[ Is deze mail niet goed leesbaar? Klik hier voor de webversie.
](http://p.n2g19.com/l/212613301/c/0-ipbs-obju4j-12jp)
(http://loudspeakerrepair.com)
==
SERVICECENTER
=
==
==
[LUIDSPREKER
HERSTELLING.COM===](http://loudspeakerrepair.c
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 08:08:29 + (UTC)
with message-id <1193332644.1357295.1463990909802.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#819394: RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #819394,
regarding RFS: stormlib/9.20-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
Hi Lumin, Ghislain
>An update to this, according to
>https://people.debian.org/~mpitt/autopkgtest/README.package-tests.html
>Even if I want to add some testsuite for python-caffe, I don't need
>to add those runtime deps in control, I can add them in tests/control
>instead, by adding "Depends" fi
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:48:37PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi sorry for the late answer, it took a while to have time to dig into the
> issue.
Did anything happen here in the past 2,5 months?
--
regards,
Mattia Riz
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 08:55:35 +
with message-id <20160523085532.ga4...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#808231: RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #808231,
regarding RFS: mkcast/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi Jerome,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:52:39AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Meanwhile OpenViewerFX moved to GitHub and thing get clearer for me:
> I am not sure that this pacakge is indeed still needed.
> For now I will focus on the OpenViewerFX package.
> The probability is high that I abandon th
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 02:45:16AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Firstly I apologies for my very late reply.
> Secondly, thanks you for your sponsorship.
Is anything happening here? ~2,5 months passed since the last email.
@Markus: if you are committing to reviwing and eventually sponsor a RFS,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki wrote:
> > Obvious way to improve packaging would be to address Lintian warnings,
> > introduce support for Systemd etc. Sorry I don't have time for in-depth
> > review and at the moment I have no intention to sponsor MooseFS...
D
Hi Nathan!
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:51:22PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
Did anything happened here in the past 1,5 months?
Are you still interested in getting this into Debian?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Ke
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 09:14:23 +
with message-id <20160523091420.ga5...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#812216: RFS suspended until further notice
has caused the Debian Bug report #812216,
regarding RFS: libopenshot-audio/0.0.6+ds1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This m
Hi Frederic,
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 10:53:18PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, the package is already in Ubuntu, did you try to look at the packaging
> and see if it was similar?
This was the last recentish email, but anyway there have been 3 replies
to your RFS request since Feb, but
Hi Carlos!
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:30:51PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
> I have a few comments on this pavkage.
This was Feb 16, more than 3 months ago, but with no replies from you.
Are you still interested in this package?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2
Hi Jason!
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 08:09:47PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> hi, lets review:
Did anything happen in the past 1,5 months?
Are you still interested in this package?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 10:37:53 +0100
with message-id <5742cf71.3010...@rezozer.net>
and subject line RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Access
Library (LGPL4)
has caused the Debian Bug report #808782,
regarding RFS: jpedal4-lgpl [ITP] Java PDF Extraction Decoding Ac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Folks,
it appeared that the upstrem team does not show very cooperative,
so I am postponing the maintenance the Debian package openviewerfx.
Meanwhile, I thanks Markus Koschany for reviewing
the package.
Sorry for the noise,
Jerome
- --
J
On Monday, 23 May 2016 9:08:20 AM AEST Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Did anything happened here in the past 4+ months?
Not much from packaging prospective. Upstream however show some signs of
improvement as they've started using GitHub:
https://github.com/moosefs/moosefs
> Dmitry setted the morein
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 11:16:36 +0100
with message-id <5742d884.1010...@rezozer.net>
and subject line RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer
has caused the Debian Bug report #808783,
regarding RFS: openviewerfx [ITP] Open Source JavaFX PDF Viewer
to be marked as done.
T
Hi Gianfranco,
your very helpful hints helped me to get some steps forward. However,
its not finally done.
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 06:48:36AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >Another question is how I could link against the Debian packaged f2c
> >rather than building the one that comes wit
http://ftp.kevag-telekom.de/mirrors/gentoo.org/rsync/sci-libs/clapack/files/clapack-3.2.1-noblasf2c.patch
seems that the i_len_trim.c file might be somewhere else, look at gentoo
packaging, they seem to have not
stripped it from the tarball I guess.
Does this helps?
G.
Il Lunedì 23 Maggio
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 10:46:48 + (UTC)
with message-id <1353418483.1652467.1464000408369.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#822107: RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #822107,
regarding RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This
Sorry for replying to my own mail. I just noticed that the Debian
packaged libf2c really has no symbol i_len_trim. Will check what
version is packaged and how this can be fixed.
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:08:08PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> your very helpful hints helped me
hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except:
Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging
there are a lot of tutorials which explain how to start a repo from
scratch using DPMT, but it's hard to know what to do with an established
r
Hi Julien,
exactly the some days ago you hit this too:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote:
> hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except:
> > Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging
>
> there are a l
Hi Mattia and Gianfranco,
yes I haven't answered recently because I've been working with upstream to tune
the installation part and deal with the interface version that was not
correctly handled. The patch is pushed upstream and I've asked for a new
tarball release this morning which should come so
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 02:07:39AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> I'm worried about fonts/*.ttf. If these fonts are packaged in Debian they
> shouldn't be shipped in the binary package. Otherwise, there is no info
> that they are free, no license, no canonical name etc. In any case
> shipping s
Hi,
On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Hi Julien,
exactly the some days ago you hit this too:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote:
hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except:
Also, you did not use git-dpm, as mandate inside the DPMT:
https://wiki.debian.
hi julien,
On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Hi Julien,
exactly the some days ago you hit this too:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonathon Love wrote:
hi, everything i can fix pretty easily, except:
Also, you did not use gi
On 23/05/2016 23:52, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
On 23/05/2016 15:39, Jonathon Love wrote:
hi julien,
On 23/05/2016 23:16, Julien Puydt wrote:
Hi,
On 23/05/2016 14:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
Hi Julien,
exactly the some days ago you hit this too:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:48:41PM +1000, Jonat
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient"
* Package name: udfclient
Version : 0.8.5-1
Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk
* URL : http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/
* License : Clar
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 16:37:21 + (UTC)
with message-id <71202530.2115810.1464021442015.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825105: RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825105,
regarding RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1
to be marked as done.
This mean
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 17:52:26 + (UTC)
with message-id <67274442.2180220.1464025946310.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #822107,
regarding RFS: eja/9.3.12-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "scantailor"
Package name: scantailor
Version : 0.9.12.2-2
Upstream Author : Nate Craun
URL : http://scantailor.org/
License : GPL-3+
Section : gr
Your message dated Mon, 23 May 2016 20:47:40 + (UTC)
with message-id <756086665.2351912.1464036460432.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825126: RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #825126,
regarding RFS: scantailor/0.9.12.2-2
to be marked as done.
Hi Mattia,
I apologize for not getting back to you sooner. I completely forgot to
reply to your last email.
I removed the debug package, bumped the standards version, and removed
the Lintian override. As for the test suite, I was able to reproduce the
failure and found the cause of the probl
Hello,
Any progress on this?
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
35 matches
Mail list logo
