Hi Andreas, [please cc me on replies - I am not subscribed to this list]
Quoting Andreas Tille (2016-06-29 15:10:10) > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > > > I agree that its not necessary to copy files around. However, I > > > like d-shlibs to ensure that debian/control is properly designed. > > > > It does appear to not fully support all architectures though, if you > > look at the buildd results: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libdisorder > > > > It would be great if you could report that as a bug against > > d-shlibs, assuming nobody else has done so yet. (Maybe wait until > > all other platforms are either built or failed, to have a complete > > list.) > > As Christian realised d-shlibmove is failing to resolve ld64-2-dev on > ppc64el, ppc64 and s390x and on kfreebsd-amd64 it is seeking for > ld-kfreebsd-x86-64-1-dev. I would like to fix this by using > --override for the moment and provide a patch to d-shlibs. However, I > have no idea by what might be the correct replacement in these cases. > > Any idea? Not sure why this is discussed at debian-mentors: When known which package need a fix the proper approach is, I believe, to file a bugreport against that package and discus there (in Debian each bugreport is essentially a tiny public mailinglist). To answer your question, what d-shlibs wrongly detects as "ld" belongs to a core package (libc, as I recall) and should therefore be silenced. This was the very first regexes in d-devlibdeps file. I have now extended those regexes to cover the reported misdetections, and released a new d-shlibs package. So you need not add a local quirk, just wait 6 hours, but if you insist then have a look at the d-shlibs git for the change I did there. Thanks for "reporting" this issue. :-) - Jonas [please cc me on replies - I am not subscribed to this list] -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
