : 1.2-0.1
Upstream Author : Pali Rohár
* URL : https://github.com/pali/udftools
* License : GPL-2.0+
I don't intend to sponsor this package, but...
* Pali Rohár , 2016-06-29, 21:01:
* New upstream release:
Closes: #672839, #272648, #606664, #715720, #716102, #716287, #727634
Closes: #727636, #775273, #539530, #680272
...this looks as if there were 11 different bugs asking to package ne
I have updated the package to version 0.4.0-3
https://mentors.debian.net/package/yabar
One may download the latest version here:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yabar/yabar_0.4.0-3.dsc
Changelog since the last version:
* Correctly formatted debian/copyright
* Corrected seve
24 matches
Mail list logo
