Bug#779377: RFS: classified-ads/0.03-1 / ITP

2015-02-28 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Samstag, den 28.02.2015, 12:16 +1100 schrieb Riley Baird: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "classified-ads" > > That's great! I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but I've had a > look at it, and here are some things that I've noticed: > > d/changelog: > -This file sh

Bug#777500: RFS: birdie/1.1-1 [ITP]

2015-02-28 Thread Kay Abendroth
Hello, these are my questions regarding your feedback. Question 1 to 4 refer to http://mentors.debian.net/package/birdie. 1. Warning "Package uploaded for the unreleased distribution": How do I fix that? Right now I'm using Jessie on my laptop already. Can I tell the build tool to build it fo

Bug#779377: RFS: classified-ads/0.03-1 / ITP

2015-02-28 Thread Antti Järvinen
Tobias Frost writes: > Am Samstag, den 28.02.2015, 12:16 +1100 schrieb Riley Baird: .. > should fix them, also please read https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide > -- you definitly need to separate upstream source and debian packaging; > don't ship a debian dir in the tarball. Ok, thanks a mill

Python logo license

2015-02-28 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi folks, I've got the official Python logo image [1] here in a package. 1) what would be the proper license for that file in deb/copyright? 2) what's the best place in Debian to ask copyright/licensing related questions like this in the future, the developer's list? Thanks in advance, Daniel S

Bug#777500: RFS: birdie/1.1-1 [ITP]

2015-02-28 Thread Kay Abendroth
Hello, I've one more question. 9. binary-without-manpage usr/bin/birdie I've written a man page, but I don't know where to put in the Debian package. Regards, Kay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.

Bug#779377: Dual licensed LGPL2.1/GPL3 linking to GPL3 with OpenSSL exception

2015-02-28 Thread Ángel González
On 28/02/15 02:31, Riley Baird wrote: Hi -legal! I was reviewing a package "classified-ads" for Debian, and I noticed a potential problem in the process. Namely, the author of the program has decided to use GPL3 with the OpenSSL exception. However, they have taken some files from Nokia which a

Re: Python logo license

2015-02-28 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-02-28 16:37, Daniel Stender wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've got the official Python logo image [1] here in a package. > > 1) what would be the proper license for that file in deb/copyright? > > 2) what's the best place in Debian to ask copyright/licensing related > questions like this in the

Bug#777500: RFS: birdie/1.1-1 [ITP]

2015-02-28 Thread Kay Abendroth
Hello, regarding my question number 9: I've found the answer myself and put the man page file in a directory debian/manpages and created a file debian/birdie.manpages. But I've two additional questions, which refer to you intial comments. 10. the patch should have a proper dep3-style header W

Bug#777500: RFS: birdie/1.1-1 [ITP]

2015-02-28 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Samstag, den 28.02.2015, 14:11 +0100 schrieb Kay Abendroth: > Hello, > > these are my questions regarding your feedback. Question 1 to 4 refer to > http://mentors.debian.net/package/birdie. > > 1. Warning "Package uploaded for the unreleased distribution": > >How do I fix that? Right now

Bug#777500: RFS: birdie/1.1-1 [ITP]

2015-02-28 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Samstag, den 28.02.2015, 19:53 +0100 schrieb Kay Abendroth: > Hello, > > regarding my question number 9: I've found the answer myself and put the > man page file in a directory debian/manpages and created a file > debian/birdie.manpages. > > But I've two additional questions, which refer to y

RFS: sudoku/1.0.4-1 ITA

2015-02-28 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl
Dear Mentors! After fixing issues from Jakub Wilks review (thank you very much), I am again looking for a sponsor for my package sudoku: * Package name: sudoku Version : 1.0.4-1 * URL : https://github.com/cinemast/sudoku * License : public-domain Section

Bug#779377: Dual licensed LGPL2.1/GPL3 linking to GPL3 with OpenSSL exception

2015-02-28 Thread Riley Baird
> Or they could keep the files from Nokia under LGPL2.1, and use > GPL3+openssl exception for the rest of the files. Given that they have > proper headers, I don't see a problem with that, although I would > mention that in the readme. But what license would the work as a whole be distributed a

Bug#779377: Dual licensed LGPL2.1/GPL3 linking to GPL3 with OpenSSL exception

2015-02-28 Thread Ángel González
On 01/03/15 00:05, Riley Baird wrote: Or they could keep the files from Nokia under LGPL2.1, and use GPL3+openssl exception for the rest of the files. Given that they have proper headers, I don't see a problem with that, although I would mention that in the readme. But what license would the wor

Bug#779377: RFS: classified-ads/0.03-1 / ITP

2015-02-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Antti Järvinen wrote: > - The Lenin photograph, according to > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspaper#mediaviewer/File:Lenin_reading_Pravda.gif A better link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lenin_reading_Pravda.gif >is by Pyotr Otsup who was not